Elon, Inc: Is Elon Really Quitting Politics... for Banking?
When Bloomberg's Mishal Husain interviewed Elon Musk last week, it caused quite a stir. This was especially the case when Musk proclaimed, 'in terms of political spending, I'm gonna do a lot less in the future.' (Most news reports missed a sly qualification that made this seem more like an ultimatum. But more on that below). Coverage of the supposed end of Musk's role as Republican Party's Sugar Daddy added fuel to the ongoing 'what will Elon do now?' frenzy. Over the weekend, a substantial outage at his social media platform X may have added some clarity. In response, the serial entrepreneur announced he was going 'back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms.' Or not. In this episode of Elon, Inc., Max Chafkin brings together Elon Musk reporter Dana Hull and social media reporter Kurt Wagner to discuss whether Musk means what he says about politics, subsidizing the GOP or even going back to work. Is he really leaving politics in the rearview mirror? Or were these statements calculated? Could they be a way for him to intimidate lawmakers who are expecting campaign funds while assuring investors he's on top of his sometimes struggling companies? To round things off, they rank Musk's most immediate plans on a scale of how likely they are to succeed in the foreseeable future. Will it be X Money? A functioning fleet of 'robotaxis?' Or maybe shooting Tesla's humanoid robot Optimus to Mars? There was some disagreement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Minn. State Rep. Killed, Senator Shot In Alleged ‘Targeted' Attack
In what has been characterized by officials as a 'politically motivated assassination,' Minnesota State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed in their home while State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were also shot and remain in surgery. The chief suspect may have impersonated a law enforcement officer in the attacks on the two ... More Democratic lawmakers. A police alert warned that the 'suspect is armed and dangerous and may be impersonating law enforcement,' according to the Minnesota Star-Tribune. Deputy FBI director Dan Bongino posted on X that the bureau 'is working in collaboration with our local and state partners.' This is a developing news story—check back for updates.
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
ASRA NOMANI: The familiar hidden hand behind today's #NoKings protests
Yesterday, as protesters readied to descend on city squares across America for a mass demonstration branded #NoKings, California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis took to MSNBC, praising the movement as a righteous stand for democracy. "People are very determined to get out there and be seen. This is the United States. We do not want a king," she said. What she didn't say: The California Democratic Party is itself organizing today's protests — from Orange County to Oakland — with the full institutional weight of the Democratic machine, and the Democratic National Committee is playing a critical role behind the scenes in protests across the country from California to Florida. Already, I established in analysis for the Pearl Project, a nonprofit journalism initiative, that the protests are organized by 197 organizations aligned with the Democratic Party. This network harnesses a machine of about $2.1 billion in total annual revenues toward this cause. That effort alone represents a partisan political enterprise that I call the protest industrial complex. Now, in a new analysis of 148 protest listings uploaded on a Democratic Party organizing platform, I have established that at least 70 Democratic National Committee affiliates are also organizing protests in at least 19 states and the District of Columbia. This is a clear indicator of the partisanship of these protests as an orchestrated, calculated expression of the opposition party, not a spontaneous grassroots outpouring. Despite the rhetoric of populist uprising, it's clear: #NoKings is the Democratic Party staging political theater in the streets of America. As editor-in-chief of the Pearl Project, I have spent the last week building this database of the protest organizers and the findings expose the true architecture of today's "day of defiance." From Mobilize links and protest pages to organizing toolkits, we traced the digital and physical infrastructure behind the June 14 demonstrations. I've added a tab with the Democratic Party events in a public spreadsheet that I invite readers to study. Here's what I found about the hand of the Democratic Party: It's important to recognize: the Democrat Party isn't just supporting these protests — they're leading them, often under the radar. Here's just a glimpse of the geographic footprint of Democratic National Committee club and committee activity. It's dense, but I share it so you can know we have the receipts: What does this list tell us? This is a party infrastructure, not a protest movement. Let's be honest: this isn't about stopping a "king." It's about protecting a political party. Across the country, Democratic Party chapters have flooded local organizing channels with official flyers, water bottles branded with county logos, talking points and coordinated slogans. In Santa Monica, Calif., the local Democratic Club is marching along the boardwalk. In Flagstaff, Ariz., the Coconino County Democratic Party is rallying on the steps of city hall. In Naples, Florida, the Collier County Democratic Executive Committee is mobilizing volunteers with signage pre-approved by national political action committees. In Seminole County, Fla., the advertising is about political canvassing with these details for volunteers: "Signs will be provided to place next to the cooler that say 'Free Water from SemDems.' Consider bringing trash bags to tie to the handle of the cooler to collect used bottles. Email deb4elections@ if you can bring a cooler with water. Passing out SemDems cards. Stand at protest area entry points and make sure people receive a SemDem card so they can connect with us. Passing Out Protest Signs. Hand out signs for people to wave if they didn't bring one. Help people make a sign using SemDems supplies. In this role, you will be too busy to participate in the protest at the street." In total, we tracked scores of unique combinations of state and club, proving that multiple organizations — including groups like Swing Left and Indivisible — are operating across several states with the Democratic Party, deploying scripts, signs, and staff. Here is what you won't hear on most of the media's coverage: These are not the spontaneous actions of private citizens. They are events sanctioned by the Democratic Party dressed up in the language of moral resistance. These are not the spontaneous actions of private citizens. They are events sanctioned by the Democratic Party dressed up in the language of moral resistance. These protests amount to a new chapter of political puppetry. One longtime Democratic volunteer, granted anonymity, described to us the internal pressure they felt to participate: "It feels less like a movement and more like a performance. We are told which graphics to share, what signs to print and even how to answer reporters. It is like the whole protest is a campaign rollout — but in protest clothes." This comment is telling. The Democratic Party is not showing up to these protests as supporters. They are stage managers. The very people warning us against authoritarianism are deploying authoritarian tactics to choreograph outrage. It's political cynicism at its finest—activism from above, not below. Why does this matter? In 2002, my friend and colleague Daniel Pearl was murdered by extremists in Pakistan. The ideology that led to his death — sectarianism, division, moral absolutism — has haunted me ever since. That same dogma is now playing out in American streets, cloaked in slogans like "No Kings" and "Save Democracy." In my 2023 book, Woke Army, I warned of an unholy alliance between far-left radicals and ideological opportunists that undermines institutions from within. Today's protests manifest this alliance and they are the logical next step: not organic resistance, but manufactured dissent designed to influence the next election cycles. This isn't about Donald Trump's flaws or strengths. It's about the weaponization of protest by those already in power. Today's protest is not a revolution. It's a message that refuses the 2024 election results. The message is this: the Democratic Party is willing to use every tool available — PACs, nonprofits, public unions and even street protests — to control the narrative heading into the next elections. Voters should be wary of any party that cries "democracy" while scripting the applause, supplying the signs and managing the stage. Today, as you watch video clips of marchers chanting and waving signs, ask yourself: who paid for the microphone? Who printed the signs? And who benefits when the crowd disperses? The answer is clear with Trump's birthday party for the Army: it's an expression of the ruling Republican administration. That's the kind of transparency we need to have about the street protests. The protests aren't grassroots. They are the political puppeteering of the Democratic Party.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto legislation just had a 'gigantic' week. Here's why.
Bitcoin (BTC=F) is holding above $100K despite market jitters tied to tensions in the Middle East. Axios crypto reporter Brady Dale joins Morning Brief host Brad Smith to break down the pivotal week in crypto legislation and what congressional stablecoin action could mean for bitcoin. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Bitcoin is still holding above the $100,000 level but losing some ground as stocks slump amid increasing Mideast tension. We're taking a look at crypto-related stocks as well, including Coinbase, also largely lower along with the broader market. So does this spell the end of the Rico rally for right now, or could impending legislation. And a crypto friendly administration proved to be a boost. I wanna bring in Brady Dale, Axio's crypto reporter here. Brady, good to have you back on the program with us. Just take us into your evaluation of what the mindset around riskier portions of the investment thesis, riskier assets like crypto, especially within the broader playing out of the Middle East tensions right now, how that is typical and what we should expect this time around. Yeah, I mean, I think probably what investors are looking at is does this war get a lot worse? And so I think that's why some people backed out. Now, keep in mind, the amount that, uh, Bitcoin is down right now is roughly 2% and, in the crypto markets, that could have just been like a very lackluster Tuesday. You know, I mean, the markets can easily move that much on nothing at all. So really this is kind of a smaller shift down than I would have. Expected for something that could end up being so much bigger than it has become so far. Yeah, certainly. It's also been a big week we know for cryptocurrency. You've got everyone from the president even opining in and weighing in. I saw our own Brian Sazi, executive editor, post a video where even at the most recent conference that was taking place here in New York, there is still within the conversation this willingness or want and desire. To make sure that the administration is positioning itself as continuously crypto friendly, how's that playing out? I mean this was a gigantic week in crypto legislation, um, you know, more in the Congress side, um, genius, the Genius Bill, which is about stablecoins, uh, got a cloture vote for a second time in the Senate, teamed up for a very likely final passage vote sometime I think we're looking at Tuesday right now, uh, and so that's been a big fight in the Senate and then over in the House, uh, two different committees, uh, the Ad committee and the House Financial Services Committee. Voted the Clarity Act to the floor, and that's an act that would just sort of decide how disclosures and regulations would work for cryptocurrency. And then on top of that, the final big regulator got a hearing in the in the Senate, Brian Quintends the CFTC. So it was a gigantic week in crypto legislation. If the stablecoin legislation is able to move forward, what what does that mean for, of course, the poster child of crypto in in Bitcoin? Uh, yeah, that is the big interesting question. You know, historically, thus far, when, uh, there has been more activity of really any kind in the cryptocurrency market, like, you know, your viewers might remember the ICO craze of 2017, which was really all about Ethereum, that drove a ton of, uh, value to Bitcoin regardless. So that's what we'd expect. But you know, it could be that these things are starting to decouple. You know, stablecoins are a financial utility. People can use them for a lot of reasons that have nothing to do with Bitcoin, so it could be that stablecoins explode and we see a modest bump to Bitcoin, but no direct gigantic gain. Or it could be that the explosion of stablecoins brings a lot more energy to Bitcoin. We just, we just don't know right now. I mean, we're entering into a very new world. Yeah, I imagine some of the prominent profiles that were promoting ICOs, and then got dinged by the SEC certainly remember that period very well. Barry, thanks so much for taking the time. Thank you.
