logo
'Serious Omission' in G7 Wildfire Charter Leaves Climate Change Unnamed

'Serious Omission' in G7 Wildfire Charter Leaves Climate Change Unnamed

Canada News.Net18 hours ago

Leaders of the G7 countries have agreed to cooperate on efforts to manage the impacts of devastating wildfires, in Canada and around the world, but held back from naming climate change as a primary cause of the problem.
The leaders are calling it the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter-and they're pitching it as a groundbreaking commitment for G7 leaders, reports The Canadian Press. But a former Canadian diplomat said the G7 will have to be more explicit about the climate crisis if it hopes to stay relevant.
"To maintain its status as a leading body, the G7 must return to its longstanding tradition of having climate change as an important item on its agenda, and find a way to do so even when there's not a consensus at the table," Patricia Fuller, president and CEO of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), told The Energy Mix.
The charter, published on the final day of the summit Tuesday, includes a pledge to mitigate and respond to the impact of fires on human health -an apparent reference to volumes of wildfire smoke that have travelled oceans and crossed borders in recent summers. The countries say they will reduce the risk of extreme fires through sustainable forest management and Indigenous land management techniques, such as controlled burning.
"The world has experienced record-breaking wildfires across every forested continent over the past decade, often overwhelming available national resources and requiring governments to request assistance from other countries," it states. "These increasingly extreme wildfires are endangering lives, affecting human health, destroying homes and ecosystems, and costing governments and taxpayers billions of dollars each year," the leaders wrote.
The G7 resolved "to boost global cooperation to prevent, fight, and recover from wildfires by taking integrated action to reduce the incidence and negative impacts of wildfires and ensure our readiness to help each other, and partners, when needed."
View our latest digests
Leaders also committed to collecting and sharing data and finding better ways to provide timely access to basic firefighting equipment.
The charter was endorsed by guest participants from Australia, India, Mexico, South Africa, and South Korea in addition to the G7 countries. The declaration comes as Canada battles yet another devastating wildfire season and almost one year after flames ripped through Jasper, a town 250 kilometres north of Kananaskis, the Rocky Mountain tourist community that hosted the summit, CP writes.
Going into the summit, there was no expectation that climate change would be named out loud in the final declaration-or that there would be any final declaration at all, with Donald Trump in the room to block substantive agreements. Prime Minister Mark Carney's published priorities ahead of the summit made scant direct reference to past G7 commitments in areas like power sector decarbonization, methane controls, forest and land degradation, and elimination of fossil fuel subsidies-a promise the countries made in 2016 and were supposed to deliver on by this year.
The summit ultimately produced a chair's summary from Carney as G7 President, as well as statements on critical minerals, artificial intelligence, quantum technologies for computing, sensing, and communications, migrant smuggling, and transnational repression.
The chair's summary says the G7 leaders and guest participants-including UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres and World Bank President Ajay Banga-"discussed just energy transitions as well as sustainable and innovative solutions to boost energy access and affordability, while mitigating the impact on climate and the environment." Fuller said it was noteworthy that the climate and energy references came in the section of the chair's summary that reported on the G7's interactions with guests.
"That speaks to the point that if the G7 is to maintain leadership as a global institution, it needs to be addressing issues that are of concern to the wider world, and climate change is a concern to all countries," she told The Mix. "It's certainly a concern to these large developing nations, important players on the global stage, that are experiencing very extreme impacts of climate change."
As Canada and other G7 countries build stronger relationships with the Global South, "part of doing so is showing leadership on addressing climate change and advancing the energy transition, as a means of increasing energy security, diversifying energy sources, and increasing affordability," she added. "On these questions of security and affordability, there's a very broad consensus. But what is not being brought into the space as much as it should be is the importance of renewable energies in achieving those goals."
The G7 previously committed to triple renewable energy deployment and double the rate of energy efficiency improvements, and "these are goals the G7 needs to continue to work on," Fuller said. "It also needs to make good on its commitment to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, which are an impediment to an energy transition that can achieve these goals of security and diversification."
Before the summit, news analysis suggested the wildfire references in what ultimately became the Kananaskis Charter would serve as a proxy for explicit climate commitments. When Canadian officials first began planning the meeting last year and knew they had to deal with the possibility of a Trump presidency, they understood "that if they start with the standard stuff on climate change, Donald Trump and his people would get out their red pens and just say 'no way,'" John Kirton, founding director of the G7 Research Group, told Globe and Mail freelancer Arno Kopecky. "So then, what is your strategy? And wildfires was the answer."
The difference, Kopecky wrote, was that while Trump refuses to listen to climate science, he's seen a rash of wildfires since he returned to the White House in January, and his country is now receiving smoke from the blazes in Canada. "So Donald Trump's got a reason to be seen to be doing something about it," Kirton said.
The end result-a wildfire charter with no reference to climate change-drew sharp criticism from several expert observers.
Caroline Brouillette, executive director of Climate Action Network Canada, said Canada "cratered to the lowest common denominator" to appease the U.S. president and failed the test of climate leadership, CP writes.
"They're missing the whole point in that we're seeing more fires, a longer fire season, more intense fires, more severe fires, because the climate is changing due to human activities," said fire and climate professor Mike Flannigan of Thompson Rivers University. "It's a serious omission, and that's being very polite."
The wildfire charter "misses the most important, and most controversial point, about wildfires around the globe: that increasingly they are made so much more frequent and dangerous to human life and infrastructure by climate change," agreed Stephen Legault, senior program manager, Alberta climate at Environmental Defence Canada. "To have a serious conversation about wildfire necessitates a discussion about climate change."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A new treaty could stabilize Canada's relationship with the U.S.
A new treaty could stabilize Canada's relationship with the U.S.

Globe and Mail

time36 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

A new treaty could stabilize Canada's relationship with the U.S.

Thomas d'Aquino is the founding CEO of the Business Council of Canada and author of Private Power Public Purpose - Adventures in Business, Politics and the Arts. Prime Minister Mark Carney has rightfully and boldly laid out a vision for Canada to achieve greater economic and security resilience in the face of an 'existential threat' from the United States. This demands a posture of greater independence from our southern colossus. It also requires a high degree of sang froid and diplomatic finesse in protecting Canada's national interest. The hard reality is that we cannot fully decouple ourselves from our economic and security interdependence with the Americans even as we vigorously pursue new partnerships around the world. So how best can we achieve a higher degree of certainty in our bilateral relationship while having to come to terms with a transactional president? Ever since Mr. Carney and President Donald Trump conducted their first telephone conversation on March 28 and spoke of a comprehensive economic and security package – conversations that have been since ongoing – I have been mulling the idea of a bilateral treaty binding our two countries. Radical? Counterintuitive? By all means. But here's why it merits consideration. According to Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, '...all the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land.' A Canada-United States Economic and Defence Treaty, endorsed by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate, would give the bilateral relationship a higher degree of formality and recognition. Of far more consequence than an agreement or pact, it would also provide Canada with more certainty during and after the Trump presidency, assuming, of course, that the terms of the treaty would be advantageously negotiated by Canada. From a Canadian perspective, what might be a plausible pitch to the President? I have tried to answer this question by imagining what I would say in the opening of the conversation. Opinion: Diversify from the U.S. for defence? This must include diversifying from Big Tech Opinion: Mark Carney is walking a high-stakes foreign-policy tightrope between Canada's values and interests Mr. President, one of the most important elections in Canadian history has just concluded. Buoyed by a surge of patriotism not seen since the Second World War, our citizens have affirmed their love of country and confidence in our future as a proud and independent people. Our confidence is rooted in the knowledge that we possess powerful democratic institutions, a respected judiciary, an enormous land mass rich in resources and surrounded by three oceans, and one of the most diverse and skilled populations on earth. We have also been blessed to share a continent with our long-time friend and ally, the United States of America. In a conversation you and Mr. Carney had on March 28, it was agreed 'to begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship immediately following the election.' The Canadian election now behind us, here are some preliminary ideas on how new life can be breathed into this refreshed relationship. You are well aware of the highly integrated nature of our two economies. It has yielded great mutual benefits in terms of growth and jobs. As a businessman, you appreciate the staggering achievement of our two countries exchanging nearly US$1-trillion annually in goods and services. We are indispensable customers of each other. You are also well aware of our mutual commitment to the defence of North America. In the troubled and dangerous world, Canadians, and I believe, Americans, would welcome rock-solid, mutually beneficial commitments to our common future. With this in mind, I am interested in exploring with you the negotiation of a historic Canada-United States Economic and Defence Treaty that would benefit from your leadership and the support of Canada's Parliament and the Congress of the United States. The cornerstones of this treaty would be the affirmation of our eternal friendship, the respect of our territorial sovereignty, and our mutual embrace of the rule of law, including the binding resolution of disputes. The focus of the treaty would be on joint approaches to competitiveness, economic development, and defence and security cooperation, keeping in mind the fundamental principle of reciprocity that you are championing - reciprocity beginning with the immediate clearing away of tariffs between our two countries. The treaty would: The treaty is not meant to be a substitute for the United States- Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) – an initiative that you took the leadership in successfully negotiating in your first term. A renegotiated USMCA will no doubt continue to serve all three countries, especially in areas where our continental supply chains are closely integrated. In proposing Canada-United States cooperation beyond the USMCA, Canada is mindful that the sovereignty of the United States and Canada must be respected. Canadians and Americans would expect nothing less. The treaty would acknowledge the independence of each of our countries in the domains of foreign policy and international commerce while respecting the long tradition of consultation between our two governments. As for China, I appreciate your concerns about the failure of the Chinese government to adhere to World Trade Organization liberalization protocols and to respect the principles of trade reciprocity. Canada will work with like-minded allies to press for reforms within China to alleviate these imbalances. In the defence domain, there is overwhelming public support in Canada for bolstering our armed forces. In addition to our new F-35 fleet, we will move forward on new submarine and icebreaker capability as well as surface combat vessels, artillery, radar, and drones. Canada's commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), of which we are a founding member, is unequivocal. Mr. Carney has said Canada will meet its 2 per cent of GDP expenditure in defence spending this year and has expressed interest in partnering on the U.S. anti-missile defence shield. Canada's involvement would be consistent with our long-time commitment to NORAD and to protecting the continent's northern approaches from potential hostile attack. Mr. President, each of your predecessors in modern times has spoken of the uniqueness of the Canada-United States relationship. Among the most memorable are these words from John F. Kennedy: 'Geography has made us neighbours. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies.' In the troubled and dangerous world of today, these truths resonate more than ever. Let's seize this opportunity and shape a new and exciting chapter in the historic relationship between our two peoples. The result will be a stronger Canada and a stronger America.

