Guelph's Cardinal Thomas Collins offers a glimpse into the real conclave
This will be the 2nd time Collins will help choose a new pope
Cardinal Thomas Collins has no interest in seeing the film Conclave which tells the fictitious story of the selection of a new pope.
Why would he? He's already been involved in a real one, and is about to take part in a second.
The first was in 2013 when Pope Francis became pontiff. Next month, the Archbishop Emeritus of Toronto will enter his second conclave to choose Francis' predecessor.
A conclave to choose a new pope normally takes place 15 to 20 days after the death of a pontiff, meaning it should not start before May 6.
Cardinal Collins was born and raised in Guelph and was ordained a priest in 1973 with the Hamilton Diocese.
He was elected to the College of Cardinals by Pope Benedict XVI in 2012.
Collins has retired as archbishop and now takes part in leading religious retreats.
He spoke with CBC K-W's Joe Pavia from Rome ahead of the funeral for Pope Francis and offered a glimpse into the real conclave.
The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Audio of the interview can be found at the bottom of this article.
Joe Pavia: What is the legacy that Pope Francis has left for you? What will you remember him for?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: Well, every pope has a different style, a different way of doing things. And I think that Pope Francis was very much interested in reaching out to people who are a poor and struggling people, or people that are on the margins. And that's always an important part of our Christian faith.
He would look to the example of the Good Samaritan as being a very important model for our faith. I think that would be his kind of his legacy.
Joe Pavia: Can you offer some reflection on Saturday's funeral service at St. Peter's Basilica?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: It'll be in front of St. Peter's. And then we all come out to celebrate mass. Leaders of the world will be there as well.
And then the body of the Holy Father will be taken back into St. Peter's. And then it will be taken immediately to another church, St. Mary Major, which he loved. He always would go there before and after a trip around the world. And it's the oldest Marian church in honour of Our Lady in Rome. And he will be buried there, not in St. Peter's.
This is a very solemn moment, a very significant one. I think all of us cardinals are just asking everyone, all the 1.5 billion Catholics and everybody else, all of our dear friends and neighbours of other faiths, to pray for us as we enter into this most solemn and profound historical responsibility we have, to choose the next successor of Saint Peter.
And that's the thing we're all entering is a very prayerful process. And it's just something that I found my other time doing this to be most inspiring. You know, it's just very inspiring.
Joe Pavia: What can you tell us then about what happens inside the conclave? I'm not sure if you saw the movie Conclave yourself?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: I'm not going to see the movie.
The premise of the movie is that the pope can sort of secretly name a cardinal and the guy shows up with the letter they say 'Oh my gosh, he's a cardinal who knew! Come on in!' And that just doesn't happen.
The pope can hold off the public naming of a person because they're in danger, basically, but they don't become a cardinal really until — it has to be publicly announced. And so when they can't even get the basic premise of the movie right kind of makes you wonder about the rest of it.
But I've been through a real conclave and the real conclave is beautiful. It's much more exciting than the phony one.
Joe Pavia: Take us through what happens at a real conclave.
Cardinal Thomas Collins: It's a very prayerful thing and it's remarkable. The conclave I went to before there were 117 electors, while there 135 this time. The Holy Father named a lot more and so we were just meeting the cardinals who are arriving in Rome, bit by bit.
Altogether there are 252 if you count the ones over the age of 80 and they have a right to come. They don't have to come, but the ones who are under 80 have to come. It's an obligation that we have to be there.
And so we've been having these meetings in the morning. We begin with a prayer, then the new ones, newly arrived, take the oath of office. And then we discuss different issues like the setting up the funeral and management type issues of organizing it.
And then gradually after the funeral, from my experience of the last conclave, that will shift then to the needs of the church.
And we have some external people come in and talk to us about spiritual guidance for us and the different departments of the Roman government of the church, explain what their what their needs are.
Then each of the Cardinals would give a little expression of what he felt we needed.
And so it's a very prayerful thing. We begin with a prayer and end with prayer and you have these coffee breaks halfway through, which are actually very important because the cardinals get to talk to one another and get to know one another a bit more. So that's a useful thing.
But once we call the conclave itself... we go disperse to the churches in Rome. I'm the Cardinal Priest of St. Patrick's Church. So I went to my parish because all the cardinals are basically clergy of Rome, honorary. We pray with the people of Rome and then we're going to elect their bishop.
And once you go into Santa Marta's House, this big residence, [adjacent to St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City] it's like going into an airport. You go through a metal detector and you have yourself scanned and you go in and then they take you up to the room and they cut the seal on the door. You go in. And these rooms are used by priests who work in the Vatican when there's not a conclave, but they're meant for a conclave.
And the slots on the windows are all shut, the telephones are cut, their TV is cut and they got jamming devices on the roof. So you were really isolated. And that's so you can think without pressure. Gives you the freedom to think. That's what conclave means with the key. That's what it means. They lock you in.
Joe Pavia: There have been media stories about front runners to be pope. Are cardinals, if I could use the term, and maybe this is not correct ... lobbying for the role?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: Every cardinal obviously has a lot of experience and has very strong views on where the direction of the church should go, and maybe people who they think would be the one to lead the church the way that the Lord wants it to go.
And that's all brought out in the little speeches the cardinals can make to just give their views to the other cardinals. They're meeting all the time, you know, and saying 'Who do you think should be the pope?' That's what we're there for basically. And then praying about it.
I was very impressed during the last conclave there were a lot of groups getting together. And I went to two of them last time where a whole bunch of cardinals get together for dinner and then say, 'Well, what do you think? Who do you think would be good?' And they gave their views, which is the point of what we're doing.
But then once you get in there, there's no nomination for pope.
You just take the first ballot and everyone votes and it's a little card that says 'I choose for pope' and a line.
You write the name and you go up. You look up at the Last Judgment by Michelangelo with all kinds of cardinals and popes going to hell and say, 'I promise that the one I'm voting for is the one I truly believe should be the pope.'
You drop it into this silver kind of a bowl. And once they're all done the countdown, to be sure we got the right number, and then they read out the names.
Each one of us has a little list we can check, check, check as the names are called. So we're all like scrutineers. And every time a ballot is read out it's put on a little string so we don't get them mixed up.
And if we don't get two thirds, they burn them in a little oven at the other end of the Sistine Chapel and the famous black smoke goes up.
Joe Pavia: And then the conversation continues [between the cardinals] before the next ballot?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: The first ballot is generally, you might say, a nominating ballot. You get many people in one vote, two vote, three vote, one vote, but some get 10 or 20 or 30 votes.
And so then we go back, we pray and think and have dinner. And then the next day we come back. And by that time people have chatted about, about, OK, who looks like they're maybe, I don't know, five or six cardinals who are getting double digits of votes, you know, or whatever the number might be.
And so by that time, the next ballot, usually the ones and twos drop off more or less, and numbers start accumulating towards a few of the cardinals.
And then we take another ballot and another until one of the numbers goes over two thirds.
And when that happens, we finish counting the ballots and then the chief cardinal says 'Do you accept?' And if the cardinal says yes, that's when he becomes the pope.
There's some rare case in history that he wasn't a bishop already, then he'd be ordained a bishop right away. But I mean, they're all bishops pretty well. Absolutely. And so then they ask 'What name do you choose?' And he gives a special name for his time as pope. And he picks whatever his name he wishes to pick.
And then he goes into the room of tears, as they call it, and he comes out dressed in white. And they have a small and medium and a large cassock, just in case. He comes out dressed in white. He looks like the pope and well, he is the pope. And then we all go up and greet him and congratulate him. Then he goes out on the balcony and blesses the world.
It's not a secret process because there's a rule book we follow scrupulously called The Universal Flock. You can get it on the Vatican website. And we just turned the pages and we'll be doing everything, whatever it says to do. So this is not a like what you might call it a hidden process. Who votes for what is obviously a confidential but the process itself is open to anyone who wants to take a look at the Vatican website.
Joe Pavia: Cardinal Collins, any chance you're going to be pope?
Cardinal Thomas Collins: Well...(laughs) Oh my, no. I've been very happy! That's not going to happen. But I think there are several, wonderful cardinals, anyone of whom would be a wonderful pope. And we just have to sort of come to a discernment and pray and hope to God, you know, ask God to guide us to pick whichever is the right one for now. And I'm sure God will help us to do that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
21 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Pope Leo XIV's fashion choices make waves, and many wonder what they mean
VATICAN CITY (AP) — When Pope Leo XIV stepped out on the central loggia of St. Peter's Basilica to greet the crowd for the first time after his May 8 election, liturgical fashion aficionados around the globe took note: Gone was the simple white cassock and silver cross favored by Pope Francis. Back was the red satin mozzetta shoulder cape, the burgundy stola with gold embroidery and a gold cross held by a double-stranded silken gold cord. Over Leo's first few weeks, the excitement grew among liturgical fashion-conscious Catholics as they noticed new additions to the wardrobe, or rather a return to the old additions of the papal wardrobe: cufflinks, white pants, lace. After Francis' revolutionary papacy, Vatican watchers are now wondering if Leo's return to the past sartorial look means a return to the past on other things too, including more substantial policy issues. But for tailors at the elite handful of liturgical tailoring shops in Rome, there is hope that Leo's return to the fancier garb of popes past will mean a boon to business if Leo's traditional look has a trickle-down effect from the pope to priests and all those in between. The style is a return to form According to the Rev. John Wauck, professor of church communication at the Pontifical Holy Cross University in Rome, Leo's clothing choices are a 'return to form,' and his attire similar to that worn by Pope Benedict XVI, Pope John Paul II and other popes going back to the middle ages. They show 'a respect for tradition,' he said. Such respect for the papal office is important for many conservative Catholics. Many conservatives and traditionalists soured on Francis' informal style and disdain for tradition, which reached its pinnacle with his his crackdown on the old Latin Mass. The old liturgy was celebrated before the modernizing reforms of the 1960s Second Vatican Council; Francis greatly restricted access to the old liturgy, saying it had become a source of division in parishes. Leo has shown strong familiarity with Latin, and has taken to singing the Sunday noontime prayer in Latin. Some traditionalist Catholics are hoping Leo will take the pro-Latin path even further and reverse Francis to allow greater use of the traditional Latin Mass. Massimo Faggioli, professor of theology at Villanova University, where Leo went to college, said it's too early to tell if Leo will reverse Francis' reform. 'It remains to be seen if Leo's more traditional attire and liturgical style means that he will change Francis' strong decisions limiting the so-called 'Latin Mass,'' he said. That said, Faggioli said U.S. conservatives seems particularly happy with Leo's traditional attire, given Francis' disdain for the fashion pomp of the papacy. 'In this sense, Francis might have been a parenthesis or an interlude, more than a changer of the tradition in 'papal style,'' he said in an email. Leo has made other changes, too At his inaugural Mass on May 18, 2025, Pope Leo XIV reached out his arm to sprinkle holy water and revealed a shirt with cufflinks, which Francis had largely avoided. He was also wearing an amitto, and an alb held in place by a cingulum. For the non-experts, the amitto is a lacy linen cloth that goes around the neck, the alb is the white tunic worn under the ceremonial vestment, and the cingulum is a braided rope with tassels that serves as a belt. If it weren't for photographers' long lenses relentlessly trained on the pope's every gesture, Leo's switch from Francis's standard black pants to more traditional white papal trousers would have gone completely unnoticed. In addition to the clothing changes, Leo has returned to some other traditions of the Vatican that Francis eschewed. He has shown himself willing to accept the traditional 'baciamano' or kissing of his ring. Francis disliked having his ring kissed and often pulled his hand away if someone tried to kiss it. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'I think that what we see with Pope Leo is a willingness to embrace tradition, even if it risks seeming perhaps more formal than Pope Francis,' Wauck said. The idea is that 'seeing that tradition as a treasure to be conserved and embraced as opposed to something that makes one feel perhaps a little bit standoffish.' It remains to be seen whether Leo will move into the papal apartment in the Apostolic Palace, which stood empty during the 12-year Francis papacy. Francis shocked the world by choosing to live in a small room at the Santa Marta residence at the Vatican, eating his meals in the common dining room. For the Rev. Castro Prudencio, this is all much ado about nothing. 'For Pope Francis it was simplicity. Always. And Pope Leo has taken up what Pope Benedict had and many others. That is what the church is like,' he said. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
National Observer
2 days ago
- National Observer
Continued failure to consult on uranium exploration is a harmful mistake: Mi'kmaw Chiefs
Nova Scotia's continued failure to consult with First Nations on uranium exploration is a mistake that will further erode the province's relationship with Mi'kmaq communities, says the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi'kmaw Chiefs and a lawyer from Sipekne'katik First Nation. Pictou Landing First Nation Chief Tamara Young said the Mi'kmaq people were neither consulted nor notified when Nova Scotia introduced then passed a bill that opens the province up to potential uranium mining and fracking. 'The lack of consultation is unacceptable and goes against the UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples),' Young said in a statement to The Canadian Press on Wednesday. The assembly has said they will continue to oppose both uranium exploration and hydraulic fracturing until their environmental concerns have been addressed. The provincial government added uranium to its list of priority critical minerals May 14, and it issued a request for exploration proposals for three sites with known deposits of the heavy metal. Interested companies had until Wednesday to submit their proposals. Premier Tim Houston has said the legislative changes are needed to help the province withstand economic challenges from American tariffs. 'We recognize there are international pressures and influences affecting our economy, but any resource development in Mi'kma'ki must include our consent and participation as we are the rightful owners of these lands, waters and resources,' Young said in the statement, speaking as co-lead of the environment, energy and mines portfolio on behalf of the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi'kmaw Chiefs. Rosalie Francis, a Mi'kmaq lawyer whose firm is based out of Sipekne'katik First Nation, said the province risks further damaging their relationship with Mi'kmaq communities and sabotaging the potential uranium industry by failing to consult adequately and early. 'By choosing not to consult, it scares away investors, destroys the relationship and gets us back to starting at zero,' Francis said in an interview Tuesday. 'It all comes down to trust, and this completely diminishes any kind of trust that's essential to the relationship between the first for the Mi'kmaq and the province.' Nova Scotia has opened up three plots of land for uranium project proposals: an 80-hectare site in Louisville in Pictou County; a 64-hectare site in East Dalhousie in Annapolis County; and a 2,300-hectare site in Millet Brook in Hants County. Much of this is on private land. The government has previously said companies selected by the province would have to seek permission from landowners to explore. However, Section 26 of the province's Mineral Resources Act allows the natural resources minister to intervene if there is a stalemate. A spokesperson with the Department of Natural Resources said if a company decides it wants to develop a mine on one of these sites, then there is duty to consult with Mi'kmaq communities. Francis said that position is backwards, and is not in line with case law on the matter. 'It's been clear that duty to consult begins when, in the minds of government, they're anticipating activity that will affect rights,' Francis said, adding that should happen before a company has made a decision on the site. The lawyer said it would appear the province has not learned from the fall out of the Alton Gas cavern project, which was officially scrapped in fall 2021. The Alberta energy company abandoned its plan to create huge salt caverns north of Halifax to store natural gas more than 13 years after starting construction. The company said at the time the project experienced challenges and delays, referring to opposition the project faced from Indigenous protesters and allies who opposed the company's plan to remove large, underground salt deposits by flushing them out with water from the nearby Shubenacadie River. The plan also called for dumping the leftover brine into the tidal river, where it would flow into the Bay of Fundy. In March 2020, a decision by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court ordered the province to resume consultations with Sipekne'katik First Nation on the matter and determined the former environment minister was wrong when she concluded the province had adequately consulted with the First nation about the project. 'The province should have walked away from that decision and said: 'OK, lesson learned.' The project never went forward. All the gas investors looked at it and said: 'This is just a mess now. Let's just walk away,'' Francis said. The lawyer said it will be telling in the coming weeks if the province chooses to engage with Mi'kmaq communities or "if the province will march along in the same way it did before." "Either we'll have a success story or we'll have another Alton Gas play out," she said. Shiri Pasternak, a criminology professor at Toronto Metropolitan University and co-investigator of a research project called Infrastructure Beyond Extractivism, said the situation in Nova Scotia mirrors the expedited extraction movement that's happening across the country. "What's happening to the Mi'kmaq in Nova Scotia is really proliferating as an attack on Indigenous and environmental rights across the country right now," she said in an interview Tuesday. Pasternak said Nova Scotia is one of several provinces working to speed up extraction and development projects — moves that are supported by the federal government. "We have this sweep of fast-tracked legislation and policy changes to the Environment Assessment Act, both provincially in Nova Scotia and in other places, but also federally in terms of the Impact Assessment Act in order to expedite development and extraction — most of which will be against the desires and the consent of Indigenous people across the country."
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Continued failure to consult on uranium exploration a harmful mistake: Mi'kmaw Chiefs
HALIFAX – Nova Scotia's continued failure to consult with First Nations on uranium exploration is a mistake that will further erode the province's relationship with Mi'kmaq communities, says the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi'kmaw Chiefs and a lawyer from Sipekne'katik First Nation. Pictou Landing First Nation Chief Tamara Young said the Mi'kmaq people were neither consulted nor notified when Nova Scotia introduced then passed a bill that opens the province up to potential uranium mining and fracking. 'The lack of consultation is unacceptable and goes against the UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples),' Young said in a statement to The Canadian Press on Wednesday. The assembly has said they will continue to oppose both uranium exploration and hydraulic fracturing until their environmental concerns have been addressed. The provincial government added uranium to its list of priority critical minerals May 14, and it issued a request for exploration proposals for three sites with known deposits of the heavy metal. Interested companies had until Wednesday to submit their proposals. Premier Tim Houston has said the legislative changes are needed to help the province withstand economic challenges from American tariffs. 'We recognize there are international pressures and influences affecting our economy, but any resource development in Mi'kma'ki must include our consent and participation as we are the rightful owners of these lands, waters and resources,' Young said in the statement, speaking as co-lead of the environment, energy and mines portfolio on behalf of the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi'kmaw Chiefs. Rosalie Francis, a Mi'kmaq lawyer whose firm is based out of Sipekne'katik First Nation, said the province risks further damaging their relationship with Mi'kmaq communities and sabotaging the potential uranium industry by failing to consult adequately and early. 'By choosing not to consult, it scares away investors, destroys the relationship and gets us back to starting at zero,' Francis said in an interview Tuesday. 'It all comes down to trust, and this completely diminishes any kind of trust that's essential to the relationship between the first for the Mi'kmaq and the province.' Nova Scotia has opened up three plots of land for uranium project proposals: an 80-hectare site in Louisville in Pictou County; a 64-hectare site in East Dalhousie in Annapolis County; and a 2,300-hectare site in Millet Brook in Hants County. Much of this is on private land. The government has previously said companies selected by the province would have to seek permission from landowners to explore. However, Section 26 of the province's Mineral Resources Act allows the natural resources minister to intervene if there is a stalemate. A spokesperson with the Department of Natural Resources said if a company decides it wants to develop a mine on one of these sites, then there is duty to consult with Mi'kmaq communities. Francis said that position is backwards, and is not in line with case law on the matter. 'It's been clear that duty to consult begins when, in the minds of government, they're anticipating activity that will affect rights,' Francis said, adding that should happen before a company has made a decision on the site. The lawyer said it would appear the province has not learned from the fall out of the Alton Gas cavern project, which was officially scrapped in fall 2021. The Alberta energy company abandoned its plan to create huge salt caverns north of Halifax to store natural gas more than 13 years after starting construction. The company said at the time the project experienced challenges and delays, referring to opposition the project faced from Indigenous protesters and allies who opposed the company's plan to remove large, underground salt deposits by flushing them out with water from the nearby Shubenacadie River. The plan also called for dumping the leftover brine into the tidal river, where it would flow into the Bay of Fundy. In March 2020, a decision by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court ordered the province to resume consultations with Sipekne'katik First Nation on the matter and determined the former environment minister was wrong when she concluded the province had adequately consulted with the First nation about the project. 'The province should have walked away from that decision and said: 'OK, lesson learned.' The project never went forward. All the gas investors looked at it and said: 'This is just a mess now. Let's just walk away,'' Francis said. The lawyer said it will be telling in the coming weeks if the province chooses to engage with Mi'kmaq communities or 'if the province will march along in the same way it did before.' 'Either we'll have a success story or we'll have another Alton Gas play out,' she said. Shiri Pasternak, a criminology professor at Toronto Metropolitan University and co-investigator of a research project called Infrastructure Beyond Extractivism, said the situation in Nova Scotia mirrors the expedited extraction movement that's happening across the country. 'What's happening to the Mi'kmaq in Nova Scotia is really proliferating as an attack on Indigenous and environmental rights across the country right now,' she said in an interview Tuesday. Pasternak said Nova Scotia is one of several provinces working to speed up extraction and development projects — moves that are supported by the federal government. 'We have this sweep of fast-tracked legislation and policy changes to the Environment Assessment Act, both provincially in Nova Scotia and in other places, but also federally in terms of the Impact Assessment Act in order to expedite development and extraction — most of which will be against the desires and the consent of Indigenous people across the country.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025.
