logo
Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators

Trump's budget director defends NPR, PBS, foreign aid cuts to senators

UPI5 hours ago

1 of 3 | White House budget director Russell Vought testifies at a Senate Committee on Appropriations hearing on Wednesda. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo
June 25 (UPI) -- White House budget director Russell Vought on Wednesday urged U.S. senators to approve the Trump administration's proposed cuts of $8.3 billion in foreign assistance and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting.
Vought testified before the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The cuts, which are from the Department of Government Efficiency, are a tiny fraction of the nearly $7 trillion the federal government spends each year
The House last week voted 214-212 to advance the request that reduces funds for the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has largely been dismantled, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps to fund NPR and PBS.
Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate. A simple majority is needed for passage.
A group of protesters disrupted the meeting, saying "Vought's Cuts Kill," and "Vought Lies, People Die!"
Capitol Police officers forcibly removed some protesters from the room, with at least one hitting his head on the floor.
During his opening remarks, Vought touted the cuts as part of Trump's "steadfast commitment to cutting wasteful federal spending antithetical to American interests."
"Most Americans would be shocked and appalled to learn that their tax dollars, money they thought was going to medical care, was actually going to far-left activism, population control and sex workers," Vought said. "To be clear, no lifesaving treatment will be impacted by this rescissions package."
If Congress approves the cuts, the AIDS program would lose $400 million, and another $500 million would be stripped from global health programs that support child and maternal health, AIDS care and prevention of infectious diseases.
Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the proposed cuts.
"There's no way that President Trump's administration would allow such wasteful and questionable spending," Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, told Vought.
"So, I am puzzled why you would be cutting funds that the president signed in March as part of the continuing resolution."
Trump signed legislation in March to keep the government open through September.
Vought responded the costs are "largely multiyear funding," and that "there is some expiring funds with regard to fiscal year '25, but the way that this was structured was to find the waste.
"We are $37 trillion in national debt," Vought said. "Our view is to see, when we look at these programs, can we do it cheaper, as evidenced by what we find, and then to reflect that, with some savings to the taxpayer."
Collins also questioned the administration's proposed cuts targeting the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR.
"These are not only the right thing to do for humanitarian reasons, but they're incredible instruments of soft power," she said. That includes "lifesaving multivitamins for pregnant mothers and the food supplement that's used for malnourished children."
Collins held up a packet of Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food used to treat malnutrition in babies and young children.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, the Republican serving South Carolina, said he was surprised that millions of dollars were being spent to support abortions and gender care under PEPFAR. The AIDS-fighting program has been credited for saving millions of lives since President George W. Bush launched it more than 20 years ago.
Graham said he would approve the measure though he backs the program.
"And to my Democratic colleagues: There is a consequence to this crap," Graham said. "The first thing I thought about: How is PEPFAR fraud, waste and abuse? Well, I had no idea there was one dollar spent like this."
GOP members in the House and Senate have voiced concerns about the potential impact cuts would have on local stations and rural radio.
"We have Native American radio stations in South Dakota. They get their funding through NPR," Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said during the hearing. "Ninety-some percent of what they use."
The director called PBS and NPR "radical far-left networks," and "there is no longer any excuse for tax dollars to subsidize" them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blacklisted by the U.S. and backed by Beijing, this Chinese AI startup has caught OpenAI's attention
Blacklisted by the U.S. and backed by Beijing, this Chinese AI startup has caught OpenAI's attention

CNBC

time30 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Blacklisted by the U.S. and backed by Beijing, this Chinese AI startup has caught OpenAI's attention

OpenAI is putting a spotlight on an under-the-radar artificial intelligence startup that it believes is on the "front line" of China's race to lead the world in AI — and its not DeepSeek. In a blog post on Wednesday, the company wrote that Beijing-backed Zhipu AI has made "notable progress" in the AI race, as global competition ramps up. Zhipu AI, founded in 2019, has been referred by domestic media as one of China's "AI tigers" — a class of large language model unicorns seen as key to Beijing's efforts to rival the U.S. and reduce its dependence on American technology. While fellow "AI tiger" DeepSeek has received the lion's share of international attention after it released its R1 model in January, OpenAI suggests that Zhipu's expansion outside China and its ties to Beijing deserve more attention. The startup has raised funds from several local governments, according to state media. "Zhipu AI leadership frequently engages with CCP officials, including Premier Li Qiang," OpenAI claimed, pegging the value of state-backed investments in the startup at over $1.4 billion. Zhipu AI reportedly has offices in the Middle East, the United Kingdom, Singapore and Malaysia, and is also running joint "innovation centers" projects across Southeast Asia, including in Indonesia and Vietnam. Those factors could see Zhipu AI playing a key role in China's "Digital Silk Road" strategy, as it offers AI infrastructure solutions to governments around the world. "The goal is to lock Chinese systems and standards into emerging markets before US or European rivals can, while showcasing a 'responsible, transparent and audit-ready' Chinese AI alternative," OpenAI said. Zhipu AI did not immediately respond to a request for comment on OpenAI's statements. However, last week, Zhipu AI Chairman Liu Debing told reporters that the company hoped to contribute China's AI power to the world. These aims represent a threat to OpenAI, which has received Washington's support to promote its foundational models as the world's go-to AI offering. During a visit to the UAE in May, U.S. President Donald Trump announced over $200 billion in commercial deals in the region, including one for building a Stargate UAE AI campus by OpenAI, Oracle, Nvidia and Cisco Systems. It's expected to be launched in 2026. The Stargate Project is a $500 billion AI-focused private sector investment vehicle, announced by OpenAI in January in partnership with Abu Dhabi investment firm MGX and Japan's SoftBank. This month, OpenAI was also awarded a $200 million contract to provide the U.S. Defense Department with artificial intelligence tools, and announced "OpenAI for Government," an initiative aimed at bringing its AI tools to public servants across the U.S. Zhipu is also said to be working with its domestic military, helping China's military to modernize through advanced artificial intelligence, which saw it added to the US Commerce Department's Entity List in January. The company has reportedly initiated preliminary steps toward launching an initial public offering. It has previously been valued at 20 billion yuan ($2.78 billion), according to local media reports.

Minnesota Poll: Walz approval slips, voters evenly divided on whether he should seek third term
Minnesota Poll: Walz approval slips, voters evenly divided on whether he should seek third term

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota Poll: Walz approval slips, voters evenly divided on whether he should seek third term

Jun. 25—By Ryan Faircloth, Star Tribune (TNS) Gov. Tim Walz's approval rating has dropped to 49% since his failed run for vice president last year, and about half of Minnesotans say he shouldn't seek a third term in 2026, according to a new poll. The results suggest the DFL governor could face headwinds if he runs for a third consecutive term, particularly from voters in greater Minnesota and suburbs outside Hennepin and Ramsey counties. A majority of independents also disapprove of Walz's performance, according to the new Star Tribune/Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication Minnesota Poll, including about half who say he shouldn't run for re-election. Walz's standing at home appears to have taken a hit since his turn on the national stage; a Minnesota Poll conducted last September found 53% of Minnesotans approved of Walz's performance while 44% disapproved. Fifty percent of those surveyed in the latest Minnesota Poll disapprove of Walz's performance as governor, and just 1% are unsure. It's only the second time Walz's approval rating has fallen below 50% in the Minnesota Poll. "I think he's done harm to the state," said Gary Bettcher, an 82-year-old Republican from Bloomington. "He makes a fool of himself trying to get on the national scene like he's a big shot." (Scroll to the end of this article for full results for each question. More information about the poll methodology, a demographic breakdown of the sample and a map of the poll regions can be found Walz hasn't ruled out another run for national office in 2028, and he's recently traveled to key states in the Democratic Party's presidential nominating contest to give political speeches. He is still weighing whether to run for another term as governor and is expected to announce a decision this summer. On the prospect of Walz seeking a historic third consecutive term, 49% of respondents said he should step down while 45% said he should run again. Six percent aren't sure. Minnesota Republicans say the poll numbers suggest Walz could be vulnerable next year. They're seeking to win their first statewide election since Tim Pawlenty was re-elected governor in 2006. "The fact that more voters want Walz to step aside than run again says it all: His time is up," Minnesota GOP Chair Alex Plechash said in a statement Tuesday. "Outside of the DFL bubble, voters are sending a clear message—Governor Walz is out of touch and out of favor. Minnesota students are falling behind, fraud is rampant, and radical policies are taking priority over real people." Walz's spokesman, Teddy Tschann, said Tuesday that "we've seen polls that show him up and down and everywhere in between." "Here's what we know: Crime rates are down, graduation rates are up, and the Governor just balanced the state budget working with the most narrowly divided legislature in the whole country," Tschann said in a statement. "Governor Walz remains focused on doing the work of governor and making Minnesota the best state to live, work, and raise a family." The Minnesota Poll findings are based on interviews with 800 Minnesota registered voters conducted June 16-18. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Men overwhelmingly disapprove of Walz's performance and believe he shouldn't run again, the poll found, while most women approve of the job he's doing and support him seeking a third term. Kathleen Jorde of South St. Paul said Walz has been a good governor and should run for re-election. She said she'd even like to see him run for president in 2028. Jorde, 73, said she appreciates Walz's support for public schools, including a policy he signed into law providing free school meals to all children. "There's been a lot of really positive things that have occurred in this state" during Walz's tenure, Jorde said, "and it's all for the betterment of the communities at whole." Bettcher criticized Walz's handling of the 2020 riots and some of the progressive policies he signed into law: "When he came into office, we had a nice surplus. Where'd that go? And my taxes didn't go down, my taxes went up." "It just doesn't make sense," Bettcher added. "Spend, spend, spend." In 2023, Walz and a DFL-controlled Legislature used most of a $17.6 billion surplus to pass a nearly $71 billion two-year budget, the largest in state history. It included some one-time spending while also creating new programs, such as free school meals. Walz has strong support among voters in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. But his approval rating is underwater in the rest of the state, including in other suburban counties, where 60% of voters said they disapprove of his performance compared to 39% who approve. Gary Blanchard, a 62-year-old Republican from Lakeville, said he learned more about Walz's "extremely liberal" record when the governor ran for vice president last year. He said Walz "squandered" the previous budget surplus and signed into law policies many Minnesotans disagree with. A majority of college graduates and people of color approve of Walz's performance and said they would support him running for re-election. Most white voters and people without college degrees disapprove and don't want him to run again. Among independents, who said they don't lean toward either party, 54% disapprove of Walz's performance in office. A slightly smaller share of independents, 51%, do not want Walz to run for a third term, while 40% do and the rest aren't sure. Justin Prisendorf, an independent from Orono, said he isn't an enthusiastic Walz supporter, but he doesn't see any reason not to elect him again, either. Minnesota remains a great place to live and work, and Walz deserves some credit for that, Prisendorf said, though he believes taxes are a little too high. "The devil you know is better than the devil you don't know. If he feels there's still work to be done and he can persuade 51% of the electorate that he still can contribute, why not?" said Prisendorf, 57, who runs a home health care agency. David Sturrock, a political science professor at Southwest Minnesota State University, said the 4 point slide in Walz's overall approval rating isn't too alarming for a second-term governor. But he said Walz should be aware of the perils of seeking a third consecutive term. Rudy Perpich was the only Minnesota governor in recent history to run for a third consecutive term in 1990, and he lost. Minnesotans tend to be skeptical voters, Sturrock said, and they could want change after eight years of Walz. Sturrock said Walz's approval rating in the suburbs outside Hennepin and Ramsey counties should be of particular concern as he weighs running for a third term. "Approval rating in the outer suburbs, or the collar counties, should concern them," he said. "The suburbs are where statewide elections are won or lost in Minnesota." Mason-Dixon Polling and Strategy Inc. interviewed 800 Minnesota registered voters between June 16 and June 18, 2025. Findings from questions about Gov. Tim Walz are below. Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Details about how the poll was conducted, the demographics of the 800 respondents and a map of the Minnesota regions used in this poll can be found at

White House Wants Iran Leaker Jailed
White House Wants Iran Leaker Jailed

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

White House Wants Iran Leaker Jailed

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House has said a source who leaked intelligence suggesting that U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were not effective should be jailed. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the FBI was examining the leak, published by CNN and The New York Times, which cast doubt on the Trump administration's statement that Saturday's strikes had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program. Leavitt told reporters it was "disgusting" that the news outlets were "disparaging" both Trump and U.S. personnel who conducted the operation. When asked what should happen to the source of the leak, Leavitt replied that they "should go to jail." Flames rise from an oil storage facility that was struck by an Israeli missile in Tehran last week. Flames rise from an oil storage facility that was struck by an Israeli missile in Tehran last week. Vahid Salemi/AP This is a breaking story. More to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store