
Harvard president takes a swipe at Trump in commencement speech
Harvard President Alan Garber smugly taunted President Trump as he congratulated students from 'around the world' graduating from the prestigious university. 'From around the world,' he repeated for emphasis. 'Just as it should be.' Students erupted in cheers and gave Garber a standing ovation as he gave the address during Harvard's 2025 commencement.
Garber told graduates they should 'expand our thinking and change our minds in the process', and said his 'hope is that you stay comfortable being uncomfortable.' The educator has led Harvard since January 2024 after his predecessor Claudine Gay was ousted following car crash testimony she gave to Congress about the rise of anti-Semitism on college campuses.
Garber has gone to war with the Trump administration in recent weeks and has sued the White House over its efforts to block international students, which led the president to sever $2.2 billion in funding to Harvard earlier this month. The Harvard graduates gave him a hero's welcome on stage on Thursday, shortly after U.S. District Court Judge Allison Burroughs ruled that the Trump administration cannot make any changes to Harvard's student visa program. 'I want to maintain the status quo,' the judge said.
In her ruling Thursday, Burroughs told Harvard and Justice Department attorneys to work out an agreement that would stop the revocation of foreign student visas. 'It doesn't need to be draconian, but I want to make sure it's worded in such a way that nothing changes,' Burroughs said. The Trump administration had tried to prevent a ruling in Harvard's favor ahead of the mid-morning hearing by backing away from plans to immediately revoke the university's ability to enroll international students.
Instead Harvard was given 30 days to challenge the ban. Lawyers for the Justice Department argued to Burroughs that the case might be moot because of the Trump administration's latest procedural move. Harvard has denied Trump administration charges of alleged bias against conservatives , fostering antisemitism on campus and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party.
The university has said losing that right would affect about one quarter of its student body and devastate the school. Harvard had argued that the revocation violated its free speech and due process rights under the U.S. Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs agency actions. Its lawyers said DHS regulations required providing at least 30 days to challenge the agency's allegations, and give Harvard an opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal.
That 30 day window was offered ahead of Thursday's court date. The revocation announced on May 22 was an escalation of the Trump administration's attacks on Harvard. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university's lawyers have argued the agency's action was part of an 'unprecedented and retaliatory attack on academic freedom at Harvard,' which is pursuing a separate lawsuit challenging the administration's decision to terminate nearly $3 billion in federal research funding.
In a letter that day, she accused the school of refusing to comply with wide-ranging requests for information on its student visa holders, including about any activity they engaged in that was illegal or violent or that would subject them to discipline. 'As I explained to you in my April letter, it is a privilege to enroll foreign students, and it is also a privilege to employ aliens on campus,' she said. Harvard said the decision was 'devastating' for the school and its student body.
The university, the nation's oldest and wealthiest, enrolled nearly 6,800 international students in its current school year, about 27 percent of its total enrollment. The department's move would prevent Harvard from enrolling new international students and require existing ones to transfer to other schools or lose their legal status. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday that Harvard University should have a 15 percent cap on the number of non-U.S. students it admits.
