Kenya government slams deadly unrest as ‘terrorism disguised as dissent'
NAIROBI, June 27 — Kenya's under-fire government on Thursday condemned protests across the country during which at least 16 people were killed and thousands of businesses ruined as 'terrorism disguised as dissent'.
The marches on Wednesday were called to mark the one-year anniversary of anti-tax demonstrations that peaked when a huge crowd stormed parliament and dozens were killed by security forces.
The rallies began peacefully but descended into chaos as young men held running battles with police, lit fires and ripped up pavements to use as projectiles.
'What unfolded yesterday was not a protest. It was terrorism disguised as dissent,' Kipchumba Murkomen, interior cabinet secretary, said in a televised speech.
'We condemn the criminal anarchists who in the name of peaceful demonstrations unleashed a wave of violence, looting, sexual assault and destruction upon our people,' he said, calling events an 'attempted coup'.
The United Nations meanwhile deplored the violence and called for calm and restraint.
'We are deeply concerned by reports of several deaths of protesters and many more injuries — of protesters and police officers — during demonstrations in Kenya on Wednesday,' UN human rights office spokeswoman Elizabeth Throssell said in a statement.
'We are concerned by reports that some protesters had gunshot wounds,' Throssell added. 'Under international human rights law, lethal force by law enforcement officers, such as firearms, should only be used when strictly necessary.'
In Nairobi's business district, the epicentre of the unrest, AFP journalists found entire shopping centres and thousands of businesses destroyed, many still smouldering.
At least two banks had been broken into, while businesses, ranging from supermarkets to small electronics and clothing stores, were reduced to ashes or ransacked by looters.
'When we came we found the whole premise burnt down,' said Raphael Omondi, 36, owner of a print shop, adding that he had lost machines worth US$150,000 (RM634,000).
'There were guys stealing, and after stealing they set the whole premises on fire... If this is what protest is, it is not worth it.'
'They looted everything... I do not know where to start,' said Maureen Chepkemoi, 32, owner of a perfume store.
'To protest is not bad but why are you coming to protest inside my shop? It is wicked,' she added.
Several business owners told AFP that looting had started in the afternoon after the government ordered TV and radio stations to stop broadcasting live images of the protests.
'My everything'
Amnesty International's Kenya director Irungu Houghton said the death toll had risen to 16.
Rights group Vocal Africa, which was documenting the deaths and helping affected families at a Nairobi morgue, said at least four bodies had been brought there so far.
'All of them had signs of gunshots, so we suspect they all died of gunshot wounds,' its head Hussein Khalid told AFP.
'We condemn this excessive use of force,' he said. 'We believe that the police could have handled themselves with restraint.'
'You come out to protest police killings, and they kill even more.'
One of those at the morgue was Winifred Mwangi, whose husband was killed during the demonstrations and who fainted as she tried to speak about the father of her two girls.
'He was my everything,' she said, adding she did not know what she would do without her husband.
A coalition of rights groups earlier said at least 400 people were wounded, with 83 in serious condition in hospital. It recorded protests in 23 counties around Kenya.
Emergency responders reported multiple gunshot wounds and there were unconfirmed local media reports that police had opened fire on protesters, particularly in towns outside the capital.
President William Ruto, who came to power in 2022 promising rapid economic progress, faces deep resentment.
