Dramatic day of diplomacy culminates in Trump announcing Iran-Israel ceasefire
In the hours after Iran launched a missile attack on a US base in Qatar, President Donald Trump and a group of his top diplomatic and security officials worked furiously behind-the-scenes to try to broker a peace deal to end the conflict between Iran and Israel.
While Trump communicated directly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio and Mideast Envoy Steve Witkoff worked on the Iranians – through direct and indirect channels, a senior White House official said.
The government of Qatar played a key role as an intermediary, and Trump at one point spoke directly to its leader, Emir Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.
Roughly 48 hours after the US struck Iranian nuclear sites – and just hours after Iran hit back at the US base – Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that a deal had been struck, heralding a 'complete and Total CEASEFIRE' between the warring nations that would lead to 'an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR.'
But it remained unclear Monday night in the US – early Tuesday morning in the Middle East – whether the fragile equilibrium would hold.
Israel agreed to the ceasefire deal on the condition that Iran stop its attacks, the White House official said. Iran agreed to those terms, they added.
Trump told the Qatari Emir that the US was able to get Israel to agree to a ceasefire with Iran, two sources familiar with the matter said. He also thanked him for his help in mediating, the White House official said, and asked the Emir to help persuade the Iranians to accept the deal.
Vance coordinated with the office of Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al-Thani on details, one source said. After speaking with Al-Thani, the Iranians agreed to the ceasefire proposal, the source and a diplomat familiar with negotiations said. A US official said that a series of calls with the Qatari Emir was pivotal on the Iranian side.
In a promising sign, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi thanked his country's armed forces and said military operations against Israel 'continued until the very last minute,' hinting that hostilities may have ended.
'The military operations of our powerful Armed Forces to punish Israel for its aggression continued until the very last minute, at 4 a.m.' Araghchi said in a post on X.
Earlier, Araghchi had said Iran would halt its military response if Israel stopped its strikes on Iran by that time.
Israel is yet to publicly comment on whether it has agreed to the ceasefire.
The White House maintains that the deal was only possible due to the US strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday.
Earlier on Monday, Doha informed the US about the incoming Iranian strikes aimed at a US military base in Qatar which were successfully intercepted with no reports of injuries or deaths. Iranian officials had given Qatar advance notice of the retaliatory attack, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
Diplomatic sources told CNN they were hopeful that Iran's retaliatory strikes would serve as an off-ramp for Tehran to return to negotiations. The ceasefire is likely to create further space for discussions between the US and Iran to continue.
Following Israel's launch of a military operation against Iran, there was an intensive diplomatic effort by US officials and intermediaries to get Tehran back to the table to negotiate a new nuclear deal.
There were messages exchanged throughout last week between the two sides, via numerous interlocutors, to try to revive high-level discussions. There was also an active effort underway to have Trump and the Iranian president meet in Turkey last week, a regional source confirmed, but that did not materialize.
Iran's consistent reply was that it was amenable to talks, but only if Israel suspended its military operations, sources said. Even after the US strikes, the Iranian foreign minister has conveyed to some interlocutors a willingness to return to the table if Israel stops its military attacks on Iran, according to a source familiar with the matter.
On Saturday, ahead of its unprecedented strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites, the Trump administration messaged Iran through intermediaries. Their message was twofold: forthcoming US strikes would be contained, but also that the US terms for a diplomatic deal with Iran were clear and simple: no uranium enrichment, sources said.
Iran has repeatedly said that it retains the right to enrich uranium.
According to one source familiar with a secret meeting that took place on Saturday, an intermediary reiterated to the Iranians that the White House was still willing to come to the table with no other conditions beyond enrichment. That sole condition from the US stripped away many other points that the two sides had discussed during multiple rounds of nuclear talks.
Witkoff has continued to exchange messages with the Iranians in the aftermath of the US military operation, a senior White House official and source familiar with the matter told CNN.
On Sunday, Rubio repeatedly publicly messaged a desire for direct negotiations with Iran. He noted that a deal that allowed Tehran to have a civil nuclear program – without its own enrichment – was still on the table.
'If they call right now and say we want to meet, let's talk about this, we're prepared to do that,' the top US diplomat said on CBS 'Face the Nation.'
This story has been updated with additional details.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
19 minutes ago
The Republican attempt to discourage Trump lawsuits has hit a big obstacle
WASHINGTON -- Republicans have hit a roadblock in an effort that could deter nonprofits, individuals and other potential litigants from filing lawsuits to block President Donald Trump over his executive actions. As Trump faces lawsuits nationwide, GOP lawmakers had sought to bar federal courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions against the federal government unless the plaintiffs post what in many cases would be a massive financial bond at the beginning of the case. The proposal was included in the Senate version of Trump's massive tax and immigration bill, but ran into trouble with the Senate parliamentarian, who said it violates the chamber's rules. It is now unlikely to be in the final package. Federal judges can already require plaintiffs to post security bonds, but such funds are commonly waived in public interest cases. The GOP proposal would make the payment of the financial bond a requirement before a judge could make a ruling, which critics said would have a chilling effect on potential litigants who wouldn't have the resources to comply. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer hailed the parliamentarian's ruling in a press statement and called the GOP effort 'nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored the nation since it's founding.' 'But Senate Democrats stopped them cold,' Schumer said. Lawmakers are running scores of provisions by the Senate parliamentarian's office to ensure they fit with the chamber's rules for inclusion in a reconciliation bill. The recommendations from Elizabeth MacDonough will have a major impact on the final version of the legislation. On Friday, she determined that a proposal to shift some food stamps costs from the federal government to states would violate the chamber's rules. But some of the most difficult questions are still to come as Republicans hope to get a bill passed and on Trump's desk to be signed into law before July 4th. Republicans could still seek to include the judiciary provision in the bill, but it would likely be challenged and subject to a separate vote in which the provision would need 60 votes to remain. The parliamentarian's advice, while not binding, is generally followed by the Senate. Republicans and the White House have been highly critical of some of the court rulings blocking various Trump orders on immigration, education and voting. The courts have agreed to block the president in a number of cases, and the administration is seeking appeals as well. In April, the House voted to limit the scope of injunctive relief ordered by a district judge to those parties before the court, rather than applying the relief nationally. But that bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate since it would need 60 votes to advance. That's left Republicans looking for other avenues to blunt the court orders. 'We are experiencing a constitutional crisis, a judicial coup d'etat,' Rep. Bob Onder, R-Mo., said during the House debate.
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Iran state TV says ceasefire deal was ‘imposed'
State media in Iran said President Donald Trump's announced ceasefire deal was 'imposed on the enemy' after Tehran's military attacked a US base in Qatar.
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Two activists fled Iran for the US. They disagree on the strikes against their home country
Roozbeh Farahanipour saw his name published in an Iranian newspaper — along with a reward for his body, and he knew he was no longer safe, he said. Elham Yaghoubian, a student activist in Iran who co-founded an underground party against the Islamic Republic with Farahanipour had that same feeling when her friends and fellow activists were arrested in 1999. Both fled Iran nearly 30 years ago, fearful for their safety. Both built new lives in Los Angeles, where nearly 141,000 Iranian Americans, according to the US Census, have forged a tight-knit community. But the two activists, who have had such similar paths to the United States, are split on the country's strikes in Iran. Farahanipour, a restaurant owner, had been jailed and tortured for his work as an opposition leader by the time he fled Iran in 2000. He opposes war in the region because he doesn't want to see another 'Afghanistan or Iraq.' Yaghoubian, who works at a language and translation company, supports the attacks, saying they are 'beneficial' for Iran, the Middle East and the world. The US attack Saturday night led to Iran retaliating with a targeted missile attack on the US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The strikes, which are part of an escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, have divided Los Angeles' tight-knit Iranian American community, Farahanipour said. One of Farahanipour's restaurants is located on a strip of Westwood Boulevard near UCLA known as Persian Square. Home to many Iranian businesses, the restaurants, bakeries and bookstores are adorned with signs in both English and Farsi. On Sunday, nearly three decades after he saw his name on an execution list and a day after the US strikes on Tehran, Farahanipour stood outside the restaurant with his young son. The pair wore jeans and matching blue polos as they waved the flag of the Iranian diaspora. Immigration from Iran to the US began in the early 20th century and spiked around the time of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Over 50 percent of immigrants — including Farahanipour and Yaghoubian — arrived in the US after 1994, according to the UCLA Center for Near Eastern Studies Many Persian residents refer to the Los Angeles area as 'Tehrangeles,' — a mix of Tehran and Los Angeles — according to Bruin Life, a UCLA student website. On Sunday, demonstraters gathered at the federal building in Westwood to rally against the United State's involvement in the conflict. People held signs reading 'No War on Iran,' and 'We won't let you drag us into global war.' Others chanted 'hands off Iran,' and 'Money for jobs and education. Not for wars and occupation.' The recent strikes, Yaghoubian argued, targeted infrastructure belonging to the Islamic Republic. The US attack hit three nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. 'These infrastructures, roads, factories, buildings, they can rise again, but what we can never recover are the lives of all young men and women we've lost to the brutal regime every time they rise for their basic rights,' Yaghoubian said. War isn't something people wanted, but Yaghoubian believes something good could come out of it — the end of the Iranian regime. The attacks represent hope for a better future, she said. 'No negotiation, no appeasement will bring an end this war. Only with removing this regime from Iran will bring peace and prosperity, she said.' But Farahanipour doesn't think the attacks will free Iran. He has advocated for a secular Iran, and the 'internal toppling' of the Islamic Republic by Iranians. The activist believes the US should not have thrust itself into the conflict. 'Killing the people, regardless in Iran, in Israel, American people, anyone, any civilian or people, they just died, is not an answer,' he said. CNN's Jack Hannah and Lauren Mascarenhas contributed to this report.
