logo
Greedy smuggling gangs cramming more migrants into small boats as Labour's excuse for record arrivals is sunk

Greedy smuggling gangs cramming more migrants into small boats as Labour's excuse for record arrivals is sunk

The Sun4 days ago

GREEDY smuggling gangs are cramming ever more migrants into small boats — as the Government's excuse for record arrivals was sunk.
The number of dinghies carrying 80 or more people tripled in just one year.
3
In the 12 months to April, there were 33 compared to 11 in 2024 and just one in 2023.
And there were 312 boats carrying 60 or more compared to 153 the year before.
The dangerous squeeze emerged yesterday when the Home Office published for the first time data on both the number of migrants -per-boat and how weather affected the crisis.
Labour has tried to blame recent sunny spells for a higher number of migrants completing Channel crossings.
They pointed out the last year saw 190 so-called calmer 'red days' — up from 106.
But Sky News research showed that in rougher conditions small boat journeys were still up 30 per cent.
Last night the Home Office said smugglers overloading boats was 'all the more reason why we should crack down on their vile trade'.
Afghans Shah Salim Sajjadi, 38, and Safiollah Mohammadi, 25, were yesterday jailed for eights months each in Folkestone after a woman and child died in the overcrowded Channel dinghy they captained.
A probe into the deaths continues.
3

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dear Richard Madeley: ‘My housemate and I kissed and now she's avoiding me'
Dear Richard Madeley: ‘My housemate and I kissed and now she's avoiding me'

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Dear Richard Madeley: ‘My housemate and I kissed and now she's avoiding me'

Dear Richard, I'm living in a shared house with one man and two women, one of whom is an old friend from university. We are all in our early 30s. We get on pretty well but tend to socialise with our own groups of friends outside the house – we don't do big Sunday lunches together or anything like that. A couple of weeks ago, one of the women – the one I don't know well – asked me if I wanted to go out to the pub. We went for a few drinks, and then we kissed on the way back to the house. Nothing has been said since, and I get the feeling she's avoiding me. I don't want her to feel uncomfortable about what happened, but I worry that if I try to clear the air I'll just make things worse. It's fine if she thinks it was a mistake – while I don't exactly hate the idea of our revisiting some sort of romantic situation, I haven't fallen head-over-heels in love or anything, plus I don't want to upset the 'chemistry' of the house. It's just that it now feels really awkward. Should I try to talk to her? –Ben, via email Dear Ben Hmm. I've always been cautious about initiating 'clear the air' conversations. In my experience, they can have the opposite effect, leaving the atmosphere clouded by confusion, embarrassment – and even antagonism. Often the wiser course is simply to let things lie and resolve themselves with the passage of time. If this woman is avoiding you, it's precisely because she doesn't want an air-clearing exchange with you. Maybe she's simply embarrassed about your brief clinch on the way home, or she feels guilty about it for some reason, or she just plain regrets it. Whatever the reason, she obviously doesn't want to talk about it. You should be sensitive to that. And in any case, it's hardly a big deal, is it? It was only a kiss or two (or maybe three?). These things happen. And if she wants to pretend that it didn't, I'd go along with it if I were you. Least said, soonest mended.

Man, 20, appears in court on terror charges over arson attacks and bomb hoax after police 'foil lone wolf attack on King's Guards'
Man, 20, appears in court on terror charges over arson attacks and bomb hoax after police 'foil lone wolf attack on King's Guards'

Daily Mail​

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Man, 20, appears in court on terror charges over arson attacks and bomb hoax after police 'foil lone wolf attack on King's Guards'

A 20-year-old man has appeared in court charged with terrorism offences after a series of alleged arson and bomb hoax incidents, as police foiled a 'lone wolf attack on King's Guards'. Ilyas Akhtar, of Slough, Berkshire, spoke only to confirm his personal details when he appeared in the dock at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Saturday. The 'lone wolf' was arrested on suspicion of possessing an offensive weapon and arson in Slough last week at the Salt Hill Activity Centre, near Windsor Castle. On Sunday he was rearrested over alleged terror offences. Military personnel at a barracks close by were told not to leave the grounds in uniform for two days amid the security scare. Akhtar, who was dressed in a grey tracksuit during the three-minute hearing, was charged on Friday after an investigation by Counter Terrorism Policing South East, with authorisation from the Crown Prosecution Service. He is accused of preparing acts of terrorism, possessing information useful to terrorists, carrying out two arson attacks and causing a bomb hoax. The arson charges relate to fires at Salt Hill Activity Centre in Slough on May 31 and Slough Ice Arena on Montem Lane on May 14, police said. The bomb hoax charge relates to an incident at the town's Asda supermarket on Telford Drive on May 9. The supermarket closed almost 90 minutes early after a member of staff found a suspicious package. No indication of a plea and no bail application was made at the court hearing. District Judge Louisa Cieciora told Akhtar he will next appear in custody at the Old Bailey on June 20. A source told the Sun last night that Akhtar was believed to have been plotting an attack: 'The suspect is feared to have been plotting an attack. 'Police informed bosses at the barracks and measures were taken immediately despite him already being in custody. 'It was a huge security scare. But it was in the interests of everyone's safety.' The warning was circulated to Victoria Barracks in Windsor - home to the 1st Battalion Coldstream Guards. Detective Superintendent Andy Penrith, of Thames Valley Police, previously said: 'We understand that these charges for terrorism offences will be concerning to our communities in Slough. 'I want to reassure all our residents that Thames Valley Police is working closely with our communities and partners in Slough as well as our colleagues in counter-terrorism.' He said patrols would be stepped up in the area and urged anyone with concerns to speak to officers or police community support officers. 'Due to the ongoing court proceedings, our officers and staff won't be able to provide any further details on this specific case, but we will be there to listen and support our communities,' he added.

Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns
Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns

Britain is at war with Russia already, one of the authors of the government's strategic defence review has warned, while arguing that we can no longer depend on the US as a reliable ally. Dr Fiona Hill, who served as the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term in office, said the UK is in 'pretty big trouble', warning that the country is stuck between 'the rock' of Russia and the 'hard place' of an increasingly unreliable US under Mr Trump. 'Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't fully anticipated,' Dr Hill told the Guardian, concluding that 'Russia is at war with us'. Arguing that the Kremlin has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years, she pointed to 'the poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations, all kinds of cyber-attacks and influence operations. The sensors that we see that they're putting down around critical pipelines, efforts to butcher undersea cables.' Unveiling the SDR last week - authored by Dr Hill, Lord Robertson and General Sir Richard Barrons - defence secretary John Healey said Britain's army needed to become '10 times more lethal' in the face of the 'immediate and pressing threat" from Russia and the rise of China. 'We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence,' he told MPs. The review found that the armed forces are not ready to fight its opponents as a result of inadequate stockpiles of weapons, medical services that cannot cope with a mass-casualty conflict and a personnel 'crisis' that means only a small number of troops are ready to be deployed. Meanwhile, General Sir Richard Barrons, warned that a cruise missile was 'only 90 minutes away from the UK'. But Sir Keir Starmer vowed to make Britain "a battle-ready, armour-clad nation' as he unveiled the SDR at the Govan shipbuilding yard in Scotland, which included an army boosted to 100,000 personnel, 12 new submarines, drones and a rollout of Artificial Intelligence. But questions were raised over the government's big ambitions to make Britain 'safer and stronger' after Sir Keir refused to commit to spending 3 per cent of Britain's gross domestic product on defence by 2034 — which the review warned was essential to ensure the plans were affordable. Dr Hill, who was highly critical of the Trump administration, said Britain could no longer rely on the US's military umbrella as it did during the cold war, at least 'not in the way that we did before'. It comes after the SDR contained a similar warning, saying: 'The UK's longstanding assumptions about global power balances and structures are no longer certain.' The defence adviser argued that the US president 'really wants to have a separate relationship with Putin to do arms control agreements and also business that will probably enrich their entourages further, though Putin doesn't need any more enrichment'. Speaking about Mr Trump's White House, Dr Hill warned it is 'not an administration, it is a court', arguing that the president is driven primarily by his 'own desires and interests, and who listens often to the last person he talks to'. Speaking about the rise of the populist right in the US, she expressed concerns it could do well in British electoral politics if 'the same culture wars' are allowed to grow in influence. Warning of the impact of Reform UK, she said: 'When Nigel Farage says he wants to do a Doge against the local county council, he should come over here [to the US] and see what kind of impact that has. 'This is going to be the largest layoffs in US history happening all at once, much bigger than hits to steelworks and coalmines.' Doge (the Department of Government Efficiency) is an initiative by the second Trump administration, which aims to cut wasteful spending.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store