
The overhaul of L.A. County government begins now
In November, Los Angeles County voters approved Measure G, which promised to transform county governance. The process that will implement its reforms begins now with the creation of the Governance Reform Task Force, and L.A. County leaders, residents and media need to be engaged because, as the saying goes, 'The devil is in the details.'
For too long, the county has underserved the people of Los Angeles. With nearly 10 million residents, our county is more populous than 40 U.S. states, yet it is governed by only five supervisors, each overseeing about 2 million people. The result has been reactionary leadership that maintains the status quo when the challenges we face require speed and innovation.
At its core, Measure G is about ensuring that the county can meet our greatest challenges. After all, the design of a government shapes the behaviors of those who govern us. The Board of Supervisors will be expanded, over time, to nine members from five. And an elected county executive will provide for the separation of executive and legislative powers, and a more accountable county government.
Take for example the devastating January fires. The Palisades and Eaton fires tore through the cities of Los Angeles, Malibu, Pasadena and Sierra Madre. The largest devastation in terms of deaths, homes lost and residents displaced was in the unincorporated neighborhood of Altadena. Instead of having one voice and one plan leading fire response and recovery at the county level, residents must navigate a maze of district by district bureaucracy to put the pieces of their life back together. Imagine if there was just one elected county executive guiding one regional strategy — this is the future we can create.
Now let's consider homelessness — the most pressing issue facing the county year after year. Despite spending billions of dollars each year, the county has yet to move the needle far enough in addressing the issue. When an audit was mandated by U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, the county learned of eye-popping inefficiencies and nepotism, leading it to pull its funding from the city-county Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, and leading to the resignation of the agency's chief executive. Is this effective governance? Is this the best we can do?
In their recent book 'Abundance,' Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson point to the need for proactive government in fostering innovation and breaking stagnation that places such as Los Angeles face. But ending the status quo won't be easy. So many entities will resist change — agencies that have been allowed to underperform, vendors who overcharge, nonprofit organizations whose million-dollar contracts with the county may change — because an opaque county system is working for them.
Right now, the vision and continuity of the county change on an annual basis along with the rotating chair structure of the five-member board. Most actions get decided based on district preferences instead of the regional greater good. But as the founding fathers noted, government works best with checks and balances. The county supervisors, as the legislative branch, should have a healthy level of friction with an executive to keep them accountable to the people. Measure G's addition of an elected county executive establishes those checks and balances. This change is critical to the leadership needed to tackle major crises such as homelessness and emergency response.
The new task force will also define the scope of a new independent ethics commission mandated by the measure.
Measure G is not just governance reform — it's also democratic renewal. Los Angeles County's form of government hasn't changed since 1912, when our population was just 500,000 and women didn't have the right to vote. To have world class transportation countywide, to transition to a green economy, to lessen disparities between rich and poor requires innovation.
As the task force begins the process to implement the voter-approved Measure G, we need the voices of all 88 cities and our hundreds of neighborhoods to help define the future of county government. Tune in for our livestreamed meetings, email your ideas to the task force and be sure to get involved as the task force develops and rolls out a community engagement strategy in the coming months.
We can't afford to waste this opportunity. As a member of the task force, I welcome your participation in shaping the county we all deserve. This thrilling process starts Friday — join us.
Sara Sadhwani is a politics professor at Pomona College and was appointed by Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, co-author of Measure G, to serve on the Governance Reform Task Force. measureg.lacounty.gov.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. Mayor Lurie wants to end free parking in Golden Gate Park
Anyone who's unfurled a picnic blanket in Golden Gate Park has probably witnessed the line of cars packing its curbs, taking advantage of free parking. That privilege could soon end. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has introduced budget legislation to make visitors pay to stow their cars, probably at a rate of $3 an hour, though the cost would fluctuate according to demand. When Recreation and Park officials proposed the idea earlier this year, they hoped to stave off a budget deficit that could balloon to $15 million by 2027. Parking fees were among a slew of possible funding initiatives put forward during a Rec and Park Commission meeting in late February. Other recommendations included a $5-an-hour charge to rent a tennis court. Without a steady and reliable new revenue stream, the parks department could be forced to make crippling cuts across its system, including closing swimming pools and offering fewer summer camps. Additionally, staff might have to mow ball fields less frequently, scale back the gardener apprentice program and reduce custodial facilities. 'San Francisco's parks are one of our greatest treasures,' Lurie wrote in a statement. 'And despite serious fiscal challenges, our budget offers a fair, responsible way to keep them clean, safe and open to everyone.' He emphasized the importance of prioritizing core services as the city makes agonizing cuts across its departments. The Board of Supervisors would have to approve Lurie's parking legislation for it to take effect in 2027. Lurie must sign the budget into law by Aug. 1. • Live event: Can the Bay Area save public transit? Join reporter Rachel Swan, Muni head Julie Kirschbaum, BART GM Bob Powers and State Sen. Scott Wiener live at Manny's at 6 p.m. on June 18. Get your ticket. Parking kiosks alone could generate a windfall for city parks, with revenue projections of $1.2 million in the upcoming fiscal year, and $9.2 million the following year. Although San Franciscans often grumble over parking fees, some call the Golden Gate Park proposal a worthy trade-off. 'A lot of people come to the park to visit the museum or the botanical gardens, and I don't think it's a huge ask for them to pay a few dollars for parking,' said Steffen Franz, president of the neighborhood group Friends of Lafayette Park in Pacific Heights. While Golden Gate Park has two paid parking lots, spaces are free along Martin Luther King Drive — the main artery other than John F. Kennedy Drive, where cars are not allowed on the east section. For the time being, motorists can also find free street parking on Nancy Pelosi or Bowling Green drives or JFK Drive on the west side of the park.


CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Sacramento County supervisors agree to reverse budget cuts to district attorney's office
Sacramento County DA says budget cuts to department would mean no misdemeanor prosecutions Sacramento County DA says budget cuts to department would mean no misdemeanor prosecutions Sacramento County DA says budget cuts to department would mean no misdemeanor prosecutions SACRAMENTO – The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors agreed Wednesday night to restore proposed budget cuts to the district attorney's office. The move comes after District Attorney Thien Ho testified inside the chambers that the cuts would lead him to halt prosecutions of all misdemeanor cases. He turned the board chambers into more of a courtroom, arguing his case against cuts. "The word 'recommendation' means that I approve of it, that I consent to it, and I'm going to say right now I've never consented, approved, or recommended any of these cuts," Ho said. "If we cut by $1.7 million, I won't have the vacancies to fill the misdemeanor cases." Ho said his department was already working with limited resources. "Because we are hanging together by duct tape and superglue," Ho said. Ho made the case that cuts of $1.7 million would force him to cut seven attorney positions from his staff. Low-level crimes like vandalism and burglary would be left with no staffing to prosecute. "I can't cut enough photocopies to meet $1.7 million," Ho said. The packed chambers watched as Ho made the case that these recommendations were not his, but forced on him by the board. A point that Supervisor Phil Serna refuted, leading to an exchange between the two inside the chamber. "This recommendation of the cuts is coming from the CO's office and I've also been very clear about what that would be reflected in," Ho said. "I disagree wholeheartedly," Serna said. "He doesn't have the authority to make the recommendations. He just doesn't. It's not a fact, so we can agree to disagree, but it's not a fact." "Well, we'll disagree, respectfully, mister chair," Ho said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'Milk' star Sean Penn, writer Dustin Lance Black blast Pete Hegseth for stripping ship of Harvey Milk's name
Mlik star Sean Penn and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black, who each won Academy Awards for the 2008 biopic of civil rights icon Harvey Milk, aren't mincing words in response to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's decision to strip Milk's name from a U.S. Navy vessel. "These guys are idiots," Black told The Hollywood Reporter on Wednesday. "Pete Hegseth does not seem like a smart man, a wise man, a knowledgeable man. He seems small and petty. I would love to introduce him to some LGBTQ folks who are warriors who have had to be warriors our entire life just to live our lives openly as who we are." Black was referencing a statement from Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell circulated following the leak of a memo first reported by CBS News discussing plans to rename a fleet of ships bearing the names of American civil rights leaders. Shared with Entertainment Weekly, the statement reads, "Secretary Hegseth is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos. Any potential renaming(s) will be announced after internal reviews are complete." "I've never before seen a Secretary of Defense so aggressively demote himself to the rank of Chief PETTY Officer," Penn snarked to THR. Milk served as a lieutenant, junior grade in the Navy during the Korean War, opting to resign in 1955 rather than face court-martial because of his sexuality. He then pursued a career in San Francisco politics and was the first openly gay man to be elected to public office in California when he became a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977. The following year, fellow Supervisor Dan White assassinated Milk and Mayor George Moscone as a reprisal for Moscone opting not to reappoint him to the Board of Supervisors, a decision he perceived Milk as playing a role in. Current San Franciso Mayor Daniel Lurie responded to Hegseth's plan, a rare one in American military history and a questionable one given its timing during LGBTQ Pride Month. In a statement shared with EW, Lurie noted, "From the Board of Supervisors to the U.S. Navy, Harvey Milk dedicated his life to serving our city and our country, and he did it with courage and distinction. Our city has proudly followed his leadership, marking what would have been his 95th birthday last month and now Pride Month. Harvey was a model for how all of us, across this country, can contribute to our communities." Former Speaker of the House and San Francisco congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, responded in her own public statement: "Harvey Milk proudly served as a Lieutenant in the United States Navy and was a formidable force for change.... The reported decision by the Trump Administration to change the names of the USNS Harvey Milk and other ships in the John Lewis-class is a shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream." The USNS Harvey Milk isn't the only Navy vessel flagged by the Trump administration for a potential name change. Ships named after civil rights leaders and influential progressive politicians including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harriet Tubman, Dolores Huerta, Cesar Chavez, and Medgar Evers are among those listed in the leaked memo. The move from the Hegseth-led Department of Defense is the latest in a string of attacks on government programs designed to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion. In January, the DoD issued a release titled "Identity Months Dead at Dod" signaling the Department's intention to eliminate "celebrations related to cultural awareness months" including National African American/Black History Month, Women's History Month, and Pride Month. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly