Medicaid expansion would be a lifeline for Floridians; that's why we're suing
Let's not sugarcoat it: Florida's healthcare policies are failing us.
They're failing the single mother in Ocala who earns $15,000 a year working part-time and was recently diagnosed with cancer — but can't afford the treatment she needs to survive. They're failing rural hospitals on the brink of collapse.
And they're failing the hundreds of thousands of Floridians stuck in the 'coverage gap'— earning too much to qualify for Medicaid, but too little to afford private insurance.
And now, to make matters worse, our state's lawmakers have passed a law that aims to take away one of the last tools Floridians have to fix it: the power of citizen-led constitutional amendments.
That's why Florida Decides Healthcare filed a federal lawsuit challenging the dangerous new law known as House Bill 1205. This isn't just about getting Medicaid expansion on the ballot. This is about defending the very foundation of our democracy: the people's right to be heard and to shape their own future.
This law, signed by the governor, isn't reform. It's repression.
HB 1205 is a cynical effort to make it harder for everyday Floridians — teachers, nurses, veterans, parents — to participate in their own government. It buries citizens in red tape, threatens them with criminal penalties, and intimidates them for simply trying to collect signatures. It's designed to silence us, to shut down grassroots movements, and to keep power locked in Tallahassee's political elite.
But we're not backing down.
Because we know what's at stake. Medicaid expansion could transform lives in every corner of Florida—from the Panhandle to the Keys. It would bring billions of our own federal tax dollars back to our state — money we're already sending to Washington, only to fund healthcare in other states.
It would help stabilize struggling hospitals, especially in rural areas where 135 hospitals have closed since 2010. It would let people see a doctor without risking bankruptcy.
This isn't welfare — it's common sense. More than 60% of the people who would benefit from expansion are part of working families. Medicaid helps people stay healthy enough to work, care for loved ones, and contribute to their communities. And study after study has shown that expansion wouldn't raise taxes — it would grow Florida's economy.
Floridians get it. Nearly 8 in 10 — Republicans, Democrats and independents — support Medicaid expansion. It's not a partisan issue. It's a people issue.
And when our elected officials refuse to act, the people have not just the right, but the responsibility, to do it themselves.
That's what Florida's citizen-led amendment process is for. It's how we raised the minimum wage, legalized medical marijuana, and protected our land and water. It's a tool for communities to drive change when politicians won't.
HB 1205 is not about accountability or transparency. It's about fear of the people and the power they hold. This law hacks away at a process that may need refining, but not destruction. It puts up traps and hurdles to ensure only the wealthy and politically connected can get an idea on the ballot.
It is a direct assault on the will of the people. And if it's allowed to stand here, you can bet it will spread across the country.
This is how democracy erodes — not in one sweeping moment, but in a thousand paper cuts to participation, voice, and power.
But we're not letting that happen.
We filed this lawsuit because we believe in the power of the people. We believe the single mother in Miami, the bus driver in Fort Myers, and the veteran in Jacksonville deserve a voice in the laws that shape their lives. Floridians — not politicians afraid of accountability — should have the final say.
This lawsuit is our declaration: We will not let them rig the rules. We will not be silenced.
We're collecting signatures. We're building coalitions. We're taking this fight from the courtroom to the streets to the ballot box. Because Medicaid expansion isn't just smart policy — it's a moral imperative. And the citizen initiative process isn't just a political tool—it's a right we will defend.