'Harvard has got to behave themselves,' he said. Harvard University's commencement ceremonies were happening Thursday amid the court battle. A number of speakers brought up the administration's war on the university during their speeches. 'Part of what makes America great, if I may use that phrase, is that it allows an immigrant like me to blossom,' said commencement speaker, Dr. Abraham Verghese, a best-selling author and Stanford expert on infectious diseases. 'The greatness of America, the greatness of Harvard, is reflected in the fact that someone like me could be invited to speak to you.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
12 minutes ago
- Sky News
Los Angeles latest: 700 marines to be deployed - as thousands of troops 'given no food or water'
We're pausing our live coverage That's all our live coverage of the protests in Los Angeles for now. Before we go, here is a recap of the key moments from the past day... The fourth day of demonstrations were more peaceful, with thousands attending a rally at City Hall; Hundreds also protested outside a detention centre where suspected illegal immigrants are being held after federal raids; California governor Gavin Newsom said he would sue the Trump administration after National Guard troops were deployed in the state; Donald Trump later claimed LA would have been "completely obliterated" if he hadn't sent in the Guard; He then said Newsom should be arrested and claimed "professional agitators" were behind the unrest; The US president also ordered the deployment of another 2,000 additional National Guard troops; Around 700 marines will also join the Guard in LA, a US official told news agencies; And the head of the LA Police Department said their deployment "creates logistical challenges and risks". Watch below: Martha Kelner reports from LA Newsom and Trump escalate war of words While much of the focus has been on the streets of LA, running parallel to the disorder is a bitter political row. Donald Trump's decision to send in the National Guard came over the heads of state Democratic leaders. It pitched a Republican White House against a firmly Democratic state. Things have become so tense that Trump even suggested his border czar should have arrested Californian governor Gavin Newsom. Meanwhile, Newsom himself has characterised Trump's actions as an invasion of his state - flipping Trump's usual rhetoric on undocumented immigration. Similarly, many of their outriders and allies have repeated these messages across social media and TV. 'We've taken Trump to court 23 times, we'll do it again' Some more to bring you from California's attorney general. He told a news conference on Monday that his state will continue to battle Donald Trump in the courts, after announcing his intention to sue the administration. This, he said, marks California's 24th lawsuit against the federal government in 19 weeks. We reported earlier on the attorney general's announcement that California was set to sue the Trump administration. Rob Bonta said the deployment of National Guard troops "stokes the flames, it's inflammatory, it's provocative, it's unhelpful". He went on: "It's not normal to have a president who violates the law so blatantly, but if that's his course, our response ... is to take him to court. "We will take him to court every time he breaks the law and hurts Californians." The goal of the lawsuit, he said, is to secure a court declaration that Trump's National Guard deployment is unlawful. Watch: Violence and vandalism in LA US correspondent Martha Kelner reports from Los Angeles, where protests have continued for a fourth day. 'What do we do?' Protester tells Sky News why they took to the streets Protesters have been telling Sky News why they took to the streets. Our US correspondent Martha Kelner has been reporting from Los Angeles where protests and unrest have flared up in recent days. "A lot of my people are getting taken away, we've lived here all our lives. How are you going to send us back to a place that we don't even know?" one said. "What do we do from here?" Another protester, clearly carrying scrapes and bruises, detailed her experience with law enforcement to Sky News. "They shot me in the leg with a rubber bullet, they hit me in the head, there's bruising." In pictures: Marines prepare for departure to Los Angeles Marines were preparing to depart for the greater Los Angeles area on Monday from the Marine Corps Combat Center in Twentynine Palms, California, according to a post on X from the US Northern Command. The 700 soldiers "will seamlessly integrate" with the National Guard troops protecting federal personnel and property in LA, the Northern Command said. 'False invitations' led to immigration arrests We heard from David Cruz, communications director at the League of United Latin American Citizens. He told Sky News that people in Los Angeles received what he described as "false invitations" for an immigration hearing at the federal building. But, since then, they were "never seen again". He said: "What was more concerning were the false invitations that were being sent out to immigrants, some of whom had been here more than 10 years. "They arrived at their immigration hearing at the federal building in downtown Los Angeles, never to be seen again. "We found out about it 72 hours later when 200 detainees were being shipped to points unknown around the nation and beyond. "That's what this reaction from our community." Sky News has approached ICE for comment. National Guard deployment to 'our city is actually a test case', LA mayor says Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass spoke at a news conference about Donald Trump sending National Guard troops to Los Angeles. She said: "It makes me feel like our city is actually a test case for what happens when the federal government moves in and takes the authority away from the state or away from local government. "I don't think that our city should be used for an experiment to see what happens in the nation's second-largest city [and whether they] can do this to other cities." Bass, a Democrat, previously accused Trump of "creating a crisis" in LA - see our 20.37 post for Bass and fellow Democrat Gavin Newsom taking aim at the US president. Deployment of marines 'creates logistical challenges and risks', LAPD chief says Jim McDonnell, leading the Los Angeles Police Department, said at a news conference that deploying the Marines to LA "without direct coordination creates logistical challenges and risks confusion during critical incidents". "We urge full transparency and communication across all levels of government," he added. McDonnell highlighted that the LAPD's priority was to "simply keep both the public and law enforcement officers and to maintain order". This comes after McDonnell said on X that the LAPD had not "received any formal notification that the Marines will be arriving in Los Angeles". In pictures: Fourth day of protests hit LA Here are some of the latest pictures from a fourth day of protests in Los Angeles. Unlike previous days, there seem to be fewer clashes between protesters and authorities so far.


