Fire at New Mexico GOP headquarters under investigation as arson
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A fire that damaged the entryway to the New Mexico Republican Party headquarters in Albuquerque is being investigated as arson, a fire official said Monday.
No suspect has been named in the Sunday morning blaze that's under investigation by local authorities, the FBI, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Incendiary materials were found on the scene, according to an ATF spokesperson. Spray paint on the side of the building read 'ICE=KKK,' said Lt. Jason Fejer with Albuquerque Fire Rescue. Fejer said federal officials were taking over the arson investigation.
Republican leaders described the fire as a deliberate attack. The building had extensive smoke damage, which Republican party spokesperson Ash Soular said left the offices uninhabitable.
Surveillance video from the inside the building captured images of the fire, Soular said. She declined Monday morning to give further details and said law enforcement asked the party not to release the video or discuss its contents in detail.
The weekend fire followed vandalism across the U.S. in recent weeks targeting dealerships for Tesla, the electric car company owned by Elon Musk, who is leading Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to slash the federal workforce. Trump has also sought to ramp up deportation efforts against people living in the country illegally, led by agents at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.
Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller, a Democrat, said in response to the GOP headquarters fire that 'politically motivated crimes of any kind are unacceptable.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
11 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump Means to Provoke, Not Pacify
President Donald Trump is about to launch yet another assault on democracy, the Constitution, and American traditions of civil-military relations, this time in Los Angeles. Under a dubious legal rationale, he is activating 2,000 members of the National Guard to confront protests against actions by ICE, the immigration police who have used thuggish tactics against citizens and foreigners alike in the United States. By militarizing the situation in L.A., Trump is goading Americans more generally to take him on in the streets of their own cities, thus enabling his attacks on their constitutional freedoms. As I've listened to him and his advisers over the past several days, they seem almost eager for public violence that would justify the use of armed force against Americans. The president and the men and women around him are acting with great ambition in this moment, and they are likely hoping to achieve three goals in one dramatic action. First, they will turn America's attention away from Trump's many failures and inane feuds, and reestablish his campaign persona as a strongman who will brush aside the law if that's what it takes to keep order in the streets. Perhaps nothing would please Trump more than to replace weird stories about Elon Musk with video of masked protesters burning cars as lines of helmeted police and soldiers march over them and impose draconian silence in one of the nation's largest and most diverse cities. Second, as my colleague David Frum warned this morning, Trump is establishing that he is willing to use the military any way he pleases, perhaps as a proof of concept for suppressing free elections in 2026 or 2028. Trump sees the U.S. military as his personal honor guard and his private muscle. Those are his toy soldiers, and he's going to get a show from his honor guard in a birthday parade next weekend. In the meantime, he's going to flex that muscle, and prove that the officers and service members who will do whatever he orders are the real military. The rest are suckers and losers. During the George Floyd protests in 2020, Trump was furious at what he saw as the fecklessness of military leaders determined to thwart his attempts to use deadly force against protesters. He's learned his lesson: This time, he has installed a hapless sycophant at the Pentagon who is itching to execute the boss's orders. Third, he may be hoping to radicalize the citizen-soldiers drawn from the community who serve in the National Guard. (Seizing the California Guard is also a convenient way to humiliate California Governor Gavin Newsom and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, with Trump's often-used narrative that liberals can't control their own cities.) The president has the right to 'federalize' Guard forces, which is how they were deployed overseas in America's various conflicts. Trump has never respected the traditions of American civil-military relations, which regard the domestic deployment of the military as an extreme measure to be avoided whenever possible. Using the Guard could be a devious tactic: He may be hoping to set neighbor against neighbor, so that the people called to duty return to their home and workplace with stories of violence and injuries. In the longer run, Trump may be trying to create a national emergency that will enable him to exercise authoritarian control. (Such an emergency was a rationalization, for example, for the tariffs that he has mostly had to abandon.) He has for years been trying to desensitize the citizens of the United States to un-American ideas and unconstitutional actions. The American system of