Utah Capitol paychecks: Why top government staffers make more than big state counterparts
The top government employees at the Utah Capitol earn more than their counterparts in some of the country's most populous states, according to publicly available salary information.
The chiefs of staff for the Utah Governor's Office, Utah Senate and Utah House all made over $300,000 in 2024, with each position receiving a 40% raise over the previous two or three years, according to data that is accessible through the Utah state auditor's Transparent Utah website.
Legislative leadership said the salaries and raises are justified because Utah's part-time Legislature and its relatively small number of legislative staff require the people in full-time positions to cover a variety of responsibilities, making the jobs demanding and difficult to fill in the state's tight labor market.
Jon Pierpont, who Gov. Spencer Cox brought on as chief of staff in 2021, received a salary of nearly $338,000 in 2024, not including benefits, which add nearly $123,600 to last year's total.
Cox earned just over $182,200 that same year, with an additional $62,800 in benefits. It is not unusual for a governor's chief of staff to make more than a governor. This was the case in most of the states reviewed by the Deseret News.
Similar chief-of-staff positions for governors in other states with easily accessible government employee data all made less:
Utah: $337,986 (2024)
Texas: $335,710 (2025)
Connecticut: $240,710 (2025)
Indiana: $220,000 (2024)
New York: $214,322 (2023)
Ohio: $212,991 (2024)
Florida: $205,486 (2025)
Idaho: $189,509 (2025)*
Massachusetts: $185,285 (2024)
*Estimate based on hourly rate.
Of these states, Utah has one of the smallest populations, at 3.5 million, compared to 31.3 million in Texas, 23.4 million in Florida, 19.9 million in New York, 11.9 million in Ohio, 7.1 million in Massachusetts, 6.9 million in Indiana, 3.7 million in Connecticut and 2 million in Idaho.
'The context matters: He not only leads the Governor's Office as Chief of Staff, but also serves as Chief Operating Officer over 20 state agencies and 22,000 employees — overseeing a budget and workforce larger than those managed by most tech CEOs,' said Rob Carroll, senior adviser for communications to Cox, in a statement.
Utah state executive offices are each headed by a director, a commissioner or board members who report to Pierpont. Most of these leaders belong to Cox's Cabinet and earn between $200,000-250,000 a year.
Before joining the Governor's Office, Pierpont, who attended the University of Utah, worked as the executive director of Utah's Department of Workforce Services for eight years under former Gov. Gary Herbert.
Pierpont's annual salary doubled during his first year as chief of staff from $120,574 in 2021 to $242,572 in 2022, before increasing by $50,000 in 2023 and $40,000 in 2024, constituting a nearly 40% raise over those two years.
The chiefs of staff in Utah's state House and Senate have also seen regular salary increases. While the Legislature appropriates funding for government agencies, each office determines employee salaries. The Senate president and House speaker determine the salary of their respective chief of staff.
Senate chief of staff Mark Thomas' salary has increased from just under $148,000 in 2019 to more than $314,200 in 2024, including a 20.5% raise from 2023 to 2024. These totals do not include benefits which made up another $117,300 in 2024.
Here's how that salary compares to similar positions in other states:
Texas: $335,000 (2024)
Utah: $314,226 (2024)
Indiana: $235,242 (2024)
Connecticut: $226,425 (2025)
Florida: $213,216 (2025)
Ohio: $211,312 (2024)
Massachusetts: $187,537 (2024)
New York: $175,994 (2023)
Idaho: $101,234 (2025)*
*Estimate based on hourly rate.
Utah's Senate chief of staff oversees all Senate employees and works with legislative leadership to 'manage the day-to-day operations of the Senate' and to coordinate with the House and Governor's Office, according to a statement from the state Senate majority.
Thomas, who studied political science at the University of Utah, came to his Senate position from the Lieutenant Governor's Office, where he served as the state's elections director under then-Lt. Gov. Cox.
Likewise, over the past four years, House chief of staff Abby Osborne's salary has increased from around $183,800 in 2020 to nearly $315,200 in 2024, with a 15% raise from the previous year. This does not include the $104,800 she also received in benefits.
Here's how that salary compares to similar positions in other states:
Utah: $315,194 (2024)
Texas: $250,000 (2025)
Connecticut: $219,115 (2025)
Florida: $205,008 (2025)
Ohio: $193,059 (2024)
New York: $184,886 (2023)
Indiana: $183,534 (2024)
Massachusetts: $174,983 (2024)
Idaho: $103,896 (2025)*
*Estimate based on hourly rate.
