Opinion: Why the UK refuses to do the one thing that could stop Israel's 'intolerable' war on Gaza
What Israel is doing in Gaza is 'morally wrong and unjustifiable', its actions 'intolerable' and 'an affront to the values of the British people'.
These are not the words of a pro-Palestine activist, but of the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, who has now suspended negotiations on a new free trade agreement and vowed to review co-operation on the 2030 bilateral road map.
But the UK government still won't take the single fastest and most effective step: ending military cooperation with Israel and halting all arms sales.
Lammy said in parliament that 'arms are not getting to Israel that could be used in Gaza'. This is false. The UK government last year suspended a small number of arms export licences - around 10 percent - after determining that Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law, but it allowed UK participation in the F-35 fighter jet programme to continue.
In addition, new data from both Israel and the UK raises concerns about the scale and end use of UK-supplied weaponry.
A protester holds a placard reading "No genocide, no war, Kier Starmer's got to go" as he takes part in a Pro-Palestinian march in central London, on 15 March, 2025 (AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Nations urged to make UN summit a 'turning point' for oceans
2 June 2025 09:41 PARIS (AFP) Nations will be under pressure to deliver more than just rhetoric at a UN oceans summit in France next week, including much-needed funds to better protect the world's overexploited and polluted third UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) seeks to build global unity and raise money for marine conservation even as nations disagree over deep-sea mining, plastic trash, and Sunday, hosts France are expecting about 70 heads of state and government to arrive in Nice for a pre-conference opening ceremony, including Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da are "in a state of emergency" and the June 9 to 13 meeting "will not be just another routine gathering", said UN under-secretary-general Li Junhua."There's still time to change our course if we act collectively," he countries are expected to send ministers or lower-level delegates to the summit, which does not carry the weight of a climate COP or UN treaty negotiation or make legally binding United States under President Donald Trump is unlikely to send a delegation at has promised the summit will do for ocean conservation what the Paris Agreement did for global climate present are expected to adopt a "Nice Declaration:" a statement of support for greater ocean protection, coupled with voluntary additional commitments by individual leaders are expected to turn out in force and demand, in particular, concrete financial commitments from governments."The message is clear: voluntary pledges are not enough", Ralph Regenvanu, environment minister for Vanuatu, told summit will also host business leaders, international donors, and ocean activists, while a science convention beforehand is expected to draw 2,000 ocean experts. Temperature Check France has set a high bar for securing by Nice the 60 ratifications needed to enact a landmark treaty to protect marine habitats outside national jurisdiction. So far, only 28 countries and the European Union have done so. Olivier Poivre d'Arvor, France's oceans envoy, says that without the numbers, the conference "will be a failure." Bringing the high seas treaty into force is seen as crucial to meeting the globally agreed target of protecting 30 percent of oceans by 2030.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Gaza cannot afford more ceasefire stalemate
Yesterday's reports from Palestinian media that at least 30 people in Gaza were killed by Israeli gunfire at an aid distribution point only underlines the dire consequences that confront the enclave's suffering civilian population in the absence of a ceasefire. The day before, it appeared that Gaza's deadly stalemate was set to continue. US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Saturday that Hamas's response to a Washington-backed ceasefire plan for Gaza was ' totally unacceptable '. In doing so, the stage is set for further conflict in which it has been long apparent there are no winners. Since Israel resumed military operations on March 18 after the end of a two-month truce brokered by mediators from the US, Egypt and Qatar, the suffering inflicted on the Palestinian territory is almost without compare in modern times. In its response to the Hamas-led attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people on October 7, 2023, the Israeli military has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians and injured more than twice that number. Much of the enclave lies in ruins amid critical shortages of food, medicine and water caused by a months-long Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid. Such unacceptable death and destruction would ordinarily lead to frantic negotiations to try and bring the bloodshed to a close. And yet, despite month upon month of mediation involving key Middle East countries and the US, the violence continues. In Gaza, Palestinian civilians are literally caught in the crossfire between an Israeli military guided by politicians that have made no secret of wanting to ethnically cleanse the territory of its inhabitants and Hamas, an organisation that recklessly attacked Israel with no defensive strategy or capability that could protect Gaza's people from collective punishment. The fact that what is being discussed is essentially a time-limited ceasefire, rather than a settlement, shows how entrenched the war has become. Continuing disputes over the duration of the proposed truce, when and how the remaining Israeli hostages should be released, and the mechanics of getting essential aid into Gaza combine to delay a deal that could save lives and provide an important break in the conflict. This latter point is essential for ending Gaza's default setting of punishing violence and displacement. The fact that what is being discussed is essentially a time-limited ceasefire, rather than a settlement, shows how entrenched the war has become Frustration at this continuing failure to strike a deal is palpable. Late last month, Gaza truce talks in Doha collapsed with sources telling The National that Israel's three-man delegation appeared to have had no mandate to negotiate and spent more time in their hotel rooms than at the negotiating table or with the mediators from the US, Egypt and Qatar. Compounding such failures to strike a deal is the availability of realistic and practical alternatives to war without end. An Egyptian plan was adopted in March at the Arab Summit in Cairo; this proposed a five-year timetable for reconstruction and governance with Palestinian participation. Politically, the Arab Peace Initiative, a seven-point proposal for a comprehensive political settlement to the conflict, remains on the table, despite being fatefully rejected by Israel. Events are in flux, and it is to be hoped that a compromise is reached. However, what is clear is that although neither Hamas nor Israel can continue in this vein indefinitely, it is 2.3 million Gazans who cannot wait for this Gordian knot of negotiation tactics and strategies to be untangled.
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Nuclear missile build up as Starmer spends billions more on defence
Britain is to announce billions more spending in defence to show its rivals that it is serious about a pledge to get the country ready for full-scale war with new missiles, nuclear platforms and a boost to troop numbers. Keir Starmer, the prime minister, is to announce from the docks of a shipyard that the Strategic Defence Review calls for an expansion of the nuclear deterrent. Writing 24 hours earlier in a newspaper, he said war-fighting readiness was overriding priority. "It's time to flood the zone with new initiatives and new investments," he wrote. "It's time to bring together a whole-of- society effort to keep Britain safe.' John Healey, the defence secretary, said on Sunday that he had no doubt that defence spending would rise to 3 per cent of GDP in the foreseeable future, implying an extra £17bn in the budget. The SDR was led by former Nato Secretary General Lord Robertson, a former Labour statesman, and makes 62 recommendations in its 150 pages. Central to the plans are the construction of up to 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines, as well as investment of £15 billion in the nuclear missile warheads. While the SDR has been revised several times in recent months, its main themes are rearmament and "getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war". Other immediate drives by the government include £6bn for new weapons, including £1.5bn for new production lines for weapons. When the government asserts that Russia is mounting digital attacks on the UK everyday and other states, such as Iran pose incessant dangers there is a new offensive strategy. This means setting up a new cyber command and investing £1 billion in digital capabilities Other announcements: – Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war – Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs – More than £1.5 billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing. The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades. 'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad,' Mr Healey will say on Monday. From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven astute class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating. The build up is part of a partnership with Australia and the US that has promised a global arc of security between the three allies. Mr Robertson, warns that Britain is entering "a new era of threat" as drones and artificial intelligence transform modern warfare. The document also describes the "immediate and pressing" danger posed by Russia, as well as urging the government to focus on the dangers emanating from China, Iran and North Korea. Robertson has described the four countries as a "deadly quartet" that were "increasingly working together".
