
Tired of apartments with no fridges? California bill would require landlords to supply them
Tired of scouring Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace for a decently used refrigerator because your new apartment didn't come with one?
This headache could become a thing of the past with a new bill in the California Legislature that, if approved, would require landlords to provide refrigerators and stoves in their rentals.
The simple answer is landlords don't have to provide a refrigerator.
Existing California law requires any building with a dwelling unit to maintain 'certain characteristics in order to be tenantable,' which includes maintenance of adequate heating and hot water systems.
Even though cooking and storing food might seem like a necessity in order to live in any kind of housing situation, legally the appliances are categorized as amenities.
The number of Californians who have entered new leases without such luxuries is far greater than any other state, according to a Times analysis in 2022.
Research showed that Los Angeles and Orange counties 'offered the fewest number of apartments with refrigerators among nearly two dozen large metropolitan areas nationwide.'
It's the added cost of purchasing the appliance.
The average monthly rent in the city of Los Angeles is $2,347, higher than the national average of $1,995, according to Zillow.
But the highest average rent in the surrounding area is $4,500, in Ladera Heights.
When entering a lease, you're providing the landlord with the first month's rent and a security deposit. If a refrigerator isn't provided, you're looking at spending on either a new appliance or searching online for a used one.
Product analysts say the average price of a new refrigerator is between $600 and $2,300, the basic is between $200 and $600 and the high-end is between $2,300 and $5,000.
If you're on the market for a used refrigerator, the cheapest listing The Times found on Facebook Marketplace is $25 for a two-door Whirlpool. The seller described it as not 'looking so good on the outside but perfect for a garage or even outside.'
When Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D-Hawthorne), whose 61st District covers communities from Inglewood to Marina del Rey, introduced Assembly Bill 628, she realized refrigerators and stoves were legally labeled as amenities. She decided to make it a necessity with the new bill.
The bill, if passed, would add a stove and refrigerator in good working condition and capable of safely generating heat for cooking and storing food, respectively, as a requirement of landlords starting Jan. 1, 2026.
McKinnor said she has regular town halls with her communities and the main topics of concern she's heard from constituents are affording rent, rising grocery prices and everyday bills.
'We know that people are really struggling out there with the high cost of food, gas, household goods, and on top of that, lots of people spend more than half their income on rent,' she said.
She wants renters to have one less payment to think about when entering a new lease.
If the bill is approved, a landlord 'cannot have you in a rental without a refrigerator just like they can't have you in there without hot running water or a heater' starting next year, McKinnor said.
There are some rentals that come with the appliance, but McKinnor wants everyone to have the much-needed item.
Similar to a heater in need of repair or replacement, McKinnor said the landlord will be in charge of fixing or replacing a refrigerator.
In the city of L.A., landlords can increase the rent once every 12 months by the allowable rent increase percentage required by the Rent Stabilization Ordinance.
Rentals that are not subject to the Rent Stabilization Ordinance include:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Here's how to avoid potholes when haggling to purchase a used car
Looming tariffs on new cars are expected to ripple through Canada's car market, even down to your local used car dealership. Tack on the sales tax, licensing fees and other add-ons, and the price of a used car can easily add up. You can purchase a used car from a private seller — this could be your neighbour or someone listing their car on Facebook Marketplace or Kijiji — or a dealership registered with the Ontario Motor Vehicles Industry Council (OMVIC), which regulates motor vehicle sales in the province. 'I strongly recommend people buy from a registered dealer so that OMVIC has their back if something goes sideways,' says Lorraine Sommerfeld, a consumer advocate and automotive journalist. A good place to start is OMVIC's directory, which lists registered dealerships and salespeople. If you go through a dealership, be prepared to wade through a laundry list of fees and charges that can include everything from administration, registration and licensing fees to a fee for wheel locking nuts if they are installed on the vehicle. A frequent road tripper and financial planner points to credit card offers, loyalty programs and The Motor Vehicle Dealers Act requires dealers and salespeople to include all fees in the advertised price of a new or used car that you plan to lease or buy. This is known as 'all-in pricing,' says Maureen Harquail, CEO and registrar of OMVIC. The two exceptions to all-in pricing are sales tax and licensing fees, she adds. All-in pricing on a used car can include the dealer's administration fees for preparing the paperwork of a sale and the set OMVIC transaction fee of $12.50. The price you see in a sales ad can also include pre-installed products and services, such as a tire protection package, rust protection, nitrogen-filled tires, paint protection, theft deterrents, wheel locks and extended warranties. 'If these pre-installed products and services were not included in the advertised price, the consumer can ask the dealer to remove these add-ons from the bill of sale,' says Harquail. This is why it's important to read the bill of sale carefully before you buy your used car. Refinancing your mortgage can include securing a lower rate with a different lender, changing OMVIC requires that all fees and charges in an advertised price be itemized and listed separately on the bill of sale. ' On used cars especially, warranty is a snake pit,' says Sommerfield. But depending on the type of used car you're in the market for, an extended warranty, which offsets repair costs after the car's manufacturer warranty has lapsed, may save you money and trouble later on. As Sommerfield points out, many cars are now equipped with electronic and software components that can malfunction. 'It could be a whole module that's $12,000 to replace.' Sommerfeld says dealerships 'make all their money on all the extra stuff,' so it's important to do your research on what add-ons you actually want and need. For instance, Sommerfield generally doesn't recommend tire or paint protection. Tire protection, she adds, 'doesn't cover you wrecking your wheel cover … and I'd do my own rustproof.' And when negotiating, Sommerfield advises caution. Everything from account numbers and subscriptions to social media instructions and passwords are 'If you're in a situation where you don't feel comfortable and you're getting pushed around, vote with your feet and walk out — there's always another car.' You can also file a complaint or report a tip to OMVIC if you believe your rights were breached at a dealership. 'Stick with registered dealers, ask for referrals from friends you trust and walk out if the pressure is too high.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Hella construction on Sacramento's Hwy. 50 promises little long-term relief
The perpetual roadwork on Sacramento's highways is a never-ending story of surprise detours, dangerous lane splits, metal-smeared K-rails and tragic fatal accidents — all in the futile pursuit of a solution to relieve congestive traffic. A 'solution' that will be obsolete in less than a decade. Caltrans announced this week that the 'Fix50' project will go until at least 2026 and will cost $529 million — a year later than the original completion date of the summer of 2025 and nearly $50 million over the estimated budget of $483 million. For a mere 7-and-a-half miles of road, that's a cost of more than $70 million per mile. The project will add new carpool lanes in each direction from Watt Ave. in Rosemont to the intersection with I-5 downtown; replace crumbling pavement with reinforced concrete; add retaining walls and widen the highway between 39th and 65th street undercrossings; build new sound walls along the south side of the highway from Stockton Blvd. to 65th St.; upgrade and widen several on and off ramps; improve signs, drainage, guardrails and utilities; and widen 12 bridges overall — among numerous other, smaller improvements. But at what cost? We don't mean the more than half a billion dollar price tag — Californians are well-accustomed by now to that level of spending. The bigger issue is that the Fix50 project is notoriously dangerous for drivers, and statistically, will be out-of-date by 2035. So why are we investing more than half a billion dollars when Sacramento could be putting that money toward a project that improves mass transportation? Such forward thinking would not only alleviate traffic, it could save lives and assist Californians in our climate-neutral goals overall. Why do we insist on repairing and widening when we could be innovating? The construction on Hwy. 50 has already resulted in multiple fatalities, and is statistically likely to only cause more before its completion. According to data from the California Highway Patrol, the number of wrecks from March 2021 and December 2021 doubled from that same period in 2020 on westbound Highway 50. Ronald Fitzgerald, a local man, died on Hwy. 50 in 2021 after he crashed his motorcycle into a car stalled on the road's non-existent shoulder, leaving behind a loving wife and family — and all for what? This boondoggle project is funded through multiple sources in the state, with Caltrans subsidizing nearly $90 million of the construction costs under California's Senate Bill 1 — also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. Caltrans has also relied on $52.2 million from Sacramento's Measure A Transportation Sales Tax to support the project, and the State Highway Operation and Protection Program is funding an additional $387 million. But all of the extra money and construction delays are unlikely to relieve Sacramento's notorious congestion issues in the long run. It begs the question: What's the point? UC Davis Professor Susan Handy, who specializes in transportation, explained that adding lanes to a roadway only relieves traffic in the short term. The new lanes actually encourage more drivers to use the road which simply leads to more traffic. 'We don't adequately account for the pain that we all experience during construction,' Handy said about the Fix50 project in 2023. She cited the increase in crashes, deaths and severe congestion as the cost of that hubris: 'The analysis that Caltrans and others are doing overstates the benefit of widening the freeway. And data analysis is also understating the environmental impacts of widening the freeway.' In a state like California, where driving is as second-nature as breathing and many commute on the highway to work, construction projects like 'Fix50' do more harm than good. With thousands of federal workers returning to the office on July 1, piling more cars on the road, the situation will only worsen. Caltrans, hell-bent on highway construction, is a lost cause. It's going to take leadership by a governor and a legislature to start investing in transit that can attract commuters and truly reduce congestion.