government was never meant to cope with a rogue president. Yet Trump is not unstoppable. Thwarting his authoritarianism will require restraint on the part of the public, some steely nerves on the part of state and local authorities, and vigilant action from national elected representatives, who should be stepping in to raise the alarm and to demand explanations about the president's misuse of the military. As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear, the last thing anyone should do is take to the streets of Los Angeles and try to confront the military or any of California's law-enforcement authorities. ICE is on a rampage, but physically assaulting or obstructing its agents—and thus causing a confrontation with the cops who have to protect them, whether those police officers like it or not—will provide precisely the pretext that some of the people in Trump's White House are trying to create. The president and his coterie want people walking around taking selfies in gas clouds, waving Mexican flags, holding up traffic, and burning cars. Judging by reactions on social media and interviews on television, a lot of people seem to think such performances are heroic—which means they're poised to give Trump's enforcers what they're hoping for. Be warned: Trump is expecting resistance. You will not be heroes. You will be the pretext. Conor Friedersdorf: Averting the worst-case scenario in Los Angeles Instead, the most dramatic public action the citizens of Southern California could take right now would be to ensure that Trump's forces arrive on calm streets. Imagine the reactions of the Guard members as they look around and wonder what, exactly, the commander in chief was thinking. Why are they carrying their rifles in the streets of downtown America? What does anyone expect them to do? Put another way: What if the president throws a crackdown and nobody comes? This kind of restraint will deny Trump the political oxygen he's trying to generate. He is resorting to the grand theater of militarism because he is losing on multiple fronts in the courts—and he knows it. The law, for most people, is dreary to hear about, but one of the most important stories of Trump's second term is that lawyers and judges are so far holding a vital line against the administration, sometimes at great personal risk. Trump is also losing public support, which is another reason he's zeroing in on California. He is resolutely ignorant in many ways, but he has an excellent instinct for picking the right fights. The fact of the matter is that tens of millions of Americans believe that almost everything about immigration in the United States has long been deeply dysfunctional. (I'm one of them.) If he sends the military into L.A. and Guard members end up clashing in high-definition video with wannabe resistance gladiators in balaclavas, many people who have not been paying attention to his other ghastly antics will support him. (For the record, I am not one of them.) So far, even the Los Angeles Police Department—not exactly a bastion of squishy suburban book-club liberals—has emphasized that the protests have been mostly peaceful. Trump is apparently trying to change that. Sending in the National Guard is meant to provoke, not pacify, and his power will only grow if he succeeds in tempting Americans to intemperate reactions that give him the authoritarian opening he's seeking.
Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
Gina Ortiz Jones says there's no time to waste as San Antonio mayor
San Antonio mayor-elect Gina Ortiz Jones tells Axios she's not waiting to be sworn in to start tackling issues like a potential new Spurs arena, an expected budget deficit and the impact of Trump administration policies. Why it matters: The nonpartisan mayor's race became distinctly about politics as it drew money and influence from across Texas and the country. Now that it's over, Ortiz Jones must tackle the reality of everyday issues facing a city on the cusp of pivotal changes. Catch up quick: Ortiz Jones, who had national Democratic backing, beat out Republican Rolando Pablos 54% to 46%, cementing San Antonio as a reliably blue city. The big picture: Ortiz Jones will lead San Antonio at a critical time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. Voters could be asked to weigh in on the project as soon as November. She will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. What they're saying: "There's no time to waste, and I'm not going to wait until I am actually in the seat, because I think there's a lot of work and conversations we can have now that will be helpful to ensure (it's) as smooth a transition as possible," Ortiz Jones told Axios on Saturday. When asked about how she can get things done on a City Council poised to have a starker political divide, she said "I think there's going to be a lot that we can agree on ... I'm quite confident that we'll get to six (votes)." State of play: Ortiz Jones, who is the first openly gay woman elected San Antonio mayor, served as the Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. She grew up on San Antonio's Far West Side. Between the lines: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's former political director. Ortiz Jones had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, and Emily's List. The bottom line: Ortiz Jones, who takes office June 18, says it was her personal background that helped her break through a crowded mayoral field.
Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Nebraska Republican says he won't follow GOP ‘off the cliff'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In an interview in his office last week, Bacon, at 61 serving his fifth term in Congress, would not say whether he voted for Trump last year. He also likened members of his party to people following someone off a cliff, compared himself to Winston Churchill speaking out against Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and criticized billionaire tech tycoon Elon Musk, who has bankrolled many of his Republican colleagues. Advertisement 'I sort of blame him for that disaster,' he said of Musk, referring to Musk exhorting Republicans late last year to tank a spending deal that was intended to avert a government shutdown. Advertisement On one level, Bacon is making a fairly obvious statement: Musk did play a crucial role in killing the spending bill. But it is the kind of obvious statement that most Republicans on Capitol Hill are not willing to make these days, for fear of jeopardizing their political futures as Musk threatens retribution against anyone who fails to vote the way he believes they should. In the coming weeks, Bacon, who represents a center-leaning district in the otherwise deeply red state of Nebraska that both former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris won by more than 4 percentage points, plans to announce whether or not he will seek a sixth term in Congress. His retirement would be welcome news for Democrats, who have long viewed Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District as one of their best opportunities to pick up a seat. They have consistently been denied because of Bacon's strong independent brand and unique electoral strength. Last month, a Democrat unseated a three-term Republican in the Omaha mayor's race. The morning after that race was called, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the minority leader, told the House Democratic Caucus that they were officially on 'Don Bacon retirement watch,' and the room erupted in cheers, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Bacon would not discuss his plans, but his recent record of criticizing Trump and Musk suggests that he does not have a reelection campaign in mind. Still, in the interview, he said he had not given up on politics or on the Republican Party. 'I'd like to fight for the soul of our party,' Bacon said, sitting in his office as Trump and Musk's high-stakes alliance dissolved in real time on social media. 'I don't want to be the guy who follows the flute player off the cliff. I think that's what's going on right now.' Advertisement He also has no interest in taking the path of former Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois or Liz Cheney of Wyoming and making a clean break with a GOP that no longer reflects many of his values. 'You can't be anti-everything,' he said. 'I like what the president has done on the border, so I have no problem with that.' He also likes being a negotiator. 'I don't like voting 'no,'' he said. 'I like fixing things.' At the moment, he is pressing Republican leaders to reject a proposal from the Trump administration to claw back $400 million for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the global health program started by President George W. Bush that is credited with saving more than 25 million lives worldwide. The proposal is part of a $9 billion package of spending cuts the White House sent to Capitol Hill last week, which House GOP leaders plan to bring to a vote this week. 'I told them I'm a no,' Bacon said of the bill. 'I just want to make sure we're funding the medicine. We want to prevent AIDS; it's a noble program; it's George Bush's legacy. I put the marker out there. We'll see.' Bacon, a mild-mannered Midwesterner with a permanent half-smile on his face, is too much of a traditional conservative to have ever voted for Harris. But he would not say whether he voted for Trump. This is not a normal pose for a Republican in 2025. But Bacon has grown more confident over the years, as he has consistently fended off both right-wing challengers and Democrats to hold onto his seat, that he can remain fairly independent and suffer no political consequences. Advertisement House leaders have begged him to keep more of his opinions to himself, telling him to, as Bacon puts it, 'quit kicking President Trump in the nuts.' In response, Bacon said he has assured them: 'I'll do it only when I think it's needed.' That is becoming more and more often. In the interview, Bacon said he was disappointed in Hegseth, because 'I expect leaders to take responsibility.' He got his back up about Vice President JD Vance's claims that Denmark has 'not been a good ally' to the United States. 'The Danes have lost more people per capita in Afghanistan than any other country,' he said. 'And to call them not a good ally? They were all in with us, and it wasn't fair.' He said he opposed Trump's decision to take away deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the United States. 'These guys fought by our side; we have a compact with those guys,' he said. 'To me, it's not a morally right decision.' And he warned that if Russia overruns Ukraine, it will define Trump's entire legacy. 'President Trump will always be known as the president who had Ukraine fall,' he said. He is also unwilling to let some of the less important stuff slide, breaking with some of his Republican colleagues who, he said, have tried to persuade him to pick his battles. On renaming the Gulf of Mexico, he said: 'I thought it was dumb. That's what people told me -- they said, 'It's so dumb; just vote for it.' That argument didn't work on me.' Advertisement In an alternative universe where there was more appetite for a Republican willing to break with Trump, Bacon has the kind of temperament and resume that could prompt dreams of running for president. Raised on a farm in Illinois, Bacon served for nearly three decades in the U.S. Air Force, earning the rank of brigadier general and specializing in electronic warfare and intelligence. The self-described Reaganite Republican has served in the House for eight years, consistently winning a district that centers on Omaha, the 'blue dot' in an otherwise red state. Bacon said he does think about running for president, drawing a comparison between his own fairly independent position in a tribal party and Churchill's during the 1930s, when the British government was pursuing a policy of appeasement toward Nazi Germany. 'You never know; things change,' he said. 'Right now, probably not. But Winston Churchill, who is one of my heroes, he was very unpopular 1932 through '40 because he was anti-Nazi. But in 1940, they go, 'Who was the only guy that knew what was going on?' ' Bacon said his dream job would be to serve in a Republican administration in a Cabinet-level role. 'If I had a perfect lane, someday I'd love to work in an administration, as director of intelligence, or secretary of defense or Air Force.' That's exceedingly unlikely in the current administration. But if his independent streak costs him such opportunities, Bacon said he would be just fine with that. 'I'd rather go down in history as being on the right side of this stuff,' he said. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
