logo
Why Waymo cars became sitting ducks during the LA protests

Why Waymo cars became sitting ducks during the LA protests

NBC News21 hours ago

Engineers working on self-driving technology have given a lot of thought to difficult questions over the years, including how to keep pedestrians safe and how to avoid collisions with other vehicles.
But last weekend's protests in Los Angeles threw a spotlight on one of the thorny problems that remain for autonomous vehicles: what to do about arson, vandalism or other physical attacks.
Five vehicles owned by Google's self-driving spinoff Waymo were set ablaze last Sunday during protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies. Images and video of the flaming cars quickly went viral, illustrating for a global audience how vulnerable robotaxis can be in volatile situations.
For all their advanced technology, including expensive cameras and sensors, the cars seemed to be defenseless. Waymo says the five cars were in downtown Los Angeles to serve passengers when they were attacked. There were no drivers to plead for mercy, and with crowds surrounding the vehicles, there was no escape path that didn't include threatening pedestrians — something Waymo vehicles are programmed not to do.
'They're very much sitting ducks,' said Jeff Fong, who has worked at tech companies including Lyft and Postmates and now writes a newsletter about cities and technology.
And it wasn't the first time Waymo was a victim of arson. Last year, a Waymo in San Francisco's Chinatown was set on fire during Lunar New Year celebrations. Police later charged a juvenile with starting the blaze, saying they had thrown a lit firework into the vehicle.
Waymos have been vandalized in other ways, too, including having their tires slashed, their windshields smashed, their doors torn off and their exteriors defaced with spray-paint. Local prosecutors have charged individuals in at least some cases.
Part of what makes robotaxis vulnerable is their caution. While it's impossible to know if a human driver behind the steering wheel could have deterred or escaped vandalism in any specific case involving a robotaxi, driverless vehicles are generally designed to stay put if there's any risk that they'd hit a person while moving.
'There's been so much effort into making sure they can't hurt human beings,' Fong said. 'That's the problem Waymo has been solving for, rightfully so, but when you have the problem where a human wants to do harm, these cars have no countermeasures.'
Autonomous technology companies, including Waymo, appear to be largely at a loss for ideas on how to deter vandalism over the long term. Their cameras may be a partial deterrent — Waymo says each of its cars has 29 cameras — and the company has cooperated with police to help find vandalism suspects after the fact. But Waymo's collection of street data through its cameras and sensors is also one of the sources of anger against the company and other startups like it.
Some Uber and Lyft drivers have said that vandalism incidents bolster the importance of human drivers as a deterrent.
A spokesperson for Waymo said that in response to the protests in Los Angeles and elsewhere, it was temporarily adjusting its service area. Waymo declined to make anyone available for an interview about the problems of arson and vandalism and how the company plans to deal with such incidents in the long term.
The vandalism problem is mostly limited for now to Waymo, which is the biggest self-driving car company. It has about 1,500 vehicles operating in four regions, with additional cities scheduled to come online this year. But the market is set to become more competitive soon, with Tesla saying it plans to launch a robotaxi service this month in Austin, Texas, and Amazon-backed Zoox planning a service in Las Vegas and San Francisco.
Representatives for Tesla and Zoox did not respond to requests for comment about how they plan to avoid incidents like last Sunday's attack on Waymo vehicles.
The problem has been gnawing at robotaxi fans on message boards on Reddit. In one thread in January, users tossed around ideas like having dedicated security on motorcycles nearby or equipping Waymo vehicles with pepper spray.
Adam Millard-Ball, director of the UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies, said that robotaxis are a symbolic target for some street demonstrators.
'They're attacked not because they're autonomous cars but because they're a symbol of inequality in cities and a symbol of the power of large technology companies,' he said. He noted that electric scooters are also sometimes targets.
He also said it's hard to imagine what the companies, police or city officials could do to eliminate the threat entirely.
'I don't think any country in the world has eliminated vandalism in public spaces,' he said.
The incidents are problematic for Waymo on multiple levels: not only the cost of repairing or replacing the vehicles, but also the reputational risk when images and videos spread widely online.
There's also the possible danger to passengers. And although no passengers were harmed in either arson incident, some passengers have been delayed or reported feeling threatened when the cars they were riding in were vandalized from the outside. Last year, a San Francisco woman posted a video online after she said two men targeted her while riding in a Waymo.
Then there's the lost business from what Waymo calls 'temporary service adjustments.' In Los Angeles and San Francisco this past week, Waymo stopped serving certain areas that are part of its normal service area. People using the company's app in recent days were greeted with a message, alluding to the street protests: 'Pickup times and routing may be affected by local events. Thank you for your patience.'
In San Francisco, that meant Waymo refused to take customers through or to several neighborhoods, including parts of the Financial District, the Civic Center area near City Hall and the sprawling South of Market neighborhood.
Waymo also limited service to the Mission District, a historically working-class and Latino neighborhood that's also home now to many tech workers and a vibrant nightlife scene. Thousands of people attended an anti-Trump protest in the Mission on Monday night, and the effects on Waymo reverberated for days: A post on X with an example of rerouting around the Mission went viral Wednesday, getting 1.2 million views.
Searches of the Waymo app by NBC News showed the service continuing to refuse service to parts of the Mission throughout the week, including during relatively quiet morning hours and on Friday. The app labeled certain destinations as 'unreachable.'
A Waymo spokesperson said: 'We're taking these heightened measures now out of an abundance of caution.' They said the situation was temporary and subject to change quickly in response to conditions on the ground. Waymo hasn't published a map of which areas are restricted.
Mass anti-Trump protests advocating for 'No Kings' are scheduled for Saturday nationwide, providing another potential disruption for robotaxis.
Though the service restrictions may be temporary, they struck some people as discriminatory against poorer neighborhoods, with some social media users on X calling the practice ' redlining ' on the part of Waymo. The term refers to the decades-long practice of refusing home loans to predominantly Black neighborhoods.
In contrast, ride-hailing services Uber and Lyft, which use human drivers, still offered rides to the Mission in recent days, according to NBC News searches of their apps. San Francisco's Municipal Transportation Agency rerouted some buses during the height of anti-Trump administration protests but then resumed regular service.
There have been no arrests for the attacks on Waymo vehicles in Los Angeles last Sunday. On Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said it was taking the lead in investigating the Waymo attacks, making them the subject of a federal investigation.
'The cause of these fires is quite obvious,' ATF Special Agent in Charge Kenneth Cooper of the Los Angeles Field Division said in a statement.
'The task at hand now is to determine who is responsible. ATF's National Response Team is going to be a tremendous asset, and we look forward to the results of their efforts to hold the responsible parties accountable,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No Kings' protests span 2,000 locations across the US
‘No Kings' protests span 2,000 locations across the US

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

‘No Kings' protests span 2,000 locations across the US

Nationwide 'No Kings' demonstrations spanned 2,000 locations, protesting against President Trump and his administration. Protests were largely peaceful, but clashes with police were reported in some areas, including downtown Los Angeles, where tear gas was used to disperse crowds. In San Francisco and Virginia, drivers struck protesters, with police investigating the incidents as possible intentional acts. Law enforcement officials in Texas evacuated the state capitol in Austin following a 'credible threat' to lawmakers attending the protests. Demonstrations took place in numerous cities, including West Palm Beach, Philadelphia, and New York, with speakers like Rep. Jamie Raskin and Martin Luther King Jr's eldest son addressing crowds.

Is Apple Delaying Smarter Siri Yet Again?
Is Apple Delaying Smarter Siri Yet Again?

Geeky Gadgets

time2 hours ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Is Apple Delaying Smarter Siri Yet Again?

Apple has once again postponed the release of updates aimed at making Siri a more advanced and capable virtual assistant. This decision, announced without a clear timeline for rollout, has sparked questions about Apple's ability to remain competitive in the rapidly evolving virtual assistant market. As rivals like Amazon and Google continue to push the boundaries of artificial intelligence (AI), the delay raises concerns about Siri's future and Apple's position in the broader AI landscape. The video below from SaranByte gives us more information. The delay is particularly significant given the increasing reliance on virtual assistants to simplify daily tasks and enhance user experiences. With Siri's updates on hold, Apple risks falling behind competitors who are already delivering more sophisticated and user-friendly solutions. Watch this video on YouTube. What the Delay Means for Siri's Evolution The postponed updates were expected to introduce substantial advancements to Siri's AI capabilities, promising to make the assistant more intuitive, responsive, and versatile. These updates were anticipated to include: Enhanced voice recognition for improved accuracy in understanding user commands. for improved accuracy in understanding user commands. Better contextual understanding to enable more natural and fluid interactions. to enable more natural and fluid interactions. Seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem, enhancing compatibility across devices and services. By delaying these updates, Apple has left users waiting for improvements that could significantly enhance their experience with Siri. For now, Siri remains largely unchanged, which may frustrate users who expect their virtual assistant to evolve alongside their needs. This stagnation could also impact Apple's ability to retain users who might seek more advanced alternatives. Rising Competition in the Virtual Assistant Market The delay comes at a critical time when competition in the virtual assistant market is intensifying. Rivals such as Amazon's Alexa and Google Assistant are consistently raising the bar with innovative features, including: Multi-turn conversations that mimic natural, human-like dialogue. that mimic natural, human-like dialogue. Proactive suggestions based on user behavior and preferences. based on user behavior and preferences. Extensive third-party integrations that expand functionality and usability. These advancements have positioned Alexa and Google Assistant as leaders in the market, offering users a more dynamic and personalized experience. By postponing Siri's updates, Apple risks losing ground to these competitors, who are already delivering innovative solutions. This delay could make it increasingly difficult for Siri to remain a compelling choice for users seeking advanced AI-powered assistance. Why Smarter Siri Features Are Crucial For many users, the value of a virtual assistant lies in its ability to simplify tasks, provide accurate information, and integrate seamlessly with other devices. Smarter Siri features, such as improved natural language processing and advanced voice recognition, could significantly enhance its utility. These updates would: Enable Siri to handle more complex and nuanced queries effectively. to handle more complex and nuanced queries effectively. Deliver personalized responses tailored to individual user preferences and contexts. tailored to individual user preferences and contexts. Streamline interactions across Apple's ecosystem, from iPhones to smart home devices. Without these advancements, Siri risks falling short of user expectations, especially as competitors continue to innovate. Users increasingly demand virtual assistants that can anticipate their needs, adapt to their preferences, and provide seamless integration across devices. Apple's delay in delivering these features could erode user confidence in Siri's ability to meet these demands. What This Means for Apple's AI Strategy The delay in smarter Siri updates also raises broader questions about Apple's approach to artificial intelligence. While Apple has made strides in areas like privacy-focused machine learning, its progress in virtual assistant technology appears slower compared to its competitors. Several factors may be contributing to this lag, including: Apple's commitment to user privacy, which limits the data available for training AI systems. which limits the data available for training AI systems. Technical challenges in developing more advanced and capable virtual assistants. in developing more advanced and capable virtual assistants. Resource allocation, as Apple prioritizes other AI-driven projects over Siri's development. These challenges highlight the complexities of balancing innovation with Apple's core values, such as privacy and security. However, the slower pace of Siri's evolution could jeopardize Apple's competitive edge in the AI-driven virtual assistant market. To remain relevant, Apple must address these challenges and accelerate its efforts to enhance Siri's capabilities. What's Next for Siri and Apple? Apple has yet to provide a clear timeline for the release of the smarter Siri updates, leaving users uncertain about when they can expect meaningful improvements. In the meantime, competitors like Amazon and Google are likely to capitalize on this delay by further advancing their own virtual assistants and attracting users with more innovative features. For Apple, the delay underscores the urgency of staying competitive in the virtual assistant market. To maintain its position as a leader in technology, the company will need to overcome the obstacles slowing Siri's development and deliver updates that meet user expectations. This will require a strategic focus on innovation, user experience, and seamless integration across Apple's ecosystem. As the virtual assistant landscape continues to evolve, Apple's ability to adapt and innovate will determine Siri's future relevance and its role in shaping the next generation of AI-powered tools. Below are more guides on Siri updates from our extensive range of articles. Source & Image Credit: SaranByte Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Man arrested after allegedly driving into protesters in Virginia
Man arrested after allegedly driving into protesters in Virginia

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Man arrested after allegedly driving into protesters in Virginia

Culpeper Police charged Checklick with reckless driving, according to the release. He appeared before a magistrate and was ordered to be held without bond at the Culpeper County Jail. Officers said they stopped the vehicle and identified the driver as Checklick. Their preliminary investigation determined that Checklick had "intentionally accelerated his vehicle into the dispersing crowd, striking at least one person with his vehicle." No injuries were reported to police. The person Checklick is accused of striking with his vehicle has not been identified by law enforcement, the release said. Incident occurred amid 'No Kings' protests The incident in Virginia occurred as millions took part in coordinated "No Kings" protests from coast to coast, criticizing the Trump administration. The "No Kings" marches, rallies and demonstrations were organized to coincide with the Army's "Grand Military Parade and Celebration, which falls on Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. Woman killed at Virginia protest in 2017 after man drove car into crowd Several years ago, a car drove into a crowd of counterprotesters about an hour from Culpeper in Charlottesville, Virginia, killing a demonstrator. James Alex Fields Jr. was convicted of killing a woman named Heather Heyer, after intentionally driving into a group protesting a "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville on Aug. 12, 2017. Fields was convicted of first-degree and eight other charges, including aggravated malicious wounding and hit and run. Heyer, a 32-year-old paralegal and civil rights activist, was killed, and nearly three dozen were injured during the attack.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store