logo
Queensland passes legislation to exempt venues for Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games from major planning laws

Queensland passes legislation to exempt venues for Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games from major planning laws

Queensland has passed legislation to ensure all venues built for the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games will be exempt from major planning rules, with the government confident a federal funding agreement will be reached "very soon".
The move will exempt Games infrastructure from major planning laws, in a bid to ensure projects are not held up by potential legal challenges.
It means final planning sign-off rests with the state government, rather than local councils.
Deputy Premier Jarrod Bleijie said the laws were vital for Games delivery, allowing for development at sites including Brisbane's Victoria Park.
"There'll be shovels being turned across the state."
Andrea Lunt from Save Victoria Park, a group against building a stadium at the site, said the laws would not stop them from protecting the green space.
"We were expecting it, but we're still incredibly disappointed, but we're not deterred, we'll continue to fight this no matter what gets thrown at us," Ms Lunt said.
"The park is too important to lose, it's such a precious natural asset to Brisbane.
"If you're thinking about showcasing Brisbane for the Olympic Games, you'd think we'd protect and enhance such a beautiful natural asset, not cover it up for stadiums."
Queensland Conservation Council director Dave Copeman said the government had ignored hundreds of submissions from the community and key stakeholders.
"We firmly believe that any development, for the Olympics or otherwise, should be rigorously assessed and held to a high standard on First Nations engagement, community benefits and nature protection.
The planning laws also implement changes to the approval processes for renewable energy projects, with the government seeking to ensure regional community interests are prioritised.
Large-scale wind and solar farms will have mandatory public consultation, with developers required to enter into binding community benefit agreements with local councils.
Mr Bleijie said the move would ensure infrastructure goals are achieved.
"This is about making sure that housing is delivered, the roads are upgraded, temporary accommodation for workers is put in place, schools, housing," Mr Bleijie said.
"Whatever the council want in these agreements they can put, it is putting local communities at the forefront of the renewable energy project."
However, Clean Energy Council National spokesperson Chris O'Keefe said the laws may prevent vital investment.
"We agree that communities must benefit, but this legislation imposes up-front processes that will frustrate good projects and could delay real outcomes," he said.
"Renewables investors are already expressing hesitation to continue their projects in Queensland given the time frame uncertainty, which risks stalling the rollout of clean energy to replace retiring coal and leading to higher household energy bills."
The LNP government scrapped its Labor predecessors venues plan for the Games, which included a federally funded indoor arena in the Brisbane CBD.
Instead, the private sector has been engaged to build an arena at Woolloongabba, leading the two jurisdictions to negotiate how the $3.4 billion in Commonwealth funds are used.
Federal Minister for Sport Anika Wells assured that an agreement was imminent.
"We understand people want to see work advance as quickly as possible... these aren't just venues that are relevant to a four-week period in 2032, these are venues people want to get their value out of as quickly as possible."
Queensland Olympics Minister Tim Mander said negotiations had been progressing well.
"I'm very confident that an agreement will be made shortly, and the discussions are very positive and very constructive," Mr Mander said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia stands firm against Trump's defence spend demands
Australia stands firm against Trump's defence spend demands

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Australia stands firm against Trump's defence spend demands

Australia stands firm against Trump's defence spend demands Published 26 June 2025, 9:30 am While Australia has been under pressure from the United States to spend more on the military, Defence Minister Richard Marles says NATO's move does not reflect Australia's own needs. Speaking at the summit he announced further support for NATO's operations assisting Ukraine, and a new round of sanctions against Russia.

Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure
Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Australia remains firm on defence spending targets despite US pressure

