How To Build Your Own Generative AI Toolkit To Stay Ahead At Work
How To Build Your Own Generative AI Toolkit To Stay Ahead At Work
If you are waiting for your company to adopt AI, you are missing out on a personal opportunity to get ahead in your career. With generative AI you can build your own workflow, automate routine tasks, or create more compelling content. It doesn't take a technical background, but it helps if you have curiosity. The first question you should ask is: what is generative AI and what is a generative toolkit? Generative AI is a fancy term for artificial intelligence that creates new things by learning from existing data and using patterns to generate something original. A generative AI toolkit a collection of tools you can use to create new things like text, images, videos, or audio using AI.
What Should Be In A Generative AI Toolkit To Help You Work Smarter?
I use many tools that help me get things done more efficiently, and I encourage others to do the same. Don't let the sound of the following AI-related terms intimidate you. Once you start using them, they're easier than you might expect. Here are some of the tasks where I've found generative AI most useful, along with the tools that can help you do each one more effectively so you can be more productive and make a stronger impression.
• Brainstorming: Use ChatGPT to generate ideas, outlines, and scripts for any content format.
• Audio Creation: ElevenLabs can replicate your voice to narrate scripts. If you record your own voice or anything else, Adobe Podcast Enhance cleans up the audio and makes it studio-quality.
• Visual Creation: FAL.ai Kling creates video clips quickly and inexpensively. Canva helps you design everything from presentations to videos to graphics. If you have a lot of expertise, you can use Photoshop as well.
• Video Editing: Use Camtasia for editing and Submagic to add b-roll (video clips), captions, and supporting visuals.
These platforms don't require a production team. Many are low-cost subscriptions or pay-per-use, making it easy to experiment and find your best-fit tools.
How Can A Generative AI Toolkit Make You A More Effective Communicator?
If you present ideas to clients, teams, or students, generative AI tools can help you create stronger, more polished content. I use them to work faster and communicate more clearly. Captions, visuals, and sound quality all contribute to how a message is received.
Captions are essential, especially on mobile devices or in quiet settings. Submagic handles that seamlessly and can add visual enhancements to keep viewers engaged.
Using ElevenLabs to adjust tone and pacing also improves how your message lands. These tools allow you to focus on the substance of your message while still producing something visually and audibly appealing.
How Affordable Is It To Build Your Own Generative AI Toolkit?
You don't need to invest thousands. Most of the tools I've mentioned are affordable and flexible. Some charge monthly. Others charge per project. Camtasia and Canva are widely used and offer significant value. Many people underestimate what Canva can do until they explore it.
When I wanted to learn more, I took a short course through ContentCreator.com for under one hundred dollars. I have no affiliation with them (or any of the other tools I mention here), but the course was far more useful than a recent graduate-level university certification I completed from one of the top technology schools. That program cost thousands and didn't include real-world applications or hands-on training.
How Does Curiosity Help You Get The Most From Your AI Toolkit?
Learning how to use AI tools starts with curiosity. You don't need to understand every feature. You just need to be open to trying something new. People often wait until they feel completely prepared. That delay is what slows progress.
I recently attended an event hosted by HRNxt, where we discussed how hard it can be to adopt new technologies. Jessica Hanan, Head of Workforce Enablement at Altruistic, told a story that captured the problem well. When cars were first introduced, some had fake horse heads attached to the front to make passengers feel more comfortable. We're in a similar place now with AI. People need help getting past their initial discomfort.
One simple way to make adoption easier is to divide learning across a team. Assign one person to experiment with ChatGPT for scripting. Another can test ElevenLabs for voiceover. A third can use Adobe Podcast Enhance for audio quality. Someone else can explore FAL.ai for visuals. Make the group goal a final video project. That structure gives everyone a role and makes learning more purposeful.
How Do You Know When Your Generative AI Toolkit Is Working?
You'll know it's working when your process feels smoother. Maybe you spend less time on repetitive tasks or feel more confident creating something that used to take hours. You don't need dozens of tools. Just a few that work well for you.
Once people get started, they tend to personalize their stack. One person might use their toolkit for presentations. Another may use it to create educational materials or social content. The point is to start building your own system that supports your work.
What's The Best Way To Get Started With A Generative AI Toolkit?
Start with one real task at work that takes too long or could be better. Choose one tool to improve that task. If you need clearer audio, try Adobe Podcast Enhance. If you want help writing, test ChatGPT. If you need short videos, explore FAL.ai.
Document what works and refine from there. This kind of simple experimentation builds your skills quickly without being overwhelming.
Why Should You Build A Generative AI Toolkit Now?
You don't have to wait for your company to catch up. The best time to start using AI is when you still have the space to experiment without pressure. The people gaining the most value from creating a generative AI toolkit are professionals who stay curious, take small steps, and learn by doing. This is your chance to get ahead while others hesitate. Pick one tool and share what you learn. The sooner you start, the more confident and capable you'll be when these tools become a standard part of work.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.
An explosive breakdown in the relationship between President Donald Trump and his biggest political donor turned part-time employee, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has been foreshadowed since their alliance first took shape. When Trump brought Musk along for the ride as he moved back into the White House, the looming question was always how long the two could possibly stay in sync. After all, neither the most powerful person in the world nor the richest person on Earth is known for keeping his ego in check. The main thrust of the Trump-Musk feud boils down to who can assert dominance over the other. In the intense back-and-forth that had everyone glued to their screens Thursday, we saw bullies used to getting their way desperately trying to find leverage over each other. But unlike the flame wars of old, where internet trolls would hurl insults at each other across message board forums, Trump and Musk can do serious damage to each other in the real world — and to the rest of us in the process. Musk first gained access to Trump through his vast fortune; he donated almost $300 million during last year's election and hasn't been afraid to throw his money around in races this year. Though he said in May he would be 'spending a lot less' on funding political races, he has also been quick to threaten pumping money into the midterms should lawmakers back the massive budget bill currently working its way through the Senate. And Musk has made clear that he expects a return on his investments, having already snidely claimed on his X platform that Trump would have lost and Democrats would have taken Congress without his backing. Trump is reportedly more focused on the midterms than he was during his first term, worried that a new Democratic majority would lead to more investigations and/or a third impeachment. While he's already sitting on $600 million to help hold on to a GOP majority, Musk's money could throw a spanner in the works, especially if he follows through on his public musing about bankrolling a third party to 'represent the 80% of Americans in the middle.' Though Trump has his own social media platform, Truth Social, X remains a much louder microphone to amplify Musk's messaging to the right, including his supposed 'bombshell' about Trump's presence in the Jeffrey Epstein files. (Musk provided no evidence for the claim and Trump has previously denied any involvement with Epstein's criminal behavior.) Trump, in turn, has threatened Musk's lucrative government contracts, which would include billions of dollars funneled toward his SpaceX company, as well as the subsidies that Tesla receives for its electric car production. Musk responded by warning about cutting off access to SpaceX launches, which would potentially cripple NASA and the Defense Department's ability to deploy satellites. But that would prove a double-edged sword for Musk, given how large a revenue stream those contracts have become. By Thursday evening, Musk had already backed down from his saber-rattling about restricting access to the Dragon space capsule, but he could change his mind again. That he made the threat in the first place has raised major alarm bells among national security officials. The Washington Post reported Saturday that NASA and the Pentagon have begun "urging [Musk's competitors] to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft" to lessen his chokehold on the industry. Notably, Trump isn't alone in his fight against Musk, though as ever those wading into the brawl have their own motives. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon took the opportunity to launch a broadside against Musk. 'People including myself are recommending to the president that he pull every contract associated with Elon Musk,' Bannon told NBC News on Thursday night. Bannon requested that 'major investigations start immediately' into, among other things, Musk's 'immigration status, his security clearance and his history of drug abuse.' There are already several federal investigations of Musk's companies that have been underway for years, which critics had previously worried might be stonewalled due to his influence with Trump. While the extremely public breakup makes for high drama and more than a little schadenfreude, the pettiness masks a deeper issue. The battle Musk and Trump are waging is predicated on both wielding a horrifying amount of unchecked power. In a healthy system of government, their ability to inflict pain on each other wouldn't exist, or at least such an ability would be severely blunted. Musk being able to funnel nearly unlimited amounts of spending into dark money super PACs is an oligarchical nightmare. Trump using the power of the presidency to overturn contracts and launch investigations at a whim is blatant authoritarianism in action. In theory, there are still checks to rein each of them in before things escalate much further. Musk's shareholders have been unhappy with his rocky time in government, and the war of words with Trump sent Tesla's stock price tumbling once more. Trump needs to get his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passed into law and — next year — ensure Congress doesn't fall into Democrats' hands. Trump and Musk have incentives, then, to stay in each other's good graces despite their wounded pride. Trump made clear to NBC News in an interview Saturday that he has no real interest in patching things up with Musk, warning that there will be "very serious consequences" if his one-time ally funds Democratic campaigns. Even if the two eventually reach a détente, it's unlikely to be a lasting peace, not so long as one feels his authority is challenged by the other. The zero-sum view of the world that Trump and Musk share, one where social Darwinism and superior genetics shape humanity, doesn't allow for long-term cooperative relationships. Instead, at best they will return to a purely transactional situationship, but one where the knives will gleefully come back out the second a new opening is given. Most importantly, there is no protagonist when it comes to the inciting incident in this duel, as a total victory won't benefit the American people writ large. Trump wants Congress to pass his bill to grant him more funding for deportations and to preserve his chances of staying in power. Musk wants a more painful bill that will slash the social safety net for millions. No matter what the outcome is as they battle for supremacy over each other, we're the ones who risk being trampled. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IPO Filings Remain Low in Q2
