Scientists outline possible nuclear winter scenario
The aftermath following an exchange of nukes could include prolonged cooling, agricultural collapse and social upheaval, a study has said
Apart from killing millions, a war between Russia and the US could result in a 'nuclear winter' that would devastate the Earth's atmosphere and lead to a drastic reduction in agricultural production, a group of American scientists has said.
A team led by an assistant research professor at Pennsylvania State University, Yuning Shi, published the results of their stimulation of a war between the two largest nuclear powers in an article in Environmental Research Letters earlier this month.
According to the paper, "a global nuclear war" could see up to 150 million tons of soot released into the atmosphere, leading to "prolonged cooling, agricultural collapse, and social upheaval on an unprecedented scale."
In such a scenario, precipitation and solar radiation would decrease by as much as 70% globally, resulting in the average air temperature dropping by over 15 degrees Celsius, it said.
Due to this 'nuclear winter', the annual production of maize, which the scientists focused on, could decrease by as much as 80%, the paper said.
Supply chains and trade could also be seriously disrupted, further worsening the situation in the agricultural sector and leading to regional or global famine, the researchers stressed. According to their estimates, it would take from seven to 12 years to restore food production levels.
Understanding the possible damage from a nuclear exchange and preparing for it is "critical" given current geopolitical trends, including the Ukraine conflict, the tensions between India and Pakistan, and instability in the Middle East that have "undermined the fragile detente that prevailed during the last years of the Cold War," the paper stressed.
Shi and his colleagues proposed to develop what they called 'Agricultural Resilience Kits' of region- and climate-specific seeds and technology packages to serve as a "buffer against uncertainty" in case of a 'nuclear winter'.
Last month, Nikolay Patrushev, national security adviser to President Vladimir Putin, accused Western powers of "deploying their military machine against Russia and becoming delirious with nuclear apocalypse scenarios."
READ MORE: Israel could strike Iranian nuclear facilities CNN
Moscow has repeatedly denied claims by the US and EU of planning to use nuclear weapons during the Ukraine conflict. However, Russia updated its nuclear doctrine in 2023, allowing for the use of such arms as a deterrent to prevent aggression by hostile powers and military blocs that possess weapons of mass destruction or large arsenals of conventional weapons.
(RT.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
China developing deadly Marine Toxins, may be merging AI with bioweapons: U.S. Report
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Two Chinese nationals have been arrested in the United States for allegedly attempting to smuggle a highly dangerous fungus into the country, which the FBI says could be used as an agroterrorism incident adds to growing concerns over China's alleged bioweapons to a 2025 U.S. State Department report, China may be incorporating artificial intelligence into its biological weapons (BW) program. The report, released in April, warns that China could be leveraging publicly available AI and machine learning tools to enhance bioweapon development."China probably is unable to make complex scientific equipment without Western innovation. It probably is capable of using publicly available artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) tools to advance efforts related to BW applications," the report a signatory to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), China is prohibited under international law from developing bioweapons. However, the report stops short of confirming current BW activity, while noting China's historical possession of such weapons and the lack of evidence showing their report also alleges that China has failed to disclose two historical BW facilities in Beijing and Lingbao. These sites were reportedly involved in the development of military-grade biological agents including anthrax, cholera, plague, tularemia, ricin, and botulinum toxins.'Historical information suggests that China's BW production occurred at two facilities, in Beijing and Lingbao, prior to China signing the BWC in 1972. Although China has submitted BWC CBMs each year since 1989, China's CBM reporting has never identified these facilities or otherwise disclosed it ever pursued an offensive BW program,' the report particular concern is China's ongoing research into potent marine toxins—naturally occurring compounds from marine organisms with possible bioweapons applications. The State Department believes China still depends on Western innovation to manufacture the specialized equipment required for large-scale bioweapon integration of AI into such programs, the report warns, could have devastating global consequences. It draws parallels to the COVID-19 pandemic, which many believe may have originated from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology—a facility known for its gain-of-function research aimed at increasing virus transmissibility. The report suggests that similar research, when combined with advanced AI, could result in a future catastrophe of even greater magnitude.
News18
14 hours ago
- News18
'Direct Threat': Chinese Couple Caught Smuggling 'Agroterrorism Agent' Into US
Last Updated: The FBI Director's concern came after two Chinese nationals were arrested for smuggling a "biological pathogen" that can be used as an agricultural terrorism weapon into the US. FBI Director Kash Patel on Wednesday warned against a 'serious national security threat" after two Chinese nationals were arrested in the US for allegedly smuggling a 'dangerous biological pathogen" into the country to study at the University of Michigan laboratory. The FBI Director's concern came after two Chinese nationals were arrested for smuggling a dangerous 'biological pathogen" that had the potential to be used as an agricultural terrorism weapon into the United States for research. 'This case is a sobering reminder that the Chinese Communist Party continues to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate our institutions and target our food supply, an act that could cripple our economy and endanger American lives," Patel was quoted as saying by Fox News. 'Smuggling a known agroterrorism agent into the U.S. is not just a violation of law, it's a direct threat to national security. I commend the FBI Detroit Division and our partners at CBP for stopping this biological threat before it could do real damage," he added. Chinese Nationals Charged With Smuggling 'Agroterrorism Agent' Into US The US Department of Justice on Tuesday identified the pathogen as Fusarium graminearum, a fungus, classified in scientific literature as a potential 'agroterrorism weapon'. In a statement, it said that the fungus causes 'head blight" in some crops and is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses globally each year. According to an FBI criminal complaint, Zunyong Liu, 34, a researcher currently in China, brought the fungus into the United States while visiting his girlfriend, Yunqing Jian, 33, in July 2024. He admitted to smuggling in the fungus so he could conduct research on it at a University of Michigan laboratory where his girlfriend worked, according to the complaint. Both individuals have been charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, false statements, and visa fraud. Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 04, 2025, 09:01 IST
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
US scientists warn that trump's cuts will set off a brain drain
Ardem Patapoutian's story is not just the American dream, it is the dream of American science. He arrived in Los Angeles in 1986 at age 18 after fleeing war-torn Lebanon. He spent a year writing for an Armenian newspaper and delivering Domino's at night to become eligible for the University of California, where he earned his undergraduate degree and a postdoctoral fellowship in neuroscience. He started a lab at Scripps Research in San Diego with a grant from the National Institutes of Health, discovered the way humans sense touch, and in 2021 won the Nobel Prize. But with the Trump administration slashing spending on science, Dr. Patapoutian's federal grant to develop new approaches to treating pain has been frozen. In late February, he posted on Bluesky that such cuts would damage biomedical research and prompt an exodus of talent from the United States. Within hours, he had an email from China, offering to move his lab to 'any city, any university I want,' he said, with a guarantee of funding for the next 20 years. Dr. Patapoutian declined, because he loves his adopted country. Many scientists just setting out on their careers, however, fear there is no other option but to leave. Scientific leaders say that's risking the way American science has been done for years, and the pre-eminence of the United States in their fields. China and Europe are on hiring sprees. An analysis by the journal Nature captured the reversal: Applications from China and Europe for graduate student or postdoctoral positions in the United States have dropped sharply or dried up entirely since President Trump took office. The number of postdocs and graduate students in the United States applying for jobs abroad has spiked. A university in France that created new positions for scientists with canceled federal grants capped applications after overwhelming interest. A scientific institute in Portugal said job inquiries from junior faculty members in the United States are up tenfold over the last two months. 'We are embarking on a major experiment in restructuring the innovative engine in America, and China is the control,' said Marcia McNutt, a geophysicist and the president of the National Academy of Sciences, which was established by President Abraham Lincoln to advise the government on science policy. 'China is not going to cut its research budget in half.' Since the 1950s, when the federal government expanded the National Institutes of Health and created the National Science Foundation as public-private research partnerships, the United States has become the international mecca for science. It was the uniquely American system that President Franklin D. Roosevelt's science adviser, Vannevar Bush, envisioned in his landmark report, 'Science, The Endless Frontier': Federal money enabled scientific discoveries that made American research institutions the envy of the world, and they in turn fueled the rise of the United States as the leader in technology and biotechnology. As that system attracted international talent, it came to depend on the aspiring scientists who come to the United States to work in university labs at low wages for the privilege of proximity to the world's best researchers. They often stay: In the American defense industry and fields like engineering and computer and life sciences, at least half the workers with doctorates are foreign-born. Now, American science finds itself fighting on several fronts as the Trump administration seeks to cut budgets and seal borders, to punish universities for their liberalism and federal health agencies for their responses to Covid. Federal science budgets have been slashed. Stricter immigration policies have spread fear among international scientists working in the United States, and those who had hoped to. Graduate and postdoctoral students have had their visas canceled, or worry they will. The administration cut off funding for international students at Harvard — a judge blocked the move, but other universities worry about being next. Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students in what he called 'critical fields,' which almost certainly includes science, where labs often have more Chinese than American-born graduate students and postdocs. President Trump has worried about the nation losing its scientific edge to 'rivals abroad,' as he wrote in a letter in March to his science adviser, Michael Kratsios. He urged Mr. Kratsios to continue Vannevar Bush's vision, 'recapturing the urgency which propelled us so far in the last century.' Yet Mr. Kratsios argues that philanthropies and industry should pick up more of the cost, and that too much federal science spending goes to bureaucracy. 'Spending more money on the wrong things is far worse than spending less money on the right things,' he said in a speech at the National Academy in May. But even at Johns Hopkins, which has benefited from the philanthropy of former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, those dollars can't make up the shortfall. Industry doesn't typically fund basic research, and it costs more to do research in industry in part because companies, unlike university labs, have to pay competitive wages. 'It's not just the international students, the whole system is on hold because the uncertainty does not allow you to plan,' Dr. Patapoutian said. 'With all these grants frozen or cut, it creates this massive chaos.' Just under half of the graduate students and postdocs in his lab hail from other countries. Now he is seeing less interest from abroad, but like many other lab heads he is not hiring new postdocs anyway: 'Everybody's kind of bolted down making sure we have the funds to keep the people we have.' In the first half of the 20th century, American scientists joined European universities to make fundamental discoveries: the structure of molecules (J. Robert Oppenheimer), the structure of DNA (James Watson). The rise of fascism in Europe drove many Jewish scientists to the United States. After World War II, 'we brought the rocket scientists here,' said Dr. McNutt. 'That's what got us to the moon.' While the logistics and expense of moving entire labs is likely to daunt more established researchers from moving, for postdocs and others just starting their labs, other countries offer the promise of greater stability. 'They are going to be able to recruit the best and brightest, proven people,' Dr. McNutt said. 'They are going to give them labs. They're going to give them equipment and funds, no questions asked.' At Johns Hopkins, which has long received more N.I.H. funding than any other university, Richard Huganir, the chairman of neuroscience, said he is 'terrified' of being unable to enroll international students. His department has 36 labs with 100 graduate students and postdocs, about 30 percent are international. 'For us, it would be losing 30 percent of our work force,' he said. 'They are integral to the whole fabric of American science, and losing that population would be devastating.' Graduate students and postdocs are going home to China and Korea for jobs, he said. Beyond losing talent, Dr. Huganir worries about the increasing isolation of American science. He canceled plans to host an international meeting at Hopkins because foreign scientists did not want to come to the United States; organizers considered moving it to Oxford, in England, but realized international students in the United States would not go because they fear not being allowed back in. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's top federal health official, this week said he wanted to bar scientists at the N.I.H. and other federal agencies from publishing in leading scientific journals, which he called 'corrupt.' Mathias Unberath, a computer scientist who studies computer-assisted medicine, came to Hopkins from Germany eight years ago. He has 13 doctoral students and two postdocs, all but five from abroad. 'My whole team, including those who were eager to apply for more permanent positions in the U.S., have no more interest,' he said. Those looking for jobs are applying in Europe, 'including some of my superstars,' he said. One American citizen, the recipient of a prestigious Siebel scholarship and an award for best paper, has taken a postdoc in Germany. Dr. Unberath himself was in the hospital with his wife, who had just given birth to their second son, when the first Trump administration suspended H-1B visas — Dr. Unberath had one. Now, he said, even if his students can get visas, they see the cuts to the N.S.F. and N.I.H. and worry they will not be able to get the early career grants they need to earn tenure. 'And if you don't make tenure,' he said, 'well, then what?' Daphne Koller came from Israel to do her Ph.D. in computer science at Stanford, became a professor there and was awarded a MacArthur Fellowship before founding two tech companies, Coursera, which puts university courses online, and Insitro, which uses artificial intelligence to drive drug discovery. Most of the first employees at both companies, she said, were hired right out of universities, and most were foreign-born. 'I would like nothing better than for the U.S. education system to really have the same emphasis on rigor and science and STEM so that we can train great scientists and engineers here,' Dr. Koller said. 'That would be incredible, but it doesn't happen magically. Even if that were ultimately the case, it's wonderful for a country to be in the unique position where it is the beacon, the magnet for the best and brightest from all over the world.' No institution has been more affected than Harvard, as the administration has made it an example of what it sees as the woke excesses of higher education. Rudolf Pisa, in a cell biology lab there, lost the N.I.H. grant that helps postdoctoral researchers transition to running their own labs. He came from the Czech Republic to do his Ph.D. at Rockefeller University in New York because he believed the American approach to science was 'brave.' His wife, a neuroscientist at Boston University, is American, but fears it is only a matter of time before her grant is canceled, too. They are looking for jobs in Europe. 'Two months ago I would not have thought of any of this,' Dr. Pisa said. He had considered himself a good investment for the United States. His work at Rockefeller helped lead to a patent and then a company to design cancer drugs that would be less likely to develop resistance over time. 'We created jobs,' he said. 'There's more out of it than just the papers.' The head of Dr. Pisa's lab, Tom Rapoport, said five of his students had their visas revoked before a judge temporarily restored them. He also lost the federal grant that funds his lab — despite a perfect score from N.I.H reviewers. He may have to reduce his lab from 14 people to eight, only one of them is American. Dr. Rapoport knows well how political turbulence affects science. His parents fled Nazism in Germany and Austria to train and work in the United States: His mother was a pediatrician, his father a biochemist who discovered how to prolong the shelf life of blood, which the U.S. military used to save countless service members. They left after being blacklisted as members of the Communist Party, ending up in East Germany. Dr. Rapoport was a professor there until the fall of the Berlin Wall; after, he had trouble getting a position, he said, because universities were suspicious of those from the East. He joined Harvard in 1995 because he admired the innovation and rigor of American science. 'This is scientific heaven,' he said. 'Or it used to be.' He worries that Americans don't appreciate how the system has worked for so long. 'Many people look at us as just parasites,' he said. 'All the medicines that people take, they were all developed in the U.S. There's essentially nothing developed by anyone else. We are on the top of the whole thing, and we're really risking it all.'
