
Jimmy Buffett's 'upset and confused' widow locked in legal row over late singer's $275M fortune
A legal battle is brewing over the estate of late singer Jimmy Buffett.
The Margaritaville singers's widow Jane Buffett said in legal docs she believes the co-trustee of the estate is not being forthright about the $275 million in it, according to legal documents reviewed by People.
Jane says both the co-trustee Richard Mozenter, as well as an attorney assigned to carrying out the high-profile transaction named Jeffrey Smith, have been 'openly hostile' toward her, according to court docs reviewed by the magazine.
Lawyers for Jane Buffett told the court in legal docs that she has on multiple occasions urged Mozenter to 'act responsibly and perform his duties' to no avail.
They added, 'Mr. Mozenter has failed to perform even the most basic tasks required of him in his role as co-trustee, including providing Mrs. Buffett with information concerning Trust assets and finances, which has left Mrs. Buffett in the dark with regard to the state of her own finances.
'Along the way, Mr. Mozenter has belittled, disrespected, and condescended to Mrs. Buffett in response to her reasonable requests for information she undoubtedly was entitled to receive.'
Jane's legal team told the court that her late spouse initially put together the Trust in 1990 so she would have a nest egg if anything happened to him.
Changes were made to the Trust in 2017 and 2023, according to the outlet, which noted that the pair's three kids have shares of the remnant Federal estate tax exemption totaling about $2 million in value.
An insider told the outlet that Jane and her confidantes are upset and confused by the drama.
'Jimmy would never have wanted Jane to be treated like this ... I know how close Jimmy and Jane were all these years, and how Jimmy relied upon and trusted Jane around so many of his important decisions in his life and career,' the source said.
Jane said that Mozenter was vague and evasive when pressed on details about the estate following the singer's death.
'Rather than help his recently widowed client understand her finances, Mr. Mozenter spent the next 16 months stonewalling and making excuses for why he could not yet provide the requested information,' Jane said in the filing.
Jane said that earlier this year, Mozenter put 'shocking' results in front of her, as 'he showed the Marital Trust earning less than $2 million in net income, a remarkably poor return for a Trust with an estimated $275 million in assets.'
Jane said that Mozenter advised her to 'consider adjustments' in her budget and possibly sell off real estate, according to the court filing.
The filing said 'if the Marital Trust truly earns such a low return consistent with the financials Mr. Mozenter presented, it will confirm that Mr. Mozenter is either not competent to administer the Trust or unwilling to act in Mrs. Buffett's best interests.'
Daily Mail has reached out to Richard Mozenter for further comment on the topic.
The singer-songwriter, who popularized beach bum soft rock with the escapist Caribbean-flavored song Margaritaville and turned that celebration of loafing into a billion-dollar empire of restaurants, resorts and frozen concoctions died at the age of 76 on September 1, 2023.
'Jimmy passed away peacefully on the night of September 1st surrounded by his family, friends, music and dogs,' a statement posted to Buffett's official website and social media pages said at the time. 'He lived his life like a song till the very last breath and will be missed beyond measure by so many.'
The classic song Margaritaville, released on February 14, 1977, quickly took on a life of its own, becoming a state of mind for those 'wastin' away,' an excuse for a life of low-key fun and escapism for those 'growing older, but not up.'
The song is the unhurried portrait of a loafer on his front porch, watching tourists sunbathe while a pot of shrimp is beginning to boil. The singer has a new tattoo, a likely hangover and regrets over a lost love. Somewhere, irritatingly, there is a misplaced salt shaker.
'What seems like a simple ditty about getting blotto and mending a broken heart turns out to be a profound meditation on the often painful inertia of beach dwelling,' Spin magazine wrote in 2021. 'The tourists come and go, one group indistinguishable from the other.
'Waves crest and break whether somebody is there to witness it or not. Everything that means anything has already happened and you're not even sure when.'
The song - from the album Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes - spent 22 weeks on the Billboard Hot 100 chart and peaked at number eight.
The song was inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame in 2016 for its cultural and historic significance, became a karaoke standard and helped brand Key West, Florida, as a distinct sound of music and a destination known the world over.