The muted IPO market which has become commonplace in the last few years continued in that fashion through the first five months of 2025. However, the last few weeks has brought a renewed focus to dealmaking after a couple of highly anticipated IPOs began trading, and a cryptocurrency unicorn filed to IPO. Recently, MNTN and Hinge Health made their public debuts to much fanfare. On May 21, adtech platform MNTN went public at $16 a share, putting its valuation at $1.2B, the high end of analyst estimates.[1] The following day, digital physical therapy company, Hinge Health, made their debut. Shares were priced at $32, at the high end of the expected range, denoting a valuation of $2.6B.[2] Both companies had tremendous first day results, with MNTN shares popping 65% and Hinge Health up 17%. List of 52-Week Lows List of 3-Year Lows List of 5-Year Lows Last week the IPO buzz continued when stablecoin issuer Circle announced it is readying itself for a public debut. The company looks to raise about $624M at a $5.65B valuation. They plan to sell 24M shares of common stock at an expected range of $24-$26 per share, but no official trading date has been announced.[3] Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency that is pegged to another currency such as gold to maintain a stable price. The announcement comes as stablecoins are more frequently in the news cycle, with a recent report suggesting Meta is eyeing potential stablecoin partners as it looks to give users crypto support.[4] Bitcoin is also on a run, hurtling over $111,000 on May 22. Despite that fanfare, May only saw ten companies announce plans to go public, the slowest month since December 2024 recorded only 9 IPO filings. This has also been the lightest two month start to a quarter in a year with only 38 filings vs. Q2 2024 which saw 35 filings. Source: Wall Street Horizon, Data Licensed from IPOScoop The decision to go public has been somewhat tumultuous in 2025 as macroeconomic uncertainty and stubbornly high interest rates led to some high profile IPO delays earlier in the year. Since then however, those on the sidelines such as Chime Financial, Circle, Hinge Health and Stubhub have either already made their debut or announced plans to do so. Klarna is one of the big holdouts, further delaying their long-awaited IPO to later in the year.[5] Beyond the Trump tariff market turmoil in 2025 and high interest rates, there may be other reasons why private companies have been timid about going public. One potential explanation could be that many IPO debuts in the last couple of years haven't gone so well for the companies making them. In aggregate, companies that went public in 2024 returned 8%, significantly underperforming major indexes such as the S&P 500 which was up 25% and the Nasdaq Composite which was up 35% for the year.[6] Another reason for lighter IPO numbers as of late could be the availability of private capital. Mega startups such as Stripe, OpenAI and SpaceX have delayed the need to go public by raising huge sums of private capital, often from major international institutions. While dealmaking activity remains light in 2025, there is hope that a big IPO could jump-start the market. Optimism for new listings remains high as technology trends like AI and crypto have made significant progress. The major indices have been on a 6 day run due to certain tariff pauses and the blocking of some of the steepest tariffs by federal judges. If markets can remain resilient and the Federal Reserve begins to cut interest rates at their July meeting as currently expected, then perhaps that opens the window for stronger IPO activity in the second half of the year. 1 MNTN Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering, Business Wire, May 21, 2025, Hinge Health prices IPO at $32, the top end of expected range, CNBC, Ashley Capoot, May 21, 2025, Circle Launches Initial Public Offering, Business Wire, May 27, 2025, Report Says Meta Looking For Stablecoin Partnership To Give Users Crypto Support, Forbes, Billy Billy Brambough, May, 11, 2025, 5 Klarna doubles losses in first quarter as IPO remains on hold, CNBC, Ryan Browne, May 19, 2025, These Were The Winners And Losers In A Boring Year For Startup IPOs, Crunchbase, Joanna Glasner, December 9, 2024, Copyright 2025 Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All rights reserved. Do not copy, distribute, sell or modify this document without Wall Street Horizon's prior written consent. This information is provided for information purposes only. Neither TMX Group Limited nor any of its affiliated companies guarantees the completeness of the information contained in this publication, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in or your use of, or reliance on, the information. This publication is not intended to provide legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial or other advice and should not be relied upon for such advice. The information provided is not an invitation to purchase securities, including any listed on Toronto Stock Exchange and/or TSX Venture Exchange. TMX Group and its affiliated companies do not endorse or recommend any securities referenced in this publication. This publication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor may there be any sale of any securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. TMX, the TMX design, TMX Group, Toronto Stock Exchange, TSX, and TSX Venture Exchange are the trademarks of TSX Inc. and are used under license. Wall Street Horizon is the trademark of Wall Street Horizon, Inc. All other trademarks used in this publication are the property of their respective owners. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
