logo
Peter Marks, FDA's top vaccine official, resigns

Peter Marks, FDA's top vaccine official, resigns

Yahoo29-03-2025

This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter.
Peter Marks, the Food and Drug Administration's top vaccine official, abruptly resigned from the agency on Friday, citing disagreement with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Marks, who helped lead the successful advancement of COVID-19 vaccines during the first Trump administration, said he had tried to address Kennedy's concerns around vaccine safety and transparency.
'However, it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,' Marks wrote in a letter to acting FDA Commissioner Sara Brenner, a copy of which was obtained by BioPharma Dive.
'My hope is that during the coming years, the unprecedented assault on scientific truth that has adversely impacted public health in our nation comes to an end so that the citizens of our country can fully benefit from the breadth of advances in medical science,' he continued.
Marks' resignation is effective April 5. His departure will leave both of the FDA's principal drug review offices without a permanent leader. Patrizia Cavazzoni, who was formerly head of the other office, stepped down from her role on January 18. In addition to Marks and Cavazzoni, several other agency leaders have either departed or been fired in recent months.
The Wall Street Journal first reported news of Marks' resignation. Both HHS and FDA did not respond to multiple requests by BioPharma Dive for comment.
Marks, a physician and hematologist, has led the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research since 2016, overseeing the agency's review of vaccines, blood products and some genetic medicines. He helped come up with the idea for Operation Warp Speed, a cross-government initiative that helped the U.S. quickly develop, review and produce several safe and effective vaccines for COVID-19. He's also championed the development of cell and gene therapies, pushing the agency to be more flexible and move faster — sometimes controversially so.
'I had the chance to work closely with [Marks],' Robert Califf, a former FDA commissioner under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, wrote on Bluesky. 'While many people disagreed with one or another decision he made, I can assert that his interest was always with the combination of public health and the special needs of patients in this rapidly evolving world of technology.'
Marks' ouster could spark concerns within the biopharmaceutical industry, which has been cautious in opposing Trump administration actions at HHS and the FDA.
"We are deeply concerned that the loss of experienced leadership at the FDA will erode scientific standards and broadly impact the development of new, transformative therapies to fight diseases for the American people," John Crowley, head of the biotech lobbying group BIO, said in a statement.
'Marks will be sorely missed,' John Maraganore, a biotechnology leader and former CEO of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, wrote on X.
In his letter, Marks directly cited the current measles outbreak that has sickened at least 483 people across 20 states through Thursday and led to the first U.S. death from the disease in 10 years. Kennedy, who for years pushed unproven claims about the safety of many vaccines, has been criticized for his handling of the outbreak. While he recommended parents discuss vaccination with their child's physicians, he has also touted ineffective treatments like cod liver oil, which can cause injury if overdosed.
'Undermining confidence in well-established vaccines that have met the high standards for quality, safety, and effectiveness that have been in place for decades at FDA is irresponsible, detrimental to public health, and a clear danger to our nation's health, safety and security,' Marks wrote in his letter.
Two doses of the measles vaccine available in the U.S. are 97% effective at preventing the disease and side effects are mild in the vast majority of cases. It has not been linked to autism, as Kennedy has long claimed.
Other actions by Kennedy since he became health secretary have also raised alarms. A meeting of advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was postponed soon after Kennedy was sworn in, although it has since been rescheduled. According to reporting by Politico, Kennedy is also considering forcing out some of the advisers on the panel, and is scrutinizing other vaccine advisory committees.
Most significantly, Kennedy on Thursday unveiled plans to dramatically shrink HHS, including by cutting some 2,400 employees at the CDC and 3,500 at FDA. The layoffs follow a number of moves by the Trump administration to force government workers to leave or retire early, as well as to reduce funding for scientific research.
Martin Makary, President Donald Trump's pick to run the FDA, was confirmed by the Senate Tuesday, but it's not clear if he has been sworn in yet as commissioner.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breyers Ice Creams Recalled After Flavor Containing Life-Threatening Allergen Was Packaged as Another Flavor
Breyers Ice Creams Recalled After Flavor Containing Life-Threatening Allergen Was Packaged as Another Flavor

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Breyers Ice Creams Recalled After Flavor Containing Life-Threatening Allergen Was Packaged as Another Flavor

6,668 cases of Breyers Chocolate Truffle Ice Cream across the United States have been recalled by Unilever Manufacturing The affected ice cream cartons actually contain Rocky Road Ice Cream, which contains almonds, a potentially "life-threatening" allergen The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced the recall on June 10Over 6,600 cases of Breyers Ice Cream have been recalled amid concerns that the product is mislabeled and contains a "life-threatening" allergen. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirmed that 6,668 cases of Breyers Chocolate Truffle Ice Cream were voluntarily recalled by Unilever Manufacturing on June 2 in a Tuesday, June 10 statement. The cause for the recall was determined to be "undeclared allergens and mislabeled product." "Rocky Road Ice was packaged with Chocolate Truffle Ice Cream labeled tub and a Rocky Road Ice Cream lid. Tub said 'may contain tree nuts' the lid said it did contain almonds," the FDA clarified about the recall. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! The FDA declared this a Class II recall, which is defined as "a situation in which use of, or exposure to, a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote." A representative for Breyers commented on the recall in a statement shared with PEOPLE, saying, "Unilever in the U.S. is voluntarily recalling one lot of Breyers Chocolate Truffle 1.5 quart tubs after some were found to contain Rocky Road ice cream, which includes almonds not listed on the label." The statement continued: "People with an almond allergy should not consume the product due to risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction. The safety and quality of our products is our top priority. For more information, consumers can visit or call 1-800-931-2826." It is unclear where exactly the cases of ice cream were distributed across the United States. The FDA reported the distribution as targeting "distribution centers and retail locations across the U.S." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Rocky Road is a flavor of ice cream that contains almonds. Although almonds are considered tree nuts, the label for Breyers Chocolate Truffle Ice Cream only says that the product "may contain tree nuts." The Breyers recall comes a few weeks after nearly 18,000 containers of Wells Dairy ice cream and frozen yogurt were recalled due to contamination with hard plastics. Wells Enterprises, which produces Wells Dairy products, was responsible for the recall, which targeted 22 different flavors of frozen desserts. Read the original article on People

BioNTech to Acquire CureVac in Stock Deal Valued Around $1.25 Billion
BioNTech to Acquire CureVac in Stock Deal Valued Around $1.25 Billion

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BioNTech to Acquire CureVac in Stock Deal Valued Around $1.25 Billion

BioNTech will acquire all shares of CureVac after the two sides reached an agreement in a deal valued around $1.25 billion. Each share of CureVac, a clinical-stage biotech company, will be exchanged for about $5.46 in BioNTech American depositary shares. Upon the deal's closing, CureVac shareholders are expected to own between 4% and 6% of the German developer of RNA vaccines and immunotherapies. ICE Raids Have Sent Latino Shoppers Into Hiding and Big Brands Are Hurting The Secret to Retaining the Best Employees: Ask Them These Four Questions Here's How Much Money the U.S. Is Earning From Tariffs, in Charts How Home Depot Became Ground Zero in Trump's Deportation Push Supply Chains Become New Battleground in the Global Trade War BioNTech Chief Executive Ugur Sahin said the plan is to bring complementary capabilities between the two companies together to develop transformative cancer treatments. CureVac's operating subsidiary will become a wholly owned subsidiary of BioNTech following the close of the transaction. As part of this plan, BioNTech will integrate CureVac's research and manufacturing site in Tübingen, Germany. The deal was unanimously approved by both companies' management and supervisory boards. It is expected to close in 2025. Shares of CureVac surged 29% to $5.25 in premarket trading. Write to Denny Jacob at Pulls Outlook as Sales Fall Bojangles Is Exploring a Sale While the Fried-Chicken Market Is Hot Why Bosses Should Give Feedback in the Morning The Audacious Reboot of America's Nuclear Energy Program Muted May Inflation Defies Tariff Fears Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices (FSMEX) a Strong Mutual Fund Pick Right Now?
Is Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices (FSMEX) a Strong Mutual Fund Pick Right Now?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices (FSMEX) a Strong Mutual Fund Pick Right Now?

If you have been looking for Sector - Health funds, a place to start could be Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices (FSMEX). FSMEX has a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Zacks categorizes FSMEX as Sector - Health, a segment packed with options. Sector - Health mutual funds offer investors a focus on the healthcare industry, one of the largest sectors in the American economy. These funds can include everything from pharmaceutical companies to medical device manufacturers and for-profit hospitals. Fidelity is responsible for FSMEX, and the company is based out of Boston, MA. Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices made its debut in April of 1998, and since then, FSMEX has accumulated about $4.48 billion in assets, per the most up-to-date date available. The fund is currently managed by Edward Yoon who has been in charge of the fund since May of 2007. Investors naturally seek funds with strong performance. This fund has delivered a 5-year annualized total return of 5.12%, and it sits in the middle third among its category peers. If you're interested in shorter time frames, do not dismiss looking at the fund's 3 -year annualized total return of 3.37%, which places it in the bottom third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product's returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund's [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund's performance, it is also important to note the standard deviation of the returns. The lower the standard deviation, the less volatility the fund experiences. Over the past three years, FSMEX's standard deviation comes in at 18.22%, compared to the category average of 15.64%. Over the past 5 years, the standard deviation of the fund is 19.24% compared to the category average of 16.64%. This makes the fund more volatile than its peers over the past half-decade. Investors should note that the fund has a 5-year beta of 0.92, which means it is hypothetically less volatile than the market at large. Alpha is an additional metric to take into consideration, since it represents a portfolio's performance on a risk-adjusted basis relative to a benchmark, which in this case, is the S&P 500. With a negative alpha of -7.95, managers in this portfolio find it difficult to pick securities that generate better-than-benchmark returns. Costs are increasingly important for mutual fund investing, and particularly as competition heats up in this market. And all things being equal, a lower cost product will outperform its otherwise identical counterpart, so taking a closer look at these metrics is key for investors. In terms of fees, FSMEX is a no load fund. It has an expense ratio of 0.63% compared to the category average of 1.11%. Looking at the fund from a cost perspective, FSMEX is actually cheaper than its peers. While the minimum initial investment for the product is $0, investors should also note that there is no minimum for each subsequent investment. Fees charged by investment advisors have not been taken into considiration. Returns would be less if those were included. Overall, Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices ( FSMEX ) has a high Zacks Mutual Fund rank, and in conjunction with its comparatively similar performance, average downside risk, and lower fees, Fidelity Select Portfolio Medical Technology and Devices ( FSMEX ) looks like a great potential choice for investors right now. Your research on the Sector - Health segment doesn't have to stop here. You can check out all the great mutual fund tools we have to offer by going to to see the additional features we offer as well for additional information. For analysis of the rest of your portfolio, make sure to visit for our full suite of tools which will help you investigate all of your stocks and funds in one place. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Get Your Free (FSMEX): Fund Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store