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump authorizes additional 2,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles, US officials say
Another 2,000 National Guard troops along with 700 Marines are headed to Los Angeles on orders Monday from President Donald Trump, escalating a military presence local officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom don't want and the police chief says creates logistical challenges for safely handling protests. An initial 2,000 Guard troops ordered by Trump started arriving Sunday, which saw the most violence during three days of protests driven by anger over Trump's stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws that critics say are breaking apart migrant families. Monday's demonstrations were far less raucous, with thousands peacefully attending a rally at City Hall and hundreds protesting outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids across the city. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. They say he is putting public safety at risk by adding military personnel even though police say they don't need the help. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said in a statement he was confident in the police department's ability to handle large-scale demonstrations and that the Marines' arrival without coordinating with the police department would present a 'significant logistical and operational challenge' for them. Newsom called the deployments reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops' in a post on the social platform X. 'This isn't about public safety,' Newsom said. 'It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego.' The protests began Friday in downtown Los Angeles after federal immigration authorities arrested more than 40 people across the city. The smell of smoke hung in the air downtown Monday, one day after crowds blocked a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. Additional protests against immigration raids continued into the evening on Monday in several other cities including San Francisco and Santa Ana in California and Dallas and Austin in Texas. In Austin, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said in a post on X that more than a dozen protesters were arrested, while in Santa Ana, a spokesperson for the city's police department said the National Guard had arrived in the city to secure federal buildings. California pushes back against presence of federal troops California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops following the first deployment, telling reporters in his announcement Monday that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilizing California National Guard troops,' Bonta said. He sought a court order declaring Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Trump said Monday that the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not deployed the Guard. U.S. officials said the Marine troops were deployed to protect federal property and personnel, including federal immigration agents. Trump's Monday order put more National Guard members on active duty, but one U.S. official warned that the order was just signed and it could take a day or two to get troops moving. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss troop movements. Despite their presence, there has been limited engagement so far between the Guard and protesters while local law enforcement implements crowd control. Bass criticized the deployment of National Guard troops and Marines as a 'deliberate attempt' by the Trump administration to 'create disorder and chaos in our city.' She made a plea to the federal government: 'Stop the raids.' Early protests remained peaceful On Monday, thousands flooded the streets around City Hall for a union rally ahead of a hearing for arrested labor leader David Huerta, who was freed a few hours later on a $50,000 bond. Huerta's arrest on Friday while protesting immigration raids has become a rallying cry for people angry over the administration's crackdown. He is the president of the Service Employees International Union California, which represents thousands of the state's janitors, security officers and other workers. Early protests had a calm and even joyful atmosphere at times, with people dancing to live music and buoyed by Huerta's release. Protesters linked hands in front of a line of police officers outside the downtown federal detention center where Huerta was being held. Religious leaders joined the protesters, working with organizers at times to de-escalate moments of tension. There was a heavy law enforcement presence in the few square blocks including the federal detention facility, while most in the immense city of some 4 million people went about their normal business on peaceful streets. Chanting against a line of National Guard troops with Homeland Security officers behind them surrounding the federal buildings ramped up in the afternoon as people yelled, 'Free them all!' and 'National Guard go away.' As the crowd thinned, police began pushing protesters away from the area, firing crowd-control munitions as people chanted, "Peaceful protest.' Officers became more aggressive in their tactics in the evening, occasionally surging forward to arrest protesters that got too close. At least a dozen people remaining in the busy Little Tokyo neighborhood were surrounded by police and detained. Other protests took shape Monday across LA County. Outside a Los Angeles clothing warehouse, relatives of detained workers demanded at a news conference in the morning that their loved ones be released. The family of Jacob Vasquez, 35, who was detained Friday at the warehouse, where he worked, said they had yet to receive any information about him. 