Osborne, who studied business management at Montana Technological University, previously worked as the senior vice president of public policy and government relations for the Salt Lake Chamber.
While it comes out near the top in terms of chief of staff salaries, Utah has a shorter legislative session than any of the other states.
In 2025, Utah's first-in-the-nation session was 45 days long. Meanwhile, Florida's will be 60 days, Idaho's will be 95 days, Indiana's will be 112, Texas' will be 140, Connecticut's will be 148 days and Ohio's, Massachusetts' and New York's are year-round.
As a part-time citizen legislature, Utah employs fewer full-time staff than most states, potentially putting more responsibility on the chiefs of staff to handle a greater variety of jobs and to manage some of the workload of the Senate president and House speaker during the interim.
Here are the nine states considered above, ranked by the number of full-time legislative staff in 2021, with the number of part-time employees hired during the session in parenthesis:
New York: 2,850 (88)
Texas: 1,619 (299)
Florida: 1,448 (103)
Massachusetts: 791 (0)
Ohio: 436 (0)
Connecticut: 427 (70)
Indiana: 270 (38)
Utah: 165 (74)
Idaho: 89 (124)
For fiscal year 2021, Utah spent less on legislative branch expenditures than 41 other states, ranking fifth in the country when comparing legislative costs to Utah's overall budget, according to a report from the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Since 2004, Utah's population has increased by 45% but the number of state employees has increased by just 7%, according to the Governor's Office.
A joint statement from Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, and House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said that as one of the fastest-growing and best-run states in the nation, Utah requires 'the hard work, expertise and dedication of highly qualified public servants.'
'Staff who manage operations, advise decision-makers and oversee a wide range of urgent, sensitive and complex issues are indispensable,' the statement said. 'Utah's part-time legislature is backed by a full-time staff, creating an efficient structure that enables lawmakers to concentrate on serving the public while relying on a dedicated team to provide ongoing support. This requires long hours and high levels of dedication. That's why it's not just important but essential to have the right people in key positions.'
Utah's citizen Legislature pays part-time lawmakers $293.55 per day for all authorized legislative days, for a total of $13,200 delivered as a lump sum payment before the beginning of the session, according to a 2024 report.
Lawmakers may receive reimbursements for travel, meals and lodging and are also entitled to retirement benefits and a health care insurance package. Legislative leadership also receive a bonus of $3,000-5,000 a session depending on their position, with the average legislator making nearly $37,200 a session.
Schultz and Adams in their statement said that the compensation appropriated for their top aides is 'comparable with wages for city, county and state level executive employees.'
'We deeply value the contributions of all our state employees, and we believe that investing in top-tier talent is critical to safeguarding Utah's long-term success and ensuring the sustainability of our government,' the statement said.
In the upcoming year, Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall is estimated to make just under $189,300, while her chief of staff, Rachel Otto, will make over $231,000, not including benefits.
Salt Lake County Mayor Jenny Wilson made just over $191,600 in 2024, while her chief of staff, Andrew Roberts, made over $151,400. Meanwhile, Provo City Mayor Michelle Kaufusi made $145,000 and her deputy, Isaac Paxman, made just over $149,300.
Last month, Senate Budget Chairman Jerry Stevenson, R-Layton, said that lawmakers approve higher salaries for their staff 'to keep everyone up into what we call 'market.''
Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City, defended the salaries Utah pays. Top legislative aides are 'very unique positions,' she said.
Adams said it comes down to supply and demand. It is hard to hire qualified attorneys in Utah's tight labor market, Adams said, suggesting that salary surveys had showed a need for raises.
'We've either got to pay our people competitively or we're not going to have people. And that's probably the bottom line,' Adams said.
In several analyses, Utah ranks around the middle of the pack in terms of cost of living, with Forbes naming it the 20th most expensive place to live in the country, U.S News & World Report naming it No. 25 and World Population Review putting it at No. 17.
On housing affordability, however, Utah ranks among the very worst. World Population Review places the state sixth highest on a scale of median home value, and ATTOM data puts it at No. 7, with a median home price of over $550,000.
Utah is tied in seventh place for lowest unemployment rate in the country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iowa Republican Jim Carlin announces primary campaign against Joni Ernst for US Senate
Iowa Republican Jim Carlin is launching a primary campaign against incumbent Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, saying the two-term senator has failed to deliver on her famous "make 'em squeal" mantra. 'Joni Ernst said she would go to D.C. and make them squeal,' Carlin said in a statement, referring to a viral campaign ad that helped propel Ernst to her first term in 2014. 'After a decade, it's clear it was a clever campaign commercial, not conviction. Rather than making them squeal, Joni has joined The Swamp." Carlin is a former state senator and trial lawyer who served in the Iowa Legislature from 2017 to 2022. He is the founder of the Iowa Liberty Network, a group focused on "maintaining the liberties endowed by our Creator through getting authentic, constitutional conservatives elected to the state legislature and other public offices," according to its website. Carlin previously mounted a primary campaign against Iowa's other Republican U.S. senator, Chuck Grassley, in 2022. He positioned himself to the right of Grassley, arguing he was more conservative on issues such as immigration and the Second Amendment, and he criticized Grassley for voting to certify the 2020 election in Democrat Joe Biden's favor without pushing to investigate unsubstantiated allegations of fraud. Grassley defeated him 73.5% to 26.5%. "Senator Ernst has a proven record of conservative leadership — cutting waste, securing the border, and making Washington squeal to keep Iowans' hard-earned money in their own pockets," Ernst's campaign manager Bryan Kraber said in a statement. "And she delivers for our families, farmers and veterans. Iowans already saw through Carlin's last failed campaign, and they'll reject his desperate attempt at relevance again in 2026.' Carlin said in a news release that Ernst pledged to serve just two terms in the U.S. Senate when she first ran in 2014, even though she is now seeking a third term. And he said she angered "America First conservatives" with her reluctance to support Republican President Donald Trump's pick to lead the U.S. Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth. Ernst ignited a firestorm among Republicans by withholding her support for Hegseth initially, although she ultimately voted to confirm him. Carlin also pointed to Ernst's 2022 vote for the Respect for Marriage Act, which garnered intense pushback from some Iowa Republicans. At least 17 county parties voted to condemn or censure Ernst over the vote. 'Iowans deserve a voice in Washington, D.C., who actually listens to them and represents them — not big donors and special interests,' he said. 'More than that, Iowans deserve someone who genuinely cares about them and will work to make their lives better. There are enough self-serving establishment politicians in Washington. President Donald J. Trump needs America First allies, not adversaries.' Ernst has not formally announced her reelection effort, but she has hired a campaign manager and scheduled her annual Roast and Ride fundraiser for the fall. One other Republican challenger, Joshua Smith, has announced a campaign against Ernst for the GOP nomination. And two Democrats have formally entered the race: Knoxville Chamber of Commerce director Nathan Sage and State Rep. J.D. Scholten of Sioux City. State Sen. Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, and state Rep. Josh Turek, D-Council Bluffs, have also previously said they are considering running. Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@ or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Joni Ernst gets primary challenge from Iowa Republican Jim Carlin
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Highland approves golf carts on 25 mph city roads
HIGHLAND, Utah (ABC4) — Golf carts are now conditionally allowed on Highland streets after the city council voted on an ordinance Tuesday. Four out of five councilmembers voted in favor of allowing golf carts on 25 mph roads in Highland, with Councilmember Scott Smith objecting due to safety concerns. The ordinance passed with a few restrictions, namely that golf carts are only allowed on city roads with speed limits of 25 mph and under, drivers must be at least 18 years of age, and no driving after dark. Utah House Majority leader resigns to take new role in Governor's Office The council also added penalties for cart owners who allow minors to drive a golf cart on city roads. Penalties would also be given to those who drive under the influence. The council's debate was between personal liberty and safety, with concerns centered around children on laps and speeding vehicles on the same roads as carts. 'The problem is we have neighborhood after neighborhood come in here complain about speeding, so no one follows the 25 mph,' Smith said. 'I just think we've got to be really careful because they're going to be competing at a lower rate with cars that are going 25 plus … So what street is really safe is my question.' Councilmembers in favor of the ordinance argued that this is 'a desire of our residents,' with many community members expressing interest in driving golf carts to visit neighbors or go to church and parks. WATCH: Bodycam footage released after over 150 dogs rescued from Ogden home 'Why are we restricting things when we don't have to restrict them?' Councilmember Ron Campbell said in his argument for the ordinance. 'We all have a right to risk, we all have a right for liberty, and golf carts are a part of the community that has come forward and said we would like this.' Smith, who is a physician, said he is 'very concerned' about safety issues and isn't against liberty just because he thinks this is an 'act of foolishness.' Ultimately, Smith said he would support what the majority votes for. The council decided to pass the ordinance and look at it after some time to see if changes needed to be made to the regulations. Highland is now the sixth Utah community to allow golf carts on city roads. Baby fox rescued after falling into irrigation drain in Farmington Keeping hydration delicious and effective Utah couple flown to hospital after semi-truck crashes through Wellington home CBO: House GOP plan exceeds $880B savings target Trump signs executive order aimed at slashing prescription drug costs Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session
Jun. 6—GRAND FORKS — Through an hour-long conversation looking back on the 2025 legislative session, three Grand Forks state lawmakers found moments of agreement and professed similar opinions on issues more than they disagreed. Rep. Nels Christianson, Rep. Erik Murphy and Rep. Zac Ista, all from Grand Forks, went through some of the topics from the session with different mindsets but familiar answers. For example, on the matter of property tax and Gov. Kelly Armstrong's bill — which expanded the primary tax credit to a maximum $1,600 and capped local-level tax increases to no more than 3% annually — Christianson said they found some common ground. Property tax was one of the several issues discussed during the legislative wrap-up, held at the Grand Forks County office building on Thursday, June 5. All 18 members of districts 17, 18, 19, 20, 42 and 43 were invited, but Ista, Murphy and Christianson were the only ones in attendance. Joel Heitkamp, host of KFGO News and Views and a former state senator, served as moderator. Some issues involved public funding to private schools, Medicaid, the North Dakota Republican Party and what bills the legislators worked on. Property tax was among the most newsworthy issues during the session. Armstrong discussed it prior to his November election and his bill, HB 1176, was not passed until May 2, near the end of the session. "Did we deliver relief? Yes," Christianson said. "Reform? Maybe not so much." Murphy said property taxes are typically something outside of the Legislature's lane, but that he begrudgingly supported Armstrong's property tax bill. "Property tax is part of the reality of living in a nation such as ours," he said. "Property tax, to me, is a local issue." Ista, the only Democrat among the three, said there will be a trade-off. Homeowners will get some tax relief, but political subdivisions will have to figure out how to continue to pay for things. "Now the burden is going to fall on our local, county, city, school districts to see how to live within this new reality. I think it's going to be a challenge going forward for the state and locals to balance it," he said. One issue on which all three agreed was the matter of banning books. Each legislator was against it, though they had different thoughts on the matter. Ista said he has voted against every book censorship bill, and will continue to do so every chance he gets. "The issues in our state that affect our kids are not what books are displayed where in our libraries," he said. "I love taking my kids to Grand Forks Public Library and watch them go down that big pink slide, and I've never once worried about what book they might stumble into." Christianson said that, under no circumstances, should books be banned. Instead, he said, they should be placed in the appropriate area, and that he wants his daughters to be able to go around the children's section of the library and look at any books they would like in that section. "I absolutely do not support taking anything out of the ability for people to check out from the library," he said. "I just want to make sure that ... parents have a chance to be in the loop, just that parents can understand what their children are reading, especially in the younger ages." Murphy said there are better things to do and think about in North Dakota than book bans, and he mentioned Senate Bill 2307, which would have required libraries to make material considered sexually explicit unavailable to minors, and could penalize failure to comply. One issue he took with the bill was the difference between what was said about it versus what it would really do, he said. "What it really did is, opened up every library in the state, whether it's UND's library, it opened up the (North Dakota Museum of Art)," he said. "If there's a nude in there, that could be considered pornography, therefore we need to take that picture down." Two resolutions that failed during the session — House Concurrent Resolution 3013, which requested the U.S. Supreme Court overturn gay marriage, and House Concurrent Resolution 3020, declaring that "Christ is King" of North Dakota — drew disagreement between Christianson, who voted "yes" on both, and the other two legislators, who voted against them. Christianson's thought on HCR 3013 was that issues such as marriage need to be defined at the state level, not through a court decision, referencing Obergefell vs. Hodges, the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding same-sex marriages. Ista said that it was probably the darkest day of the session for him when the resolution came to the floor, and that he was caught "flat-footed" by it. He said he had thought everyone had moved beyond the issue of marriage equality. Murphy said it's not up to him to decide who any individual should love. He also said that during this recent school year, he knew of students who were transgender and transitioning. The resolution sends the wrong message to North Dakota residents and creates a division in the state, he said. As for HCR 3020, Murphy simply said "absolutely not" when Heitkamp asked if he thought North Dakota should be in the business of declaring that Christ is king. Ista said that the faith leaders in his life respected a foundational concept of no official religions in America, and that, while he respects the religion of his colleagues, the state should be accommodating to all religions and not place one above the others. Christianson said the resolution would have no effect on state policies, claiming that he voted for what he believes is the truth. "It was simply a statement, and that's a statement that I will make every day, that Christ is king," he said.
