Breaking Fentanyl's Grip: An inside look from the DEA
HENDERSON, Ky. (WEHT) — 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin. Fentanyl is a potent-synthetic opioid drug approved by the FDA for use as pain relief, but more times than now, gets into the wrong hands.
Eyewitness News' Jessica Costello sits down with Michael Gannon, from the DEA in Indianapolis, for a 'potent' conversation about fentanyl epidemic.
Check out the video player above for the full interview.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Blue states call on FDA to expand abortion pill access
Attorneys general of New York, California, New Jersey and Massachusetts are asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to expand access to the abortion pill and remove some 'unnecessary' drug restrictions that have been in place for more than two decades. The joint petition, filed Thursday, comes days after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary committed to reviewing the abortion drug amid pressure from Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and some Republican lawmakers. The FDA first approved of the use of mifepristone and misoprostol for an abortion in 2000. Unlike surgical abortions, medication abortions do not need to take place in a clinical setting, and patients are able to take the pills at home. Most abortions in the U.S. are now medication abortions, according to data from the reproductive health and rights group Guttmacher Institute. In 2023, 63 percent of all abortions in the U.S. were medication abortions. The safety of mifepristone has come under increased scrutiny by some Republican lawmakers, citing a flawed study claiming the rate of adverse health events that occur among patients is far higher than previously reported. More than 100 scientific studies have been conducted looking at the safety and efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol; all of them have found that the drugs are a safe way to terminate a pregnancy. 'Given Mifepristone's 25-year safety record, there is simply no scientific or medical reason to subject it to such extraordinary restrictions,' New York Attorney General Letitia James said. 'The FDA must follow the science and lift these unnecessary barriers that put patients at risk and push providers out of care.' Mifepristone's use is subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program under the FDA. The attorneys general argue three requirements under the REMS program for the drug should be removed since they pose a burden to patients and health care systems. The first is related to prescriber certification. As part of the REMS program, health care providers who prescribe mifepristone are required to add their names to national and abortion provider lists, which the attorneys general say raise 'serious safety and legal concerns.' The second has to do with patient agreement forms. All patients who want mifepristone — even those using the drug to treat a miscarriage — are required to sign a document stating they are using the drug to end a pregnancy. The third requirement mentioned in the petition is connected to pharmacy certification. As part of mifepristone's REMS program, pharmacies that carry the drug are subject to tracking, shipping and reporting requirements, which the attorneys general argue may 'dissuade' some from carrying the drug. The FDA has yet to reply to a request for comment from The Hill about the petition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: When the insulin that works disappears
I remember being in a college pathology class when the professor told us we should learn about type 1 diabetes, since it was likely to impact someone we knew. Then he said something else that I didn't fully understand at the time: the insulin market was becoming more concentrated, with fewer companies producing it, which was leading to fewer options and rising prices. Fast forward nearly 30 years later, and my 13-year-old daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. We struggled at first. But after a few difficult months, we found a system that worked — involving lifestyle changes and the use of a specific long-acting insulin called Levemir (detemir). Levemir has a shorter and more predictable action than the few alternative long-acting insulins. That made it ideal for my daughter, an athlete navigating not just intense physical activity but also the fluctuating insulin needs that come with puberty and hormone fluctuations. We found a rhythm and felt in control again. Then, two years into her diagnosis, that sense of control was ripped away. On November 8, 2023, we learned that Novo Nordisk planned to discontinue Levemir in the U.S. I was shocked. Levemir had been widely available since 2005. Surely, I thought, someone would step in to fix this. But the more I learned, the more alarmed I became. Levemir is the long-acting insulin that has been most proven safe in pregnancy, where maintaining tight blood glucose control can help prevent early delivery, high blood pressure and large birth weight. Removing it from the market could put pregnant women with diabetes at real risk. I connected with physicians and advocates who were sounding the alarm. I started a petition. I joined with others also affected, and we formed a nonprofit — The Alliance to Protect Insulin Choice — and began traveling to Washington, D.C., often to meet with congressional and regulatory offices. Largely due to our efforts, a company is now seeking to manufacture a biosimilar version of Levemir. But funding has been difficult. Historically, no insulin removed from the market has successfully come back as a biosimilar, and the regulatory path remains