Plan to require carbon monoxide alarms in child care facilities in Pa. clears House panel
The exterior of the Pennsylvania state Capitol. (Photo by Amanda Mustard for the Pennsylvania Capital-Star).
With child care being the theme of Wednesday's meeting, a state House committee unanimously advanced a measure to require the installation of carbon monoxide alarms in child care centers and family child care homes across the commonwealth.
House Bill 156, sponsored by state Rep. Jeanne McNeill (D-Lehigh) would amend the Human Services Code by adding language to mandate them.
'I want to emphasize that this bill is very near and dear to my heart,' McNeill, chair of the House Children & Youth Committee, said on Wednesday.
McNeill has been trying to find traction on the legislation since 2021.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
While calling for support, McNeill referred to a 2022 carbon monoxide leak at an Allentown day care that resulted in more than two dozen children and several adults taken to hospitals.
'I was heartbroken knowing that we could have prevented this with the bill, if it had been passed when I first introduced it,' McNeill said on Wednesday.
A co-sponsorship memo cites statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and writes that 'detecting the effects of carbon monoxide poisoning is more challenging' when it comes to children.
The panel also unanimously backed an amendment adding clarifying language related to the location and installation of the carbon monoxide alarms in the facilities.
State Rep. Kate Klunk, Minority Chair of the House Children & Youth Committee, applauded the moves for giving the providers the specific information needed to follow the protocol.
The proposal is also backed by Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children, the Pennsylvania Association for the Education of Young Children, Trying Together and First Up, while the Pennsylvania Council of Children, Youth and Family Services were neutral on the legislation.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Muscle Fitness Linked to Bone Health in Youths With T1D
Higher muscular fitness, measured through handgrip strength and muscle power, was strongly associated with higher bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density across multiple skeletal regions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODOLOGY: Young patients with T1D exhibit compromised bone strength, demonstrated by reduced areal bone mineral density and bone mineral content, leading to an elevated lifetime risk for fractures. Researchers in Spain conducted a longitudinal cohort study to examine the association between muscular fitness and bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density outcomes in children and adolescents with T1D. They included 83 participants (mean age, 13.7 years; 55% boys; mean diabetes duration, 5.8 years) who had been diagnosed with T1D for more than 6 months; participants were followed up for 2 years, with evaluations conducted annually. Muscular fitness parameters assessed were handgrip strength, one-repetition maximum strength, and muscle power, measured using a digital dynamometer and other methods. Outcomes of interest were bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density, assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans across multiple body regions (total body less head, arms, legs, pelvis, and spine). TAKEAWAY: Significant positive longitudinal associations were observed between muscular fitness parameters and bone mineral content for the total body less head (beta coefficient, 16.713, 19.535, and 28.179 for handgrip strength, repetition maximum strength, and muscle power, respectively; P <.05 for all); the associations persisted for other regions of the body as well. <.05 for all); the associations persisted for other regions of the body as well. Significant associations were also found between muscular fitness parameters and areal bone mineral density for all body regions. When standardised reference data from the general population were used, youths who had higher z scores of handgrip strength showed higher z scores of bone mineral content (beta coefficient, 0.194; 95% CI, 0.088-0.300) and areal bone mineral density (beta coefficient, 0.350; 95% CI, 0.210-0.490) in the total body less head region. IN PRACTICE: "The findings support current clinical guidelines recommending regular monitoring of bone health in youth with type 1 diabetes via DXA [dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry]. They also reinforce existing recommendations advocating at least three days per week of muscle-strengthening activities, as a critical component of care for this population," the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Jacinto Muñoz-Pardeza, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain. It was published online on June 05, 2025, in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism . LIMITATIONS: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were used to monitor bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density, which limited the measurement of geometric or microarchitectural properties. The analysis was limited to whole-body scans and excluded the hip and lumbar spine regions. Lean mass was not included as a covariate because of multicollinearity with BMI. Moreover, the analyses did not account for participants' fracture histories, which may have confounded the associations. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III - ERDF. One author was granted fellowship from the funding institute of this study. Other authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 things to know about RI's new $14 billion state budget plan