Mitch Emerson is executive director of Florida Decides Healthcare.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump picks Jeanine Pirro as interim U.S. attorney for DC, appoints Martin at DOJ
President Donald Trump picked Fox News host and former prosecutor Jeanine Pirro for interim U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C., hours after announcing that he was pulling the nomination of Ed Martin. Martin failed to get enough support from Republicans on Capitol Hill. 'I am pleased to announce that Judge Jeanine Pirro will be appointed interim United States Attorney for the District of Columbia,' Trump posted on Truth Social on May 8. 'Jeanine was Assistant District Attorney for Westchester County, New York, and then went on to serve as County Judge, and District Attorney, where she was the first woman ever to be elected to those positions.' Trump described Pirro as 'crusader for victims of crime" and said she was 'considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York.' Pirro, a former host of 'Justice with Judge Jeanine' on Fox News for ten years, is currently the co-host of The Five, also on Fox News. Earlier in the day, Trump told reporters that Martin was not 'getting the support.' Martin, who has championed Jan. 6 Capitol attackers, faced a rare opposition from a Republican senator. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Tillis said on May 6 that he decided not to support the nomination due to Martin's positions on Jan. 6 defendants. "If Mr. Martin were being put forth as a US attorney for any district except the district where January 6th happened, the protest happened, I'd probably support him, but not in this district," Tillis told reporters. By the end of the day, Trump had decided on a new role for Martin. "Ed Martin has done an AMAZING job as interim U.S. Attorney, and will be moving to the Department of Justice as the new Director of the Weaponization Working Group, Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Pardon Attorney," wrote Trump on Truth Social. "In these highly important roles, Ed will make sure we finally investigate the Weaponization of our Government under the Biden Regime, and provide much needed Justice for its victims." Contributing: Aysha Bagchi This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump names Jeanine Pirro as interim U.S. attorney for DC


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fox News White House reporter questions Jean-Pierre's ‘moral clarity'
Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich cast doubt on the motives behind former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's decision to leave the Democratic Party and release a new book about her time working for former President Biden. 'I just think it's interesting that she's saying she wants to, you know, move away from the partisanship of things because I remember when Karine Jean-Pierre suggested that all the videos of Joe Biden at his worst were cheap fakes and deepfakes and misinformation when they were, in fact, the video that we as a press corps collected on site, certainly not the product of AI,' Heinrich said during a discussion on the cable channel about Jean-Pierre's announcement. Heinrich, who covered Biden's White House for Fox and frequently sparred with Jean-Pierre over Biden's health and other issues, suggested she found it convenient the former White House spokesperson has found 'moral clarity' after leaving her position. 'I find it hard to look upon that without some deep questions,' she said. 'So I will read the book and keep an open mind, but it's gonna be interesting.' The reporter and anchor's comments were first highlighted by Mediate. Promotional materials for Jean-Pierre's book said it will be a 'groundbreaking, revelatory assessment of America's broken two-party system.' But the former White House press secretary's plans are being met with widespread scorn. Jean-Pierre was on the leading edge of the White House's defense against questions about Biden's mental acuity and stamina punctuated by his decision to step aside in the 2024 presidential race. Several books and news reports published since Biden left office have detailed his decline as well as extra steps taken by those around him to aid his schedule and travel. President Trump and Republicans have accused top aides and longtime Democrats like Jean-Pierre of a 'cover up' of Biden's health, while the president this week ordered an investigation of Biden's decision making while in office. Biden forcefully pushed back against the probe in a statement, saying he 'made the decisions during my presidency' and calling Trump's claims 'nothing more than a distraction.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' and use of autopen
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump ordered an investigation of former President Joe Biden's alleged "cognitive decline" to determine who decided his signature should be applied to official documents by autopen. Trump's directive to the White House counsel, David Warrington, in consultation with Attorney General Pam Bondi, ratchets up the pressure behind Trump's longstanding criticism of Biden's mental ability. The probe comes amid similar inquiries at the Justice Department and in a House committee. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump wrote in his order. "The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." In a statement in response to Trump's order, Biden said he "made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations" during his presidency. "Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden added. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations." Biden has replied in a series of recent public appearances that he was in command of his faculties. He has also been critical of Trump, arguing that his successor was taking a hatchet to the Social Security Administration. "They are wrong,' Biden said of his alleged cognitive decline on ABC's "The View." Trump directed the investigation to cover whether Biden's aides coordinated to shield the public from information about Biden's mental and physical health. A new book, "Original Sin," describes aides shielding Biden from Cabinet secretaries and limiting his access. Biden recently revealed his diagnosis of prostate cancer. Trump also directed the investigation into how Biden took executive actions during his final years in office, to determine who ordered the autopen for granting clemencies or other presidential actions. Presidents have used automated pens to mimic their signatures on documents for decades, often when away from the office, when Congress completed urgent legislation. Justice Department memos in 2002 and 2005 confirmed that a president could direct an aide to use an autopen to sign legislation that remains valid under the Constitution. "This memorandum confirms and elaborates upon our earlier advice that the President may sign a bill in this manner," the 2005 memo said. Biden pardoned his brother, James Biden, and other relatives for unspecified crimes during his final days in office. Biden had previously pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, after gun and tax convictions. At the Justice Department, pardon attorney Ed Martin said he would investigate Biden's pardons and use of the autopen. Congressional Republicans have long argued that the president profited from his son's and brother's overseas business deals, which the family denied. The chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee, Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, asked former Biden aides to sit for transcribed interviews about his mental fitness for office. Trump's order highlights a particular sore point involving the different treatment of him and Biden in retaining classified documents after leaving office. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump with unlawfully retaining more than 100 classified documents at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, where they were retrieved 18 months after he left office during an FBI search. The charges were dropped when Trump was elected to a second term under a policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Robert Hur decided against charging Biden for classified documents found at his Delaware home and a Washington, D.C., office during a search Biden invited. Hur concluded jurors would have found Biden "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.' "For years, President Biden suffered from serious cognitive decline," Trump wrote. "The Department of Justice, for example, concluded that, despite clear evidence that Biden had broken the law, he should not stand trial owing to his incompetent mental state." Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump orders investigation of Joe Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline'