Mum's sentence over toddler death could increase
A mother who wheeled her daughter's body around in a pram could have her sentence for allowing the toddler's death increased at the Court of Appeal for being "unduly lenient".
Chelsea Gleason-Mitchell, 24, was jailed for 10 years in December after pleading guilty to child cruelty and causing or allowing the death of her two-year-old daughter, Isabella Wheildon, at the hands of her partner, Scott Jeff.
The pair, from Biggleswade, Bedfordshire, wheeled Isabella's body around in a pushchair before leaving her in a bathroom at a hostel for the homeless in Ipswich in June 2023.
At her sentencing, a judge described Gleason-Mitchell as a "weak and spineless person and pathetically desperate".
But her sentence could now be increased after solicitor general Lucy Rigby agreed to refer the case to the Court of Appeal following a request from shadow safeguarding minister Alicia Kearns.
In a letter to Ms Kearns, Ms Rigby said she was "shocked and deeply saddened" by the "horrific crime", and had decided there were "sufficient legal grounds to conclude that the sentence would likely be increased by the Court of Appeal".
Ms Kearns said: "Chelsea Gleason-Mitchell failed to protect her child from Scott Jeff, who horrifically abused and brutally murdered her child.
"No punishment will ever make up for their heinous actions, let alone their depraved behaviour in the days following her murder visiting the pub and pushing her lifeless body around the shops.
"I thank the solicitor general for accepting my request to refer Chelsea Gleason-Mitchell's paltry sentence to the Court of Appeal as unduly lenient.
"Isabella Wheildon did not deserve the awful abuse that she suffered: 36 days of beatings and being given drugs. Her killers deserve to never see the light of day again.
"Any spineless individual who stands by as a child is murdered should spend decades behind bars. I hope the Court of Appeal will agree and finally give Isabella the justice she deserves."
Jeff, also 24, was convicted of Isabella's murder and handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 26 years for what the judge described as a "cruel campaign of violence and abuse which ended in her death".
Ms Kearns had also asked for Jeff's sentence to be reviewed, but the Solicitor General declined to refer his case to the Court of Appeal, saying it did not meet the "very high" threshold for a review.
The Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme allows any member of the public to ask the Attorney General's Office to review a sentence they believe is too lenient.
If the law officers - the attorney general and solicitor general - agree the sentence appears unduly lenient, they can ask the Court of Appeal to review the sentence.
It is then up to the Court of Appeal to decide whether to hear the case and, if it does, whether the sentence should be increased.
If you have been affected by this story or would like support, you can find organisations which offer help and information at the BBC Action Line.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
How a couple planned to bury murdered toddler's body and flee
Man jailed for life for murdering partner's child
Man guilty of murdering toddler found in bathroom
Mother accused of killing daughter weeps at trial
Couple concealed murdered toddler in pushchair to go shopping
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Sir William Davis, judge whose unflappable wisdom proved invaluable at the Sentencing Council
Sir William Davis, who has died aged 70, was one of the outstanding criminal judges of his generation and one of very few to progress from the circuit bench to the Court of Appeal. As Recorder of Birmingham, Bill Davis had earlier been trusted with some of the most heavyweight cases in the country, including those arising from the serious rioting in the city in 2011, described by Davis as a 'wave of lawlessness' which required the imposition of 'severe penalties' to serve as both punishment and deterrent. Besides being well over six feet tall, Davis was remarkable for his unruffled authority in court, his entirely justified confidence in his judgment and decision-making and his sure-footed approach to the law. A superb and extraordinarily efficient judge, Davis never allowed his cases to overrun, maintaining complete control and a relentless focus on the relevant – apart from the occasional dry aside. Cases listed in front of him always took less than the time estimate, something only a few of the very best judges achieve – and he achieved it every time without giving the feeling that the cases were rushed. He was an obvious choice for the High Court bench in 2014, and seven years later he was promoted to the Court of Appeal. There he delivered several judgments of exceptional quality, particularly in sentencing matters, and was greatly valued by his fellow appeal judges as a source of wisdom, experience, good sense and humour – one of them recalled him as 'very, very funny'. Having been a judicial member of the Sentencing Council from 2012 to 2015, he became chairman in 2022. His customary calmness and measured determination was evident earlier this year during the council's much publicised dispute with the government about the proposed inclusion of ethnic, cultural and faith minority groups as a specific cohort in the list of those for whom a pre-sentence report would normally be deemed necessary. The issue arose after the widely reported remarks in the House of Commons by the shadow Lord Chancellor Robert Jenrick. He described the council's updated guidelines as biased against 'straight white men', and amounting to a 'double standard' and a 'two-tier approach to sentencing'. Other commentators subsequently suggested that the guidelines would result in a 'get-out-of-jail-free card' for certain offenders. Perhaps pressured by all this, the Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood asked Lord Justice Davis to remove the entire list of cohorts – which also included sole carers of young children and pregnant offenders – from the new sentencing guidelines so as to avoid 'impermissible differential treatment'. Davis declined to do this, explaining in a five-page letter to the Lord Chancellor that the updated guidance – designed to address the recognised disparity in sentencing outcomes for ethnic minorities – had followed extensive consultation; the pre-sentence report was designed, he said, to inform the judge or magistrate as to the 'nature and causes of the offender's behaviour' and it would not 'determine the sentence'. Davis added that 'if we had been satisfied that courts currently requested a pre-sentence report wherever and whenever one was necessary, we may not have included a list of cohorts.' Davis stood his ground in subsequent exchanges, telling Shabana Mahmood that sentencing guidance must not be 'dictated' to judges by ministers and adding that the Sentencing Council preserved the 'critical' position of the independent judiciary in relation to sentencing. 'In criminal proceedings where the offender is the subject of prosecution by the state,' he said, 'the state should not determine the sentence imposed by an individual offender. If sentencing guidelines of whatever kind were to be dictated in any way by ministers of the Crown, this principle would be breached.' It was only when the Lord Chancellor persisted with a threat to bring in emergency legislation to overrule the council's updated guidelines that Davis agreed to suspend the implementation of the changes, albeit adding that the council still deemed the new guidance 'necessary and appropriate'. William Easthope Davis was born on June 20 1954. He grew up initially at Bridlington in the East Riding of Yorkshire and later Leicester, where his father, Professor Ralph Davis, taught economic history at the university. His mother Dorothy, née Easthope, was a Leicestershire county councillor. From Wyggeston Boys' School (the alma mater of Sir David Attenborough) he went aged 17 to Queen Mary College, London, to read law, graduating in 1974. Called to the Bar by Inner Temple in 1975, he did his pupillage in London before being taken on as a tenant at 7 Fountain Court (later St Philips Chambers) in Birmingham. As a junior barrister he practised in personal injury and criminal cases on the Midland and Oxford Circuit. From the outset he was enviably unflappable and never lost sleep due to the stresses and strains of a case. He also had a very sharp legal mind, enabling him to quickly identify the main issues in each instance. After taking Silk in 1998 he concentrated on crime, mainly acting for the prosecution but also accepting a few briefs for the defence. As head of chambers from 2004 to 2008, he was noted for his selfless willingness to help colleagues, frequently putting aside whatever he was doing to focus completely on whatever was being asked of him. A Recorder since 1995, he was appointed a Circuit Judge in 2008. The next year he became a Senior Circuit Judge and Resident Judge at Birmingham Crown Court, where he remained until he became a Judge of the High Court, Queen's Bench Division. From 2016 to 2019 he was Presiding Judge of the Northern Circuit, where he was very popular. Bill Davis put his dry wit to good use when creating the scenarios used at the Judicial College, where he was director of training from 2014 to 2019. In his role as a Privy Counsellor he attended the accession council of King Charles III in 2022. Away from the law, Davis was a passionate supporter of Aston Villa FC club and a very amusing after-dinner speaker. At legal gatherings he had an excellent line in ruthlessly funny sketches about colleagues which invariably brought the house down. But he was a far from loud character off stage and tended to keep his views on any given topic to himself unless pressed for them. He greatly enjoyed writing and performing in amateur dramatic sketches. He appeared at theatres in Leamington and Kenilworth, including playing the role of Basil Fawlty, to whom some felt he bore a striking resemblance. His wife Ginny, née Smith, whom he married in 1990, is a playwright and performer, and for three consecutive years Davis took August off to support her shows at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, appearing as an actor in one and serving as stagehand and handing out flyers for the others. He also appeared in a performance at the Old Bailey in Court Number One, playing a judge in a production of Learned Friends, also written by and starring his wife. 'This isn't acting,' he told a journalist. 'I just come in and do what I do on the bench.' Their daughter Rosie, meanwhile, played Pip in The Archers for several years when she was younger, and their son Ralph is a well-regarded professional actor who has appeared in a number of leading roles, including at Stratford and at the Globe. Sir William Davis, born June 20 1954, died June 7 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for 2024 burglary charge starts Monday
The Brief Minnesota Senator Nicole Mitchell's trial for a burglary charge starts Monday morning in Becker County. Mitchell, a DFL lawmaker representing Woodbury, is accused of breaking into her stepmother's home in Detroit Lakes in April of 2024. She said her father had just died, and wanted some of his personal belongings her stepmother wouldn't give her. Mitchell was supposed to go to trial in January, but it got pushed back so she could finish her work with the Minnesota Legislature. BECKER CO., Minn. (FOX 9) - A Minnesota senator accused of breaking into her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home in April 2024 heads to trial on Monday. What we know Nicole Mitchell, a DFL Senator who represents Woodbury, pleaded not guilty to one count of burglary after she was arrested inside her stepmother's Detroit Lakes home back in April 2024. On Feb. 6. 2025, an additional charge for possession of burglary or theft tools was added. Mitchell was originally scheduled for trial in January, but got it pushed back so she could finish out the legislative session. That ended earlier this week in a special session. The trial starts Monday morning at 8:30 a.m. in Becker County, and cameras are being allowed in the courtroom. That means you can see daily clips of the trial on and on FOX 9's YouTube page. Timeline A criminal complaint states Detroit Lakes police responded to a reported burglary at a home around 4:45 a.m. on April 22, 2024. At the scene, police found Mitchell in the home's basement dressed in all black. Officers say they also found a flashlight covered with a black sock on Mitchell. Officers searched for a black backpack that was stuck in a window at the scene and recovered two laptops, a cellphone, a driver's license, Senate identification and miscellaneous Tupperware, according to the complaint. Mitchell reportedly told investigators she was "just trying to get some of my dad's things" and added "clearly, I'm not good at this." The complaint states that Mitchell explained to police that her father had just died, and she wanted sentimental items her stepmother refused to give to her. Mitchell said those include her father's ashes, pictures, clothes and other sentimental items. What they're saying In May of 2024, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and democratic leaders called for Mitchell to resign after she was charged with the burglary. She appeared before the Senate's Ethical Conduct Subcommittee in May of 2024 as members considered whether the lawmaker adhered to the highest standards of ethical conduct required of a state senator. However, she refused to answer questions and invoked her 5th Amendment rights. While Democrats have previously argued to allow for due process before taking action, the Minnesota DFL Chairman Ken Martin released a statement Thursday morning calling for her resignation. "The Minnesota DFL believes that all elected officials should be held accountable, including members of our own party. While Sen. Mitchell is entitled to her day in court, her continued refusal to take responsibility for her actions is beneath her office and has become a distraction for her district and the Legislature. Now that her constituents have had full representation through the end of the legislative session, it is time for her to resign to focus on the personal and legal challenges she faces," said Martin.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
AG: Owner of Pennsylvania home care agency gets a month in prison for Medicaid fraud scheme
BERKS COUNTY, Pa. (WHTM) — The owner of a Pennsylvania home care agency will spend a month in prison for a Medicaid fraud scheme, Attorney General Dave Sunday announced Friday. Gavin Mata, 36, will also be on parole for 22 months and five years of probation after he pled guilty to felony Medicaid fraud and perjury charges, Sunday said. Mata was the owner of A Part of Our Family Home Care Agency, which now has a '404 Error' when you go to its website. Sunday, in a statement, said Mata went through 'great lengths' to carry out the scheme. 'The defendant went to great lengths to perpetrate this fraud scheme, falsifying records and reporting bogus hours for employees without their knowledge,' Attorney General Sunday said. 'Medicaid Fraud takes money and resources away from Pennsylvanians in need of care.' Sunday said false information was submitted in claims between 2020 and 2022 to Medicaid by Mata, such as hours or services that were never performed. Sunday mentioned some patients never signed up for, or got care from, Mata's company. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now When Mata was eventually brought to testify about his payroll records, he lied, Sunday said. Restitution in the amount of $235,778 will also be paid by Mata for collecting reimbursement. The Attorney General's Office investigation included a presentment from the 47th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury. The case was prosecuted by Senior Deputy Attorney General Eric Stryd of the Attorney General's Medicaid Fraud Control Section. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
