SGA says Thunder have what it takes to rebound from game one heartbreaker
Oklahoma City's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander attempts a shot against Pascal Siakam in the Thunder's loss to the Indiana Pacers in game one of the NBA Finals (MATTHEW STOCKMAN)
Oklahoma City star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander said the Thunder must stick to the principles that made them the best team in the NBA regular season as they seek to bounce back from a devastating loss to Indiana in game one of the NBA Finals.
The Thunder, who led the league with 68 regular-season victories, had never trailed and led by 15 early in the fourth quarter of the championship series opener.
Advertisement
But the tenacious Pacers rallied and seized the 111-110 victory on Tyrese Haliburton's pull-up basket with three-tenths of a second remaining.
"As much as we can, we just got to treat it like every other game, every other situation we've been in," Gilgeous-Alexander said. "Yes, we haven't been in this situation (in the Finals), but that doesn't mean our character has to change, or what we did last time.
"It's still basketball, the game of basketball we grew up playing. The rules don't change because we're in the Finals.
After Indiana pulled within one with with 48.6 seconds remaining, Gilgeous-Alexander -- the 26-year-old Canadian who supplanted Denver star Nikola Jokic as the NBA Most Valuable Player this season -- had a chance to put the Thunder ahead by three but his fadeaway shot attempt didn't fall, leaving the door open for Haliburton's heroics.
Advertisement
"I thought I got a pretty good look, felt good, didn't go in," he said. "Then they got a look, and it went in. Can't do anything about it now. Just got to be better for next game."
Thursday's outcome recalled the opening game of the Western Conference semi-finals, when Denver's Aaron Gordon drained a last-gasp three-pointer to lift the Nuggets to a 121-119 victory over the Thunder.
Oklahoma City went on to beat the Nuggets in seven games, and Gilgeous-Alexander said it would be no harder to bounce back after another narrow defeat.
"Me personally, how you lose doesn't really matter," he said. "Obviously it sucks, last-second shot, the energy in the arena and stuff like that. But we lost at the end of the day. We lost game one. We've lost game one before.
"The series isn't first to one, it's first to four."
bb/rcw
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Bruins trying to sift through the science of finding value in the NHL Entry Draft haystack
The Black & Gold dropped their Spoked-B marker on him at No. 45 in 2003, with no one — including the Canadiens, who passed on him twice — expecting the little-known, demure kid from Quebec City would turn into one of the game's greatest two-way centermen. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Would it be fair, these 20-plus years later, to look at Bergeron, who had yet to turn 18 the day of that draft in Nashville, and think the Bruins could use his amateur career path and experience as a sort of template for future picks? Advertisement 'It's somewhat not fair,' said a smiling Ryan Nadeau , here in his eighth season as the Bruins director of amateur scouting, 'but we do it anyway, right? 'Some of what are considered the best picks in the draft tend to be outliers … players when you look and you see maybe the statistics don't stand out the way they do for some other guys. They don't have the [physical] frame of some other players or they don't have sort of the production and pedigree of those top guys. It's a funny business, the draft.' Advertisement As Nadeau noted, Sidney Crosby (No. 1, 2005) and Connor McDavid (No. 1, 2015) can't be credited as 'great picks,' per se, by the Penguins and Oilers, respectively. True, too, of Mario Lemieux , Eric Lindros , and Vincent LeCavalier , all No. 1 picks who fulfilled the 'franchise player' expectations they carried into their draft years. High, high quality, and easy draft pickings as low-hanging fruit. 'Straight forward, easy picks and they are great players,' Nadeau said. 'But when you really look at the value in the draft, we all are amazed at the picks that tend to defy the logic of where they got picked. Usually, a lot of it is that they are coming from a lower level of [competition], where it's sort of hard to correlate or justify where they're going to get to in the NHL, or players whose production wasn't that high.' Exhibit A, Bergeron, who played one full season of top Canadian junior hockey and finished third in scoring (23-50—73) for QMJHL Acadie-Bathurst. Its top producers were Olivier Filion , who was never drafted, and Jonathan Ferland , chosen No. 212 by the Canadiens in the prior year's draft. Ferland played all of seven games for the Habs and shipped off for an extended career in Europe after five seasons at AHL Hamilton, which then was Montreeal's top farm team. Nadeau began working for the Bruins in an entry-level communications role only a week or two before the Bruins drafted Bergeron. He was the wide-eyed kid in Nashville that day who was among the first to shake Bergeron's hand and lead him around to various media interviews. Advertisement 'He didn't speak a ton of English, and I didn't speak a ton of French,' recalled Nadeau. 'But we were able to get along pretty well and . . . just such an amazing human.' Related : Approximately this time next year, Bergeron will be eligible for Hall-of-Fame consideration for the first time. Feel free to book hotel rooms for the November 2026 induction in Toronto, for that No. 45 pick whose credentials were decidedly comme ci comme ça entering his draft class. 'When you think of Patrice Bergeron as a second-round pick,' mused Nadeau, with increasing enthusiasm in his voice as he spoke, 'or Trying to figure out which ones will do that? Pin up that dart board and take aim? 'To some degree,' said Nadeau. 'We're going to do as much as we can to give us the best chance to draft a player who we believe will continue to progress, get better, and adjust their game.' Longtime Bruins scout and advisor Scott Bradley spent 10 seasons in Nadeau's role as director of amateur scouting, including when the Bruins selected Bergeron. Advertisement 'I spent a lot of time with Scott and he was just an amazing mentor,' recalled Nadeau. 'I remember talking to him about Bergeron and he said, 'Well, if we knew he was that good, we shoulda picked him in the first round.' It's one of those things, and I know how much they loved [Bergeron], but you do have to project the draft and understand where players are valued and where they may go.' Related : The Bruins hold the No. 7 pick — their first in the top 10 since they took Dougie Hamilton at No. 9 in 2011. Per Nadeau, they interviewed some 85 prospects (max 15 minutes each) during Combine week as a means of building their knowledge base for whatever is to come. In part, he noted, that's also to prepare for a scenario that would include GM Don Sweeney moving the pick — be it for a slot higher or lower in the draft order, or to land a player who can become an immediate roster part of the franchise's rebuild. In all likelihood, a No. 7 pick, though prized, would need to develop elsewhere before being considered for the Boston varsity. As the director of amateur scouting, to see No. 7 disappear would have to be crushing, no? 'The ultimate goal for all of us is to get the Boston Bruins back to winning the Stanley Cup,' said Nadeau. 'So if Don Sweeney gets offered something that he feels he can't refuse and moves the seventh pick, we're going to focus on our two second-round picks, our third-round pick. We're still sitting there with 51, 63, 69, which from our standpoint is really exciting.' Advertisement Which is not to say that Nadeau cares to look past the prospect of bringing home No. 7. In his current position, the club's highest picks have been, dating back to the '18 draft, Nos. 57, 30, 58, 21, 54, 92, and 25. 'But we also understand the value of that to the organization — the context of where we are in terms of getting back in the playoffs next year,' he added, 'and the plan that Cam [Neely] and Donny and the Jacobs family have in place. While you look at it and say, 'Yeah, we worked really hard and it would be exciting to pick at No. 7,' it also would be exciting to think of what Donny might be able to bring on to our team with a trade. Our job is to be prepared for anything.' Patrice Bergeron was the steal of his draft class, going from little-known, demure kid from Quebec City to one of the game's greatest two-way centermen. CHIN, BARRY GLOBE STAFF PHOTO REUNION ARENA Bergeron, Chara on bench? Dream on. Symbolically, Marco Sturm's tenure behind the Bruins' bench begins Tuesday when the ex-Black & Gold winger steps behind a microphone on Causeway Street and shares his vision for how to guide the struggling franchise back to the playoffs. Some of you expected something bolder there, such as 'back to being a perennial Cup favorite.' If these last 2-3 seasons have underscored anything, it's to have full appreciation for what's needed for roster talent, temerity, and intelligence to collect 16 Ws in the playoffs. The Bruins have done that Much of Sturm's success will be tied directly to July 1, the day Sweeney will pick through the NHL's annual free-agent swap meet and, ideally, hand his new coach at least a couple of bona fide point producers. A body or two with the kind of pop Sturm delivered in his playing days — eight seasons of 20-plus goals — would be just what the franchise rehab doctor ordered. Related : Advertisement A No. 1 center would be the gift of gifts for the new coach. What's a swap meet without a pipe dream? Key to Sturm's success, and a point Sweeney did not address on Thursday in The 2024-25 Bruins couldn't score enough and couldn't defend at crucial times. Other than that bit of Tesla spontaneously combusting in the driveway, you know, great ride, was it not? What an intriguing thought to have Sturm aided back there by both Patrice Bergeron and Zdeno Chara . Like Sturm, neither of those future Hall-of-Famers ever has coached at the NHL level, but so what? All three were good pals during Sturm's five years here. All three helped create and curate the culture of discipline and professionalism and competitiveness that defined the team until it began to erode, in chunks, following the summer '23 retirements of Bergeron and Krejci. Best to think, for now, of Bergeron and Chara in coaching roles as two more pipe dreams. Bergeron in his latter playing years repeatedly evinced very little interest (read: zero) in coaching upon retirement, particularly any time soon after calling it quits. 'For now, it's the same answer. I don't think it's in the cards,' said Bergeron on Friday in an interview with the Globe. 'Never say never. Time will tell. Right now I don't see it as something I would like to pursue. I guess I'm getting started coaching two of my sons. We'll see exactly. Never say never.' All that said, who wouldn't want Bergy in the mix? Even if his job description was just 'assistant coach, special services, solely in charge of the power-play bumper.' Chara, in the late stages of his playing career here, was a tiny bit more open to something in the coaching sphere. He has been around the team more in recent months at Sweeney's behest. It has been an unofficial role, one that both have yet to define. In my conversation with Chara last week, just days after he was 'We're still determining the specifics of the role right now. I'm some sort of advisor, mentor and … we still have to determine which part of that need is the most important," he said. 'I enjoy the part of leadership and helping guys to be better leaders and better players, and that also depends on the new coach. You need to have that conversation, like, where am I going to be needed the most?' Overall, Big Z added, he wants to help the franchise grow, inspire players, and 'just be part of it.' 'Because, to be honest, my heart is always going to be with the Bruins,' he said. 'I spent the majority of my career with the Bruins and I really care about them. When I came here in '06, and when I left in [ Brad Marchand ] and many other players, I was very proud of what we accomplished. Not just me, but what we as a group accomplished with the help of many other players. 'So I am attached. I am emotionally attached and living here, so I am physically here, too. I care. I care. I want to help. I want to be part of this turnaround and make it work again . . . but anything I do is for a new coach and Donny to sign off on it.' Joe Sacco's Bruins were rarely, if ever, at full power during his tenure. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff QUIET GOODBYE Sacco's long stint was unfair judge With zero fanfare, Joe Sacco's 12-year tour on the Bruins coaching staff came to an end Thursday when he signed on to new Ranger coach Mike Sullivan's staff on Broadway. The Blueshirts will be the third Original Six franchise for Medford's 'JoJo.' Less than a year after his third and final season at BU, he entered the NHL as a 21-year-old winger with the Maple Leafs in 1990-91. Sacco was a total pro in his time in the Hub of Hockey, right up to Jim Montgomery's 8-9-3 roster. The already compromised lot only grew worse with the injured All that considered, the Bruins won more than they lost (19-15-3, .554) in the 37 games under Sacco's tutelage prior to losing McAvoy. A tour de force? No. But again, Sacco never had the services of Hampus Lindholm, had yet to see Elias Lindholm wake up and smell the Dunkin', and Nikita Zadorov needed months to separate the bountiful tricks from the treats in his game. The only fair review of Sacco's work has to be those 37 games, even then with asterisks attached. He whipped up a whole lot of chicken salad from the detritus he was handed, only to have more detritus heaped on as the season played out. Meanwhile, Sullivan (BU '90) also added David Quinn (BU '87), an ex-Ranger head coach, to his staff. The Ranger GM is Chris Drury (BU '98). The other NYR assistant coach named Thursday was Ty Hennes , who spent the last two seasons on Sullvan's staff in Pittsburgh. Hennes, 45, played four seasons (2000-04) at Boston College, a lesser-known institution located on the rural western portion of Comm Ave. Henceforth, the hue of that trimming on the Blueshirts' sweaters, along with their pants, will be identified as 'Terrier Red.' Loose pucks Cam Neely on Friday celebrated a milestone birthday — his 60th. The Hall-of-Fame winger, then with 51 goals in 201 games with the Canucks, was dealt to the Bruins on his 21st birthday in 1986. That day, Neely wrote via text, 'still is the best birthday gift.' . . . Matt Keator , who became Chara's agent early in the big defenseman's career with the Islanders, was in Stockholm last month for Big Z's induction into the IIHF HOF. Asked about Chara's new love for endurance competition — such as running marathons and IRONMAN competitions — Keator said, 'Of course, you knew he was going to do something to punish himself.' Keator recently added son Ryan Keator to his Win Hockey Agency masthead. Ian Moran , ex- of the Bruins and the Belmont Hill blue line, also is a 'Win' agent. Kevin Paul Dupont can be reached at
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shaquille O'Neal reveals which two dunks in his NBA career are his favorite: "He was all over me, and I was like, 'Get the fu** off me'"
Shaquille O'Neal reveals which two dunks in his NBA career are his favorite: "He was all over me, and I was like, 'Get the fu** off me'" originally appeared on Basketball Network. At his peak, Shaquille O'Neal wasn't just a dominant force in the NBA; he was an unsolvable problem for the opposing coaches and a nightmare for the opposing big men. Double-teams, triple-teams, even entire rotations collapsed in the paint to try and slow him down. Most of the time, it didn't really matter because the 7 '1", 325-pound monster would just power through them all. Advertisement So when a guy like that singles out "just two" dunks from a career filled with broken rims, you know there's more to the story than just the highlight slam. One of the most disrespectful plays of all time On a recent podcast appearance, O'Neal was asked to recall his most memorable play — and his mind immediately went to two of those nights. The first? A poster that's become etched into NBA legend as one of the most disrespectful moments on the hardwood. The infamous throwdown over New York Knicks center Chris Dudley. "My favorite dunk of all time is two of 'em. And I actually seen this dude the other night, Chris Dudley, and I was like, 'Are you trying to fight or you trying to give me a hug?' He started laughing," the LSU product shared in his recent appearance on the "New Heights" podcast. Advertisement Now, the two guys laugh about it, but in that moment, it was anything but funny. Dudley had the thankless task of guarding Shaq one-on-one, and "Diesel" quickly recognized he wasn't getting help. So he went to work. "I take it as a sign of respect when you didn't double me. I take one dribble, the double still ain't coming… I take two dribbles, I even carry it on the second, 'Oh, these motherf****** not coming?' Now I gotta take that, just dropstep and boom it. He was all over me, and I was like, 'Get the fu** off me,'" the legendary center detailed. The visual still lives rent-free in every fan's mind — Shaq powering through Dudley, throwing it down with two hands, then shoving the Knicks big man to the ground. Chris was humiliated, but all he could do was throw the ball at the legendary Laker's back. It was the pure display of dominance from the 7'1" behemoth. Advertisement Related: Luc Longley on why he and Michael Jordan couldn't get along: "Mike was doing what he did to rookies, what he was doing to me" The dunk that started a dynasty But as close and personal as the Dudley dunk was, "The Big Aristotle's" other favorite came with far higher stakes. Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals. Lakers vs. Blazers. Fourth quarter. L.A. was down 15 after the first play of the final period, the wheels falling off in front of a stunned Staples Center crowd. That's when Phil Jackson, always playing chess, delivered what felt like a farewell speech in the timeout huddle — telling his players they had a great season, subtly preparing them for the end. However, it sparked the much-needed fire in their superstar duo Kobe Bryant and O'Neal. Kobe and Shaq took it personally. What followed was one of the greatest comebacks in playoff history, capped off with one of the most memorable plays in the Association. With the score 83–78 in favor of the Lakers, Bryant found himself facing Scottie Pippen — still one of the league's premier perimeter defenders — and crossed him to the left. "Mamba"came down the lane, but the help was there so he threw a lob for his big man to finish. Advertisement At first, it looked like the ball was going a bit too high. But Shaq pulled the ladder out of nowhere, reached what felt like an impossible height, and finished the play with a thunderous one-hand dunk. Two iconic slams. One was rooted in raw power and disrespect, and the other was all about timing and trust that made the early-2000s Lakers a nightmare to deal with. However, the memory of both remains the same for "Shaq-Fu." Related: "Shaq, I'm from the Balkans, you cannot haze me so hard, I've seen everything" - Goran Dragic recalls how he survived Shaquille O'Neal's rookie treatment This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Draymond Green disagrees with LeBron James' idea for NBA schedule change
Draymond Green disagrees with LeBron James' idea for NBA schedule change Each NBA season is long and arduous, and it tests every single player in the league from day one until the moment each team is done for the year. Many people have suggested that the league shorten its schedule from 82 games for each team to roughly 60 in order to reduce fatigue and injuries, as well as possibly increase the quality of play. Such proposals will likely never see the light of day, mostly because it would mean reduced revenue and pay for everyone involved, from superstar players down to those who live paycheck to paycheck. Los Angeles Lakers superstar LeBron James recently made an interesting suggestion on his "Mind the Game" podcast. He said that perhaps the NBA should give its players several weeks off between the end of the regular season and the start of the playoffs. "If they're going to allow it to be as physical as it is, you've got to give us a little time to prepare for it," James said. "Maybe 12 to 15 games left in the regular season. Like a month. Give us a month to prepare for it. Because it goes from zero to 100." Draymond Green of the Golden State Warriors, a friend and rival of his, pushed back on that suggestion. Green feels such a break would do more harm than good. 'I know Bron talked about there being a month off before the playoffs; I don't know that that's possible,' Green said. 'A, guys will get a bit out of shape and can have an adverse effect, guys getting back in, and all of a sudden, you pull something because it's been a month." The NBA has already made some adjustments in recent years in order to make its schedule a little easier. It has cut down on the number of back-to-back games, and it has given teams several days off surrounding the All-Star game in order to make it, in effect, a mini-vacation, especially for those who don't participate in it. But what James suggested is extremely unlikely to ever take place. The league would either need to compress its regular season schedule, shorten the offseason or reduce the number of regular-season games, and the downsides would probably greatly outweigh the benefits.