'Jacob is a family man and the sole breadwinner of his household,' Vasquez's brother, Gabriel, told the crowd. He asked that his last name not be used, fearing being targeted by authorities. Several dozen people were arrested in protests throughout the weekend. Authorities say one was detained Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Guard deployment is a nearly unprecedented escalation The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' ___ Sullivan reported from Minneapolis. Associated Press writers Dorany Pineda in Los Angeles, Amy Taxin in Orange County, California, Lolita C. Baldor in Washington, Hallie Golden in Seattle and Jake Offenhartz in New York contributed to this report.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tuesday briefing: What Trump's response to the LA protests could mean for US democracy
Late last week, Los Angeles was left stunned as droves of federal US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers bore down on homes, businesses and neighbourhoods across the city in a series of immigration raids. The anti-ICE protests that followed were swift and furious, fuelled in part by the reported ill-treatment of some of the 118 people thought to have been detained, allegedly without judicial warrants. By Friday evening, thousands had taken to the streets in mostly peaceful protests before violence flared in points around the city, with protesters attacking police cars and blocking highways. Then came the response from the White House. President Donald Trump promised to crush the opposition on the LA streets, immediately and with military force, by using his powers to send 4,000 National Guard troops to the city. Yesterday, despite the protests dwindling and remaining largely peaceful, Trump continued to escalate the situation, branding the protesters 'paid insurrectionists' with the administration ordering 700 marines into Los Angeles to support law enforcement in an exceptionally rare domestic deployment. California governor Gavin Newsom has called Trump's response an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism', accusing him of intentionally causing chaos, terrorising communities and endangering democracy. Karen Bass, Los Angeles mayor, also warned that LA was being used by the Trump administration as a 'test case for what happens when the federal government moves in and takes the authority away from the state or away from local government'. For today's newsletter, I spoke with Philippe Sands, the renowned human rights lawyer, on what Trump's response to the anti-immigration protests could mean for US democracy. That's after the headlines. Labour | All pensioners with an income of £35,000 or less a year will have the winter fuel payment restored in full, Rachel Reeves has announced, after weeks of uncertainty over the decision to make a U-turn on scrapping the benefit. Northern Ireland | Public disorder broke out in Ballymena in Northern Ireland, with police saying a number of missiles had been thrown towards officers after crowds gathered near the site of an alleged sexual assault in the town. Reform | Nigel Farage has demanded the reopening of domestic coalmines to provide fuel for new blast furnaces, arguing that Welsh people would happily return to mining if the pay was sufficiently high. AI | All civil servants in England and Wales will get practical training in how to use artificial intelligence to speed up their work from this autumn, the Guardian has learned. More than 400,000 civil servants will be informed of the training which is part of a drive to overhaul the civil service. Music | Sly Stone, the American musician who lit up generations of dancefloors with his gloriously funky and often socially conscious songwriting, has died aged 82. With his group Sly and the Family Stone, Stone tied together soul, psychedelic rock and gospel into fervent, uplifting songs, and became one of the key progenitors of the 1970s funk sound. The speed at which Trump deployed National Guard troops to quell the protests is a sign of just how willing the administration is to flex its power to the absolute constitutional limits. According to Philippe Sands, none of us should be surprised by the tactics deployed. Throughout his career, Sands has documented and examined the methods used by authoritarian regimes and military dictatorships. Sands says that the scenes unfolding in Los Angeles should be seen as part of a wider drive to create a sense of emergency, but also to test the limits of the public's imagination about what is acceptable and what must be resisted. 