Amazon to invest $13 billion in Australia's data center infrastructure
(Reuters) -Amazon will invest 20 billion Australian dollars ($12.97 billion) from 2025 to 2029 to expand, operate and maintain its data center infrastructure in Australia, aiming to bolster the nation's artificial intelligence capabilities, the company said in a blog post on Saturday.
($1 = 1.5418 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
An 8.3% yield! Is this under-the-radar penny stock worth the risk?
As the FTSE 100 nears record levels, yields fall, valuations stretch and quality income stocks become harder to find. But while large-cap shares dominate headlines, the lesser-travelled world of penny stocks could be harbouring some surprising income potential. Penny stocks are often disregarded due to their speculative nature. They can be illiquid, volatile and lack reliable financials. Many are small-cap growth stories without a history of profitability, let alone dividends. But amid the noise, there are a few gems that stand out as possible exceptions. One such company is Ultimate Products (LSE: ULTP). Ultimate sells everyday household items under well-known brand names such as Salter, Beldray and Kleeneze. The firm operates in a highly competitive segment but its niche in affordable kitchen and cleaning products has allowed it to build steady customer demand across the UK and Europe. What makes it worth considering in today's income-starved market is its generous 8.3% dividend yield. Unlike most penny shares, which pay no income at all, Ultimate has delivered eight consecutive years of payouts. The dividend appears sustainable too, with a payout ratio of 78%, suggesting enough earnings are being retained to keep the lights on. On valuation, the stock appears attractive. With a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 9.5 and a price-to-sales ratio of 0.44, it looks to be trading well below the market average. By comparison, many large-cap FTSE 100 names now look fully priced after a strong rally this year. Naturally, there are still some red flags investors shouldn't ignore. Despite its reliable dividends, the share price has climbed just 17% over the past five years. This underperformance is partly due to thin operating margins (4.67%) and strained cash flow, with just £1.6m in operating cash generated. In a low-margin retail environment, rising input costs or supply chain issues could easily eat into profits and threaten future payouts. There's also the ever-present issue of liquidity. The company's shares are lightly traded, and its £64m market-cap places it firmly in the micro-cap territory. That brings additional risk during market downturns, when small-caps tend to be hit hardest and recover last. For those depending on steady income, volatility like this can be unsettling. Risks aside, the stock could appeal to long-term investors seeking something other than the usual fare. With larger dividend payers offering yields closer to 5% today, an 8.3% yield from a profitable, dividend-paying penny stock sounds appealing — if you can stomach the risks. Overall, I think it's worth considering, but diversification remains crucial. Ultimate could help raise the average yield of a portfolio primarily made up of more stable but lower-yielding FTSE 100 shares. And by spreading investments across different sectors, company sizes and risk profiles, investors can mitigate the impact of any single stock underperforming or cutting its dividend. As always, these types of penny stocks won't go well with everyone's risk appetite. But in an environment where the big names are looking increasingly expensive, they might just offer a small corner of hidden value for those willing to look beneath the surface. The post An 8.3% yield! Is this under-the-radar penny stock worth the risk? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Mark Hartley has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BT CEO eyes deeper job cuts as AI becomes more powerful, FT reports
(Reuters) -BT Group Chief Executive Allison Kirkby said advances in artificial intelligence could deepen significant job cuts under way at the British telecoms company, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. Kirkby told the newspaper that BT's plans to cull more than 40,000 jobs and strip out 3 billion pounds ($4 billion) of costs by the end of the decade "did not reflect the full potential of AI". "Depending on what we learn from AI . . . there may be an opportunity for BT to be even smaller by the end of the decade," the FT quoted her as saying. Britain's biggest broadband and mobile provider had said in 2023 it would cut as many as 55,000 jobs, including contractors, by 2030, with then-CEO Philip Jansen saying the company would rely on a much smaller workforce and significantly reduced cost base by the end of the 2020s. Kirkby, who took over from Jansen a year ago, has also opened the door to a possible future spin-off of Openreach, the company's network infrastructure business, the FT said. She said she did not feel the value of Openreach was reflected in the company's share price and if that persisted, BT "would absolutely have to look at options". BT said last month that strong demand for fibre broadband and more than 900 million pounds of cost savings had helped shore up its full-year earnings and boost cash flow. Resilience at Openreach offset declines in revenue and profits in its business and consumer units, where legacy voice services continued to wane and handset sales fell. ($1 = 0.7372 pounds) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Bigger problem': Boss hits back at WFH claims
The Australian boss of a major tech company says businesses that argue working from home hampers productivity need to address bigger concerns. A mandate to work from the office is unlikely to fix a 'bigger problem' of employees who won't do their jobs without a manager 'hovering over them', HP Australia director Brad Pulford has told NewsWire. Research from the Australian HR Institute shows working-from-the-office mandates have peaked in the Australian economy. Released in April, the research finds mandates for a certain number of in-person days are now falling. Multinationals and Australia's biggest homegrown firms represent a broad spectrum of policies. Amazon, Dell and Tabcorp have ordered workers into the office five days a week. Coles has tightened the reins on its administrative staff, with one day in-person minimums becoming a three-day mandate this year. Woolworths office staff need to show up three days a week too. Commonwealth Bank and ANZ staff need to rock up for half of all working days per month. At National Australia Bank, the rank and file need to show face three times a week, and managers only get one day at home per week. On paper, the NSW public service is the biggest employer in the country. Public servants in that state were sent a memo last year saying they would 'principally' need to be in the office, but different agencies are mandating different rules. The availability of actual desks is cited online by workers as a tangible factor at each agency. Mr Pulford points to HP's own analysis, which shows 73 per cent of people think it's important that staff are empowered to work in the way that best suits their personal needs and maximises their effectiveness. However, Australian workers do not think they are entitled to flexible working arrangements, the HP analysis shows. Among Australian 'knowledge workers', 92 per cent would take a pay cut to work where and when they want, or for a better work-life balance. 'There are real and persistent concerns over team collaboration, organisational culture and performance management,' Mr Pulford said. 'Some professions require in-person creativity. Others have a physical component that can't be replicated. But these problems can be managed. 'The businesses that are going against the grain usually cite productivity as their main justification. But if your employees won't do their job without a manager hovering over them, arguably you have a bigger problem,' he said. HP employs 435 people in Australia and New Zealand. Mr Pulford said flexible working arrangements were 'not a free-for-all' at the tech firm, but an issue to be managed 'carefully and thoughtfully'. 'Our employees are at times required to connect in person at our HP sites to further business goals.' The Australian job market had clearly adapted with one-third of people working remotely at least some of the time, he said. 'We think the entire conversation around hybrid work needs to shift. If the debate hasn't been decided entirely, we think those in favour of hybrid work definitely have the upper hand at this point.' 'We should spend less time arguing about whether it's acceptable and more time thinking about how we can use it to drive growth by creating better workplaces,' Mr Pulford said.
