
Edinburgh council 'inadequacies' found in handling of Cammy Day complaint
There were "inadequacies" in the way City of Edinburgh Council handled a complaint made against former leader Cammy Day, an independent investigation has concluded.Councillor Day became leader of the council in 2022 but stepped down in December 2024 after allegations he had sent inappropriate messages to Ukrainian refugees.In April, a police investigation concluded that there was "no evidence of criminality."An independent review found that the complaint was handled well but found "inadequacies" in the way a previous complaint was dealt with.
Edinburgh council tasked the former Information Commissioner Kevin Dunion with reviewing how complaints made against Day were handled.His newly-published report found no evidence of a potential complaint made in 2006 - before Day was a councillor.But he concluded there were inadequacies with the way the then-council leader, Adam Nols-McVey, handled a complaint in 2018 when Day was the deputy leader of the council.The seriousness of an allegation that a "senior Labour councillor" had "groomed" a 15-year-old boy meant Nols-McVey should have shared it with other senior officials, the report said.Emails relating to the complaint were lost, with police later advising the fact the complaint was anonymous meant it couldn't be taken any further.Mr Dunion said the loss of related emails was an "unintended and unexpected consequence" of the information not being shared.More broadly, the report says the council still lacks sufficient safeguards to prevent this type alleged behaviour in future.
The report concluded that recent complaints about Councillor Day's alleged behaviour towards Ukrainian refugees in 2023 were handled properly and in line with the council's policies.He said, overall, complaints were for the most part handled properly and that the policies and procedures in place are broadly effective.Councillor Day denies all the claims that have been made against him, telling a newspaper he is the victim of a co-ordinated political attack.In April, Police Scotland said that no criminality had been established during its investigation into Cammy Day that focused on the 2023 allegations.Councillor Adam Nols-McVey said the report acknowledges that the 2018 complaint was dealt with in a "sensitive manner prioritising the protection of the complainant while raising it with the police, senior council officers and, most importantly, giving the individual concerned advice and directing them to support available".He added "unless alleged victims choose to make an official complaint and go through the process, there are restrictions on what action authorities can take".It raised concerns about "egregious" leaking of information for political motives and alcohol-fuelled behaviour at social functions in the City Chambers.Councillors will consider the report next Thursday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Mercia Police officer banned for 'vulgar' comments
A gross misconduct hearing has upheld allegations that a male police officer engaged in inappropriate behaviour repeatedly towards female colleagues. PC Nathan Rogers would have been dismissed from West Mercia Police if he had not already resigned, the force said after the hearing on Tuesday. Mr Rogers made "highly offensive" and "vulgar" comments as well as initiating unwanted contact through social media - with his behaviour deemed "derogatory" and "harassing in nature". The former officer, who was based in the Operations and Communications Centre in Worcestershire, will be banned from working for a UK police service in the future. The hearing upheld an allegation that his behaviour, between June 2023 and May 2025, amounted to gross Mercia Police said his conduct was first formally addressed in June 2023, when he was sanctioned with a written warning. The force said despite both informal and formal interventions he continued to breach policing standards of professional behaviour. It said: "Despite prior disciplinary measures, Rogers repeatedly failed to uphold professional standards, showing a blatant disregard for his colleagues and for the values of the force. "The hearing found his actions breached the standards of authority, respect, and courtesy, and amounted to discreditable conduct."Mr Rogers resigned from the force in April Chief Constable Rachel Jones said: "Nathan Rogers was given opportunities to learn and change his behaviour, but he continued to act in a wholly unacceptable and unprofessional manner."His actions were highly unprofessional and undoubtedly made his female colleagues feel deeply uncomfortable and such behaviour will not be tolerated."He will now be added to the College of Policing's barred list, banning him from working for a UK police service in the future. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ryanair introduces £500 fines for disruptive passengers
Disruptive Ryanair passengers removed from planes will be fined £500, the airline has announced. The carrier said this will be the 'minimum' punishment, and it will continue to pursue passengers for civil damages. Ryanair expressed hope the new policy will 'act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behaviour'. A spokesperson for the airline said: 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behaviour. 'To help ensure that our passengers and crew travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment, without unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers, we have introduced a £500 fine, which will be issued to any passengers offloaded from aircraft as a result of their misconduct. 'While these are isolated events which happen across all airlines, disruptive behaviour in such a confined shared space is unacceptable.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
M18 mound of earth could be removed after fatal crash
A coroner has called for National Highways to take action to prevent future deaths on a stretch of motorway after a teenager was killed in a Mongan, 18, was a passenger in an Audi being driven by his brother John, 19, when it left the M18 between Doncaster and Rotherham last inquest previously heard the car hit a mound of grass on the central reservation which caused it to become "airborne" before it landed in woodland some 42 metres its conclusion, senior coroner Nicola Mundy said the presence of the mound placed "road users at risk". National Highways said it would be providing a "comprehensive response" to her concerns. The inquest, which was held at Doncaster Coroner's Court last week, heard the Audi was travelling at about 100mph when the crash happened and that both men were thrown from the hearing was told Patrick died instantly while John remained in a serious condition in hospital and had not yet been told of Patrick's brothers, from Cottenham, Cambridgeshire, had been at a pub in the Doncaster area. 'Catastrophic effect' South Yorkshire Police forensic collision investigator Steven Gardner told the inquest the manner of driving was the "sole causation" of the crash, although the mound has also posed a Mundy's call for National Highways to take action was raised in a prevention of future deaths it, she said the forensic collision investigator had advised the "mound of earth creates a continuing hazard to motorway users and any vehicle which might have legitimate cause to veer to the central reservation and in doing so strikes the mound".She said even if a vehicle was travelling within the speed limit "it would be subjected to the same effect on the vehicle (in that control of the vehicle would be lost) with potentially catastrophic effects". The coroner added: "The continued presence of this hazard (the mound of earth) places road users at risk of death."A spokesperson for National Highways said: "Any death on our roads is one too many and our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Patrick Mongan."We are reviewing the coroner's comments and will provide a comprehensive response to the report."The report said National Highways had 56 days to respond to its stated: "Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. "Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North