'People start in one place but very quickly events like we're seeing in Los Angeles can change the parameters of tolerance,' he says. What are the LA protests about? Protests broke out across Los Angeles on Friday after agents from ICE conducted a series of high-profile immigration raids, which were met with horror by many locals. LA's city council released a statement that the city, which was 'built by immigrants and thrives because of immigrants' would not 'abide by fear tactics to support extreme political agendas that aim to stoke fear and spark discord in our community.' Across the weekend, thousands joined anti-ICE demonstrations, with violence flaring at points across the city as police cars were attacked and highways blocked. The authorities responded with teargas and rubber bullets. What was Trump's response? On Saturday, Trump said he was deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to clamp down on the immigration protests, posting on Truth Social: 'These radical left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will not be tolerated.' Yesterday plans were announced to send 700 marines to LA, with the administration saying they were there to support law enforcement efforts. In sending troops, Trump bypassed the authority of the state's governor Gavin Newsom, who said that the deployment was 'purposefully inflammatory'. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called the images of truckloads of armed National Guard troops arriving in the city 'akin to a declaration of war on all Californians'. How has Trump been able to deploy military personnel on to the streets of LA? It's a central tenet of American democracy that the US military should not be used against its citizens. While the American constitution makes the president the commander-in-chief of all the armed forces, a set of constitutional and statutory legal constraints are intended to prevent the abuse of this exceptional power. However there are loopholes, which Trump has been open about his intention to exploit. First is the 18th-century Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to decide whether to use the military to engage in civilian law enforcement in certain situations. While he has labelled the protesters 'insurrectionists', Trump has stopped short of invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the protests in LA. Second is the National Guard. While the US president cannot command military forces against US citizens, he is in charge of the use of the National Guard in Washington DC and can request that other states provide additional guard troops to supplement deployments in emergencies. This weekend is not the first time the National Guard has been sent to Los Angeles. In 2020, troops used smoke canisters and rubber bullets to disperse Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters in Lafayette Square. In 1992, George HW Bush deployed thousands of troops to quell the riots after the police beating of Rodney King. Yet, significantly, this weekend is the first time since 1965 that a president has sent in the National Guard without being requested to do so by a state governor, something labelled an 'outrageous overreach' by Newsom. Should this fuel fears Trump is driving the US towards authoritarianism? In his first term as president, Trump was open about his desire to expand the powers of federal law enforcement and use the military to crush civil protest. Announcing the deployment of National Guard troops in 2020, Trump said: 'If the city or state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residence, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them,' before reportedly advocating for BLM protesters to be shot. Sands is keen to stress we shouldn't be jumping to hasty conclusions, 'but it is obvious there are some warning signs that need to be taken seriously'. He draws parallel's with Augusto Pinochet's Plan Z, where the Chilean dictator concocted a narrative that leftist insurgents were planning a coup to justify violently suppressing dissent and attacking citizens. Now in the US, you have Trump talking about the 'enemy within' to describe illegal immigrants and saying they are a threat to law and order. 'It's a very well-used playbook,' says Sands. 'You use the power of your office to create a climate of fear, which then allows you to go further than you'd otherwise be able to do, to argue for exceptional circumstances.' At the same time, some say that in branding those protesting as a 'mob' being paid to incite violence, the Trump administration is conflating resistance to his immigration policy with unlawful and dangerous behaviour that the administration claims state authorities can't deal with. 'You might say that what is going on in Los Angeles is a way of testing the limits of what the American people are willing to tolerate, whether in these circumstances they can stomach the sight of troops on the streets of a major American city,' says Sands. You only have to look at history to see how quickly such actions can become normalised, he adds. 'It's all part of this testing of the public's capacity to absorb this alongside all the other stuff – banning books, taking people off the streets, deporting without due process. It is a slow creep that takes people past limits that were previously unimaginable.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Is this a turning point for US democracy? Sands says that although warning signs are there, the major difference between a case like Pinochet in Chile – the subject of his new book, 38 Londres Street – or other authoritarian regimes, is that so far the Trump administration has not limited – or not been able to limit – the role of the judiciary or the courts in holding the executive to account. 'Judges and lawyers are being attacked, very publicly, but judges have not been removed from office and Congress has not curtailed the powers of the courts,' he says. 'In the past it has been very clear that the role of the judges and the courts is the line that divides democracy and dictatorship. Authoritarian regimes such as the Pinochet dictatorship neutralised the courts almost immediately. In the US this hasn't happened.' Sands says that Trump's decision to bypass the state and directly deploy troops to LA will probably lead to a slew of legal challenges. Already the state of California has said it will sue the government accusing the US president of 'unlawfully' federalizing the state's national guard to quell the protests. 'The courts and the judiciary's powers have actually stood firm so far,' he says. 'And on occasion we've seen the Trump administration blink and roll back when challenged.' However, he concedes that the jury is out on whether this will remain the case. 'Judges in the United States are already under immense pressure,' Sands says. 'President Trump's administration seem to be pushing as far as they can, trying to create cracks and seeing how much they can bend that system.' As anti-ICE protests spread to other cities across the country, political, public and legal resistance that Trump will face in the coming days in LA could be crucial in determining just how resilient the checks and balances built into the US constitution are in face of the real onslaught that Trump 2.0 has unleashed. 'There is a great deal at stake here,' says Sands. 'Warts and all, since 1945 the United States has always seen itself as a beacon for the idea of the rule of law and constitutionalism. If it now descends into classic authoritarianism, the world will be very different.' Oprah, Stanley Tucci and Selena Gomez love them – but just how safe are those supposedly 'nontoxic' ceramic pans taking over your feed? Tom Perkins digs into the murky marketing behind the cookware boom, uncovering how a wellness aesthetic and vague labels are masking potential health risks. Sundus Abdi, newsletters team I loved this piece by Jon Harvey about how Jaws not only changed the film industry but also kickstarted a pathological fear of sharks that led to years of bloodshed and persecution. Thankfully, this seems to be turning and the most misunderstood of marine animals is having a cultural moment thanks to the dulcet tones of kiddie anthem Baby Shark. Annie Forget clubbing – people in Britain are now booking late-night dinner reservations instead. With restaurants staying open later and offering discounts for night-owls, a new night out has emerged. Sundus Chris Godfrey's interview with Brad Dourif, who starred alongside Hollywood greats in many legendary movies (from Cuckoo's Nest to Chucky) and became one of the most beloved of character actors of all time, is a great read. Annie From a darkly tender comedy about three siblings dodging social services (Just Act Normal) to a woman with terminal cancer chasing the perfect orgasm (Dying for Sex), this roundup of 2025's the best TV is anything but predictable. Sundus Football | Belgium raced to a three-goal lead inside half an hour, before Wales, rallied to equalise with the side ranked eighth in the world. A perfect Kevin De Bruyne cross in the 88th minute sealed the deal though, ending the match 4-3 and leaving Wales second in Group J in the World Cup qualifiers. Football | Tottenham have approached Brentford over appointing Thomas Frank as their new head coach. The Dane is the club's No 1 target to replace Ange Postecoglou, who was sacked on Friday, and there is confidence that a deal will be struck in the next 48 hours. Rugby union | A leading executive at TNT Sports has dismissed the proposed R360 breakaway league as 'delusional' while Premiership executives have played down the rebels' threat, insisting rugby 'doesn't need pop-ups'. The Guardian leads with 'Labour pledges £14bn for nuclear to get UK off 'fossil fuel rollercoaster''. The Telegraph follows the same story with '£14 billion for nuclear to keep the lights on'. The Financial Times has 'Reeves retreat restores winter fuel payments to pensioners', while the Times reports 'Millions escape winter fuel cuts'. The Mirror characterises the move as 'Winter wonderful', but the Mail calls the chancellor's comments on the matter 'Deluded'. The Sun follows the story too, under the headline 'It was fuelish so say sorry!' and the i reports 'Winter fuel U-turn gets warm welcome – but Labour MPs warn Reeves: don't make same mistake on disability benefits'. Trump, Musk and the end of a bromance Andrew Roth details the explosive falling-out between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and what it tells us about the future of the US presidency. A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad At 67, Jean Walters (pictured above) heard church bells drifting through her garden in Meltham, West Yorkshire. On a whim, she decided to learn how to ring them. What began as a curious hobby turned into a passion. Within a few years, Walters joined the Yorkshire bellringers' association and marked her 80th birthday by ringing eight different patterns – one for each decade of her life. A former soprano and teacher who lost her singing voice, Walters found a new way to express herself through bellringing. She says the physical and mental challenge of bellringing leaves her feeling exhilarated. 'Its another way of expressing my joy of living.' Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply