Trump administration weighs deep cuts to CDC's HIV prevention program
Donald Trump's administration is reportedly mulling cuts to a public health program that accounts for nearly all federal spending on HIV prevention efforts, reaching thousands of people a year.
With no other programs to replace them, cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HIV Prevention Division could jeopardize progress in addressing the nation's HIV epidemic and potentially cost lives, according to public health experts and LGBT+ advocacy groups.
More than $1 billion was appropriated for HIV prevention efforts this year, and the agency spent roughly $1.3 billion on the prevention of HIV and sexually transmitted infections within the previous fiscal year. About three-quarters of that spending supports state and local health departments and nonprofit groups working to prevent HIV in their communities.
In 2022, more than 22 million HIV tests were performed by 60 CDC-funded state and local health departments and community organizations, which connected roughly 8,000 people newly diagnosed with HIV to healthcare they may have otherwise not received.
CDC support is 'extremely significant in terms of funding efforts' for HIV prevention, according to Lindsey Dawson, associate director of HIV policy and director of LGBTQ health policy with nonprofit health research and news organization KFF.
'The role of the CDC prevention funding is to provide states, local jurisdictions and community-based orgs with funding to do surveillance [and] HIV testing to help shore up prevention … including linking people to care,' she told The Independent.
Threats to that funding follow declining numbers of new infections in the United States, which saw a 12 percent drop between 2018 and 2022. Those declines were even more dramatic in jurisdictions that received additional federal funding.
Eliminating those funds will 'jeopardize' continued success and potentially lead to an increase in new infections, Dawson told The Independent.
During his first term in office, Trump announced an initiative that sought to end the nation's HIV epidemic by 'focusing resources in the 57 jurisdictions where they're needed most.'
The president's target date for 'Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S.' was set for 2030.
Eliminating funding to combat the epidemic would make that virtually impossible.
'The success of the 'Ending the HIV Epidemic' initiative is in peril,' according to Colleen Kelley, chair of the HIV Medicine Association's board of directors.
'Not only will we not end the HIV epidemic with the current administration's policies, we could reverse these gains and go back to the dark days of the '80s when people died from HIV every day,' she said in a statement.
LGBT+ advocacy groups fear those impacts would be particularly acute among LGBT+ Americans.
'An effort to defund HIV prevention by this administration would set us back decades, cost innocent people their lives and cost taxpayers millions,' according to Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest LGBT+ civil rights group.
'This is not just a policy debate — it is a direct assault on the 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States and countless others who are vulnerable to HIV,' she said. 'The LGBTQ+ community still carries the scars of the government negligence and mass death of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We should be doubling down on our investment to end the HIV epidemic once and for all, not regressing to the days of funeral services and a virus running rampant.'
A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services — now under the direction of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr — stressed to The Independent that a final decision on the CDC's HIV prevention efforts has not been made, and a timeline for a decision is unclear.
'HHS is following the Administration's guidance and taking a careful look at all divisions to see where there is overlap that could be streamlined to support the President's broader efforts to restructure the federal government,' deputy press secretary Emily G. Hilliard told The Independent.
'This is to ensure that HHS better serves the American people at the highest and most efficient standard,' she said. 'No final decision on streamlining CDC's HIV Prevention Division has been made.'
If HHS does cut the program, that work would be continued elsewhere within the agency, according to a statement from an HHS official speaking on background about the administration's plans.
But it's unclear where the agency could continue that work, and other agencies and programs focused on HIV are statutorily obligated to administer other forms of medical care, not prevention efforts, according to KFF.
If that funding is wholly eliminated, the burden for prevention efforts would fall on state and local governments and cash-strapped community groups facing their own budget constraints against a shrinking pool of federal grant opportunities, forcing public health officials across the U.S. to make difficult decisions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
More Musk-Trump Fallout: Tesla Sales Will Shrink At Historic Pace, Goldman Says
A pessimistic prediction for Tesla sales from Goldman Sachs added further fuel to the Tesla fire, as the unraveling relationship between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his former close ally President Donald Trump plays out publicly, accelerating Wall Street's concerns about the increasing exposure of Tesla to Musk's outspoken politics. Elon Musk has alienated 'multiple sides of the political spectrum' from Tesla, according to one ... More prominent Wall Street analyst. In a late Thursday note to clients, Goldman Sachs analysts led by Mark Delaney slashed their forecast for second-quarter Tesla vehicle deliveries to 365,000, far below consensus analyst forecasts of 405,000, according to FactSet. That would be an 18% decline from the same period last year, equating to by far the weakest quarterly deliveries growth since at least 2015, the extent of quarterly delivery data available on Tesla's investor relations website. It's another knock for Tesla as analysts warn this week's quarrel between Musk and the president, who Musk donated $288 million last year to help elect alongside other Republican candidates, could further weigh on Tesla, which is already grappling with declining brand sentiment on the left, historically the base for EV purchasers. This disagreement 'could potentially (temporarily) alienate multiple sides of the political spectrum," warned Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas in a Friday note. Tesla stock bounced back Friday, gaining 6% by early afternoon as part of a broader rally. That only recovered a small portion of Thursday's historic loss, as the Musk-led firm's share price is down 9% since Wednesday. The Musk-Trump division "clearly raises the degree of [near-term' uncertainty' for Tesla, according to TD Cowen analyst Itay Michaeli. Amid the kerfuffle, Trump threatened to cancel all of the federal government's contracts with Musk's portfolio of companies. That would likely impact the private aerospace and communications firm SpaceX far more than Tesla, which does not rely on government contracts for a significant portion of its revenues, but there is a way Trump could target Tesla's bottom line directly. Trump could restrict Tesla's ability to sell its automotive regulatory credits, according to Morningstar strategist Seth Goldstein, referring to the essentially free profit Tesla gets from selling its emissions credits to gas-powered automakers. That could dramatically reduce Tesla profits, as it reported $595 million in those regulatory credits compared to a $934 million net income during 2025's first quarter, meaning the credits directly contributed about two-thirds of its net profit. Since Musk announced his purchase of Twitter (now X) in 2022, Tesla stock has frequently faced downward pressure as its top decisionmaker and shareholder Musk became increasingly outspoken on politics to much controversy. Musk endorsed Trump in July and rose to become perhaps the most prominent and powerful figure in the early days of Trump's second administration, though the perceived impact of Musk's buddying up to Trump turned negative this year as sales globally for the automaker tumbled. In a further sign of fray in the relationship between Musk and Trump, the president has decided to sell his Tesla Model S, according to the New York Times. Tesla is expected to report its Q2 delivery numbers July 2.


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Stop Posting, and Start Legislating—A Message to the GOP from Gen Z
We remember. We remember the Paul Ryan years. We remember the lofty promises, the press conferences with tax cut charts, the selfies with Trump in the Roosevelt Room. And we remember the disappointment—because when Republicans controlled the House, Senate, and White House, barely anything bold got done. The border wasn't secured. Obamacare wasn't repealed. The swamp wasn't drained. The only thing that moved quickly was the clock—and opportunity slipped away. The bills stalled. The hearings dragged. The excuses piled up. And in the end, the status quo won. Again. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is pictured. A Make America Great Again (MAGA) baseball hat supporting President Donald Trump is here we are again. President Donald Trump is back in the Oval Office. Conservatives have momentum. The political stars are aligned like they haven't been in years. And yet? The same old D.C. inertia is setting in. Congress is snoozing through a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver real change. There's no sense of urgency. No fire. No strategy. Just more performative politics as usual. The difference is: this time, we're paying attention. Gen Z conservatives didn't get off the couch and show up to the ballot box to watch history repeat itself. We're tired of politicians who post more than they produce. House and Senate Republicans—stop acting like influencers and start acting like lawmakers. You don't get to post selfies with Elon Musk or tweet your appreciation to DOGE if you won't even codify basic spending cuts like the DOGE Act. You can't coast on vibes while the country's on fire. You were sent to legislate, not livestream. You weren't elected to trend on X—you were elected to fix what's broken. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Brilyn Hollyhand and President Donald Trump are pictured at the University of Alabama on May 1, 2025. Photo Courtesy of the White House Despite facing one of the most pivotal moments in modern political history, Congress still isn't working full weeks. Many lawmakers fly in Tuesday afternoon and are wheels-up by Thursday. Three-day workweeks in the middle of a national crisis? That's not leadership—that's laziness. Meanwhile, families across America are grinding five, six, even seven days a week just to stay afloat. Blue-collar workers don't get to call it a week by Wednesday night. Neither should the people writing our laws. If our representatives can't even put in a full week's work during a make-or-break presidency, maybe they don't deserve the job. I will never forget my first ever dinner with a U.S. senator. It was my 12th birthday, and we were in D.C., eating downtown after I had recorded some episodes of my podcast on Capitol Hill. He leaned across the table to me and said, "Brilyn, the first thing you're going to learn in this business is that in politics there are work horses and show horses. The work horses bring home the pork for the state that sent them there. The show horses run to the TV cameras. Be a work horse, and only join a cable show when you have an accomplishment to tout." That stuck with me—and I'm reminded of it right now more than ever. Because D.C. is overflowing with show horses. They gallop into every hearing, prance onto every panel, and leave before the hard work begins. This isn't just about optics. This is about outcomes. Republicans were given a second chance to do what they promised the first time. It's not enough to give speeches about the border. Close it. It's not enough to post videos in front of the IRS. Defund it. It's not enough to warn about weaponized government. Dismantle it. This is the moment to act, not admire the problem. Stop playacting reform—deliver it. The base isn't looking for another firebrand quote; we're looking for a signed bill. We're not asking for the moon—we're demanding that you work. Get off the couch. Get off cable news. And get legislation on the president's desk. Defund the weaponized bureaucracy. Close the border. Cut the waste. Stop acting like your job is to coast to retirement and start acting like your job is to represent us. If you need inspiration, look outside the Beltway—real Americans are hustling every day without fanfare. Why can't Congress? Gen Z is watching. And we have receipts. We're the most online, most informed, and most fed-up generation to ever engage in politics. We can see through the talking points. We recognize when someone's all flash and no follow-through. And we're not afraid to call it out—publicly, loudly, and often. You can't gaslight us with headlines. You can't distract us with Instagram posts. We see the floor schedule. We track the votes. We know the difference between working and pretending. If the GOP wastes another Trump term, it won't just be a policy failure—it'll be a generational betrayal. My generation won't forget. We didn't come this far just to watch you do nothing, again. We showed up because we believe in a different future—one that isn't dictated by lobbyists, legacy institutions, and leadership that loves the camera more than the country. Clock in, Congress. Or clock out—and make room for someone who will. Brilyn Hollyhand is an 18-year-old political commentator, chairman of the Republican National Committee's Youth Advisory Council, and bestselling author of One Generation Away: Why Now is the Time to Restore American Freedom. For more of his hot takes you can follow him on socials @BrilynHollyhand or visit The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone diagnosed with thyroid cancer
Media mogul Shari Redstone, CBS parent Paramount's controlling shareholder, has been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. "Shari Redstone was diagnosed with thyroid cancer earlier this spring. While it has been a challenging period, she is maintaining all professional and philanthropic activities throughout her treatment, which is ongoing. She and her family are grateful that her prognosis is excellent," Redstone's spokesperson told Fox News Digital. The 71-year-old has frequently been in the news this year as she seeks the Trump administration's approval of a multibillion-dollar planned merger with Skydance Media and has given lawyers the green light to settle President Donald Trump's election interference lawsuit against CBS News, although no deal has been reached. Redstone wanted the opinion of doctors "about two months ago after experiencing fatigue and other symptoms," according to The New York Times, which first reported the diagnosis. She underwent surgery in May. The Times noted that she was quickly diagnosed and surgeons removed her thyroid gland but were unable to remove all the cancer cells because they'd spread to her vocal cords. Redstone controls more than three-quarters of Paramount's Class A voting shares through National Amusements, the company she took control of in 2016 when her media mogul father, Sumner Redstone, was deemed too incapacitated to run the company. He died in 2020. Redstone, who recused herself from settlement discussions related to the Trump lawsuit in February, isn't thrilled with being tied up in litigation with the sitting president and wants to get things resolved. Fox News Digital confirmed last week that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit. The talks are ongoing, but the president's legal team is demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Many industry insiders believe the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will wait until the lawsuit is in the rearview mirror before deciding if the planned merger with Skydance Media will be approved. Redstone is set for a significant windfall if she's able to flip Paramount to Skydance. Bloomberg reported last year that she would receive $180 million in severance on top of the roughly $350 million she would pocket from the merger. Skydance Media CEO David Ellison, who would take control of CBS as head of the newly formed Paramount Skydance Corp. if the merger is finalized, was aware of Redstone's cancer diagnosis, according to the Times.