
State set to pay $750,000 in wrongful death settlement
COURTESY PHOTO Delmar Espejo : The 28-year-old was shot by a sheriff's deputy at the state Capitol in 2019
COURTESY PHOTO Delmar Espejo : The 28-year-old was shot by a sheriff's deputy at the state Capitol in 2019 The state Legislature is expected to approve a $750, 000 settlement in the 2019 wrongful shooting death of an unarmed, disabled, homeless man by an on-duty state deputy sheriff, who was not criminally held responsible but since faces scrutiny in the deaths of two more people in 2021 and 2022 while a police officer in San Diego.
Delmar Espejo, 28, was shot in the back at close range and killed on Feb. 18, 2019, at the state Capitol rotunda by former Deputy Sheriff Gregory Bergman.
The victim's family filed a civil wrongful death lawsuit against the state and Bergman on Feb. 17, 2021. A jury awarded $2.27 million to Espejo's mother, Cresencia Espejo, including $1.52 million in punitive damages.
The shooting of Espejo was the 12th in a string of 16 shootings by Oahu law enforcement officers from 2018 to March 2019, eight of them deadly. The fatal shootings by Bergman and a second by a prison guard in March 2019 were the first fatal shootings in at least the previous 10 years by Department of Public Safety officers.
The state sought to overturn both the jury's verdict and a judge's findings and conclusions against the state and Bergman, who left Hawaii shortly after Espejo was killed. He became a police officer in San Diego, where he was involved in the shooting of a suicidal man ; the other, a man shot in the back, on his knees allegedly surrendering.
Bergman was never held criminally responsible for Espejo's death. The Department of the Attorney General in September 2019 cleared him, saying there was insufficient evidence to charge him, despite the Honolulu Police Department having opened a second-degree murder case after an autopsy revealed Espejo was shot in the back at close range.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
The AG spokesperson at the time said the Attorney General's Office reached its conclusion by relying on HPD's preliminary findings and did not conduct its own investigation.
After the verdict in the civil case, the state and Bergman, who claimed self-defense, had filed a motion for a new trial, but instead a closed settlement conference was held Feb. 6. The parties reached a confidential agreement.
The state's $750, 000 portion was made public when it sought approval by the Legislature in House Bill 990 with other judgments against the state and settlement of claims.
The Department of the Attorney General did not respond to requests for comment.
On the evening of Feb. 18, 2019, Bergman was making his rounds and encountered Espejo, who had been drinking alcohol at about 8 :20 p.m. at the Ewa-makai corner of the state Capitol rotunda.
At a news conference the following day, then-Public Safety Director Nolan Espinda told the public the shooting resulted from an 'extreme struggle ' between a deputy sheriff and Espejo, who refused to dispense of his drink container, was combative and failed to obey numerous commands to stop fighting.
Instead of waiting for backup, the deputy got up close enough to Espejo so that according to Espinda's narrative, Espejo wrapped his arms around the deputy sheriff who, at over 6 feet 2 inches tall and 205 pounds, towered above the 5-foot-3, 117-pound shooting victim.
Espinda said that's when the deputy's gun discharged and killed Espejo.
Espejo walked with a limp and had withered legs from congenital polio as a child, which required surgery, his family and his family's attorney, Myles Breiner, said.
Espinda said there was no surveillance footage of the shooting at the state Capitol, despite numerous security cameras there.
Circuit Court jurors, in an overwhelming majority—11 to 1—found Nov. 29 that punitive damages in the amount of $1.52 million should be awarded to Espejo's mother and against Bergman.
Jurors found that compensatory and /or general damages of $750, 000 should also go to Espejo's mother.
The majority of jurors, 10 to 2, found Bergman was negligent in his use of force.
But a majority did not find that, based on the evidence, Bergman used excessive /
unreasonable force, and none found he committed battery on Espejo.
The jury unanimously found the state breached its duties to properly train and /or supervise Bergman.
Circuit Judge Dean Ochiai, in his Jan. 10 findings of fact and conclusions of law, awarded $750, 000 in general damages to Cresencia Espe jo, 'in which Bergman and the State of Hawaii are jointly and severally liable.'
The judge found Bergman violated training, department policy on use of force, failed to wait for backup, failed to remain 6 feet away, and shot Espejo in the back while pushing him down onto his stomach.
The lawsuit was initially filed against the state, Public Safety Department, Sheriff Division, Bergman in his individual capacity and Public Safety Director Nolan Espin da individually and in his official capacity.
The judge found Bergman, who had been a deputy sheriff for less than two years, called but failed to wait for backup.
He confronted Espejo for drinking alcohol, a petty misdemeanor, and ordered him to pour out the drink.
'From the time Bergman reached toward Espejo to force him to pour out the bottle in less than 1 minute, (he ) had shot Espejo in his upper back, ' the judge said.
An Internal Affairs investigator and Bergman testified he had at least six opportunities to call for backup and maintain a 6-foot distance and use a baton or pepper spray, but instead rushed to tackle Espejo for refusing to pour out the drink.