unclear. That must change — especially for a drug so critical to pregnancy and pediatric care. Levemir isn't just a niche preference. It was the 127th most prescribed drug and used by just under one million people in 2022. It's still available in other countries. It's the only long-acting insulin that can be diluted, making it vital for infants and small children who need extremely precise doses. It also leads to less weight gain than its alternatives and causes less discomfort during injection because it isn't acidic. The FDA knows that not every drug works the same for every person. Just last year, in response to a penicillin shortage, the agency worked with manufacturers, explored foreign supply chains and increased domestic production. We're asking for the same urgency. We need the FDA to act — to ask Novo Nordisk to permit U.S. access to Levemir from abroad, and to support the company trying to bring a generic version to market. Insulin is not optional. Less than half of people who require insulin use insulin pumps, and many pump users rely on long-acting insulin as a backup. Without Levemir, many patients will be forced onto one of the few alternatives that might not work as well for their bodies and lives. Imagine if a common pain reliever was suddenly pulled from the market — not for safety reasons, but because it was no longer as profitable. There would be outrage. So why is there so little outcry when this happens to a drug that literally keeps people alive? We're asking for fairness, for choice and for a healthcare system that puts patients before profits.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
RFK Jr. wants to allow more experimental therapies, acknowledging health risks and threat of ‘charlatans'
'And of course you're going to get a lot of charlatans, and you're going to get people who have bad results,' he added. 'And ultimately, you can't prevent that either way. Leaving the whole thing in the hands of pharma is not working for us.' Advertisement Kennedy cited his own experience at a clinic in Antigua, where he said he received a stem cell treatment that 'enormously' eased his neurological condition, spasmodic dysphonia, which affects his voice and has few treatment options. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up If Kennedy does permit broader use of unauthorized or experimental therapies, he would be reversing long-standing efforts by the FDA to monitor and sometimes police the emerging field. Experts, including some who support alternative medicine, worry that without safeguards, an expansion of such treatments could undermine legitimate development of new therapies. The FDA now narrowly permits stem cell therapies to treat blood and immune disorders. Nearly a decade ago, the field was so loosely regulated that the agency pursued court actions to shut down rogue clinics using unauthorized treatments for a wide array of ailments. Some providers in the United States and in other countries continue to offer experimental stem cell therapies for everything from autism to Alzheimer's to erectile dysfunction. Advertisement The latest move reflects an expansion of Kennedy's drive to dismantle federal health policy to reflect his long-held views, which had so far focused mainly on vaccines, chronic diseases, food dyes and fluoride. A push to open up the field of unregulated stem cell infusions meshes with his oft-stated contention that the FDA is a 'sock puppet' for major drug companies and faces a crisis of distrust. Wellness industry products, he has claimed, are unfairly sidelined. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to requests for comment. Kennedy's statements alarmed experts on the field of sometimes dangerous stem cell infusions -- who noted that many of Kennedy's allies endorse wellness products ranging from red-light therapy to magnetism. 'It's a complete abdication of protection of the public, letting these grifters go forward,' said Timothy Caulfield, a research chair in health law and policy at the University of Alberta in Canada. 'For him to say, 'There are problems with Big Pharma, so we want our opportunity to be bad actors too,' it doesn't make any sense.' One leading expert group, the International Society for Stem Cell Research, reviewed Kennedy's podcast statements and condemned the approach as potentially allowing products that are 'sometimes contaminated with pathogens and are often marketed with scientifically implausible claims.' 'It is critical that the FDA maintain its regulatory authority to protect Americans from these potentially harmful and deceptive products,' the society said in a statement. Advertisement On Thursday, a panelist appearing at an FDA meeting on cell and gene therapies raised a concern about 'snake oil' treatments. Dr. Vinay Prasad, the agency's director of the center for biologics evaluation research, responded, 'We have to regulate the bad actors. We can't let that taint what we do here at the FDA.' Kennedy, who also attended the event, voiced full support for the researchers and biotech executives working on gene therapies for rare diseases, including those who made history by creating a custom gene therapy for an infant named KJ. 