logo
Labour to force academies to take thousands of violent and disruptive pupils permanently excluded from other schools

Labour to force academies to take thousands of violent and disruptive pupils permanently excluded from other schools

Daily Mail​11 hours ago

Ministers are pushing through new laws to fast-track the admission of violent and disruptive pupils into academy schools.
In the latest attempt by Labour to clip the wings of academies, which are designed to be free of local authority control, schools would be directed by councils to take thousands of pupils permanently excluded for physical violence or threatening to use an offensive weapon.
Currently, they have the power to do so only if the Education Secretary rules on their behalf.
The attacks on the academies by Left-wing Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has dismayed moderates within the party, who believe schools are more likely to flourish if headteachers are given the freedom to run them.
The School Bill would force academies to follow the national curriculum and constrain their autonomy.
Until now, the academies have had the freedom to refuse a pupil assigned by a local authority if they think it would undermine the safety or learning of other children at the school.
In the latest attempt by Labour to clip the wings of academies, which are designed to be free of local authority control, schools would be directed by councils to take thousands of pupils permanently excluded for physical violence or threatening to use an offensive weapon. Pictured: File photo
But under the Bill, councils would be given the power to force admission directly for the 5,000 children excluded for violence every year.
Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said: 'There have to be consequences for bad behaviour – that's real life. Labour are weak on discipline.
'They've axed behaviour hubs and voted against reporting violence against teachers to the police.
'An inclusion charter puts the needs of one disruptive child above the other 29 who want to learn. It's misguided.'
The Department for Education said: 'An academy can already be directed to accept a vulnerable pupil who has been excluded.
'The proposals would simplify this process... The purpose of the measure is to ensure vulnerable children have access to a school place in the rare instances when normal admission processes fail.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If Sadiq Khan wants money for policing, he could trim his legions of overpaid bureaucrats
If Sadiq Khan wants money for policing, he could trim his legions of overpaid bureaucrats

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

If Sadiq Khan wants money for policing, he could trim his legions of overpaid bureaucrats

The Mayor of London is not happy. Despite the Chancellor's alarmingly profligate Spending Review announced this week – with commitments worth an estimated £600 billion – the Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan remains 'concerned' with insufficient funding for the Metropolitan police. If Sir Sadiq's concern is keeping London safe, funding need not be a problem. We can provide him with a catalogue of fat to trim, which would free up taxpayers' money to better serve the public. In its City Hall Rich List published last year, the TaxPayers' Alliance revealed that the Mayor-led Greater London Assembly (GLA) and its subsidiary bodies employed at least 1,146 people who received over £100,000 in total remuneration in 2022-23. A whopping 143 of these employees received over £150,000. The same report also revealed that the number of employees at the Met Police (including the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime or MOPAC which oversees it) who received total remuneration of over £100,000 totalled at 301 in 2022-23. The number had almost quadrupled compared to that in 2018-19, when 80 employees received that amount. However, the crime rate per 1,000 people in London had gone up in that period. Could the money instead have been spent more efficiently on simply recruiting more old-fashioned bobbies on the beat? There are more savings to be made. In January, the Conservatives in City Hall put forward an amendment to the GLA budget that would see £22.4 million from the MOPAC fund being reallocated to the Metropolitan Police. Alas, it did not pass. Compared to the rest of England and Wales, the Met already 'receives the most funding per head of population' according to the Home Office. In 2024-25, it received up to £3.5 billion, which was an increase of up to £119 million on the previous year. However, early this year, the Met's Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley warned that his police force needed an extra £140 million 'to address the racism, misogyny and homophobia identified by the Casey Review '. It would appear that the nearly £3.7 million the Met spent on 'staff (and the number and cost of those staff) and non-staff initiatives for Diversity, Equality and Inclusion' between April 2024 to Feb 2025 had fallen short of delivering the intended results. In the light of these revelations, Waste Watch readers might be wondering if instead of demanding more money, the Mayor might have better luck keeping the capital safe by carrying out an audit of his priorities. I have every confidence that the Mayor would take this advice in the spirit in which it is meant, being the humble man he is. After all, he did graciously forgive the King for taking so long to dub him a knight.

Mum of Charlene Downes welcomes grooming inquiry plan
Mum of Charlene Downes welcomes grooming inquiry plan

BBC News

time35 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Mum of Charlene Downes welcomes grooming inquiry plan

The mother of a 14-year-old girl believed to have been murdered more than 20 years ago has welcomed the announcement of a national grooming Downes went missing in Blackpool in 2003, but no-one has ever been convicted over her disappearance despite numerous arrests, trials and a £100,000 believe Charlene was one of a number of girls who were sexually exploited in the Lancashire to Sir Kier Starmer's announcement there would be a full, national statutory inquiry, the schoolgirl's mother, Karen Downes, said it was "about time". Charlene disappeared near the town's North Pier on 1 November 2003, but has never been mother told the BBC: "I'm no fan of the prime minister but hopefully some good will come out of it."But all this has been going on for so long."I'd never heard of grooming gangs when Charlene went missing."I was shocked by the scale of it. "Hopefully this inquiry will shed more light on it and more will be done."The search for Charlene has been one of Lancashire Police's longest-running missing person of people have been spoken to by officers and almost 7,000 statements 2008, a man who ran a local takeaway was cleared of Charlene's murder when a retrial collapsed due to a judge's "grave concerns" about the first trial had ended when a jury failed to reach a verdict. Ms Downes has said she is "living in limbo" but was still "optimistic" and hopeful that "we can get justice for Charlene".Lancashire Police have said inquiries into Charlene's disappearance were ongoing and urged anyone with information however "insignificant" to get in touch. The government has been under pressure to launch a full statutory inquiry into grooming gangs for months. At the start of the year, the government dismissed the calls, arguing it had already been examined in a seven-year inquiry led by Professor Alexis instead announced the creation of a number of investigations to be conducted by local authorities. Sir Keir Starmer said he had accepted the recommendations of an audit by Baroness Louise Casey into the data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual Casey has recommended a national inquiry is required, he said. The inquiry will cover England and Wales. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict
Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Government advises against all travel to Israel amid Iran conflict

Britons are being told not to travel to Israel amid the ongoing conflict with Iran. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office updated travel advice on Sunday to advise 'against all travel to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories'. Israel and Iran continued to exchange fire overnight, after Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK was sending more RAF jets to the region amid the increasing hostilities. The FCDO website warns that 'travel insurance could be invalidated' if people travel against the advice, and described the current status as a 'fast-moving situation that poses significant risks'. Earlier on Sunday, Rachel Reeves said that sending more jets to the region 'does not mean' the UK is at war. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store