Trump again questions NATO's collective defense guarantee ahead of summit
Trump again questions NATO's collective defense guarantee ahead of summit

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump again questions NATO's collective defense guarantee ahead of summit

THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — President Donald Trump on Wednesday once again raised questions about America's commitment to defend its allies should they come under attack as he prepared to join a NATO summit in the Netherlands. Just as he did during his first term in office, Trump suggested that his backing would depend on whether U.S. allies are spending enough on defense. He's demanded that European allies and Canada dedicate 5% of GDP to their security. On the eve of the meeting in The Hague, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that his commitment to Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty – the organization's collective security guarantee – 'depends on your definition.' 'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signaled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he is at the summit. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantee. In March this year, he expressed uncertainty that NATO would come to the United States' defense if needed. What Article 5 says Article 5 is the foundation stone on which the 32-member North Atlantic Treaty Organization is built. It states that an armed attack against one or more of the members shall be considered an attack against all members. It also states that if such an armed attack occurs, each member would take, individually and in concert with others, 'such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.'' That security guarantee is the reason previously neutral Finland and Sweden sought to join NATO after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and why Ukraine itself and other countries in Europe also want in. When it has been invoked Article 5 was only invoked once, in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks on the United States, paving the way for NATO's biggest ever operation in Afghanistan. But NATO allies have also taken collective defense measures, including joining the U.S. to fight the Islamic State group in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as help keep the peace in the Balkans. The Three Musketeers-like pledge of all for one, one for all, is at the heart of NATO's deterrent effect. To question it too loudly might invite an adversary to test it. European officials have said that Russia is planning to do just that. The impact of Article 5 on Ukraine NATO's credibility hinges on Article 5 and its commitment to offer membership to any European country that can contribute to security in Europe and North America. But Ukraine, currently in the middle of war with Russia, might oblige all 32 member countries to spring to its defense militarily, potentially igniting a wider war with a nuclear-armed country. Trump is vetoing its membership for the foreseeable future. Article 5 becomes problematic when the territory of a member is unclear. For instance, Russian forces entered Georgia in August 2008, a few months after NATO leaders first promised the country it would join, along with Ukraine. Georgia's NATO application is still pending but seems unlikely for many years. Russia continues to occupy large swaths of Ukraine and other parts are contested, meaning that its borders cannot be easily defined.

