‘Sluggish' UK business activity picks up as tariff threat eases
The strengthening service industry helped offset a persistent slump in manufacturing in June.
The S&P Global flash UK composite purchasing managers' index (PMI) reported a reading of 50.7 in June, up from 50.3 in May.
The flash figures are based on preliminary data. Any score above 50.0 indicates that activity is growing while any score below means it is contracting.
The volume of new business returned to growth in June, ending a six-month period of contraction, the survey found.
This was primarily driven by the service sector – the largest part of the UK's economy, spanning industries including hospitality, entertainment and culture, finance and real estate.
A further slight expansion of activity in the sector was contrasted by another drop in production for manufacturers, led by a decline in overseas export orders.
Concerns over the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs on US imports were partly behind the slump, despite some businesses saying confidence had improved as a result of the President striking new trade deals with countries including the UK.
Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said the UK economy was in a 'sluggish state' in recent weeks.
'Although business conditions have continued to improve since April's downturn, quelling recession fears, growth of business activity remains disappointingly lacklustre, indicative of second quarter GDP (gross domestic product) rising at only a 0.1% quarterly pace,' he said.
'Business confidence also remains in the doldrums compared to this time last year, losing ground again in June.
'On top of concerns over the impact of recent government policies and worries over global trade protectionism, June's data collection coincided with increased tensions in the Middle East.
'Employment has hence continued to be cut as firms grapple with the combination of higher staffing costs, linked to last autumn's budget, lower demand and subdued confidence.'
The survey showed that hiring continued to be squeezed throughout the month, with employment across the private sector decreasing for the ninth month in a row and at a faster pace than May.
Businesses surveyed said they had been making cutbacks to their workforce through hiring freezes and redundancies.
But Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist for Pantheon Macroeconomics, pointed out that 'businesses were more optimistic about the future in June than in May, suggesting the economic outlook is improving'.
'Domestic activity is proving more resilient than external demand, consistent with Mr Trump's tariff threats weighing on cross-border trade,' he added.
'All told, the PMI suggests that business confidence is staging a fragile recovery after being battered by tariff threats and tax increases.
'That said, rising geopolitical stress is likely to be added to the growing list of worries facing businesses.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Markets' Gulf composure fits a wider pattern
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Investors don't seem that bothered about the United States' dramatic intervention in Israel's war with Iran. Despite President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities over the weekend, asset prices hardly budged. History does suggest geopolitical flashpoints aren't always long-term headaches for investors – but the data doesn't conclusively prove they've made the right call. On Monday morning, the STOXX 600 declined 0.1%, meaning the European equity benchmark is only down around 2.5% since Israeli attacks on June 13. German and Saudi 10-year bond yields rose marginally. The U.S. S&P 500 was also due to drop only 0.1% on opening, according to futures prices collected by LSEG. And Brent oil contracts for August delivery rose just 0.6% to trade at $77 a barrel, admittedly above the $66 level seen earlier this month, but hardly pricing in major disruptions. This all seems highly premature. While Trump called on Sunday for peace following what could reasonably be seen as an act of war, he continues to post on social media about the possibility of Iranian regime change. Iran's parliament has already approved actions to block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world's daily oil supply passes. As such, markets should be braced for further escalation, not less. One explanation might be that investors know that geopolitical storms are often just squalls. A JPMorgan study, opens new tab of 36 different political and martial flashpoints between Germany's invasion of France in 1940 and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 found that the S&P 500 returned 0.3% in the three months afterwards, against 1.3% over the same period in calmer times. But over six months the returns were the same. Oil-related shocks are, admittedly, different. The 1990 Gulf War saw the S&P 500 drop 20% in the two months after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August, although it recovered these losses by February 1991. But after the five-month Arab oil embargo in 1973, the S&P was still lower five years later. Investors' sangfroid may reflect confidence that Trump's attacks are a run-of-the-mill geopolitical squall. More likely, they see the latest crisis as a potential oil shock, but one that the U.S. can easily contain. There's some logic in that: even if Iran tries to block Hormuz, a move its Supreme National Security Council still needs to approve, the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain might stop it. Meanwhile, restricting oil exports would hurt Tehran too. Yet the geopolitical received wisdom could easily be wrong, especially if a cornered Iranian regime starts to fear that Trump and Israel will push to replace it, and resorts to drastic measures. In that scenario, markets' relative calm might still quickly turn to panic. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Iran war: UK economy 'will be smashed'
Donald Trump has hinted in a social media that he would be in favour of regime change in Iran. His government have said otherwise. Elsewhere, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy has so far refused to say whether the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites was legal. Does the UK government quietly approve of Trump's actions? In this episode our associate political editor Rachel Cunliffe discusses those questions with US correspondent Freddie Hayward and senior editor George Eaton. Meanwhile in response to the attack, the Iranian government have threatened to block the strait of Hormuz, effectively restricting one fifth of the world's oil supply. Rachel asks our editor Tom McTague and business editor Will Dunn what this would mean for the global economy – and the cost of goods in the UK. [See also: Britain wants no part in Israel's war] Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump calls for producers to pump more oil amid Iran shipping lane fears
President Donald Trump called for the US and other oil-producing economies to pump more oil as crude prices remain volatile following strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Mr Trump urged stepped-up production as the White House sharpened its warnings to Iran against closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil and gas shipping lane, in retaliation for the US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme. Advertisement 'To the Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' Mr Trump posted on social media. He added: 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' The push by Mr Trump comes at an uncertain moment as US embassies and military installations in the Middle East are on high alert for potential retaliation. The USS Dwight D Eisenhower and other warships cross the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf (Information Technician Second Class Ruskin Naval/U.S. Navy via AP) Global markets are trying to ascertain what lays ahead after the US struck key Iranian nuclear facilities with a barrage of 30,000-pound bunker busting bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Advertisement Iran's parliament has approved cutting off the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow shipping lane in the Persian Gulf that about 20% of global oil and gas passes through. It is now up to Iran's national security council to decide whether to move forward with the idea, which could lead to a spike in the cost of goods and services worldwide. The price of oil jumped 4% shortly after trading began on Sunday night, but it quickly pared back as the focus shifted from what the US military did to how Iran would react. Oil futures were flip-flopping in Monday morning trading between gains and losses. They still remain higher than they were before the fighting began a little more than a week ago. Advertisement White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt warned Tehran anew against closing the strait, saying 'the Iranian regime would be foolish to make that decision'. The State Department has doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, and ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the US Embassy in Lebanon. It also is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East because of concerns Iran will retaliate against US interests in the region. In an alert sent to all Americans worldwide and posted to its website on Sunday, the State Department warned all US citizens abroad to exercise caution. Advertisement White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt (Evan Vucci/AP) The US Embassy in Qatar issued an alert on its website on Monday urging American citizens in the energy-rich nation to 'shelter in place until further notice'. Hours later, the Qatari government issued an extraordinary order to shut its busy airspace. Qatar, across the Persian Gulf from Iran, is home to Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts the forward headquarters of the US military's Central Command. Many energy industry analysts are sceptical that Iran would go forward with a full closure of the strait, something that it has threatened to do in the past. Advertisement Iran would face the possibility of retaliation against its own shipments and the possibility that the move would upset China, the biggest purchaser of Iranian crude.
