Protest against demolition of house with history
A heritage group has objected to the proposed demolition of a Victorian house which is a symbol of an important benchmark in electoral history.
The property in the Walkley area of Sheffield was built on a plot of land bought by a land society in an attempt to help more working-class men qualify for the right to vote.
Developer Time Architects has been granted planning consent to remove the 19th Century house and replace it with three apartments.
Hallamshire Historic Buildings member Robin Hughes said: "It isn't that nothing is ever allowed to change, but we need to make choices about what we'd like to keep and what keeps reminding us of who we are."
The house's origins came about from strict voting laws which did not change until 1918, when all men were granted the right to cast their ballot in elections.
Before that, there were thresholds for eligibility based around land and property values. From 1832, a man had to own assets worth £2 a year to be enfranchised. The sum put voting beyond the reach of the working classes.
This rule led to the formation of freehold land societies, which bought land and divided it into smaller plots which could be paid for in weekly instalments to enable the owner to qualify for voting rights.
In Walkley the Freedom Hill Land Society was formed in 1851, but the house is an unusual survivor as most of the owners used their plots to create allotments rather than build on them.
Mr Hughes said the building was a reminder for local residents of "where we came from".
"It's a very Sheffield thing to do - this is a radical city with a DIY ethos, and it's had this for centuries; the 'pull yourself up' kind of approach."
He said he hoped that the building could be saved and incorporated into the development.
"The ideal outcome isn't that no building can take place, but what I'd ask for is a bit of imagination to keep what's there now," he said.
Time Architects have been contacted for comment.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
'Communication errors' to blame for pub demolition
'It's a vital part of Sheffield's history'
Cinema restoration 'a lot of work' - new owner
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
City suburb set for speed limit cut to 20mph
A 20mph (32 km/h) speed limit is set to be introduced on roads in a city suburb following a public consultation. Officers have recommended Sheffield councillors approve plans to cut the speed limit in Netherthorpe as part of the authority's strategy to improve road safety in residential areas. A report to be considered by councillors said that, so far, 65 "sign-only" 20mph areas had been introduced in Sheffield, in addition to 12 child safety zones, with a further six schemes currently under way. The report noted that there had been an "unusually low" response to the public consultation over the Netherthorpe proposal, with only three emails in favour of the proposal and two against. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the report stated that the low number of participants in the consultation could be "for a number of reasons". "Having looked at the address data, the area is predominantly flats/HMOs, and we tend to receive less interest in schemes (except for parking schemes) from student areas," it said. The council said it was aiming to reduce the frequency and severity of collisions, lower people's fear of accidents, and encourage more sustainable travel. Sheffield City Council's transport, regeneration and climate policy committee is expected to make a final decision next Wednesday. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. New 20mph zones agreed for two city suburbs Sheffield City Council
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scam warning over government energy-saving grant
People hoping to get free energy-saving upgrades to their homes as part of a government scheme could be targeted by scammers, councillors have warned. Bradford Council has been awarded more than £7m as part of the Warm Homes fund to improve energy efficiency in some of the district's poorest insulated homes. However, concerns have been raised that householders could fall victim to rogue companies posing as official council contractors. Kamran Hussain, the council's spokesman for neighbourhoods and community safety, urged the council officers to "make sure safeguarding is put in place so that these companies are not scamming customers". "Over the years, we have found that many people have been stung through grants that have been implied as coming through the council," Hussain said at a meeting. He said work had in fact been carried out by private companies that were not part of government funding, leading to a "very large bill". Susan Hinchcliffe, leader of the council, said: "If a householder is asked to pay something, it is not a council scheme." She said the council should give out clear information about the programme to ensure residents are not misled. Council officers said the local authority would directly manage the scheme, selecting a single contractor to do the work through official processes. Bradford Council had applied for £27 million from the Government's new Warm Homes scheme but, despite receiving less than requested, it still secured the largest grant awarded to any single council. The authority hopes the project will mirror the success of a previous scheme, which upgraded 635 homes in Bradford with roof and underfloor insulation in 2022 and 2023, and was praised by government officials as a model project. Sarah Ferriby, the council's executive member for healthy people and places, said: "The work will make these homes a lot more comfortable, reduce their fuel bills, and assist in reducing carbon emissions." The scheme will roll out over the next three years, with additional funding potentially available if Bradford exceeds its delivery targets. The funding comes from a £500m national pot for energy performance upgrades and better heating for people living in some of the worst quality privately owned and rented homes. The free work could include new insulation, solar panels or an air source heat pump if suitable. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. Warning after trader pretends to be council worker Residents warned over 'real menace' rogue traders
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Executive bonuses banned at six UK water companies over pollution
Six UK water companies were banned Friday from paying bonuses to senior executives, which the government said would be inappropriate given their failure to clean up their massive sewage discharges. The new measures, whose targets include the country's biggest supplier, financially troubled Thames Water, prohibit the companies from paying bonuses "to water bosses that oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes", the government announced in a statement. Suffering from underinvestment in a sewer system that dates largely back to the Victorian era, UK water companies, privatised since 1989, have been under fire for several years due to the discharge of significant quantities of sewage into rivers and the sea. Despite this, "water companies have awarded over £112 million ($152 million) in bonuses and incentives over the last decade," the government noted. These executives "should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution", said environment minister Steve Reed. The Labour government, which came to power in July, has promised to reform a sector "in crisis" and has already legislated to toughen penalties for water company bosses who fail to comply with the law. Water regulator Ofwat last week imposed a record fine of £123 million on London supplier Thames Water, which serves 16 million customers, for repeated sewage spills. Some £18.2 million of the fines related to "unjustified" payouts of dividends. The firm is seeking a private buyer to avoid a state bailout. US investment fund KKR pulled out of a potential deal on Tuesday. Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water were also hit with the bonus ban. Britain's public spending watchdog warned in April that the water sector as a whole will need to invest £290 billion over the next 25 years to meet environmental and supply challenges. ode/jwp/pdh/jhb