logo
'Horrifying' fire at California lithium battery plant sparks calls for new clean energy rules

'Horrifying' fire at California lithium battery plant sparks calls for new clean energy rules

Yahoo26-01-2025

When a massive fire erupted at one of the world's largest lithium-ion battery storage facilities in Monterey County, it didn't just send plumes of smoke over nearby communities — it cast a pall over the future of California's clean energy industry.
The fire at the Moss Landing Power Plant, which ignited on Jan. 16, burned for five days and ultimately destroyed around 80% of the batteries inside the building. Now, as the smoke clears, Monterey-area officials warn that the blaze may be a harbinger as the state increases its reliance on renewable energy, electric vehicles and other battery-powered devices.
"I know green is good, but we've got to move slowly," Monterey County Supervisor Glenn Church told The Times. "What we're doing with this technology is way ahead of government regulations and ahead of the industry's ability to control it."
The fire earlier this month was the fourth at Moss Landing since 2019, and the third at buildings owned by Texas-based Vistra Energy. The plant is off Highway 1, about 18 miles northeast of the city of Monterey.
Read more: Monterey County officials call Moss Landing lithium battery storage fire a 'wake-up call'
Already, the fire has prompted calls for additional safety regulations around battery storage, and more local control over where storage sites are located. Officials are also demanding that Moss Landing remain offline until an investigation can be completed and major safety improvements implemented.
Assemblymember Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay) has introduced Assembly Bill 303 — the Battery Energy Safety & Accountability Act — which would require local engagement in the permitting process for battery or energy storage facilities, and establish a buffer to keep such sites a set distance away from sensitive areas like schools, hospitals and natural habitats.
"I believe that we are living in a climate crisis and that we need to have solutions," Addis said at a news conference Thursday. "But along with those solutions, we have to be able to have safety."
Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fierce advocate of clean energy, agrees an investigation is needed to determine the fire's cause and supports taking steps to make Moss Landing and similar facilities safer, his spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in a statement.
Read more: Battery storage is a key piece of California's clean energy transition. But there's a problem with fires
Addis and two other state legislators sent a letter to the California Public Utilities Commission Thursday requesting an investigation.
"The Moss Landing facility has represented a pivotal piece of our state's energy future, however this disastrous fire has undermined the public's trust in utility scale lithium-ion battery energy storage systems," states the letter. "If we are to ensure California moves its climate and energy goals forward, we must demonstrate a steadfast commitment to safety."
Vistra has promised an internal investigation into the incident, and to conduct soil testing and fully cooperate with any state or local investigations.
During an emergency briefing after the fire broke out, officials said a plume released from the plant contained hydrogen fluoride, a toxic compound, according to county spokesperson Nick Pasculli.
However, initial testing from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ruled that the levels of toxic gases released by the batteries, including hydrogen fluoride, did not pose a threat to public health during the fire.
Read more: Lithium-ion batteries causing fires, dangers on California freeways, sparking calls for safety improvements
Still, many residents remain on edge about potential long-term impacts on the nearby communities of Watsonville, Castroville, Salinas and the ecologically sensitive Elkhorn Slough estuary.
"Having to experience and witness that kind of assault, not just on the people, but on the trees and the environment in general was horrifying," local resident Silvia Morales told The Times. "The aftereffects might be long term, and I'm seriously concerned about the fact that the plant is adjacent to organic farms that are producing food."
Several factors contributed to the rapid spread of the fire and complicated firefighters' response, according to North County Fire District Chief Joel Mendoza.
A fire suppression system that is part of every battery rack at the plant failed and led to a chain reaction of batteries catching on fire, he said at a news conference last week. Then, a broken camera system in the plant and superheated gases made it challenging for firefighters to intervene.
Once the fire began spreading, firefighters were not able to use water, because doing so can trigger a violent chemical reaction in lithium-ion batteries, potentially causing more to ignite or explode.
Read more: Big rig with lithium ion batteries flips in San Pedro, sparking hazardous fire, closing freeway
The scale of the fire startled local residents and officials, who have already experienced several smaller fires at the plant and are worried about what could happen if major changes aren't made.
Exacerbating those concerns is a new battery storage site proposed in an unincorporated part of Santa Cruz County near Watsonville. An online petition to halt the establishment of any more battery storage facilities in Monterey or Santa Cruz counties has collected more than 2,900 signatures.
The Monterey County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to declare a local state of emergency and to send a letter to Vistra and Pacific Gas and Electric Co., which also stores batteries at the plant, to request that their operations remain offline until an investigation is complete.
Local resident Ed Mitchell, who was speaking on behalf of a newly formed community group called the Moss Landing Fire Community Recovery Group, told supervisors that the potential of electric batteries is exciting.
But, he added, it's a 'technology that when it goes wrong, it's not thrilling, it's terrifying.'
Times staff writer Nathan Solis contributed to this report.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data
One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

Associated Press

time31 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

Remember 23andMe? The company that gave customers saliva-based DNA testing kits to learn about their ancestry? Founded in 2006, the company also conducted health research and drug development. But it struggled to find a profitable business model and eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March, raising concerns about the safety of customer data. Well, 27 states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court seeking to block the sale of the company's archive of genetic data without customer consent. The lawsuit comes as a biotechnology company seeks court's approval to buy the struggling firm. If you were a customer of 23andMe, you're probably wondering what is going on with your data. It turns out you do have options if you want to protect your genetic self. What happened to 23andMe? 23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March. Anne Wojcicki, who co-founded the company nearly two decades ago and served as its CEO stepped down. The San Francisco-based company said that it would look to sell 'substantially all of its assets' through a court-approved reorganization plan. Wojcicki intends to bid on 23andMe as the company pursues a sale through the bankruptcy process. In a statement on social media, Wojcicki said that she resigned as CEO to be 'in the best position' as an independent bidder. 23andMe said that filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection helps facilitate a sale of the company, meaning that it's seeking new ownership. The company said it wants to pull back on its real estate footprint and has asked the court to reject lease contracts in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, California, and elsewhere to help cut costs. But the company plans to keep operating during the process. I used the service, is my DNA data safe? In a post about the Chapter 11 process, 23andMe said its users' privacy and data are important considerations in any transaction and that any buyer will be required to comply with applicable laws when it comes to how it treats customer data. But experts note that laws have limits. For one, the U.S. has no federal privacy law and only about 20 states do. There are also security concerns. For instance, the turmoil of bankruptcy and related job cuts could leave fewer employees to protect customers' data against hackers. It wouldn't be the first time — a 2023 data breach exposed the genetic data of nearly 7 million customers at 23andMe, which later agreed to pay $30 million in cash to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to protect customers whose personal information was exposed. Experts note that DNA data is particularly sensitive — and thus valuable. 'At a fundamental biological level, this is you and only you,' said David Choffnes, a computer science professor at Northeastern University and executive director of its Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute. 'If you have an email address that gets compromised, you can find another email provider and start using a new email address. And you're pretty much able to move on with your life without problem. And you just can't do that with your genetic code.' 23andMe says it does not share information with health insurance companies, employers or public databases without users' consent and with law enforcement only if required by a valid legal process, such as a subpoena. Choffnes said while that's good, it's a fairly narrow set of categories. 'There's still other things that they are allowed to do with that data, including, as they mentioned, provide cross context, behavioral or targeted advertising,' he said. 'So, you know, in a sense, even if they aren't sending your personal data to an advertiser, there's a long line of research that identifies how third parties can re-identify you from de-identified data by looking for patterns in it. And so if they're targeting you with advertisements, for example, based on some information that they have about your genetic data, there's probably a way that other parties could piece together other information they have access to.' How can I delete my data from 23andMe? California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an urgent consumer alert before 23andMe filed for bankruptcy — noting the company's financial distress and reminding people they have the right to have their data deleted. If you have a 23andMe account, you can delete your data by logging in and going to 'settings' and scrolling to a section called '23andMe Data' at the bottom of the page. Then, click 'View,' download it if you want a copy then go to the 'Delete Data' section and click 'Permanently Delete Data.' 23andMe will email you to confirm and you will need to follow the link in the email to confirm your deletion request. If you previously asked 23andMe to store your saliva sample and DNA, you can also ask that it be destroyed by going to your account settings and clicking on 'Preferences.' And you can withdraw consent from third-party researchers to use your genetic data and sample under 'Research and Product Consents.'

One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data
One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

Remember 23andMe? The company that gave customers saliva-based DNA testing kits to learn about their ancestry? Founded in 2006, the company also conducted health research and drug development. But it struggled to find a profitable business model and eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March, raising concerns about the safety of customer data. Well, 27 states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court seeking to block the sale of the company's archive of genetic data without customer consent. The lawsuit comes as a biotechnology company seeks court's approval to buy the struggling firm. If you were a customer of 23andMe, you're probably wondering what is going on with your data. It turns out you do have options if you want to protect your genetic self. What happened to 23andMe? 23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March. Anne Wojcicki, who co-founded the company nearly two decades ago and served as its CEO stepped down. The San Francisco-based company said that it would look to sell 'substantially all of its assets' through a court-approved reorganization plan. Wojcicki intends to bid on 23andMe as the company pursues a sale through the bankruptcy process. In a statement on social media, Wojcicki said that she resigned as CEO to be 'in the best position' as an independent bidder. 23andMe said that filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection helps facilitate a sale of the company, meaning that it's seeking new ownership. The company said it wants to pull back on its real estate footprint and has asked the court to reject lease contracts in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, California, and elsewhere to help cut costs. But the company plans to keep operating during the process. I used the service, is my DNA data safe? In a post about the Chapter 11 process, 23andMe said its users' privacy and data are important considerations in any transaction and that any buyer will be required to comply with applicable laws when it comes to how it treats customer data. But experts note that laws have limits. For one, the U.S. has no federal privacy law and only about 20 states do. There are also security concerns. For instance, the turmoil of bankruptcy and related job cuts could leave fewer employees to protect customers' data against hackers. It wouldn't be the first time — a 2023 data breach exposed the genetic data of nearly 7 million customers at 23andMe, which later agreed to pay $30 million in cash to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to protect customers whose personal information was exposed. Experts note that DNA data is particularly sensitive — and thus valuable. 'At a fundamental biological level, this is you and only you,' said David Choffnes, a computer science professor at Northeastern University and executive director of its Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute. 'If you have an email address that gets compromised, you can find another email provider and start using a new email address. And you're pretty much able to move on with your life without problem. And you just can't do that with your genetic code.' 23andMe says it does not share information with health insurance companies, employers or public databases without users' consent and with law enforcement only if required by a valid legal process, such as a subpoena. Choffnes said while that's good, it's a fairly narrow set of categories. 'There's still other things that they are allowed to do with that data, including, as they mentioned, provide cross context, behavioral or targeted advertising,' he said. 'So, you know, in a sense, even if they aren't sending your personal data to an advertiser, there's a long line of research that identifies how third parties can re-identify you from de-identified data by looking for patterns in it. And so if they're targeting you with advertisements, for example, based on some information that they have about your genetic data, there's probably a way that other parties could piece together other information they have access to.' How can I delete my data from 23andMe? California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an urgent consumer alert before 23andMe filed for bankruptcy — noting the company's financial distress and reminding people they have the right to have their data deleted. If you have a 23andMe account, you can delete your data by logging in and going to 'settings' and scrolling to a section called '23andMe Data' at the bottom of the page. Then, click 'View,' download it if you want a copy then go to the 'Delete Data' section and click 'Permanently Delete Data.' 23andMe will email you to confirm and you will need to follow the link in the email to confirm your deletion request. If you previously asked 23andMe to store your saliva sample and DNA, you can also ask that it be destroyed by going to your account settings and clicking on 'Preferences.' And you can withdraw consent from third-party researchers to use your genetic data and sample under 'Research and Product Consents.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

More than 1,100 jobs cut across Northern California as layoffs mount
More than 1,100 jobs cut across Northern California as layoffs mount

San Francisco Chronicle​

time35 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

More than 1,100 jobs cut across Northern California as layoffs mount

A fresh wave of layoffs is sweeping across Northern California, with job cuts spanning the biotech, retail, agriculture and health care sectors — signaling mounting economic pressures in the region. Genentech, the South San Francisco-based biotechnology firm owned by Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche, has announced a new round of layoffs. According to a WARN notice filed with the state, 143 employees will be permanently let go by mid-July. 'As part of our ongoing commitment to innovation and operational efficiency, we continuously review and adapt our business in line with customer and patient needs,' Roche said in a statement. 'Regular reviews of our strategy and operating model ensure we deliver on our commitments.' In Napa County, Tre Posti — a well-known event venue in St. Helena — will permanently close in August, resulting in 130 job losses. The venue, popular for weddings and fine dining experiences under the direction of Chef Nash Cognetti, is considered a cultural and economic fixture in the region's hospitality landscape. Retail is also feeling the pinch. Michaels Stores announced it will permanently close its Tracy distribution center, eliminating 229 jobs. The announcement comes amid a broader downturn in retail, with store closures contributing to a 274% surge in industry-wide layoffs in the first half of 2025, according to a report released Tuesday by Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. Meanwhile, Sacramento's Blue Diamond Growers will begin phasing out operations at its almond processing facility over the next two years, impacting roughly 600 workers. The company cited a decline in almond sales and shrinking orchard acreage as key factors. 'Thank you Blue Diamond for 115 years of partnership,' Sacramento Mayor Kevin McCarty and City Councilmember Phil Pluckebaum said in a joint statement. 'The Blue Diamond factory is primed for new life and new opportunity for our city.' The plant is located about a mile from the future site of the Sacramento Republic Stadium. Kaiser Permanente also reported a round of layoffs this week, cutting 40 positions across its Bay Area facilities in Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont and Pleasanton, as part of a broader reduction of 55 jobs statewide. Compounding the region's economic uncertainty, retail layoffs nationally have climbed sharply in 2025, driven by widespread store closures. According to the report by Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc., the first five months of the year saw over 75,000 retail job cuts — a 274% increase compared to the same period in 2024. Macy's leads the pack, closing 150 locations after a $21.3 billion sales drop. Joann, the crafts retailer, shut down all 800 stores following bankruptcy, while CVS plans to shutter 270 locations amid changing consumer patterns. JCPenney, Walgreens and Forever 21 have also announced significant downsizing. Retail now ranks as the second-hardest-hit sector for job cuts this year, trailing only the federal government, which has shed over 270,000 jobs due to reductions tied to the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. The tech industry follows closely, with 74,716 layoffs reported so far — a 35% increase from last year. 'Tariffs, funding cuts, consumer spending, and overall economic pessimism are putting intense pressure on companies' workforces,' Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said in a statement. 'Companies are spending less, slowing hiring, and sending layoff notices.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store