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — R.I. House leaders unveiled their draft state budget bill on Tuesday night, releasing a plan that spends about $119 million more than Gov. Dan McKee had proposed back in January. The $14.3 billion budget bill makes major changes to the tax-and-spending plan McKee had put forward. Here are five key takeaways on the plan, which will be debated by the full House next Tuesday. R.I. House Speaker Joe Shekarchi said Tuesday that the primary care crisis was a major focus for lawmakers as they drafted the budget, leading to significant increases in spending. Over $40 million would go to primary care in an effort to shore up more doctors under the budget bill, while $38 million would go to hospitals. Those sums include federal matching dollars. The Hospital Association of Rhode Island (HARI) said in a statement it was 'grateful' for the investments, but warned the state's health care crisis 'cannot be solved in a single fiscal year.' 'HARI remains committed to working with the General Assembly and Governor McKee to create long-term solutions that protect patient access to care, support our health care workers, and ensure long-term financial sustainability for providers and hospitals,' the association said. 'Without clear commitments in these areas, hospitals remain at risk.' The budget also allocated $12 million to nursing homes, once federal matching funds are added to the totals. That money is part of a deal to amend the Nursing Home Safe Staffing and Quality Care Act, a law that was enacted but later halted from implementation amid an industry outcry. That amended law on staffing levels in nursing homes would take effect on Jan. 1. Leaders of SEIU 1199NE, a union that represents many nursing home workers, said the money would cover hiring new staff at facilities that have not met the safe staffing requirement, or raising wages and benefits for workers at facilities that are already in compliance. The proposal unveiled to reporters on Tuesday would raise a variety of taxes, fines, and fees in order to fund health care and education, though House leaders rejected calls for an income tax hike on the wealthy. A review of reimbursement rates paid to primary care providers would move up a year earlier than McKee proposed in his original budget bill, from 2027 to 2026. Lawmakers also plan to generate $30 million annually by adding a new fee on health insurance plans, at an estimated $4 a month per insured person, to fund primary care and other programs. Lawmakers said they want to make raise fines at the R.I. Traffic Tribunal for the first time since 2008. Most fines will rise from $85 to $100. Also of note to drivers: Registration surcharges for licenses and some vehicle registrations would rise from $30 to $40 Electric vehicles would now be charged an annual $200 registration fee Plug-in hybrids would be subject to a $100 registration fee Regular hybrids would be subject to a $50 registration fee Lawmakers also want to implement a statewide property tax on non-owner-occupied homes valued above $1 million. That means that part-time residents, like singer Taylor Swift, would pay more property taxes in the coming year. (Swift owns a home in Westerly.) The budget includes $10 million in expected revenue once the R.I. Department of Transportation restarts the state's truck toll program, which was paused amid litigation but got the green light from a court late last year. 'We're still waiting to hear from DOT regarding the likely target date to reinstate the tolls,' Shekarchi said on Tuesday night. The revised budget calls for a 2-cent gas tax increase that lawmakers said would generate nearly $9 million to help the RIPTA to close its funding gap. The agency would also get an additional $6 million from its share of Highway Maintenance Account funding, bringing its funding infusion to almost $15 million. The funding comes with conditions. RIPTA is required to maintain the RIde Anywhere program for passengers with disabilities, and also to complete an efficiency study examining cost savings and fare hikes. RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand said in a statement on Wednesday that the last time the agency saw a permanent change to its funding structure was over 10 years ago. 'The agency has long needed a consistent funding stream to allow us to better support getting Rhode Islanders to work, school and health care,' Durand said. 'This is a needed improvement, which we are thankful for.' At Tuesday's budget briefing, lawmakers revealed that the R.I. Department of Education had notified them just hours earlier that the department needed nearly $2 million to address a tentative legal settlement. RIDE spokesperson Victor Morente told 12 News that settlement of the civil suit, which dates back to 2014, still needs approval from the Council on Elementary and Secondary Education. Two categories of students with disabilities — those over 21 but under 22 as of Feb. 10, 2012, and those who turned 21 before July 1, 2019 — would be eligible for a share of the money if they did not receive a regular high school diploma and lost access to their legally required public education, according to Morente. Lawmakers dedicated $1.86 million in the budget to repay those students and cover related administrative costs and attorneys fees. The governor was not ready to go into detail about how he felt regarding the revised budget when reporters asked him about it at an unrelated event on Wednesday morning. 'I made sure the budget I put in that didn't have any real broad-based tax increases,' McKee said. 'We'll have to review everything to determine whether the budget that is being proposed, or being presented by the General Assembly, actually fits with our goals.' McKee also said, 'We certainly have had a challenge in this budget session — not only our office, but also the General Assembly. Let me review it and then I'll be able to kind of make comments on it.' The budget bill heads to the full House for a debate and vote next Tuesday, where additional amendments could be made that alter the final policies and price tag. Once the budget passes the House it will head to the Senate, which in most years makes no further changes before sending it on to the governor for his signature. The new fiscal year begins July 1. IN-DEPTH: Taxes, fees going up in $14.3B RI budget as federal relief wanes Alexandra Leslie (aleslie@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter covering Providence and more for 12 News. Connect with her on Twitter and on Facebook. Ted Nesi contributed to this report. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