'There was no such place as Margaritaville,' Buffett told the Arizona Republic in 2021. 'It was a made-up place in my mind, basically made up about my experiences in Key West and having to leave Key West and go on the road to work and then come back and spend time by the beach.'
The song soon inspired restaurants and resorts, turning Buffett's alleged desire for the simplicity of island life into a multimillion brand. He landed at No. 18 in Forbes' list of the Richest Celebrities of All Time with a net worth of $1 billion.
Tributes following the singer's passing came from all walks of life, from Hollywood star Miles Teller posting photos of himself with Buffett to former U.S. Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama, who wrote on X that Buffett 'lived life to the fullest and the world will miss him.'
Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys wrote: 'Love and Mercy, Jimmy Buffett' and Paul McCartney called him 'one of the kindest and most generous people.'
Buffett's evolving brand began in 1985 with the opening of a string of Margaritaville-themed stores and restaurants in Key West, followed in 1987 with the first Margaritaville Café nearby. Over the course of the next two decades, several more of each opened throughout Florida, New Orleans and California.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
How the Glazer family cost Manchester United £1.2bn
On 28 June 2005, the Glazer family completed their takeover of Manchester United Football loaded the club with debt, and over the next 20 years, BBC Verify has found about £1.2bn has been spent on debt interest, debt repayments, dividends and fees to the fund the deal, the Glazers borrowed millions of pounds from hedge funds and left the club with debts of £ year on, the club had already paid £53.2m in debt interest to its lenders and in fees to the Glazer family. June 2025 marks the 20th anniversary of the Florida-based Glazer family taking full control of the Premier League was a deeply controversial takeover from the beginning because of the financial implications for 22 June 2005, the Glazer family paid £790m to buy out the club's exiting shareholders and to remove the club from the London stock it was a deal mainly funded by borrowed money and loaded £604m in debts on to the club, which had previously had borrowings of only £ club's board had warned, external in April 2005 about the dangers of this amount of debt, saying it was not "prudent" and risked "a downward spiral in both team and financial performance".The takeover provoked protests from fans, which continue to this by BBC Verify - based on an analysis of the club's published accounts and stock market announcements - show that since the Glazer family's acquisition of the club in June 2005 it has paid out:£815m in debt interest repayments£166m in dividends to shareholders£10m in management and administration fees to Glazer family companies£197m in external net debt repaymentsThis means that, in total, £1.187bn in cash left the club between 2005 and 2024 which it is reasonable to argue would not have done so in the absence of the Glazer is a conservative estimate, too, because it does not include various fees to banks, financial advisers and other financing costs, including currency also does not include the cash that has left the club in the form of directors' the Glazers re-listed a portion of the the club's shares on the New York Stock Exchange in 2012, £125m has also been paid out in compensation to the club's half of the directors were Glazer family members, it's likely half of this sum - about £63m - went to Verify asked the club to comment on the findings and they said they would leave the accounts to speak for themselves. Have the Glazers added value? The Glazer family can legitimately point to the fact they have significantly grown the value of the club over the past two the Glazers' two decades of full ownership, United's annual commercial revenues have risen more than fivefold - from £55m in 2006 to £303m in 2024. This is reflected in the implied market value of the Glazers acquired United for £790m. The stock market implied value of the club in May 2025 was more than £ the financial terms of the sale of a stake in the club to Sir Jim Ratcliffe in 2024 implies an overall valuation of £ family can also point to the fact that, under their ownership, the club has spent more than £2bn on signing new players since 2012. This compares well with expenditure by most of the club's rivals, external over that the pitch, United have won 15 major trophies under the Glazers, but only five have those have come since the retirement of legendary former manager Sir Alex Ferguson in season they finished 15th in the Premier League - the lowest they have ended a campaign since a year in the second tier in was acknowledged in the club's quarterly accounts, released on executive officer Omar Berrada said it had been "a difficult season in the Premier League, which we all know fell below our standards and we have a clear expectation of improvement next season". How much have the Glazers invested themselves? The Glazers mainly used