Beach property owner urges Senate to block director of agency that fined him $289,000
An Isle of Palms property owner who was fined $289,000 over construction of a seawall on the beach is fighting plans to make the acting director of the agency that penalized him the department's permanent chief.
But Rom Reddy says his recommendation that the Senate not confirm Myra Reece as director of the Department of Environmental Services is on behalf of property owners who can't afford to defend themselves against heavy-handed state enforcement efforts. Reddy, a wealthy owner of small newspapers, said he has the resources to challenge the Department of Environmental Services in court.
'The nomination of Myra Reece, a 30-year career bureaucrat, is a disgrace in a red state,'' Reddy said in a text to The State newspaper. 'I have personally experienced the police powers she and her agency have used. By the grace of God, I can afford to stand up to their bullying. They prey on the 80 percent of small businesses and citizens who cannot afford to stand up to their police powers.''
Reddy, who has started a political action committee, has run afoul of coastal regulators over construction of a seawall along the beach at the Isle of Palms. He now is involved in a legal fight with Reece's agency over the $289,000 fine last year. He disputes the state's position that the seawall was built illegally. State law restricts seawall construction because they can worsen beach erosion.
Reddy said South Carolina needs fresh leadership in its environmental protection department. He maintains that people's rights often have been infringed upon by overzealous government agencies. Reece declined comment Friday.
An enthusiastic supporter of Republican President Donald Trump, Reddy put $2.5 million into the political action committee and has launched a web site that supports a state version of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, which is making deep cuts in the federal workforce and regulations.
Last fall, Republican Gov. Henry McMaster chose Reece to be the permanent director at the environmental services department, saying 'no one is more qualified or better positioned to lead this agency.'' He said her professionalism and commitment had earned his respect and the respect of others.
Reece, 66, is a North Augusta resident widely known in state government for her easygoing manner, her understanding of politics and her knowledge of environmental rules. She has a reputation as a consensus builder and is now steering efforts to come up with a comprehensive state water plan. Some of those who know her say she is not heavy-handed with enforcement.
Senators, who must confirm McMaster's appointment, have not met yet to discuss Reece, although they have confirmed some of McMaster's other picks, including Department of Natural Resources Director Tom Mullikin. A hearing on Reece would likely need to be held this month because the Legislative session ends in May.
One McMaster choice not confirmed by the Senate is Edward Simmer, who worked with Reece at the state Department of Health and Environmental Control before it was dissolved last July as part of government restructuring. A Senate committee this week did not deem Simmer qualified to be named permanent director of the new state Department of Public Health after an outcry from COVID vaccine opponents. The Medical Affairs committee voted 12-5 against Simmer.
York County Republican Wes Climer, who chairs the Senate agriculture committee that would vet Reece, declined to share any concerns committee members might have about Reece.
Among those on the committee is Sen. Stephen Goldinch, a Georgetown County lawmaker who has been highly critical of state coastal enforcement efforts. Goldfinch, a Republican from Murrells Inlet, has introduced legislation that would call for examination of whether certain state regulations are necessary. He was not available for comment Friday. He has led efforts to change development rules to help seaside property owners. A key question is how far back state jurisdiction extends from the ocean.
Many interest groups familiar with Reece's work at DHEC are backing her to become permanent director of the new environmental services department.
Environmental organizations, including Audubon SC, the S.C. Wildlife Federation, Upstate Forever and the Congaree Riverkeeper, as well as business associations, such as the Home Builders Association of South Carolina, have written letters of support for Reece becoming director at the environmental services agency. The Palmetto Agribusiness Council and the state Forestry Association, two major agricultural organizations, also have written letters of support, as has state Agriculture Commissioner Hugh Weathers.
'She enforces our state's environmental laws, protecting our state's natural resources and our economy, while maintaining a level of respect for farming and the people who make up the industry,'' Weathers wrote.
One coastal association, S.C. Beach Advocates, backs her, as well. The beach group's members include city officials who deal with oceanfront development issues.
'Her leadership style, which emphasizes balanced problem-solving, has garnered respect from a diverse array of stakeholders,'' wrote Isle of Palms Mayor Phillip Pounds, who chairs the beach advocates group.
Former DHEC employee Rebecca Haynes, who now heads Audubon SC, and one-time agency board member Rick Lee said they never found Reece to be overzealous in directing enforcement. Both said she is easy to work with and reasonable. Haynes and Lee said Reece has backed up staff members who were trying to uphold state environmental rules.
'She needs to be confirmed,'' Lee said.
Still, Reddy said South Carolina needs a new way of thinking about environmental issues, akin to that of Lee Zeldin, Trump's U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administrator. Zeldin has led efforts to rollback a plethora of regulations businesses say are burdensome and he has cut funding for an array of environmental programs.
Reddy called McMaster's choice of Reece to run the Department of Environmental Services a 'lazy'' one. He said Reece kowtows to environmental organizations who pressure the agency with lawsuits.
'You need a strong person who stands up for the citizens,'' Reddy said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Skift
10 minutes ago
- Skift
Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking
Although travel isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, lawmakers in Washington are discussing several bills that would impact the industry. Travel and tourism isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, which this month is dominated by debate over the President Donald Trump-backed 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill. But that doesn't mean that lawmakers aren't attempting to make laws that would directly affect the hotel, lodging, air travel, and cruise industries. Here are seven such federal bills to watch heading into the summer: 1: Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2025 Introduced by Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), this bipartisan bill targets 'unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging.' Bill co-sponsors include Reps. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), Russell Fry (R-S.C.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Craig Goldman (R-Texas), Eugene Vindman (D-Va.) and André Carson (D-Ind.). The bill mandates that hotels and short-term rental providers must: Display the 'total services price, if a price is displayed, in any advertisement, marketing, or price list wherever the covered services are displayed, advertised, marketed, or offered for sale.' Disclose 'the total services price at the time the covered services are first displayed to [an] individual and anytime thereafter throughout the covered services purchasing process.' Disclose before a final purchase 'any tax, fee, or assessment imposed by any government entity, quasi-government entity, or government-created special district or program on the sale of covered services.' The bill passed the U.S. House on a voice vote in April. The U.S. Senate is now considering the measure. There, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) has introduced a Senate version of the Hotel Fees and Transparency Act of 2025, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Shelley Moo


USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill
Trump says Elon Musk bromance may be over after attacks on tax bill 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Show Caption Hide Caption 'Kill the bill': Musk urges lawmakers to stop Trump's tax cut bill Elon Musk blasted President Trump's new tax bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' urging millions of followers to lobby lawmakers to 'kill the bill.' WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said his close relationship with Elon Musk might be over after the world's richest man and former top White House adviser spent the past few days slamming the president's signature tax and policy bill. "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. "I don't know if we will anymore." The president's comments triggered a war of words with Musk, who said Trump wouldn't have won a second term if it weren't for the quarter of a million dollars in campaign cash he pumped in his 2024 campaign. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said in a post on X, the social media company he owns. "Such gratitude." Trump's remarks were his first since Musk called Trump's reconciliation bill "a disgusting abomination" and later urged his social media followers to lobby their representatives to "kill the bill." Musk has objected to the deficit implications with the legislation. "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I helped Elon a lot," Trump said during a lengthy response to a question from a reporter about Musk's criticism as the president sat next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a bilateral meeting. Trump accused Musk of opposing the legislation because it would end a $7,500 consumer tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles, a policy of former President Joe Biden that has benefited electric car companies like Musk's Tesla. "Elon knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here," Trump said. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate." Musk fires back at Trump: 'Whatever' More: Trump overpowers Musk's attacks on mega tax bill with blizzard of orders Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, fired back at Trump shortly after the president's comments. "Whatever," Musk said in a post on his social media platform X. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." Musk added: "In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" He also disputed Trump's assertion that Musk was kept abreast of the bill's details. "False" Musk said. "This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Musk left the White House last week after leading the government-slashing Department of Government Efficiency during the first four month's of Trump's second term. Although Musk first voiced criticism of Trump's bill before his exit, Trump had seemed to smooth things over when he welcomed him to the Oval Office for a friendly send-off news conference on May 30. "I'll be honest," Trump said six days later on June 5. "I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office." Musk, prior to his White House departure, asked for his special government employee status to be extended beyond 130 days to allow him to continue to lead DOGE, but the White House declined, a source told USA TODAY. Last weekend, Musk expressed disappointment after Trump withdrew his nominee for administrator of NASA, Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Musk. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. (This story has been updated with more information.)


Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
Tesla Stock Drops 12% As Trump-Musk Relationship Appears To Unravel
Shares of Tesla dropped by 12% on Thursday as the relationship between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's appeared to unravel, with Musk launching attacks at the president on X and Trump suggesting to reporters at the White House criticism of his signature bill from the world's wealthiest person amounts to 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Tesla's stock fell 12.3% to around $291.18 as of just before 3 p.m. EDT on Thursday, with losses accelerating following Trump's comment. Through more than a dozen posts on X since Tuesday, Musk has referred to Trump's policy bill as 'massive, outrageous' and 'pork-filled,' while adding, 'shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Musk's latest criticism of the bill Thursday targeted Trump for the first time, as Musk wrote 'wise words' in response to a tweet from Trump in 2013, in which Trump said, 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!' Trump responded to Musk's recent attacks, suggesting Thursday he and Musk 'had a great relationship,' but 'I don't know if we will anymore.' $17.2 billion. That's how much was cut from Musk's fortune amid Tesla's stock slide, bringing his net worth below $400 billion to $398 billion, according to Forbes' estimates. Tesla's stock jumped 22% in May, which came as Musk said he would leave the White House and committed to serving as Tesla's chief executive for the next five years. Trump has called on Republican senators to approve his policy bill by a July 4 deadline set by Senate leadership. A stock slide for Tesla also comes as sales for the automaker declined in the U.K., Germany, Italy and China in May. Tesla's sales dropped more than 45% in the U.K., despite sales across the industry increasing by 28%. Tesla will launch a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June, featuring some 20 self-driving Model Y vehicles. The service's debut in Austin follows criticism about Tesla's self-driving software and Musk's failure to disclose detailed safety and technical data about Tesla's technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened several investigations into Tesla's Autopilot feature over nearly a decade, including recent probes into whether Tesla's Full-Self Driving software is linked to two deaths. Musk has repeatedly said the software allows for 'full autonomy' while in a vehicle, though he has said an active driver is still required. Musk's attacks on Trump's policy bill follow his monthslong stint in the White House leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Trump and Musk have said Musk's departure happened on good terms, and that Musk would continue to be present as a Trump adviser. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump 'already knows' Musk's stance on his bill, saying 'it doesn't change the president's opinion.' Tesla's stock declined in recent months as Musk appeared to increasingly focus on his role with the Trump administration, with some analysts criticizing him for spending '110%' of his time as head of the DOGE rather than leading Tesla. After Tesla's first-quarter earnings report in April, Musk signaled he would be 'allocating far more of my time' to Tesla, though he had yet to commit to exiting his government role.