'We're going to do everything in our power to sweep away the barriers from you getting those solutions to market and getting them funded, and do everything that we can to support you all,' Kennedy said. On Brecka's podcast in May, Kennedy cited other products that he'd like to see more of, including chelation treatment, which was discussed in a 2015 book edited by him that focused on widely debunked theories about mercury in vaccines and autism and cites 'evidence of chelation's benefits' from a few small studies. One 5-year-old Pennsylvania boy died in 2005 from cardiac arrest after a doctor tried to treat his autism with chelation. Neither Kennedy nor the FDA has released a formal plan to change agency standards for stem cell treatments, which have typically been reviewed by the agency as individual therapies to treat a specific disease. Widening overall access could also happen informally if the agency decided to relax enforcement, an approach the FDA used in the past to indicate that it wouldn't crack down on unauthorized products. During the pandemic, for example, the agency allowed providers to retrofit infusion pumps and ventilators to treat hordes of sick patients. Advertisement During the first Trump administration, the agency's commissioner, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, escalated enforcement against stem cell providers whom he described in 2017 as 'unscrupulous actors who have seized on the clinical promise of regenerative medicine.' The FDA followed through with lawsuits seeking to stop some stem cell providers, including one case that the government won on appeal in the fall. In that case, the agency alleged that one provider, the California Stem Cell Treatment Center, was offering a drug without FDA approval by taking stem cells from a person's fat, manipulating them and infusing them as a remedy for Alzheimer's disease, cancer and arthritis. The agency classifies stem cell treatments as a 'biologic' and approves them much like a drug after careful studies of safety and effectiveness. But the FDA does make exceptions: It does not regulate some treatments if providers say they are extracting and then reinserting a person's cells with minimal manipulation. In March, Kennedy convened a meeting with leaders in the stem cell field. Two people who attended said the gathering was a fact-finding effort to explore a safe way to increase access. To Dr. Noah Raizman, who attended the meeting on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Kennedy's new pronouncement 'sounds a little more casual and a little bit more emboldened.' In the podcast, Kennedy said that consumers should be able to navigate the industry's claims. 'We don't want to have the Wild West,' Kennedy said. 'We want to make sure that information is out there. But we also want to respect the intelligence of the American people -- the capacity of people who explore the outcomes that are going to benefit them the most.' Advertisement In recent years, stem cell treatments have caused harm in the United States and abroad. Experts at the Pew Research Center tallied more than 350 cases of side effects including life-threatening blood infections, heart attacks and tumors. One Boston neurosurgeon discovered a huge mass of bloody tissue in the lower spine of a man who had received unproven stem cell treatments in Mexico, China and Argentina. Three patients were blinded after stem cell treatments at a Florida clinic. The FDA prevailed in getting a court order to stop the clinic from operating. The field of stem cell treatments is so complex that the Harvard Medical School created a free course to help doctors navigate patient questions, said Insoo Hyun, the director of life sciences at the Museum of Science in Boston. More than 110 stem cell clinical studies are advancing under regulatory oversight. In one, scientists at the National Institutes of Health are using retinal cells developed from patients' blood to try to treat vision loss in older adults -- and follow them for 15 years. In another study aimed at helping patients with Parkinson's disease, researchers at a biotech company in California are exploring the safety of infusing dopamine-producing neurons in a region of the brain that controls the body's movements. A Chinese company is studying a treatment for heart failure that involves transplanting cardiac muscle cells into the heart. Some providers sidestep the costly, yearslong process of careful work that can lead to an FDA approval. Among them is Dr. Chadwick Prodromos, a Chicago doctor who offers stem cell treatments in Antigua. Kennedy welcomed him warmly at the March meeting, Raizman recalled. Reached for comment, Prodromos' office said that he was in Antigua doing treatments and was not available. Advertisement In an April interview on YouTube, Prodromos said that he was still in touch with the FDA about stem cell treatments that could help people 'without allowing scams and things that aren't valid. And you know, it's a tricky proposition.' A website for Prodromos' clinic says that he and colleagues offer injections in Antigua into the joints, back, neck, scalp, penis and pelvic floor for an array of conditions including autism, thinning hair and lupus. He uses AlloRX cells, which are derived from the umbilical cord, in a manner that in the United States would require an FDA-cleared clinical trial. People can seek out unregulated treatments using their own cells that are processed, purified and amplified in different ways. They can also find treatments using others' cells that vary widely in quality and sterility. Some low-quality clinics process cells in a back room, which is the opposite of a clinical-grade cell processing site. Hyun said he recently toured one in the Netherlands that used specialized air filtering, layers of gowns and a ban on bacteria-laden cellphones in their sterile area. 'It's kind of like you're entering a space station,' he said. Ultimately, Caulfield said, many unauthorized stem cell providers adopt the language of biotech and regenerative medicine, post glowing patient testimonials and exploit patients who are desperate for a cure. This article originally appeared in .
