Ukraine expands evacuations in Sumy region amid offensive fears
Ukraine ordered the evacuation of 11 more villages in its Sumy region bordering Russia on Saturday amid fears Moscow was gearing up for a fresh ground assault.
Russia claims to have captured several villages in the northeastern region in recent weeks, and has massed more than 50,000 soldiers on the other side of the border, according to Kyiv.
The evacuations came just two days before a possible meeting between the two sides in Istanbul, as Washington called on both countries to end the three-year war.
Russia has confirmed it will send a delegation to the Turkish city, but Kyiv has yet to accept the proposal, warning the talks would not yield results unless the Kremlin provided its peace terms in advance.
On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accused Moscow of doing "everything" it could to sabotage the potential meeting by withholding its peace terms.
Authorities in Ukraine's Sumy region said Saturday they were evacuating 11 villages within a roughly 30-kilometre range from the Russian border.
"The decision was made in view of the constant threat to civilian life as a result of shelling of border communities," the regional administration said on social media.
A spokesman for Ukraine's border guard service, Andriy Demchenko, said Thursday that Russia was poised to "attempt an attack" on Sumy.
In total, 213 settlements in the region have been ordered to evacuate.
Russia's defence ministry said Saturday that its forces had taken another Sumy region village, Vodolagy.
Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, launched in February 2022, has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and the destruction of towns and villages across parts of the east and south of the country.
The Kremlin's army now controls around a fifth of the country and claims to have annexed five Ukrainian regions as its own, including Crimea, which it seized in 2014.
US President Donald Trump has spearheaded diplomatic efforts to bring an end to the fighting, but Kyiv and Moscow have both accused each other of not wanting peace.
The Kremlin has proposed further negotiations in Istanbul on Monday, after a May 16 round of talks that yielded little beyond a large prisoner-of-war exchange.
Kyiv has not yet said whether it will attend the Monday meeting, and said Friday it did not expect any results from the talks unless Moscow provided its peace terms in advance.
Russia says it will provide its peace memorandum in person on Monday.
But Ukraine suspects it will contain unrealistic demands that Kyiv has already rejected, including that Ukraine cede territory still under its control and abandon its NATO ambitions.
In a statement to the United Nations on Friday, Russia's UN ambassador Vassily Nebenzia suggested the memorandum might call for Western countries to halt arm supplies to Kyiv and for Ukraine to abandon its military mobilisation.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has fostered warm relations with both Zelensky and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, has become a key mediator amid efforts to end the conflict.
In a call with Zelensky late Friday, the Turkish leader urged both sides to send "strong delegations" to ensure momentum towards peace, according to Turkish state news agency Anadolu.
Turkey has offered to host a summit between Putin, Zelensky and Trump, but the Kremlin has turned down the offer.
Putin has consistently rebuffed calls for a 30-day, unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine.
bur-cad/rmb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
38 minutes ago
- First Post
'Near consensus': Hegseth says Nato close to deal on 5% defence spending
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said Nato allies are nearing consensus on a new defence spending target of 5% of GDP, a longstanding demand from President Donald Trump to member states read more Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, and Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte deliver statements ahead of a meeting of Nato defence ministers at Nato headquarters in Brussels, on Thursday. AP US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said Nato allies are nearing consensus on a new defence spending target of 5% of GDP, a longstanding demand from President Donald Trump to member states. Trump has for months said he wants Nato allies to boost investment in defence to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. No country is yet at 5%, not even the US, but Hegseth said there was progress on agreeing to the target. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking after a meeting with Nato defence ministers in Brussels, Hegseth said, 'I think it is, it is worth taking a moment to note the historic nature of what just occurred in there, which is not an end state, there's still more to go. But considering 2% was the goal that President Trump set out in his first term, President Trump said other countries need to carry the burden, pay the fair share, and a lot of people thought that was impossible, it couldn't happen, and here we are: countries in there are well exceeding 2% and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5% commitment for Nato.' He, however, said there are a few countries that are not quite there yet but expressed the desire to get them there. 'I won't name any names. It's amongst friends in that room. We'll get them there. But from France to Germany to the Baltics to the Nordic countries to Poland to Greece to Hungary, to so many more, the commitment is there 5% on defence spending. When you consider the threats that we face, the urgency in the world, it's critical,' he added. 'Capability targets' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte confirmed ministers agreed on 'capability targets' to strengthen military readiness. These targets involve priority acquisitions like long-range missiles, drones, and air defence systems, as well as logistics tools to enhance rapid deployment. 'All these investments have to be financed,' AP quoted Rutte as saying. Earlier in the days as he arrived for the Nato meeting, Hegseth said that all Nato members must commit to spending 5% of their GDP on defence by the upcoming summit of Nato leaders scheduled for June 24–25. According to diplomats, European allies recognise that increasing defence spending is essential to securing continued US support for the continent's security. They believe enabling President Trump to claim a victory on his 5% demand is key to maintaining American engagement, especially during the Hague summit, reported Reuters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'That will be a considerable extra investment,' Rutte told reporters. He expressed confidence that at the Hague summit, 'we will decide on a much higher spending target for all the nations in Nato.' In an effort to reach Trump's 5% target, Rutte has proposed that alliance members increase direct defence spending to 3.5% of GDP and allocate an additional 1.5% to broader security-related initiatives, Reuters reported. Hegseth expressed support for that plan on Thursday. 'You got to spend to have hard power,' Reuters quoted Hegseth as saying. 'This alliance, we believe, in a matter of weeks, will be committing to 5%: 3.5% in hard military and 1.5% in infrastructure and defence-related activities, that combination constitutes a real commitment.' Spain not on board However, not all member states are aligned. Spain, for instance, has expressed hesitation about adopting the 5% target. 'We think that this 2% is enough to meet the responsibilities we have committed to,' Reuters quoted Spanish Defence Minister Margarita Robles as saying on Thursday. 'What is important is that each country is able to meet the objectives it has set itself,' Robles added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nato's investment plan Negotiations over Nato's new investment plan are expected to continue up to the summit's eve. Meanwhile, Rutte said allies are set to agree Thursday on 'historic' new capability targets —defining troop numbers, weapons, and ammunition contributions — to better balance defence efforts across Europe, Canada, and the US. Germany will need 50,000–60,000 additional active troops under the proposed targets, according to German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius. Disagreements remain over the timeline for meeting the 5% spending goal. Rutte has suggested 2032, a deadline some Eastern European countries say is too slow, while others see it as too ambitious. Estonia wants the target reached within five years. 'We don't have time for 10 years, we don't have time even for seven years,' said Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur. Sweden is pushing for 2030. Debate also continues over what counts as 'defense-related' spending, with possible inclusion of cybersecurity and certain infrastructure projects. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘India-Pakistan conflict was stopped with Trump's personal participation': Kremlin after Putin call
Trump on Wednesday (June 4) held a telephonic conversation with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during which the two leaders also discussed the India-Pakistan conflict, among other issues read more Kremlin appears to have endorsed US President Donald Trump's claim of helping reach a ceasefire between India and Pakistan following a four-day military conflict last month. Trump on Wednesday (June 4) held a telephonic conversation with Russian leader Vladimir Putin during which the two leaders also discussed the India-Pakistan conflict among other issues. In a press statement issued after the talks, the Kremlin acknowledged Trump's 'personal involvement' in helping halt the military standoff between the two South Asian neighbours. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump,' said the statement. Trump's ceasefire claim The US president has on several occasions claimed he helped broker the truce between India and Pakistan on May 10. He made the latest claim during a press conference with Tesla CEO Elon Musk earlier this week, saying, 'We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster, and I want to thank the leaders of India and Pakistan, and I want to thank my people. Also, we talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons. They're great leaders in those countries, and they understood and they agreed, and that all stopped.' Trump's comments come merely a week after he made the same claim during South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to the White House, where he said he 'settled' the tensions between India and Pakistan through trade. India's rebuttal However, New Delhi has swiftly rejected the claims made by the Trump administration. India maintains that the request for ceasefire was initiated by the Pakistani side on May 10. Indian opposition lawmaker Shashi Tharoor, who is currently leading a delegation to Washington DC as part of the Operation Sindoor outreach programme, on Thursday dismissed Trump's claim. 'We have enormous respect for the American Presidency and the American President (Donald Trump). All we can say for ourselves is that we have never particularly wanted to ask anyone to mediate," Tharoor said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tharoor further highlighted that India was anyway ready to cease its Operation Sindoor once Pakistan stopped its aggression and hence required no persuasion. 'The moment Pakistan stops, we are prepared to stop. So if they, in turn, then told the Pakistanis, you better stop because the Indians are willing to stop, and that was what they did, then that's a wonderful gesture on their part with Pakistan, but only Pakistan, and they can tell us exactly what happened. With us, all we can say is that we know, in our conversations, some of these things didn't come up,' Tharoor added.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
EU must tell Pakistan to end terror cycle: Former Union Minister MJ Akbar
Brussels [Belgium], June 5 (ANI): Former Union Minister MJ Akbar urged the European Union to reject mediation efforts and take a firm stand against Pakistan's long-standing support for terrorism. He said, 'The principal message that we conveyed was that all talk of mediation is irrelevant. The only thing that the EU should do is to tell Pakistan in no uncertain terms that it must end the cycle of barbarism of violence and terrorism that it began on the 22nd of October, 1947, and which continues till this Europe cannot stand up against fascist ethnic cleansing violence, then who will? and if our European friends do not recognise the danger, then it will hurt is the global war against terrorism and particularly against Pakistan-sponsored fascist terrorism.' Akbar stressed that Europe must recognize the threat posed by Pakistan-sponsored terrorism and act decisively to uphold global peace and security. As part of the all-party delegation led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, which toured the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, and Belgium, Akbar voiced strong concerns about global inaction and hypocrisy on terrorism. He questioned the international community's double standards, highlighting the disparity in responses to terrorism based on geographical location and the nationality of victims. He emphasised that while India's actions against terrorism are met with calls for restraint, other countries are held to different standards. 'Are there two laws in this world? One for America and the West, and another for India?' he asked. 'After 9/11, the US went 12,000 kilometres to seek justice in Afghanistan and Pakistan. They held Pakistan accountable -- General Musharraf admitted it. But when India takes action just 500 kilometres away to fight terror, we are asked to show restraint.' Akbar stressed that Indian lives are equally precious and deserving of justice, questioning whether the international community's silence stems from a perceived difference in value between Indian and Western lives. 'Are the tears of an Indian widow less painful than those of an American widow? Is an Indian life less precious?' he questioned, urging the international community to shed its silence. He clarified that India is not seeking revenge but justice. 'We are here as friends, not in hostility. We share Europe's values -- democracy, freedom, and nationhood. Yet many still sit on the fence,' he said. 'We now ask the hard questions and expect answers.' The all-party Indian parliamentary delegation, led by BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad, engaged with the Indian diaspora in Brussels and sharply criticised Pakistan for its continued support for terrorism. The delegation includes BJP MPs Daggubati Purandeswari and Samik Bhattacharya, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, Congress MPs Ghulam Ali Khatana and Amar Singh, former Union Minister MJ Akbar, and former Ambassador Pankaj Saran. This visit is part of India's broader diplomatic campaign to highlight the impact of cross-border terrorism and advocate for justice for its victims. (ANI)
