logo
'Common error' could leave thousands of women out of pocket in pensions

'Common error' could leave thousands of women out of pocket in pensions

Sky News10-03-2025

Thousands of British women could be missing significant sums from their pension due to a "common error" made by their employers while on maternity leave.
When a woman goes on mat leave, their employer should continue to make pension contributions based on their full salary. However, women have reported their contributions have been wrongly changed to match their lower mat leave income.
Women who spoke to Sky News reported missing anywhere from a few hundred to £4,000 in their pension pots.
Advocacy group Nugget Savings shared data with Money after surveying 236 women about their pension contributions while on maternity leave. More than 100 had found discrepancies, and while some have been repaid the money after raising it with their HR department, others have not.
It is not clear how widespread the issue is, but Katie Guild, co-founder of Nugget Savings, said: "We're concerned we have just scratched the surface of this issue. This error could have started as far back as auto-enrolment in 2012, therefore affecting potentially millions of women."
More than half a million women take maternity leave each year and a pension mis-payment of just a few hundred pounds loses the chance to earn compound interest over the following decades, exacerbating the existing gender pension gap, which sees the average woman retire with a pension pot 55% smaller than the average man's.
Katie said: "Some were successful in recouping their lost pension contributions.
"Others faced resistance from their employers who said too much time had passed to fix the error or the employers still believed that they had contributed correctly to their pensions."
Problems are 'tip of the iceberg'
MP Stella Creasy expressed concern to Sky News about these discrepancies.
"The problems women have with pensions and their maternity leave are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to why millions of older women end up destitute," she said.
"When employers write women off because they have children they don't just harm their careers, they consign them to poverty in old age too.
"With women living longer and forming a larger proportion of the older workforce, it's time we committed not just to ending the gender pay gap but the gender pensions gap too."
'No apology or explanation'
One mum of two, who works in marketing and asked to remain anonymous, said she was missing £4,000 in her pension pot.
The amount was eventually repaid by her employer after she flagged it with them.
But she said there was "no apology of explanation", and she was not compensated for the loss of interest - her pension is currently at 7% growth, meaning she has lost out on hundreds of pounds in interest.
"Given how tough working mums have it at the moment, combined with increasing financial pressures and extortionate childcare costs, I'm disheartened that a big corporate company has chosen to leave me out of pocket due to a technical issue out of my control," she said.
Chloe, 29, a mother of two, said her employer underpaid her by £717.22 while on maternity leave from her role in the aviation industry. She raised the issue and was eventually repaid.
She said her employer was not apologetic and expected the software to calculate it automatically.
Sam, also a mum of two, was missing £1,400 - she had to get her union involved to recover the money.
"I ended up working out the calculations for the missing contributions myself and estimating what their growth would have been over the year - around 10%," she said.
"I eventually was offered a repayment and something like 0.4% interest. I challenged this and got the 10%."
She said her finance director personally apologised to her and thanked her for identifying the issue.
"It turned out to be a longstanding mistake and they were going to identify everyone impacted and restore missed contributions," she said.
How it works in practice - an example...
A woman pays 5% of her salary into her pension pot, a total of £200 of her paycheque. Her employer matches this and also pays £200. This means £400 goes into her pension pot each month.
While on maternity leave, the woman's pay drops and now she pays £100 into her pension pot because the percentage is based on her actual pay received.
However, her employer should continue to pay the full £200 as if she had not taken the leave. This means £300 goes into her pension each month.
Why many won't even know they're missing out
Not all women have been repaid.
One mother, who was missing around £250 from six months of maternity leave, said her employer told her they would "look into it" but has yet to repay the shortfall.
"I feel let down as I have had other errors with my maternity pay," she said. "It is challenging enough raising a newborn without having to go through payslips with a fine tooth comb to check for errors. It's tiring having to chase things up and it all feels very unfair."
Harriet Morton-Liddle, co-founder of Nugget Savings, said the organisation had tried to discover why advice on pension contributions during maternity leave was not more clear.
"We contacted HMRC, The Pensions Regulator and Citizens Advice and even submitted FOI requests but still had no straight answer regarding the correct procedure that should be followed for employers or employees," she said.
Much of the online advice was "contradictory", she said, which means many employers may not even realise they are making mistakes.
"We want to raise awareness for the women across the UK who could be impacted but might not even realise it yet, so they can rightfully claim back money that belongs in their pension pots," she said.
How to tell if you have been affected
You need to check with your workplace pension provider - there is usually an online portal to do this, although the amounts contributed may be listed on your paycheque (but it may just list your own contributions).
Your pension provider should also send you an annual statement, outlining how much you and your employer have both contributed.
Check the amounts paid by your employer - both before and after you took maternity leave - are they same? If they have decreased, you may have been underpaid.
What the pension regulator said
When Sky News contacted the pension regulator, Catherine Nicholson, interim director of automatic enrolment, said: "Some employers are making common errors by skipping important steps in respect of calculating pensions contributions and communications to staff. These errors include miscalculating contributions for staff receiving maternity pay."
It said it has recovered more than £700m in missing contributions owed since 2012, but did not have specific figures related to mis-paid pensions while on maternity leave.
The Pension Ombudsman said it did not have any data on this, but said: "We have not seen an increase in complaints stemming from this issue."
It added: "All occupational pension schemes must operate an IDRP (Internal Dispute Resolution Process). If they remain unhappy with the response after the IDRP process they are able to submit a complaint to TPO, we act impartially, and our service is free."
How problem makes gender pay gap worse
The missing money could exacerbate the existing gender pay gap.
According to Legal and General, the average UK pension pot for men is £84,205. The average woman has less than half of this saved, at £39,654.
Research shows the difference in savings begins right at the start of people's careers - the initial gap stands at 16% but can double by the time women reach their 40s.
By the time they retire, on average, a woman's pension pot is 55% smaller than a man's.
The reasons for this are varied and complex - women are still paid less, and are less likely to be in senior leadership positions, resulting in lower pension contributions.
They are also more likely to take career breaks to care for children or work part-time and reduced hours.
Women are also more likely to waive their right to a partner's pension after a divorce, according to Legal and General, despite being entitled to a portion of their husband's private pension wealth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gardeners urged to mix 59p kitchen ingredient with soap and apply to plants
Gardeners urged to mix 59p kitchen ingredient with soap and apply to plants

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Gardeners urged to mix 59p kitchen ingredient with soap and apply to plants

If slugs, flies and ants are plaguing your garden this summer, no need to pick up a bottle of pest-killer - this handy household item can make a great and effective pesticide instead Summer beckons an onslaught of greedy pests chowing down on your plants – but, luckily, there's an easy solution you can make with household ingredients. The weather is finally warming up and the days are getting longer. But while gardeners can expect to see lush bouquets of peonies, lilacs and wisteria, and full vegetable gardens beginning to ripen, they also need to be on the lookout for nasty insects. Including those that can damage your garden. ‌ Some of the most common pests that like to plague British gardens include aphids, ants and slugs. All of these creatures are notoriously greedy and can quickly destroy your plants in large numbers. ‌ In particular, slugs are known to go after fresh, young plants as well as fruit like strawberries and figs. Worse still, they can be difficult to spot as they like to crawl on the underside of leaves. Aphids also pose a massive threat, despite their miniscule size. Aphids are small sap-sucking insects, which include the infamous greenfly and blackfly and are known to stunt plant growth, weaken plant structure and damage leaves. Of course, it can be tempting to turn to a chemical pesticide if you notice an infestation in your garden. However, these can be incredibly damaging to wildlife and animals. A better – and cheaper – solution is to turn to using household ingredients. Gardening experts from Grow Barato suggest creating a pesticide made of baking soda and soap. ‌ First, you should mix the baking soda with water. Grow Barato recommends mixing 'half a tablespoon' of baking soda in four litres of water. You should then shake well to dissolve the powder. You should then add 'a bit of liquid soap' to the mixture. This will create an effective pesticide which you can spray on plants. Baking soda can be an effective deterrent as it disrupts the scent trails of pests like slugs and ants, which will put them off nibbling on your plants. It can also dehydrate and kill pests like slugs and aphids if they consume it. ‌ Equally, soap is particularly effective when used on insects like aphids and mealybugs. This is because it can damage the cell membranes of these creatures and, in some cases, even suffocate them. Grow Barato writes: 'Apply the product to the affected plants and monitor if the insects disappear. This treatment can be repeated for several days if necessary.' If you don't have any baking soda lying around at home, no need to fret. You can pick up a packet for a bargain 59p from Sainsbury's.

Prince Harry's plan for kids' future 'makes no sense', says royal expert
Prince Harry's plan for kids' future 'makes no sense', says royal expert

Daily Record

time2 days ago

  • Daily Record

Prince Harry's plan for kids' future 'makes no sense', says royal expert

A Royal expert has questioned Harry and Meghan's plan for their children's futures. The Sussex family may no longer be active as royals or carry out duties for the King Charles. But despite their controversial withdrawal from the royal family, they reportedly are open to their children playing their part in the monarchy. Sources close to the Sussexes have said that the pair do in fact want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, who just turned four, to retain their royal titles, so they will be able to choose to become working royals if they want to when they reach adulthood. It comes after the source claimed Harry and Meghan feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their HRH titles. ‌ It was claimed that the Sussexes were left frustrated as they waited months for British passports to arrive, and reportedly believed it was due to the fact they included their children's royal titles on the application. But former BBC royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned why Harry and Meghan appear so keen to cling onto titles for their children - even though they have previously hit out against the institution of monarchy. ‌ The expert told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet were given prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. It is said that the passport delay caused Harry to approach the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." ‌ There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. ‌ They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance, and so are not in active use. However, earlier this year, it emerged that Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used their royal titles, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly, but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

Alan Titchmarsh issues warning over brutal pest that can 'wipe out crops'
Alan Titchmarsh issues warning over brutal pest that can 'wipe out crops'

Daily Mirror

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Alan Titchmarsh issues warning over brutal pest that can 'wipe out crops'

Alan Titchmarsh has raised the alarm over the return of a brutal pest, which is said to pose a serious risk to the food industry, after a sighting in Kent in 2023 Gardening pro and national treasure Alan Titchmarsh has warned fellow green-fingered enthusiasts to be on the lookout for one nasty pest. He has warned that this destructive menace, namely the Colorado beetle, can completely 'wipe out crops', with people already wary of other creatures such as slugs, mealybugs, ants and aphids, known for destroying plants. ‌ At the 2025 Chelsea Flower Show, Alan warned that the tiny black and yellow-striped pest is one of the biggest threats to the UK's food security, as reported by the Daily Mail. And it could pose a risk to the British potato industry. ‌ Colorado beetles were eradicated from British soil 50 years ago following a vigilant campaign in the 1970s. However, larvae from the insects were discovered in a potato field in Kent in 2023, marking the first known return of the species. While quick action by the Animal & Plant Health Agency (APHA) and DEFRA meant the situation was kept under control, Titchmarsh still urges the public to be vigilant. He said: 'It devastates potato crops and we need all the crops we can get in this country. It's so savage it'll wipe crops out. It's like locusts – it's that fast.' He added that the most effective way to avoid a disaster is to 'stamp it out before it becomes reality'. However, he later reflected on how the outbreak of the 1970s brought the gardening community together. Colorado beetles are typically between 6mm to 11 mm in size and have distinctive yellow and black stripes on their shells. Meanwhile, their larvae are typically 15 mm long and a reddish colour. In the wild, they can weaken crops, like potatoes and aubergines, and reduce their yield. They are also known to strip the foliage from tomatoes and peppers. ‌ The beetle has been known to be imported into the UK on different food items. These include leafy vegetables, salad leaves, fresh herbs, grain and frozen vegetables. Therefore, experts are urging people to check these items. Equally, they also need to keep an eye on any vegetables picked from their gardens and allotments before consuming them. Professor Nicola Spence, the Environment Department's chief plant health officer, said that the Colorado beetle 'poses a significant threat to plants and the wider potato industry'. She also added that the public have an important role to play in helping to protect UK biosecurity. The public have been urged to report suspected sightings to the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA). They should also include a photo and location details.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store