borrowed money to buy the club in 2005, but the accounts show they also put in £273m of their own they have invested no money of their own investments in the squad have come from the club's own internally generated cash resources and from debt secured on the club directly and on the ownership shares in the family have also realised considerable value from their 2012 and 2022 the Glazer family sold £555m in shares in the club, including the proceeds of a £150m 2012 listing on the New York Stock the sale proceeds, £484m went to them directly, though £71m went to partially pay down the debt they took out to buy the club. What has happened to the debt? In 2005, Manchester United PLC's total gross debt was just £ Glazers' leveraged buyout increased the gross debt listed in the accounts to £604m in 2006 - this was partially secured on the club's assets directly, and partially secured on the Glazer family's ownership have been been some major refinancing of the debt over the two decades, including in 2010 and 2015. But in 2024, the club's gross debt still stood at £547m. Other measures of debt which factor in the future cost of transfers put this figure at almost £ annual interest costs since 2005 have been £42m with costs of £37.2m in the most recent financial year of 2023-24. How has Jim Ratcliffe's involvement affected the finances of the club? In 2024, the Glazer family sold £732m in shares to Ratcliffe, leaving him with roughly a 30% ownership stake and control of the football part of the deal, Ratcliffe injected a further £236m of his own funds directly into the club for investment into the infrastructure of their Old Trafford additional investment was not funded by additional Jim told the BBC in March 2025 the club had been set to run out of money by the end of this year, forcing him to drastically cut costs.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk takes Trump feud to next level with more Epstein files claims as aides try to broker peace: Live updates
Donald Trump branded Elon Musk 'the man who has lost his mind' as the world's richest man escalated his feud with the president. Musk continued firing insults at Trump on Thursday evening on his X platform, with insiders said to be losing hope that a truce between the men can be brokered. Trump says he's 'not particularly' interested in peace talks with Musk Donald Trump was reportedly 'not angry or even concerned' about his escalating feud with Elon Musk in a phone call with reporter Jonathan Karl. Karl wrote on X that Trump branded Musk 'the man who has lost his mind', but was not concerned with speaking with the former 'First Buddy.' 'As for reports that there is going to be a Trump/Musk call scheduled for today, Trump told me he is 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk although he says Musk wants to talk to him,' the ABC News correspondent said.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Midea recalling 1.7 million of its popular air conditioners due to mold concern
Midea is voluntarily recalling about 1.7 million of its popular U and U+ Smart air conditioners because pooled water in the units may not drain fast enough, leading to mold growth. The news comes as temperatures are rising across the U.S. and the official start of summer rapidly approaches. The Midea air conditioners fit in windows and resonated with consumers because of their unique design, which allows consumers to close their window 'through' the unit. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission said that the recall also includes approximately 45,900 units sold in Canada. There's been at least 152 reports of mold in the air conditioners. This includes 17 reports of consumers experiencing symptoms such as respiratory infections, allergic reactions, coughing, sneezing and sore throats from mold exposure. The white air conditioners have brand names including Midea, Comfort Aire, Danby, Frigidaire, Insignia, Keystone, LBG Products, Mr. Cool, Perfect Aire and Sea Breeze. They were sold in three sizes of cooling power: 8,000, 10,000 and 12,000 BTU. The air conditioners were sold from March 2020 through May 2025 for between $280 and $500 at Costco, Menards, Home Depot, Best Buy and other stores across the country. They were also sold online through various websites including those of Midea, Amazon, Costco and Home Depot. Consumers can contact Midea for a repair or a refund that will be based on the purchase date or manufacture date. Individuals who want a refund will need to send the unit back to Midea with a free shipping label or submit a photograph showing that they cut the unit's unplugged power cord. Those who want a repair should contact Midea to have a technician install a new drain plug or be sent a repair kit that includes a new drain plug and bubble level, depending on the model. Consumers who want to continue using their air conditioners while waiting for a repair should visit to find out how to inspect their unit before continuing to use it. Individuals can visit and click on 'Recall Information' for more information or call 888-345-0256 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday.