People Who Physically Peaked In High School Are Sharing What They Look Like Now, And It's The Most Honest Trend Ever
A few years ago, women were participating in a "glow down" challenge where they shared how much their looks had changed since high school. The trend was started by TikTok user @gabslife99, who explained, "I physically peaked in high school. Like, the hottest I've ever been was when I was 18. I look nothing like that now."
And while @gabslife99 didn't share what she used to look like in high school, she did challenge other women to share their pics in a #glowdownchallenge — and the women delivered! Like TikToker @anitatrzebunia:
Related: I'm Gonna Have To Log Off For A Bit After Learning About These Terrible, Shocking, And Horrifying Things
TikTok user @aylor_liiight shared several of her before and after high school "glow down" pics:
@taylormounttidwell / tiktok.com
Related: 40 Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Creepy Wikipedia Pages
Tbh, she still looks amazing:
@taylormounttidwell / tiktok.com
@carolinekraemer33 also had a pretty good glow down to share:
@carolinekraemer_ / tiktok.com
In all the glow-down photos, the women still look fantastic — and a little more comfy in their own skin:
So, we want to celebrate our BuzzFeed readers' glow-down photos! If you physically peaked in high school — no matter your gender! — we want to see your before and after high school pics. Upload them via the dropbox below, and you could be featured in an upcoming BuzzFeed post!
Also in Internet Finds: People Are Sharing "The Most Believable Conspiracy Theories," And Now I'm Questioning Everything I Thought I Knew
Also in Internet Finds: Holy Crap, I Can't Stop Laughing At These 28 Painfully Awkward And Embarrassing Conversations
Also in Internet Finds: 23 Cute, Happy, And Wholesome Posts I Saw On The Internet This Week That You Absolutely Need To See
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Blake Lively's request to protect Taylor Swift texts in Justin Baldoni legal battle shut down by judge
Taylor Swift continues to be dragged into the legal drama ensuing between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Days after Lively requested a protective order against Baldoni's request to access Lively and Swift's private text messages, Judge Lewis Liman denied the motion on June 18. "A motion or request may be, and in this case often has been, both a legitimate litigation tactic and an attempt to maneuver in the broader court of public opinion," Judge Liman wrote. "Given that Lively has represented that Swift had knowledge of complaints or discussions about the working environment on the film, among other issues, the requests for messages with Swift regarding the film ('It Ends With Us') and this action are reasonably tailored to discover information that would prove or disprove Lively's harassment and retaliation claims," he added. In a statement to Fox News Digital, a representative for Lively said they will continue to fight against Baldoni's "relentless efforts" to exploit "Swift's popularity." "The Court outright denied the Wayfarer Parties' motion to compel documents from Ms. Lively, who has produced far more documents in this case than the Wayfarer Parties combined. Further, the Court's protective order ruling rests on the Wayfarer Parties' admission that they received nothing from Taylor Swift, which is exactly the opposite of what their 'insider' claimed two weeks ago," the representative stated. "As for the rest, Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties demanded access to Taylor Swift's private communications—despite having already subpoenaed and then withdrawn that subpoena. Baldoni's desire to drag Taylor Swift into this has been constant dating back to August 2024, when the crisis PR firm led by Melissa Nathan included her in their 'Scenario Planning' document (Lively Amended Complaint, Exhibit D), referred to her as a bully, and called for a strategy to influence the 'TS fanbase' (Lively Amended Complaint, ¶214(b))," the representative continued. "We will continue to call out Baldoni's relentless efforts to exploit Ms Swift's popularity, which from day one has been nothing more than a distraction from the serious sexual harassment and retaliation accusations he and the Wayfarer parties are facing." Representatives for Baldoni and Swift did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Swift was subpoenaed as a witness in the Lively-Baldoni dispute, but Baldoni's team has withdrawn the request, Fox News Digital confirmed in May. A source with direct knowledge of the case told Fox News Digital at the time, "When information is voluntarily received, there is no need for subpoenas." After Swift was subpoenaed May 10, a spokesperson for the pop star denied her involvement in the 2024 film "It Ends With Us" aside from the licensing of her song "My Tears Ricochet," which was featured in the movie's trailer and used in one scene. "Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie. She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions. She did not score the film. She never saw an edit or made any notes on the film. She did not even see 'It Ends With Us' until weeks after its public release and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history," Swift's representative told Fox News Digital at the time. WATCH: WHAT IS GOING ON BETWEEN BLAKE LIVELY AND JUSTIN BALDONI? "The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, 'My Tears Ricochet,'" the spokesperson added. "Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case." Baldoni and Lively's legal fight is scheduled to go to trial before a New York court in March 2026. Fox News Digital's Janelle Ash and Lauryn Overhultz contributed to this post.
Android Authority
27 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature could launch with a video upgrade (APK teardown)
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature, internally codenamed 'Bluejay,' will likely support video editing. When it launches, the feature will use generative AI to transform videos into various styles, with options potentially including 'I'm feeling lucky,' 'Subtle movements,' and 'Go wild.' Creating AI photos and videos is all the rage these days, but many people are using AI to remix their existing photos and videos. For instance, the Studio Ghibli trend went viral recently, and people had a lot of fun reimaging themselves in the popular art style. We've previously spotted Google Photos working to incorporate this generative AI use case with the upcoming Remix feature. While the feature is yet to launch, we've now spotted clues indicating it will work for both photos and videos. Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else. An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. Google Photos v7.34 includes code that indicates that the upcoming Remix feature could also support video edits. Code Copy Text Remix Bluejay Video I'm Feeling Lucky. Suble Movements. Go Wild. Here, 'bluejay' is the working codename for the Remix feature, and in the second string, it is used as a placeholder for the marketing name 'Remix' (which is still a work-in-progress name and may or may not be the final marketing name). While the Remix feature for photos could offer styles like claymation and anime, there would be different style suggestions provided for the Remix video feature. We could spot these three style suggestions: Random style: I am feeling lucky Subtle style: Subtle Movements Wild style: Go Wild As is the theme with the Remix feature, the Remix video feature will also likely use generative AI to transform your video into these different styles. Google has yet to announce the Remix feature, and it's still very much a work in progress. We don't know if and when it will roll out to users. We'll keep you updated when we learn more. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni Scores Small Legal Win After Strong Message To Blake Lively
Justin Baldoni's strong message to Blake Lively seems to be already yielding fruit in court. The director received a favorable ruling in his ongoing court case involving his "It Ends With Us" co-star. He can now review private conversations between Taylor Swift and Lively about the case. Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's bitter legal dispute has reportedly had personal consequences, particularly for the friendship between Taylor Swift and the actress. Baldoni has now advanced further in the hot legal pursuit between himself and co-star Lively. Now, the director can review the conversations between the two friends to see what was said and what was not. The essence of this ruling is to help the court and Baldoni prove the validity of Lively's claims of harassment or otherwise- due to her closeness to the performer, a personal conversation may not be unusual. U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman added that only relevant information to the case must be examined should Baldoni go through these private text messages. While Lively's legal team pulled all the strings to absolve Swift from this new ruling, their pleas were disregarded. Per Page Six, the movie star had earlier pleaded with the court to protect her interaction with Swift last Friday, noting that they are not crucial to the case. It all started when Lively accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her and proceeded to coordinate a smear campaign targeted at diminishing her career. Swift was then introduced to the mix when the director name-dropped her in his now-dismissed $400 million counter lawsuit. The singer even bagged a subpoena in May to testify as a witness in an upcoming trial for the case next year, but the request was subsequently dropped. According to Baldoni, Lively leveraged her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her friend Swift's social currency to control things on the set of "It Ends With Us." He added that he was also invited as a guest to Lively and Reynold's home, where one of their "famous" close friends was present. There, the issue of rewriting movie scripts and readjusting the story was raised. Baldoni's attorney continued that Lively bragged about her husband and her billionaire friend during a conversation, referring to them as her "dragon." Bryan Freedman continued that Lively's statement was a subtle threat to his client, making him aware of his unsafe professional environment. Last week, The Blast shared that Baldoni suffered a crushing defeat in court on another lawsuit he dragged a news outlet to court for. On June 9, a federal judge threw out Baldoni's $250 million libel suit against The New York Times. The director also got his $400 million countersuit against Lively, her husband, and her publicist Leslie Sloane dismissed. This double defeat prompted a significant reaction from Lively. The actress' legal team tagged the ruling as a total victory and absolute vindication for their client. In her words on Instagram, she described Baldoni's suit as defeated. Despite the pronouncement, the judge states that the two major claims cited in Baldoni's countersuit, namely, breach of implied covenant and tortious interference, can be amended later this month. For that reason, Lively and her team have also been advised to slow down on the early celebration by an attorney who is not involved with the case. The lawyer told PEOPLE: "The decision is undoubtedly a blow to Baldoni. But the case is far from over. One thing I've learned many times over as a litigator is not to celebrate too early." Baldoni's loss in court did not surprise his legal team. According to them, it was more of a move for them to bring public awareness to the ongoing case, which they have achieved despite the dismissal. Freedman then took a jab at Lively and her legal team for their reaction to the ruling. "Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false. Lively's allegations are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle," Freed notes." The lawyer continued that he, along with his team, was battle-ready for Lively's next line of action, including a deposition, which he would personally handle. As soon as the director files his amendments for claims that were dismissed, his lawyers expect his co-star to react by filing another motion to dismiss. In his ruling, the federal judge declared that neither Sloane nor the Times acted with intent to defame Baldoni. He added that the news agency also has no existing motive to agree with Lively's narrative or promote it. Lively looked radiant for her first appearance on the heels of Baldoni's loss in court. She took her victory lap at the Chanel Tribeca Festival Artists Dinner in New York City. The "Gossip Girl" actress looked ethereal in a white crochet outfit paired with her signature Christian Louboutin heels and Chanel accessories. She strutted her stuff on the carpet, serving killer angles to the teeming photographers. The actress was reportedly elated to get the $400 million lawsuit off her back for good and even cried with relief after hearing the verdict. What does June 23 have in store for Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni?