Many are disillusioned by continued economic stagnation, corruption and high taxes, as well as police brutality after a teacher was killed in custody earlier this month. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
UN bids to salvage global development summit after US boycott
MADRID/LONDON (Reuters) -Scores of world leaders will be sweltering in the summer sun of southern Spain next week at a once-a-decade United Nations development financing summit aimed at curbing global poverty, disease and the worst-case threats of climate change. Despite the scorching temperatures, though, a major chill looms over the event - the decision early this month by the United States, traditionally the world's largest aid giver and key finance provider, not to show up. UN countries want to close a $4 trillion-a-year funding gap they now estimate prevents the developing world achieving the organisation's Sustainable Development Goals that range from cutting infant death rates to minimising global warming. Critics say the promises at the heart of the conference - called the "Seville Commitment" - are nowhere near bold enough. The measures, agreed by consensus after a year of tough negotiations, include tripling multilateral lending capacity, debt relief, a push to boost tax-to-GDP ratios to at least 15%, and shifting special IMF money to countries that need it most. The run-up, however, has been marred by the U.S. decision to withdraw over what it said was the crossing of a number of its red lines, including the push to triple development bank lending, change tax rules and the use of the term "gender" in summit wording. The European Union only joined the summit with reservations, particularly over how debt is discussed within the UN. Speaking to reporters this week, U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed described Washington's boycott as "regrettable", especially after its "catastrophic" recent aid cuts that she said had cost lives and livelihoods. Speaking alongside officials from summit host Spain and Zambia, which has helped organise it, she said the final outcome document agreed reflected both "ambition and realism" and that the U.N. would try to re-engage the U.S. afterwards. Remy Rioux, chief executive officer of the French Development Agency, said Washington's withdrawal had not been a total surprise given Donald Trump's views. The hope is that agreements next week will allow bolder action at the UN climate talks in Brazil in November. "We will push for the new framework... (and) its operationalisation from Seville to Belem," he added, referring to the Brazilian city that will host COP30. AID IN DECLINE Other measures to be announced include multilateral lenders automatically giving vulnerable countries the option to insert repayment break clauses into their loans in case of hurricane, drought or flood. Another buzz phrase will be a "Global SDR playbook" - a plan where the wealthiest countries rechannel the IMF's reserve-like Special Draw Rights they hold to the multilateral banks, who then leverage them as capital in order to lend more. Campaigners warn that it will fall far short of what is needed, especially as more than 130 countries now face critically high debt levels and many spend more on repayments than on health or education. Aid and support from rich countries, who themselves have rising debts, is dropping too. In March, the U.S. slashed more than 80% of programmes at its USAID agency following federal budget cuts spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk. Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden have all made cuts in recent years too. The OECD projects a 9–17% drop in net official development assistance (ODA) in 2025, following a 9% decline in 2024. It looks set to hit the poorest countries hardest: bilateral ODA to least developed countries and sub-Saharan Africa may fall by 13-25% and 16-28% respectively, the OECD estimates, and health funding could drop by up to 60% from its 2022 peak. So what would be a good outcome in Seville, especially given the U.S. pull-out? "We should make sure we are not backtracking at this point," said Orville Grey at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, referring to funding commitments. "We should at least remain stable." (Reporting by David Latona in Madrid and Marc Jones in London, additional reporting by Simon Jessop in London; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
UN Charter is not a-la-carte menu: Guterres
NEW YORK: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Thursday called out the selective application of the UN Charter, saying it is not an a-la-carte menu. "Today, we see assaults on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter like never before: the threat or use of force against sovereign nations; the violation of international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law; the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure; the weaponisation of food and water; the erosion of human rights," he told a UN General Assembly event to mark the 80th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter, reported Xinhua. "On and on, we see an all-too-familiar pattern: follow when the charter suits, ignore when it does not. "The Charter of the United Nations is not optional. It is not an a-la-carte menu. "It is the bedrock of international relations. We cannot and must not normalise violations of its most basic principles." The UN Charter is a declaration of hope – and the foundation of international cooperation for a better world," said Guterres. "The charter has given us the tools to change destinies, save lives, and deliver hope to the most desperate corners of the world. "And we can draw a direct line from the creation of the United Nations and the prevention of a third world war." Upholding the purposes and principles of the UN Charter is a never-ending mission, said Guterres, stressing the need more than ever to respect and re-commit to international law, in words and deeds. "On this anniversary, I urge all member states to live up to the spirit and letter of the charter, to the responsibilities it demands, and to the future it summons us to build – for peace, for justice, for progress, for we the peoples," he said. The UN Charter, the foundational treaty of the world body, was adopted on June 25, 1945, at the San Francisco Conference and was signed by delegates the following day. –Bernama-Xinhua
Barnama
5 hours ago
- Barnama
UN Charter is Not A-La-Carte Menu: Guterres
NEW YORK, June 27 (Bernama-Xinhua) -- UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Thursday called out the selective application of the UN Charter, saying it is not an a-la-carte menu. "Today, we see assaults on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter like never before: the threat or use of force against sovereign nations; the violation of international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law; the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure; the weaponisation of food and water; the erosion of human rights," he told a UN General Assembly event to mark the 80th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter, reported Xinhua. "On and on, we see an all-too-familiar pattern: follow when the charter suits, ignore when it does not," he said. "The Charter of the United Nations is not optional. It is not an a-la-carte menu. It is the bedrock of international relations. We cannot and must not normalise violations of its most basic principles."
