HS2 has devastated my constituency. And for what?
For years we have been asking 'when? When will HS2 finally be completed?' But this misses the point. We should have questioned not the deadline, but the justification and purpose of the costly, benighted vanity project.
We should have demanded to know why taxpayers are being forced to bankroll this failure. Why are we allowing the civil servants who have overseen this woeful tale of waste and incompetence to remain in their posts? Why have no heads rolled, as a consequence of this national embarrassment?
The most painful aspect to this sorry affair is the knowledge that, even at the outset, when it was a twinkle in Lord Adonis's eye under the previous Labour government, it lacked a business case. Not one private sector investor was willing to risk a penny piece on it. Over a decade later, it has inflicted unnecessary misery on my constituents.
And now we discover that the opening of HS2 will be delayed, with the Transport Secretary announcing that the remaining section of the line will not be completed by 2033.
This is hardly the first time the project has come off the tracks. First the eastern leg to Leeds was scrapped. Then the Manchester leg was curtailed. For a time, it looked as though it would terminate at Old Oak Common in West London, not even making it to Euston despite the money piled into the station's revamp. Commuting times would then have more than offset any savings from HS2's much lauded speed. That truncation has since been abandoned.
The Department for Transport (DfT) has faced accusations of insufficient oversight. Leadership at HS2 Ltd, a public company owned by the DfT, has been a merry-go-round. And all of this is before you get to the £100 million tunnel to protect bats in my county, or HS2's 52-page annual Equality, Diversity and Inclusion statement
For the residents of Wendover, daily life has been fundamentally changed by HS2. The impact on local amenities – on churches and cricket clubs – cannot be overstated. The brazen attempts to send HGVs down narrow residential streets have been destructive.
Landowners and community organisations have been abandoned by project managers. While they face the degrading financial uncertainty that comes with losing their land, the construction companies are raking in millions thanks to the DfT's cost-plus contract model, which guarantees a profit at the expense of the taxpayer whilst reimbursing firms' costs.
This is why the project's real price tag has exceeded £200 billion, with one of the worst benefit-cost ratios of any major project, all to, in the words said to me by a former Minister of State for Transport a few years back, prop up Britain's construction industry.
Last month it was revealed by RAIL Magazine, through a Freedom of Information request, that not only will the final cost of Phase One reach over £100 billion, with £81 billion (at 2019 prices) attributed to constructing as far as Old Oak Common, but also that it will be 2036 at the earliest until this section is finished. It's a slap in the face for those who've experienced compulsory land purchases, land which may have provided a source of income.
There is effectively no spending control mechanism. It is a project which, by its very design, benefits the contractors at the expense of hard working taxpayers who are currently seeing no benefit from HS2 and likely never will, given its reduced scope.
When asked, HS2 contractor Balfour Beatty Group's former Chief Executive Leo Quinn answered 'no' to a question on the efficacy of restructuring HS2's major works contracts in the interests of the taxpayer; his suggestion that 'no contractor in the UK could actually have a balance sheet to deliver something of that [HS2's] size' is highly alarming.
Not only does this bring into doubt the Department's ability to renegotiate its own contracts – it also casts significant doubt on whether the project could ever be delivered in full at all when, as Mr Quinn suggests, the private sector does not have the capital resources required to facilitate a project like this.
The utter failure of HS2 is a vivid example of British decline. That so much money has been spent on something which has so miserably failed to come about does not augur well for other future infrastructure projects. We need to learn from this.
HS2 ruins the lives of everyone it touches and, if it's not reigned in soon, we as a country will suffer immensely, just as my constituents have.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Assisted dying bill does 'not meet needs of patients', says Royal College of Psychiatrists
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' lead on assisted dying has told Sky News she is approaching Friday's vote by MPs "with professional trepidation". The medical organisation said the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in its current form did "not meet the needs of patients". It has also expressed concern over the shortage of qualified psychiatrists to take part in assisted dying panels, concerns around capacity assessment, and whether or not assisted dying will be interpreted as a treatment – because that would have a profound impact on the psychiatrist's decision-making process. Friday will be the first time the bill has been voted on in its entirety since last year's yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. MPs are allowed to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they can decide based on their conscience instead of following party lines. The bill's supporters have said it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that changes to the bill mean it is weaker than when it was first introduced. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Dr Annabel Price, the lead for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at the Royal College of Psychiatrists ( RCPsych), said: "We know that there is a strong association between a wish to hasten death and depression, and that there isn't adequate opportunity within the bill to assess somebody's needs and also to make sure that those needs are met, which might have an impact on their continued wish to want to end their life." The RCPsych was one of the first royal colleges to voice concerns about the bill in its current form. These fears have since been echoed by two more royal colleges, physicians and pathologists. It has provided written evidence to the bill's scrutiny committee, while Dr Price has provided oral evidence. She said the organisation had "actively engaged with parliamentarians throughout the process" and expressed concerns in two public statements. But despite all of this, the concerns raised have not been addressed, it is claimed. This has prompted worries because, under the bill, psychiatrists would have a leading role in assessing a patient's mental capacity when an assisted death has been requested. They would be on a panel alongside doctors, social workers, and a legal expert. The panel would not be expected to meet the patient during the process. Panel role 'doesn't map on to job of psychiatrist' Dr Price said the idea of making a clinical assessment of a patient's mental health ran contrary to everything a psychiatrist had been trained to do. She said: "The panel role doesn't really map on to the professional job and training of a psychiatrist. What psychiatrists are trained to do is the assessment and treatment of mental illness. "The panel role is really to check what the two other doctors have done and whether that patient meets the eligibility criteria. "And if they do, then they must be granted assisted dying. That doesn't really give room to identify meeting an unmet need, like depression for example, but there are lots of things that may be unmet, social difficulties, untreated pain and other physical symptoms, where that person might no longer want to die. "And it doesn't really give room for a psychiatrist to do what they're trained to do and where their expertise lies, which would be essentially a checking role." Clarification call Dr Price said other areas of the bill also needed urgent clarification. She said: "When somebody has a mental illness, our job is to see if we can treat that mental illness. The other area in the bill that hasn't really been addressed is the psychiatrist's responsibility around suicide prevention. "When we meet somebody who wants to end their life, we have a duty to that patient and that duty may involve assessing that patient under the Mental Health Act to try to manage the mental health aspects that may be making them want to die. And there really isn't enough detail as to how we do that, how we square those two roles and duties. That needs more attention." Dr Price added: "The Mental Capacity Act was designed to support people who can't make decisions for themselves to be able to have decisions made in their best interest for them. "There is nothing in the provision of the Mental Capacity Act that talks about a decision to end one's own life, so this is a new decision. "We don't currently have anything that maps on to that clinically and so the Mental Capacity Act, we have stated very clearly, is not sufficient to be a sufficient safeguard in assisted dying and that we need to rethink how capacity is assessed."
ITV News
38 minutes ago
- ITV News
Five ways HS2 has wasted money as government announces further delays
It will be at least another ten years until we will be able to catch an HS2 train from Birmingham to London, with the line now not expected to be complete until 2035 - and coming in billions of pounds over budget. More than 44 miles of tunnels have now been completed, with research estimating the project could create 30,000 new jobs in the West Midlands. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project has been severely curtailed by spiralling costs, despite being scaled back. In Parliament on Wednesday, 18 June, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the high-speed railway on schedule and within budget. She said she will accept all recommendations from a review by James Stewart into how HS2 has been managed up until now. In a statement to Parliament, the Secretary of State condemned the 'litany of failure' of HS2, citing spiralling costs, ineffective oversight and broken promises. The review states: "There is no single explanation for the failings of the HS2 Programme. "External disruptors (Brexit, the war in Ukraine, Covid-19 and a high inflationary period) have undoubtedly had an impact, but fundamentally a combination of the Government, DfT as Sponsor and Shareholder, HS2 Ltd as the delivery entity, and the private sector supply chain have failed to be able to deliver a project of the original scale and size of HS2." So, what are some of the main failings of the project? Here at ITV News Central we have pulled together a list. 1. Cancelled Phase 2 The original route was set to run from London to Birmingham, with two separate legs running from the Midlands to Leeds,and Manchester. Due to soaring costs, in 2021, Boris Johnson announced the scrapping of the Leeds leg, with Rishi Sunak cancelling the leg to Manchester in 2023. The cost of scrapping phase 2 works is estimated at around £2bn. 2. Delayed completion of Phase 1 As the opening of Phase 1 to Birmingham is pushed back further and further, costs continue to soar. The review highlights that without action; "Phase 1 alone risks becoming one of the most expensive railway lines in the world - with costs ballooning by £37 billion". When the project was first drawn up in 2009, the estimated cost for the entire project, including Phase 1 and 2, was £37.5bn. The most recent figures estimate it will cost between £49bn and £56.6bn, despite the second phase being cancelled. 3. Contractors The review states that; " HS2 Ltd has lacked the capability to deal with the size and complexity of the HS2 Programme." It goes on to say that the model chosen for the project was wrong, but there was a "failure to change course when problems arose." Extra costs are also down to problems with some of the building work. In November last year, issued were found on some of the bridges built on the line between London and Birmingham. Steel firm Severfield identified welding problems on a number of its structures, including nine bridges on the HS2 line, with repair work costing more than £20m to fix. At the time, HS2 said: 'We have identified a number of welding defects related to steel fabrication work undertaken by one of our suppliers. 'This will not impact on the safety or quality of the operational railway which is being designed to the highest standards.' In total more than 500 bridges are being built along the route from London to Curzon Street in Birmingham. 4. Desire to build the best HS2 was a project sold on speed. The promise was trains travelling between London and Birmingham at speeds of up to 225mph. This meant a straight line was required to be built between the two cities to ensure speed of trains. The route was to go through the Chilterns AONB, with extensive tunnels required to keep trains out of sight and ensure the natural area was protected. The scope of the plans kept changing, driving up costs. Pressure from protestors and constituents left MPs voting to increase the tunnel length through the Chilterns, in turn costing more money. The review found many key decisions have been driven by schedule rather than cost, stating: "Pressure from politicians to maintain momentum, fear of HS2 being cancelled, and the belief that costs will increase as a result of delay have featured strongly." 5. Pace of decision making Since it was initially approved in 2012, the HS2 project has been through Brexit, a global pandemic and seven different Prime Ministers. The James Stewart review highlights the pace of decision making as one of the main disruptors for the project, with no buffer in place for politics. It says: "Any project of this size and scale delivered across multiple decades is going to be impacted by politics. "When I looked at comparator projects – Tideway, Sizewell C, even Crossrail – there was a buffer to the politics, either with external shareholders, regulators or joint sponsors. "The HS2 Programme has had no such buffers and has been subject to evolving political aims, which pushed forward on the schedule before there was sufficient design maturity and caused progressive removals of scope." The review found trust between stakeholders needs to be restored as the project moves forward. It says: "The significant and consistent cost overruns that have been a feature of the project have undermined trust in HS2." Following the publishing of the review, the Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, said: "This must be a line in the sand. This government is delivering HS2 from Birmingham to London after years of mismanagement, flawed reporting and ineffective oversight. "Mark Wild and Mike Brown were part of the team, with me, that turned Crossrail into the Elizabeth Line – we have done it before, we will do it again. "Passengers and taxpayers deserve new railways the country can be proud of and the work to get HS2 back on track is firmly underway. " The Transport Secretary confirmed Mike Brown will be taking over as HS2 Ltd Chair, working alongside CEO Mark Wild to deliver a programme reset, including reviewing the costs and schedule, renegotiating HS2's large construction contracts, and reviewing HS2 Ltd's skills and structure. The Transport Secretary has asked Mark Wild to be ready to provide an update on revised costs and delivery timescales at the end of the year.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare reform marks moment of compassion, says Kendall amid backbench anger
The introduction of proposed legislation to reform the welfare system 'marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity', the Work and Pensions Secretary has said. Liz Kendall's words come amid a backlash from some Labour MPs who have criticised the 'awful' cuts to welfare – which the Government hopes can save up to £5 billion a year. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over. Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. In what could be seen as an attempt to head off some opposition, the legislation – known as the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will give existing claimants a 13-week period of financial support. The Department for Work and Pensions said this will apply to those affected by changes to the Pip daily living component, including those who lose their eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of UC. But campaigners, including disability equality charity Scope, said the longer transition period, up from an originally expected four weeks, 'will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end'. Food bank network Trussell said: 'The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. 'The reality of this Bill is still record cuts in support for disabled people, and the biggest cuts to social security since 2015.' Contrary to Ms Kendall's words, learning disability charity Mencap accused the Government of having 'confirmed the choice to turn its back on thousands of disabled people and by pushing ahead with these welfare reforms, they are causing a huge amount of anxiety'. Ms Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' As the Bill was formally introduced to the Commons on Wednesday, and the question asked as to what the next date for debate will be, Labour backbencher and former shadow chancellor John McDonnell could be heard to say 'Never'. A date has not yet been confirmed. Louise Murphy, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation think tank said the longer period of protection for those affected by Pip cuts is 'a sensible tweak that should ease the blow for those who are no longer eligible for support'. But she criticised extra funding for employment support not coming fully into effect until 2029 at the earliest, saying: 'While ministers have softened the stick of welfare cuts, they have not strengthened the carrot of greater employment support.' Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told Good Morning Britain, saying 'those that need to be protected should be protected'. 'If you need help in support to get into work, the Government should be providing that support and help to get into work,' he said. 'If you do have conditions, disabilities that mean it is impossible for you to work, then you need to be properly protected and supported.' The latest data, published on Tuesday, showed that more than 3.7 million people in England and Wales are claiming Pip, with teenagers and young adults making up a growing proportion. The figures, published by the Department for Work and Pensions, showed there were a record 3.74 million people in England and Wales claiming Pip as of April this year. The figure is up from 3.69 million in January and a jump of 200,000 from 3.54 million a year earlier. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. An impact assessment published alongside Wednesday's Bill introduction, confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Ms Kendall previously said there are 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year'. The impact assessment also confirmed a previous estimate that some250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/2030, although the Government repeated that this does not take into account the potentially positive impact of £1 billion annual funding by then for measures to support people into work. Changes to UC are expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. But the Government said around 3.9 million households not on the UC health element are expected to have an average annual gain of £265 from the increase in the standard UC allowance. While all of the Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill.
