‘Imminent' threat? Hegseth escalates tone on China in key Asia speech
SINGAPORE — U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urged allies to raise defense spending and warned that China may pose an 'imminent' military threat in a landmark speech on the Trump administration's approach to Asia.
'There's no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a defense summit held in Singapore.
The assessment is a major departure for the United States government, where officials spent the last several years arguing that conflict with China 'is neither imminent nor inevitable.'
But the shift reflected the Trumpian view of the region Hegseth offered — one in which countries may need to choose between dueling superpowers and U.S. allies should do far more to counter China's threat.
'We are preparing for war in order to deter war to achieve peace through strength,' Hegseth said.
His remarks Saturday had been highly anticipated as countries across Asia try to understand the Trump administration's approach to the region. The secretary's speech in Singapore is seen as a guide to America's policy toward the Indo-Pacific, and Hegseth is the most senior member of the U.S. government to address the topic this year.
Adding to the interest was China's decision not to send its defense minister to the conference, a departure from tradition. A senior U.S. defense official told the traveling press that the Pentagon hoped to exploit that gap, and Hegseth mentioned it in his speech.
'We are here this morning, and somebody else isn't,' he said.
Hegseth visited the Philippines and Japan in March, where he signaled the Trump administration would remain focused on the region. But other signals from the Defense Department have since been mixed.
During a bombing campaign in Yemen earlier this year, Hegseth redirected U.S. military assets away from Asia toward the Middle East. And the Pentagon still lacks nominees to run policy for China and the Indo-Pacific overall.
In the speech, Hegseth affirmed that the region is still America's 'priority theater,' which has been a consensus in Washington for the last decade. While he skewered the Biden Pentagon for years of 'deferred maintenance' on the military, his remarks mostly represented continuity with the last four years.
The secretary mentioned multiple times how much the U.S. values its allies and partners. He said America's military would continue sending forces to the western Pacific. And he even mentioned several initiatives started under the previous administration as examples of American focus.
But far different were Hegseth's comments on defense spending. Keeping with the administration's approach thus far, he argued that U.S. allies needed to accept a larger military burden rather than rely on America's longtime role guaranteeing the region's security.
'We ask, and indeed we insist, that our allies and partners do their part,' Hegseth said of other countries' defense budgets.
In an ironic twist that Hegseth himself acknowledged, he urged that countries in the Indo-Pacific look to the example of Europe, which is now increasing military spending after seeing the U.S. hedge on its commitment to defend the continent.
In recent years, U.S. allies from Australia to Japan have announced increases in defense spending, though some officials now in the Pentagon have argued those pledges still don't match the severity of the moment.
Days before the conference, Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's head of policy, posted on X that countries should aim to spend 5% of GDP on defense, a goal NATO is trying to meet over the next decade.
'This is the new standard for our allies around the world, especially Asia,' Colby wrote.
Going further, Hegseth warned nations against splitting their relationship between Washington and Beijing, even along different lines.
'We know that many countries are tempted by the idea of seeking both economic cooperation with China and defense cooperation with the United States. Now that is a geographic necessity for many, but beware the leverage that the CCP seeks with that entanglement,' Hegseth said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party.
While many nations in the region prefer to rely on America for security, China is also their main trading partner and hence a force they can't ignore. Hegseth's predecessor, Lloyd Austin, used his speeches at the Shangri-La Dialogue to reassure such countries they wouldn't need to take sides in the larger competition between the two superpowers.
French President Emanuel Macron, who gave the keynote address at the conference on Friday, warned against changing that policy.
'The main risk today is a risk of division of the world and the division between the two superpowers and the instruction given to all the others: 'You have to choose your side,'' Macron said.
Despite the sharp rhetoric, Hegseth argued that the U.S. doesn't want to 'dominate or strangle China' and certainly doesn't seek conflict. But he said America wouldn't accept China's increasingly aggressive behavior toward it or its allies.
Specifically, he mentioned China's actions in the South China Sea — where it's rammed Philippine coast guard and fishing vessels — and around Taiwan, a self-governing island China claims as its own territory and has threatened to take by force.
In recent years, the People's Liberation Army has staged more complex military drills around Taiwan. The head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has called these 'rehearsals' for a future blockade or invasion, a description the secretary also used.
Hegseth also repeated a claim by President Donald Trump that China would not invade Taiwan in the next four years and that America's primary goal was to avoid such a conflict.
'But if deterrence fails,' he said, 'we are prepared to do what the Department of Defense does best and fight and win decisively.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Should Get The Hint That Xi Just Isn't That Into Him
China's President Xi Jinping (R) and U.S. President Donald Trump. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKIFRED DUFOUR/AFP via Getty Images Xi Jinping probably doesn't know whether to be flattered or aggrieved by Donald Trump's late-night rantings about the Chinese leader. Sounding more like a jilted ex than a head of state — or a force to reckon with in negotiations — the U.S. president complained Xi is proving 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Trump, on social media, sounded sincere enough — as if it just dawned on him that Beijing might not be interested in a bilateral trade deal after all. All this raises almost too many questions to pose here. One: Doesn't Trump recall Xi giving him the talk-to-the-hand treatment the first go around from 2017 to 2021? Another: What about Xi's energy, circa 2025, makes Trump think Xi is anxious for another go? Trump, like any wistful ex, is keeping his options open. He prefaced his 2:17 a.m. Washington-time rant with 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but…' It's time that someone on Trump's staff had the courage to tell him that perhaps the most powerful Chinese leader in many decades just isn't into him and his trade tactics. On one level, Xi can be excused for lacking the bandwidth to deal with Trump World's chaos right now. Even before the Trump 2.0 era started on January 20, Asia's biggest economy was grappling with a massive property crisis that's generating deflation. Xi's Communist Party was already facing weak domestic demand and record youth unemployment. Back in November, when Team Xi assumed Kamala Harris would be the next president, Beijing was struggling to stop the national birthrate from falling. It was mulling ways to address a rapidly ageing population. It was devising bigger social safety nets to encourage China's 1.4 billion people to save less and spend more. Pre-Trump 2.0, Beijing was in the throes of trying to reduce several trillions of dollars of local government debt. Before the latest Trump tariffs, Xi's government was working to shift its growth model away from exports and runaway investment to domestic demand-led growth. It was working to reduce the dominance of inefficient state-owned enterprises. It was endeavoring to increase the use of the yuan in global trade and finance. Team Xi is also contending with a notable increase in in-person protests. Especially factory workers getting stiffed as export growth slows. Now, Trump's tariffs, volatility in the dollar and bedlam in the U.S. Treasury market are sending intensifying headwinds China's way. So, yes, a busy time to be the leader of a giant, unbalanced economy directly in the Trumpian crossfire. And the White House thinks now is a good time to drop everything and do a hasty bilateral trade deal? Trade agreements are wildly complicated affairs in the best of times, taking several months, even years. Hence, Xi's strategy of slow-walking the process, one that's worked so far. Delaying talks is all the more rational given the decent odds U.S. courts will ultimately rule against Trump's claim that presidents have tariff powers. Trump, of course, is desperate for a trade deal, any deal, to try to convince Americans that, see, the tariffs are working. His splashy signing ceremony with London doesn't count, since the U.S. has a trade surplus with the United Kingdom. Japan hasn't been as pliant as Trump seemed to expect. And new South Korean President Lee Jae-myung is more Seoul's answer to Bernie Sanders than a kindred spirit keen to work with Trump World. Europe isn't exactly fertile ground for a win. Why would Trump be threatening 50% tariffs on the EU if concessions were forthcoming from the 550-million-person market? The U.S. Trade Representative sending reminder letters to trading partners so they don't forget about the upcoming deadline for talks is telling in itself. If White House phones were ringing with good offers, such embarrassing letters wouldn't need to be sent. Also, if Trump really believed Xi is ready to make big concessions, why would his team risk a deal by going after Chinese students with a ban on visas? China, meanwhile, knows how news this week that it may place an order for hundreds of Airbus aircraft, not Boeing, will have Trump fuming. Little about the last couple of weeks suggests these two economic giants are about to sit down for nuts-and-bolts trade negotiations in good faith. Trump's late-night post might've been his way of reminding Xi that the two men were supposed to catch up via phone this week. They did indeed talk on Thursday. But it still seems like high time Trump took the hint that Xi just isn't that into his trade deal.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Naval Ship Honoring Harvey Milk Is Getting a Name Change. Several Others Could Be Next
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." 1930–1978 The USNS Harvey Milk tanker ship is on the verge of receiving a new name, sparking intense reactions from some political figures. According to a report, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to rename the ship, which has honored the late gay rights activist and his military service since its launch in November 2021. A memorandum obtained by CBS showed that vessels named after other noteworthy figures—including Thurgood Marshall, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Harriet Tubman, and Dolores Huerta—have also been requested for review. The act of renaming a Navy ship is very rare and considered partially taboo. The most recent occurrence was in 2023, when the USS Chancellorsville and research ship USNS Maury received new monikers. Both names were tied to the Confederacy. The timing of the proposed change is notable, as June is Pride Month in the United States. The honorary month dates back to 1970 when the initial LGBTQ Pride marches took place on the first anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising. Democratic lawmakers criticized the decision to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calling it 'an utter abomination in terms of the extreme MAGA Republican effort to continue to erase American history, and we're not going to allow it to happen.' Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer reacted in a post to X, formerly Twitter, saying Hegseth should immediately reverse the decision. Gay rights activist and community leader Harvey Milk made history in January 1978 when he became one of the first openly gay public officials in the United States. He served on San Francisco's Board of Supervisors. Prior to his political career, the native New Yorker had served in the U.S. Navy and worked in a variety of industries before settling in San Francisco and opening a camera shop. His life and his political career came to an untimely end when he was fatally shot in November 1978 at age 48. Numerous books and movies have been made about the politician, including the Oscar-winning 2008 biopic Milk starring Sean Penn.$10.30 at FULL NAME: Harvey Bernard MilkBORN: May 22, 1930DIED: November 27, 1978BIRTHPLACE: Woodmere, New YorkASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Gemini Harvey Bernard Milk was born on May 22, 1930, in Woodmere, New York. Reared in a small middle-class Jewish family, Milk was one of two boys born to William and Minerva Milk. A well-rounded, well-liked student, Harvey played football and sang in the opera at Bay Shore High School. Like his brother, Robert, he also worked at the family department store, Milk's. After graduating from the New York State College for Teachers in 1951, Milk joined the U.S. Navy, ultimately serving as a diving instructor at a base in San Diego during the Korean War. Following his discharge in 1955, Milk moved to New York City, where he worked a variety of jobs, including public school teacher, production associate for several high-profile Broadway musicals, stock analyst, and Wall Street investment banker. He soon tired of finance, though, and befriended gay radicals who frequented Greenwich Village. In late 1972, bored with his life in New York, Milk moved to San Francisco. In California, he opened a camera shop called Castro Camera on Castro Street, putting his life and work right in the heart of the city's gay community. For much of his life, Milk had stayed quiet about his personal life. He had known since high school that he was gay, and even in the wake of an emerging gay rights movement, the deliberate and careful Milk chose to remain on the sidelines. But things had started to turn for him toward the end of his time in New York, as he befriended a number of openly gay people who frequented Greenwich Village. In San Francisco, his life and outspoken politics evolved even further. As Castro Camera increasingly became a neighborhood center, Milk found his voice as a leader and activist. In 1973, he declared his candidacy for a position on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to help lead the city and the county. A novice politician with little money, Milk lost the election, but the experience didn't deter him from trying again. Two years later, he narrowly lost a second election for the same seat. By then, Milk had become a political force—an outspoken leader in the gay community with political connections that included San Francisco Mayor George Moscone, Assembly speaker and future city mayor Willie Brown, and future U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein. In 1977, Milk, who was known affectionately as the 'Mayor of Castro Street,' finally won a seat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He was inaugurated on January 9, 1978, becoming the city's first openly gay officer, as well as one of the first openly gay individuals to be elected to office in the United States. While his campaign certainly incorporated gay rights into his platform, Milk also wanted to tackle a wide variety of issues, such as childcare, housing, and a civilian police review board. Milk's ascension had come at an important time for the gay community. While many psychiatrists still considered homosexuality a mental illness at this time, the liberal San Francisco Mayor George Moscone had become an early supporter of gay rights and had abolished the city's anti-sodomy law. Moscone had also appointed several gay people and lesbians to a number of high-profile positions within San Francisco. On the other side of Moscone was Supervisor Dan White, a Vietnam veteran and former police officer and fireman, who was troubled by what he perceived as a breakdown in traditional values and a growing tolerance of homosexuality. Also elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977, he frequently clashed with the more liberal Milk on policy issues.$12.00 at A year after his election, in 1978, White resigned from the board, citing that his salary of $9,600 wasn't enough to support his family. But White was prodded on by his police supporters and subsequently changed his mind regarding his resignation and asked Moscone to reappoint him. The mayor refused, however, encouraged by Milk and others to fill White's spot with a more liberal board member. For White, who was convinced that men like Moscone and Milk were driving his city 'downhill,' it was a devastating blow. On November 27, 1978, White entered City Hall with a loaded.38 revolver. He avoided the metal detectors by entering through a basement window that had been negligently left open for ventilation. His first stop was at the mayor's office, where he and Moscone began arguing before eventually moving to a private room so that they couldn't be heard. Once there, Moscone again refused to reappoint White, and White shot the mayor twice in the chest and twice in the head. White then went down the corridor and shot Milk, twice in the chest, once in the back, and twice in the head. Soon after, he turned himself in at the police station where he used to work. Milk died at age 48. White's trial was marked by what came to be known as the 'Twinkie defense,' as his lawyers claimed that the normally stable White had grown slovenly prior to the shootings due to abandoning his usually healthy diet and instead indulging in sugary junk food such as Coke, doughnuts, and Twinkies. In a surprising move, a jury convicted White of voluntary manslaughter rather than murder. In the wake of White's downgraded conviction, peaceful demonstrations by Castro's gay community outside City Hall turned violent. More than 5,000 policemen responded by entering nightclubs armed with truncheons and assaulting patrons. By the riot's end, 124 people were injured, including 59 policemen. This episode is known in history as 'The White Night Riots.' White subsequently served just six years in prison. In 1985, a year after his release, a distressed White died by suicide. Editor's Note: If you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or self-harming behaviors, call or text 988 to get help from the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. In the years since the killings, Milk's legacy as a leader and pioneer has endured, with numerous books and movies made about his life. In 1984, Milk was the subject of the Oscar-winning documentary The Times of Harvey Milk. Nearly three decades after its release, the project was added to the U.S. Library of Congress for preservation in 2012. In 2008, actor Sean Penn starred as Milk in the acclaimed biopic Milk. The movie primarily focuses on Milk's life and political aspirations throughout the 1970s. Penn's performance drew widespread acclaim, and he won the 2009 Academy Award for Best Actor for his portrayal of the slain politician. The film was also awarded the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay. In July 2016, the U.S. Navy announced it would name a yet-to-be constructed tanker after Milk, calling it the USNS Harvey Milk. Milk's nephew praised the decision, saying it would send 'a green light to all the brave men and women who serve our nation: that honesty and authenticity are held up among the highest ideals of of nation's military.' San Francisco politician Scott Wiener also celebrated the announcement. 'When Harvey Milk served in the military, he couldn't tell anyone who he truly was,' he wrote in a statement. 'Now our country is telling the men and women who serve, and the entire world, that we honor and support people for who they are.' However, some critics argue that Milk wouldn't have wanted such an honor, citing his opposition to the Vietnam War. The ship, a replenishment oiler that refuels aircraft carriers at sea, launched from San Diego in November 2021. Four years later, in June 2025, the tanker was back in the headlines when reported U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had ordered the Navy to rename the ship, stripping Milk's name. According to the report, a memorandum showed the change was requested to show 'alignment with president and [secretary of defense] objectives and [secretary of the navy] priorities of reestablishing the warrior culture.' A new name for the ship has yet to be announced. Additionally, a terminal at the San Francisco International Airport is named after Milk following a five-year renovation project. Completed in 2024, the space now includes multiple departure gates, exhibits, and a museum gallery dedicated to Milk. All men are created equal. No matter how hard you try, you can never erase those words. Hope will never be silent. I know that you cannot live on hope alone, but without it, life is not worth living. Fact Check: We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us! You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos


Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Average rate on a 30-year mortgage in the US falls to 6.85% this week, first decline in a month
WASHINGTON (AP) — The average rate on a 30-year mortgage in the U.S. fell this week for the first time in a month, but borrowing costs for homebuyers remain elevated. The long-term rate dipped to 6.85% from 6.89% last week, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday. A year ago, the rate averaged 6.99%. Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, popular with homeowners refinancing their home loans, also came down. The average rate fell to 5.99% from 6.03% last week and 6.29% a year ago, Freddie Mac said. Mortgage rates are influenced by several factors, from the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy decisions to bond market investors' expectations for the economy and inflation. The key barometer is the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans. Bond yields have retreated the past week but broadly have been trending higher since hitting 2025 lows in early April, reflecting investors' uncertainty over the Trump administration's ever-changing tariffs policy and worry over exploding federal government debt. The 10-year Treasury yield was 4.39% in midday trading Thursday, down from 4.54% a week ago.