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread
The dissolution of the Donald Trump-Elon Musk marriage was enough, for a brief moment, to lift beleaguered California Democrats' spirits. But within 24 hours, the gleeful mood in this heavily Democratic state darkened amid sweeping immigration raids and reports the Trump administration was planning to yank funding from California. The swift reversal was a reminder that, for all the delight Democrats took in a public feud between the president and the world's richest man, a war of words on X is far less consequential than a hostile White House. Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders on Friday quickly returned to a familiar defensive crouch, condemning the White House's reported plan and escalating the standoff by threatening to withhold the money California sends to Washington. 'We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump.' It was unclear on Friday what money the White House might rescind. A spokesperson said no decision had been made. Many Democrats had spent the previous day reveling in the extraordinary break between Trump and his former patron Musk, piling on in a cascade of snarky tweets, triumphant news hits and floor speeches. The joy was especially palpable in California, where Democrats watched Musk transform from a source of pride to a conservative nemesis eager to attack the state that helped make him. The dunking contest seemed to open new political possibilities, as Musk amplified Democrats' case against tariffs and the GOP 'megabill' being debated in Congress — two central features of the president's agenda. But the respite from unforgiving news cycles proved short-lived. And it vindicated warnings from some Democrats that the Trump-Musk feud was distracting from the more serious threats emanating from Washington. For Rep. Dave Min, who is preparing to defend a frontline Orange County seat that could help determine control of the House, Thursday was all about Musk: He excoriated the Tesla executive in a preplanned floor speech, and joined the mockery on X. On Friday, Min was scrambling to confront what he called a 'blatantly lawless' push to claw back funds. 'These cuts appear to be clearly and on their face illegal and motivated by vengeance and political retribution aimed at our state,' Min wrote in a letter to the White House. Rep. Jimmy Gomez went from tweaking Trump with a Taylor Swift meme to sounding the alarm about immigration arrests throughout Los Angeles, a resolutely Democratic county, that followed Trump's vow to target 'sanctuary' jurisdictions that limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal authorities. Union officials said SEIU California President David Huerta was detained and injured during a protest of immigration raids, drawing condemnations from a broad swathe of elected officials (ICE did not respond to a request for comment). Californians were simultaneously rallying in San Francisco against federal plans to rename a naval ship named after the late gay-rights icon Harvey Milk. Against the backdrop of that multifront defensive, the feuding between Trump and Musk became a secondary concern, at best. Newsom passed on a chance to swipe at Musk, with whom he has a long and complicated relationship, telling reporters during an unrelated news conference on Thursday that he hoped people mesmerized by 'what Elon Musk tweeted today and what Trump said tomorrow can focus on what matters' — although Newsom's press office still used a Trump-Musk breakup reference to tease the news conference, Similarly, Rep. Laura Friedman called the Trump-Musk meltdown a distraction from the White House's agenda to remake the federal government. 'They are cutting health care from Americans, they are destroying people's ability to go to the doctor and get health care coverage, they are making life more expensive for everyday people through tariffs,' Friedman said. 'I hope people see through the entertainment value of this — it is funny, but this is harmful to our country in so many ways.' Few were laughing by Friday afternoon. Instead, leading California Democrats were once again girding for battle with an administration that has made a habit of threatening to block money for areas like wildfire recovery, education and law enforcement if California does not change its policies. 'We must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes,' Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said in a BlueSky post.