'While pushing Espejo down onto his stomach, Bergman discharged one round into the unarmed Espejo's back, ' the judge found.
The judge quoted Bergman's testimony as to why he did not follow the department's crisis intervention training that avoids injury to officer and citizens and the need to deescalate and wait for backup.
Bergman said, 'I thought I could take him, ' according to the Internal Affairs investigator's testimony.
The court also found that numerous items of evidence, which should have been in the state's custody and control, were lost. They include footage from eight HPD body cameras, Bergman's interview with HPD and video footage from the state Capitol.
The San Diego Police Department confirmed with the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Bergman was hired in 2019 shortly after the Hawaii shooting, but would not respond to questions concerning the San Diego shootings, nor whether he is in good standing.
The California Department of Justice is investigating Bergman and another officer in the Dec. 8, 2022, shooting of John Ray Romero, the Office of the Attorney General's website shows.
In that case, Romero had a gun pointed to his own head when police arrived, according to news reports. He asked police to shoot him. Bergman and another officer reportedly did.
In a July 23, 2021, case, Bergman was one of two officers involved in the shooting death of Jesus Veleta, a 22-year-old armed man who was shot in the back.
The Veleta family filed a $20 million legal claim against San Diego County, alleging Veleta was in the process of surrendering and was on his knees with his back turned when he was shot. The complaint accuses the officers of using excessive and lethal force.
The San Diego County District Attorney's Office had previously cleared Bergman and the other officer of criminal liability.
The DA's report said Veleta stumbled and fell, and officers ordered him to drop the gun. He 'raised it up behind him back towards the officers.'
Officers fired and struck him in the back.
'Veleta threw his handgun in front of him as the officers discharged their weapons, ' the report said.
The DA concluded Veleta ignored multiple commands to drop the gun and made no indications he was going to surrender, and that the officers reasonably believed he would shoot them unless they fired.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Press
5 hours ago
- American Press
Jim Beam column:New voting machines overdue
Louisiana legislators have come up with a new system for buying new voting machines that some watchdogs are worried about.(Image courtesy of Louisiana has always had an election system that ranks among the most trustworthy in the country. However, the national conspiracy about the 2020 election being stolen from President Donald Trump resulted in the Legislature creating what is called 'an overly burdensome system for buying voting machines.' The Louisiana Illuminator in 2024 said the 2021 law created the Voting System Commission within the Louisiana Department of State. It is charged with analyzing any available voting systems and recommending a specific type to the secretary of state. Legislators also created a separate Voting System Proposal Evaluation Committee to independently review vendors that submitted bids before making a final recommendation. Joel Watson, a spokesperson for Secretary of State Nancy Landry, said the multiple layers of bureaucratic red tape would mean it would take five rather than three years to purchase new voting machines. And time is important because the Illuminator said the state's current machines are 35 years old and have become difficult and costly to repair. The Illuminator said an effort was made in 2024 to shorten the selection process but it failed 'under pressure from a small group of Donald Trump supporters who came to the state Capitol several times during the 2021 legislative session and bogged down committee hearings with far-fetched election conspiracy theories involving the 2020 presidential election…' Many of the baseless arguments were about Dominion Voting Systems, a voting machine vendor that many Trump supporters falsely accused of rigging the election. Dominion in 2023 won a nearly $800 million defamation lawsuit against Fox News, which spread some of the conspiracy theories. Now another effort appears to be under way to purchase those machines. The Advocate reported Thursday that House Bill 577 by Rep. Daryl Deshotel, R-Marksville, which has passed both the House and Senate, authorizes the elections department to purchase a new voting system using a bidding process called 'invitation to negotiate.' An 'invitation to negotiate' (ITN) is a type of solicitation used in procurement, where the buyer invites potential suppliers to submit proposals and then negotiates with the most promising ones to achieve the best possible outcome. It's a competitive process where factors beyond price, like experience, project plans, and design features, can be considered. The newspaper said the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana says the new process could lead to less transparency. It is a substitute for the open bidding process, which has delayed purchase of new machines because of lawsuits filed by unsuccessful bidders. Watson said Gov. Jeff Landry hopes to have a new voting system finalized by the end of 2025 and begin a 'phased-in implementation' of the new system in 2026. Under the new system, the state invites vendors to submit competitive sealed responses as a starting point for negotiations. It is then empowered to select which vendors it wants to continue negotiations with. Louisiana currently uses voting machines from Dominion and it will be interesting to see whether Dominion is asked for a response. The state's current machines don't include a paper trail, making it impossible to double-check election results. Absentee and mail-in ballots are on paper and can be checked, but over 90% of Louisiana voters cast their ballots in person. Landry defends the new selection process, saying negotiation is a public bid process. 'It's just more flexible …. It allows you to exchange more information than (a request for proposals) does.' Melinda Deslatte, the research director for PAR, said, 'We just want to make sure that there will be something available for the public to see at the end of this process to understand why the secretary of state's office chose the vendor that it chose.' Deslatte added, 'We're not entirely certain yet if that information will be publicly available. But we're hopeful because the secretary of state's office has indicated that they expect this to be a transparent process.' The PAR concerns are legitimate because the Landry administration has been active in trying to close public records. Landry and other top officials in his administration most of the time also refuse to respond to news media questions. We hope things will be different and that this new voting machine purchasing process will be open widely to the general public. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or Reply Forward Add reaction
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Roundtop woman killed in crash southwest of Brenham
Brenham, Tx (FOX44) – A 63-year-old woman has died following a fiery crash in rural Washington County southwest of Brenham. The Department of Public Safety reports Rebecca Mayer of Round Top as pronounced dead at a hospital following the crash that occurred about 5:35 p.m. on Farm to Market Road 389 near FM 2502. DPS Sgt Justin Ruiz said Mayer was the driver of a 2023 Kia Soul that as going east on FM 389 when a 2015 Ford F150 pickup going west began a left hand turn, with the Kia striking it in the side. The Kia caught fire after the collision. The driver of the pickup was treated for minor injuries. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Gov. McMaster again vetoes bill dismissing gun charge that hasn't been a crime for 15 months
A law passed in March 2024 made it legal for adults to carry a handgun openly or concealed without a permit. Legislation dismissing pending cases for unlawful carry was again vetoed by Gov. Henry McMaster on May 22, 2025. (Stock photo illustration by Getty Images) COLUMBIA — South Carolinians will continue to face sentencing for a gun charge that's no longer a crime after Gov. Henry McMaster again vetoed a bill erasing the pending cases. A law signed by McMaster 15 months ago made it legal for adults to carry handguns without a permit and allowed past convictions for unlawful carry to be expunged. It set a five-year deadline — until March 2029 — for expungement applications. One conviction per person can be expunged. But the law didn't address pending cases. Last year, McMaster vetoed legislation to dismiss those charges. The Legislature tried again this year with another version of the bill, which both chambers passed unanimously. But the governor vetoed that too. In his May 22 veto letter, the governor made clear his 'fundamental objections to the legislation remain unchanged.' As the state's former U.S. attorney and two-term attorney general, McMaster said he's wary of limiting prosecutors' authority and discretion to resolve those cases. 'Every case is unique and the prosecutors in our state should be permitted to evaluate each case based on law and the facts and then proceed as they deem appropriate,' McMaster wrote. The bill 'would universally strip prosecutors of the ability' to determine whether a case warrants dismissal or prosecution. Besides that, he wrote, it was a crime when they were charged. 'Their alleged actions were, in fact, unlawful,' he wrote. 'To be sure, those actions might not be illegal today, but that distinction misses the critical point that such actions were illegal at the time they were committed.' The question is whether the House will vote this time to override the governor's veto. Last year, the Senate voted unanimously to override the governor's veto, but it takes a supermajority vote in both chambers for a bill to become law despite a veto. And the House never took it up. So, the bill died. Last week, the Senate again voted unanimously to overrule the latest veto. The House never brought it up during the Legislature's one-day special session to adopt the budget. But this time, an override is still possible next year. House Judiciary Chairman Weston Newton said the chamber will likely take a vote when they return in January. The chamber's unanimous approval of the bill May 8 suggests an override won't be a problem, he said. 'It's dismissing charges that are no longer illegal for the purposes of consistency,' said the Bluffton Republican. Following passage in March 2024 of the law allowing any adult who can legally buy a handgun to carry it with or without a concealed carry permit, some solicitors dismissed older charges of unlawful possession on their own. But it wasn't automatic. Some solicitors didn't. As of February, 206 people in 11 of South Carolina's 16 judicial districts had charges pending for that crime alone, according to Lisa Catalanotto, the executive director for the state Commission on Prosecution Coordination. She didn't have numbers from the other five judicial districts. More cases have been dropped since she last collected the numbers in February, said Catalanotto, who didn't yet have an update. But a decline isn't good enough. No one should face conviction for something that's no longer a crime, said Sen. Deon Tedder, who was again the chief sponsor. This time, three Republicans joined him in co-sponsoring the legislation. 'We had to act as a Legislature. It's simply not fair,' said Tedder, D-Charleston. He voted against the bill that legalized carrying a handgun without a permit, which supporters dubbed 'constitutional carry.' But anyone charged with a crime the Legislature has determined is unconstitutional certainly shouldn't be convicted now, Tedder said. 'This fixes something that we missed,' he said. During legislative hearings, opponents of the bill argued some people charged with the crime were known violent offenders, and unlawful carry was just the crime they could be arrested for at the time to build a case. Catalanotto, with the prosecution commission, gave the example of a person who went to a former workplace with a gun, intending to shoot someone, but was chased away at the door. An officer arrested the person for unlawfully carrying a weapon with the intent to add additional charges later, she said. But Tedder pointed to a sentence in the law specifying that an 'immediate dismissal' isn't mandated if the charge was made 'in conjunction with any other criminal offense arising out of the same facts and circumstances. The bill also specifies that a dismissed charge can't be the basis of an unlawful arrest lawsuit — another concern of law enforcement that McMaster said in his veto letter he appreciated legislators addressing. 'We tightened this bill to do what it's supposed to do,' he said.