Trade clarity to help Canada's economy rebound after modest recession: Deloitte
Trade clarity to help Canada's economy rebound after modest recession: Deloitte

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trade clarity to help Canada's economy rebound after modest recession: Deloitte

OTTAWA – Some economists are putting an increasingly optimistic slant on Canada's tariff dispute with the United States, arguing the economy should be able to avoid 'worst-case' scenarios from the trade war. That doesn't mean the Canadian economy gets off scot-free — a new forecast published by Deloitte Canada on Wednesday calls for a modest recession to hit in the second and third quarters of the year as uncertainty and weakness caused by tariffs start to bite. 'We do think the economy really is going to be considerably slower,' said Dawn Desjardins, chief economist at Deloitte Canada. After a surprisingly strong first quarter that saw many businesses rush their orders to get ahead of looming tariffs, Canadian exports were already showing signs of a steep decline in April. Weakness in the manufacturing side of the labour market is expected to broaden in the months ahead, Deloitte Canada said. The unemployment rate is forecast to rise to 7.3 per cent by the fall from May's level of seven per cent. But Desjardins said this downturn could be much worse if Canada hadn't secured tariff exemptions for CUSMA-compliant exports in early negotiations with the United States. U.S. President Donald Trump's move to double steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 per cent earlier this month means those sectors are still set to take steeper hits, she said, particularly if Canada levies more reciprocal tariffs at the end of a 30-day negotiation deadline in July. Deloitte said parts of eastern and Central Canada, as well as British Columbia, will see subdued growth this year from the tariff dispute while the prairie provinces and Newfoundland and Labrador will see their output rise, thanks largely to energy exports. Overall, Desjardins said the status quo — if maintained — does not mark the 'worst-case outcome' for Canada's economy that some might have feared a few months ago when tariff talks were ramping up. Deloitte expects that, even with two negative quarters, Canada will post real GDP growth of 1.1 per cent this year. That would accelerate to 1.6 per cent in 2026 — not headline shattering growth by any means, but better than a protracted downturn. Unemployment would also drop back below seven per cent early next year, the report said. Deloitte is not the only one bringing a bit of optimism to the forecast. RBC published a report June 13 that also focuses on Canada's upside risks — economist shorthand for ways things might turn out for the better — amid what it called a 'gloomy' outlook on the trade war to date. 'While Canada's economic path forward remains challenging, it appears considerably less treacherous than it did just a few months ago — a narrative that has yet to permeate the Canadian psyche,' the RBC report read. Consumer and business confidence has taken a hit as Canadians wait for an outcome from trade negotiations with the United States, but RBC noted the hard data so far shows households are still spending despite the uncertainty. Desjardins also believes that once businesses get a bit more clarity on the trade front — talks so far appear productive, she said — they will also have the confidence to pick up investment again. She projects that will set up an economic recovery starting in the second half of the year, fuelled in part by a pair of additional quarter-point rate cuts from the Bank of Canada in the coming months. RBC, on the other hand, believes the economy is showing enough life that it doesn't need any support from additional rate cuts this year. That could change if cracks start to form in the economy, but RBC's assistant chief economist Nathan Janzen said he expects the central bank will remain on hold given 'resilience' in the economy. 'There is still room for the Bank of Canada to respond with more monetary policy support if the economy needs it,' he said. Both RBC and Deloitte point to recent steps taken by the federal government as girding Canada's economy from a steeper economic downturn. The House of Commons passed Bill C-5 at the end of last week, a sweeping set of legislation that aims to reduce interprovincial trade barriers and speed up major project development. Desjardins said the bill helps address long-standing reputational issues that Canadian industry is slow-moving and gets mired in red tape before getting shovels into the ground. While economists have long been banging the drum to draw attention to Canada's weak business investment levels and flagging productivity, she said the 'jolt' of the trade war has finally 'brought this to the top of this agenda.' 'This signals to business that Canada is now ready to move to a stronger playing field,' she said. RBC agreed that 'action on interprovincial trade barriers could pay long-run dividends helping to support investment and productivity growth.' Uncertainty about the U.S. market in the global trade upheaval also offers an opportunity for resource-rich Canada to support growing worldwide demand for critical minerals necessary to power artificial intelligence and defence products, RBC said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Desjardins said it could be years before today's steps to knock down interprovincial trade barriers and build out national infrastructure pay dividends. It takes time to reorient supply chains, and manufacturing industries in some provinces will still take a hit during the adjustment. But she argued that the signal is nearly as important as the outcome when it comes to giving businesses the confidence they need to invest. Adopting this 'One Canadian Economy' framework, as Ottawa has dubbed it, 'is not a magic wand that changes the landscape,' Desjardins said. 'It is building more resilience in the economy and more room for growth.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store