
Here is how Ukraine can still beat Russia
When you read this, I will just have arrived at the Pearl of the Black Sea, as this historic, much beloved, multiethnic city was known in the peaceful days before Vladimir Putin tried to break it with missiles and drones. Since no Ukrainian airports are open, the route took me by air from New York via Bucharest, Romania, to Chișinău, the capital of Moldova, and then four hours by car across the Ukrainian border to Odesa. Over the past week, Russia has unleashed a barrage of killer drones and ballistic missiles on Odesa's civilian port, which delivers grain to the world. The attack was part of an unprecedented torrent of drones, cruise, and ballistic missiles that Moscow has rained down on Ukrainian cities, including the capital, Kyiv.
Putin knows that aside from toothless protestations of 'Vladimir, STOP!' President Donald Trump won't interfere. It is painful and embarrassing to be an American in Ukraine now. Friends, colleagues, and contacts here, with whom I have talked in the lead-up to my visit, are simply astonished that a US leader would let Putin humiliate him the way Trump has.
'Russia is so emboldened by Trump. He has given Putin complete carte blanche,' is the common belief. Trump repeatedly promises to sanction Putin if he refuses a ceasefire or serious peace talks, and then backs down when Moscow pours on the missiles. Even as I arrived in Ukraine, Trump, yet again, insisted he had to give Putin more time to see if he was 'serious' about ending the war. Trump is clearly unwilling to stand up to the Kremlin boss, and his glaring weakness is evident to the entire world. But beyond the president's mad obsession about forming an alliance with Putin, Trump has spread dangerous myths to the US public about Ukraine that obscure the importance of that country to our security and global standing. The main reason I am traveling to Ukraine this time is to debunk those myths by describing facts on the ground.
Let's start with Trump's constant refrain that Putin wants peace. A tour of playgrounds, college dorms, and apartment buildings deliberately targeted by Russian missiles should have put that foolishness to rest, if the president wanted to see. As the noted Russia expert, Angela Stent, who authored Putin's World: Russia Against the West and with the Rest, told me: 'Putin has no interest in ending the war now. He has made the war his mission. The Russian economy is on a war footing. Putin has militarised the whole society.
'Three-year-olds in Russian preschools are dressed in military uniforms and singing military songs. At this point, Putin has a messianic view of rebuilding the Russian empire.'
I also want to talk with escapees from Russian-occupied territory about the brutality they've experienced to show the kind of 'peace' Putin has in mind. Trump insists Ukraine is losing the war, and Russians always win. If the president took U.S. intelligence briefings and relied less on former KGB colonel Putin's phone propaganda, he'd know Russians often lose — think 1905 to Japan, the '80s in Afghanistan, and now in Syria, for a few examples. Even more important, despite Trump's betrayal, Ukraine has not lost this war.
Indeed, given Russia's weak economic situation and desperate reliance on North Korea, Iran, and China for assistance, this is the moment when increased sanctions on Moscow's energy sector could have real impact. This is the perfect time when continued U.S. help with intel and air defense could help Ukraine's capable defense efforts push the Russians back. What most Americans may not know is that Ukrainians have done a remarkable job of holding a nuclear power with three times their population to a virtual territorial stalemate. They have done it by developing a new form of technological warfare that relies on land, sea, and air drones to compensate for artillery shortages and Russia's massive advantage in troop numbers. They have been able to do this not only because Ukraine has a wealth of talent, but because most Ukrainians believe they have no option but to continue fighting or else be subjected to Russian overlordship that will destroy their lives.
Thus, Ukraine now has the strongest, most technologically advanced army in Europe, and is ahead of the US in manufacturing unmanned drones of all sizes and capabilities, cheaply and quickly. In fact, the US military, whose innovators were already studying Ukraine's technological successes, could learn critical lessons if Trump's Pentagon was not bent on kneecapping Kyiv.
That is why I'm planning to visit private drone factories, large and small, in rear cities and near the front lines, and look at what Ukraine does right and what Kyiv needs — and lacks — to scale up military production against Russia, which relies on Iranian drone technology and copying Ukraine's successes. Trump and his team also claim Ukraine's fate is a problem for Europe, not the U.S., because we need to focus on China. And he appears to believe he can wean Putin from his alliance with China and act as the powerful balancer between Moscow and Beijing. 'It is a total illusion that Trump can separate Russia from China,' Stent said. 'They need each other to end the US dominance of the global system and to make the world safe for authoritarian systems.' Putin relishes Trump's break with Europe, she told me, because this undermines NATO and breaks the alliance of democratic countries. Trump and Vice President JD Vance have aided that process by praising pro-Russia far-right parties and, as in Germany, openly supporting the neo-Nazi opposition.
As one European parliamentarian told me, the only way to counter China is for the United States 'to glue your economy to the European Union' and join with Europe in countering unfair Chinese economic practices and overt Chinese military threats. Instead, Trump is doing the opposite, pursuing a trade and tariff war with Europe while refusing to sanction Russia and lowering tariffs on China. Trump seems bent on leaving the Europeans alone to face an aggressive Russian leader who openly detests the West. 'America, am I your enemy or your friend?' this European official asked plaintively. 'Americans have to show on which side they are on.' Ukraine is the test case. The country is defending the fault line between democratic countries of the West and Asia, and an aggressive Russia tightly aligned with an axis of dictators who all wish the United States ill. If Putin succeeds in Ukraine — aided by Trump's blindness — this will embolden Beijing to move against Taiwan and other US allies like Japan in the Indo-Pacific region.
Shocked by US abandonment, Europe has now awakened to the need to rearm to face Russia. Europe (or most of it) will do its best to help Ukraine survive — including scaling up its defense industries. But Europe can't fully fill the intelligence gap or the Ukrainian lack of air defenses if Trump abandons Kyiv and fully aligns with Moscow. No doubt, Putin is delighted at how easily he can manipulate a weak Trump to see dollar signs in such an unholy alliance. The outcome of the global contest between democracy and autocracy is being determined right now in Ukraine, as Putin sneers at Trump and mobilises a new offensive. That is exactly why I came to Odesa, and will continue on to Kyiv and frontline areas in eastern Ukraine to talk to military and political officials, civilians, and soldiers about how long they can hold out if Trump crosses over to the enemy side.
I believe Trump is wrong on every count. Ukraine is not losing, although US abandonment will make its survival much more difficult. History will regard Ukraine's fate as a turning point in deciding whether democracies, including our own, find their power eclipsed by a rising alliance of autocracies led by China. And right now, given Trump's tendencies, we do not know which side of this battle the U.S. government will choose.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
South Korea's Lee Jae-myung is the right man to deal with Donald Trump
South Koreans went to the polls to choose a new president on Tuesday, and they handed Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party a clear victory with 49.4 per cent of the vote. But even before Mr Lee was sworn in at the country's Parliament the following morning, he appeared to be surrounded by a whirlwind of questions, accusations and warnings. 'The first task facing South Korea's next leader: Handling Trump' was one headline, referring not just to the 25 per cent tariffs Seoul may have to deal with from Washington, but also Mr Lee's willingness to improve relations with China and North Korea, a shift from the very pro-US and Japan outlook of former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who had plunged the country into chaos by briefly declaring martial law last December. It may indeed be quite the challenge if Mr Trump listens to one self-appointed adviser, the hardcore Maga activist Laura Loomer, who posted on X: 'RIP South Korea. The communists have taken over and won the presidential election today. This is terrible.' Mr Lee faces a country with deep political divides, and the two other candidates, both on the right, won a combined total of just over 50 per cent. So even though the election was widely seen as being driven by anger at Mr Yoon's self-implosion – for which he was impeached, arrested and driven from office – which hindered the candidacy of Kim Moon-soo, who is from the same People Power Party as Mr Yoon, 'the conservative tally outweighed Lee's support even after the debacle of Yoon's martial law decree', as one analyst put it. Not enough young people support Mr Lee, say some. He faces legal charges – which he says are politically motivated – although they may be suspended until after his five-year term as President ends. Others accuse him of being a showy populist who has used fiery and – they would say – irresponsible rhetoric about US troops stationed in the country. How will he cope with an economy that is 'sputtering'? Oh, and to top it all, he apparently doesn't even have a proper place to work, since Mr Yoon moved the presidential office out of the Blue House, the official residence, to a military compound that none of the candidates said they liked. There are other ways to look at Mr Lee's victory, of course. The 6 per cent margin of his win over Mr Kim was more than emphatic enough in a three-way race, and with his Democratic Alliance partners holding 173 out of the 300 parliamentary seats, there should be none of the logjam between the executive and the legislature that led Mr Yoon to make such a rash (and career-ending) move. Mr Lee has called for 'national unity' and said on election night that he wanted South Korea to be a country 'where we live together with mutual recognition and co-operation rather than hatred and loathing'. All of this should reassure investors, while the new President has a $25 billion stimulus package up his sleeve, plans for labour and corporate governance reforms, and wants to go all-out on stimulating domestic demand. As for Mr Trump, despite Ms Loomer's wild characterisation of Mr Lee as a 'communist' – the adjectives 'liberal' and 'centrist' are more commonly preferred – the two leaders may be more likely to hit it off than some have suggested. They are both populists: Mr Lee made a point of being filmed when he climbed over barriers to enter the National Assembly to vote against Mr Yoon's imposition of martial law last December, and he has been referred to as 'Korea's Bernie Sanders', but also as 'Korea's Trump', for his candid speech and ability to connect with the grassroots. On North Korea, if Mr Trump enters negotiations with Pyongyang again, as he did during his first term, the two could be very in tune. In fact, this February Mr Lee's party sent a letter to the Nobel Committee urging them to nominate Mr Trump for this year's peace prize in the hope that he 'continue his peace-building efforts during his second term', as a party official put it. That was a canny move that will surely have been brought to Mr Trump's attention. Both men have survived assassination attempts. Mr Lee was stabbed in the neck in January 2024 and was airlifted to hospital. Just like Mr Trump, Mr Lee drew inspiration from his survival, saying: 'Since my life was saved by our people, I will dedicate the rest of it solely to serving them.' And when it comes to trade discussions with the US, not only has Mr Lee said it is 'the most important issue' for him, after 'overcoming people's hardships and recovering from the current turmoil', but he seems prepared both to stand his ground and to show the US President whatever deference is required. 'Diplomacy between independent countries can be mutually beneficial,' Mr Lee said on Korean radio last Monday. 'We have plenty of cards to play. There's room to give and take, and that's what we must do well.' Asked how he would react to tough words from Mr Trump, Mr Lee was ready. 'That's just the way powerful countries operate,' he said. 'Any humiliation or pressure is not about me personally – it's about the entire nation. If it's necessary, I'll crawl under his legs. What's the big deal?' So for sure, Mr Lee faces challenges. But with a clear mandate, allies dominating Parliament, and being seen as the person bringing back stability after the tumult of the past six months, he has a lot going for him too. Navigating better relations with China while maintaining the treaty alliance with the US won't perhaps be easy, but he won't be the only leader having to thread that needle. Above all, his pragmatism may end up being his greatest strength. Take his concluding words about his possible approach to Mr Trump: 'An hour of the president's time is worth 52 million hours of the Korean people's time,' he said. 'If the president has to bend briefly so that 52 million people can stand tall, then that's what must be done.'


Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Zelensky says ready for meeting with Putin, Trump, Erdogan 'any day'
4 June 2025 17:22 Kyiv (AFP)Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday said that he was ready to hold a meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump "any day". "We are ready for such a meeting any day," Zelensky told reporters at a press conference in Kyiv, adding that he was proposing that a ceasefire be put in place before any such summit, which would also include Turkish President Recep Tayip Erdogan.


Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Dollar steady with trade tensions and economic data in focus
The dollar wobbled against most major currencies on Wednesday as investors grappled with President Donald Trump's tariff negotiations with key trading partners, especially China, ahead of a batch of economic data. The Trump administration has given a deadline of Wednesday for countries to submit their best offers on trade, the same day duties on imported steel and aluminium doubled. Trump is also tipped by the White House to have a call this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping, after the two sides accused each other of violating the terms of an agreement last month to roll back some tariffs. "What happened was that the market was quite relaxed about U.S. and China until we heard the sort of ramping up of rhetoric from Trump at the end of last week," said Fiona Cincotta, City Index's senior markets analyst. "That has really put the focus back on this call and the market will be looking for a sense that the two leaders are at least getting towards the same page." Trump on Wednesday posted on his social media platform that Xi was "tough" and "hard to make a deal with". The Swiss franc edged 0.1% higher to 0.8233 francs to the dollar, while the dollar index, which measures the currency against six others, was flat at 99.194, not far from its late April low. The euro rose 0.12% to $1.1384 by 1116 GMT ahead of the European Central Bank's decision on interest rates expected on Thursday. Sterling was flat at $1.3552. The UK and its metal exports are exempt from the increased U.S. duties, given Britain has a trade deal in place. In the meantime, traders were also keyed in on developments in Japanese markets after sources told Reuters the Bank of Japan is considering slowing down the pace of tapering in its bond purchases from next fiscal year onward. The Japanese bond market was a main focus of market participants late last month, after a weak auction for longer-dated bonds further complicated the BoJ's efforts to reduce its presence in its debt market. On Wednesday, the Japanese yen was down 0.14% at 144.155 per dollar, while yields on longer-dated tenors were marginally higher. FOCUS ON ECONOMIC HEALTH Economic indicators have returned as a driver of the U.S. currency this week and sentiment overall has been buoyed by data so far that analysts say is yet to reflect the full damage of trade uncertainty. In Europe, business activity was largely steady in May, a survey showed, with upcoming ECB rate cuts and potential fiscal stimulus anticipated to be the next catalyst. Traders will also parse the ISM services sector report out of the U.S. along with ADP employment data that could reflect the health of the private sector. Friday will bring the highly anticipated monthly payrolls figures. Elsewhere, the Canadian dollar was flat at C$1.3710 versus its U.S. peer. The Bank of Canada is likely to hold interest rates steady later on. Both Canada and Mexico are exposed to the higher U.S. tariffs on industrial metals. Mexico's peso was steady. South Korea's won strengthened about 1% to 1,363.92 per dollar after the victory of liberal candidate Lee Jae-myung in the country's presidential election. Hong Kong's dollar was last flat at 7.8465 per greenback - which is close to the weak end of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's trading range of 7.75-7.85 that it maintains against the dollar. (Reporting by Kevin Buckland and Johann M Cherian; Editing by Amanda Cooper, Aidan Lewis and Gareth Jones)