NATO countries have fallen in line with a request from the United States to increase defence spending. It's a request Australia is familiar with, having been delivered earlier this year by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Defence Minister Richard Marles. But Mr Marles rebuffed the request then, and says events at the NATO conference in the Netherlands haven't changed the government's mind. He says this government has already lifted defence spending sufficiently. "Obviously, a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending and that is fundamentally a matter for NATO. We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that. And what that has seen is the biggest peace time increase in Australian defence spending that we have seen in our history. Now, that is a story which is understood here." The increase Mr Marles is speaking of involves Australia lifting its defence spending from two per cent of gross domestic product to 2.3 per cent by the 2033-2034 financial year. The US has requested that commitment be lifted to 3.5 per cent. Some experts in Australia are calling for a lift to three per cent. The opposition's defence spokesman, Angus Taylor, hasn't named a number, but says defence spending is still insufficient under this government. "Well, there's a lot of areas in the Defence Strategic Review that are clearly underfunded. Our drone and counter-drone technologies, as the Leader of the Opposition, Sussan Ley, laid out yesterday. Making sure that the Henderson sub facility is properly-funded. The hardening of our northern facilities at a time like this incredibly important. Making sure we've got domestic missile manufacturing capability, as the government said they will do, but there's no sign of making progress on this. All of these are areas that have to be properly funded, alongside AUKUS- the submarines- and frigates. There is no shortage of things that need to be properly executed and properly funded, and they are not being right now under this government." Matthew Sussex is from the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre at the Australian National University in Canberra. He says the events at the conference in The Hague will put further pressure on the government's stance-with one caveat. "This also does increase the pressure on Australia to increase its defence spending. Whether it does or not is something, I think, is still a bit of an open question. And certainly I think there's no harm in waiting until what the American review into the AUKUS program actually says-the 30-day review that is due to report soon." Elsewhere at the NATO meeting, US President Donald Trump didn't show up to a joint meeting of Indo-Pacific partners who were present. Mr Marles says that didn't affect the quality of that meeting. "No, it was a really important meeting with the Secretary-General. And we re-affirmed in the meeting how important the two theatres are to each other. The point is made is that in Japan, in Korea, and in New Zealand, we have three countries which are deeply important in terms of Australia's strategic interests. In respect of all of them, we are really at a high point of our bilateral relationship, and we are working increasingly as a team. But we all see how significantly what is playing out in Europe is influencing the Indo-Pacific." But Mr Trump not showing up does play into the narrative that the government can't get a meeting with Mr Trump, especially after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's meeting with him on the side of the G-7 conference in Canada was cancelled. More than five months into Mr Trump's second term as U-S President, no Australian minister has yet met with him face-to-face. Whether that hurts the government on a domestic political level is a matter in and of itself, but it's something the opposition is nevertheless keen to exploit. Mr Taylor says an Australian Prime Minister must invest time in building a personal rapport with whoever the President of the US happens to be at any given time. "Right now it seems that the Prime Minister is better able to get a meeting with the President of China than the President of the United States. The United States has fought with us in every major war, and that alliance is incredibly important to this country, regardless of who is leading the United States. That alliance really matters. The Prime Minister needs to get serious about the personal relationship that is necessary to nurture that alliance." There were some things proposed at the NATO meeting that Australia has agreed to. Australia will deploy a surveillance aircraft and 100 defence personnel to Poland for three months, ending in November, in order to provide visibility for key supply routes into Ukraine. On that front, the government has also slapped sanctions on a further 37 individuals and seven financial entities linked to key Russian industries, as well as it what it calls promulgators of Russian propaganda. And, Mr Marles has signed an agreement with the NATO Support and Procurement Organisation, which will increase co-operation in non-combat activities, including logistics, and capability acquisition.

North Adelaide's LIV Golf redevelopment to go ahead after controversial laws pass SA parliament
North Adelaide's LIV Golf redevelopment to go ahead after controversial laws pass SA parliament

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

North Adelaide's LIV Golf redevelopment to go ahead after controversial laws pass SA parliament

Controversial laws that allow the South Australian government to push ahead with plans to redevelop the North Adelaide Golf Course, and move the LIV Golf tournament into the city, have passed parliament. The laws allow the government to take control of the golf course, overriding the Adelaide City Council, a move that Lord Mayor Jane Lomax-Smith said effectively takes 15 to 20 per cent of the city's parklands out of the council's care. The government said it made the move to provide "certainty" as it pushes to have the site ready to host LIV Golf in the city in 2028. While the opposition voted against the bill, the government secured the support of two key crossbench MPs — SA Best's Connie Bonaros and One Nation's Sarah Game. Ms Bonaros told parliament she was a strong supporter of LIV Golf. "I'm also a realist and I can see the clock ticking and the need for certainty," she said. The bill was introduced into parliament last week and passed the lower house the same day. Greens MP Robert Simms told parliament that, MPs and the general public should have been given time to consider the proposal. "There has been woefully inadequate consultation on this bill," he said. "Rather than indicating that the bill was a fait accompli and passing it through the lower house last week, the government should have released it for public consultation months ago." Independent MP Tammy Franks described the move as a "land grab". "It is deeply disappointing to see the Malinauskas government attempt yet another land grab at the behest, this time of a sporting tournament," she said. "Too often, when a new development is in need and around the CBD, state governments have looked at the parklands as supposed free land — and it is indeed free, but it is not their land." Premier Peter Malinauskas argued the government had to act quickly to make sure the course was ready for the 2028 LIV Golf tournament. "We're getting to the point where we're fast running out of time," Mr Malinauskas told ABC Local Radio. "We're not actually doing this, believe it or not, as a criticism of the council. I've spoken to Jane Lomax-Smith about this a lot, and Jane's been supportive of the project, as have a number of other councillors." But the premier said he was still concerned the project could be delayed. "The Adelaide City Council has had a propensity of getting in the way of a lot of these things, and that has been on occasion a source of frustration," he said. The LIV Golf tour began in 2022, with Greg Norman as CEO, and the Public Investment Fund — Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund — as its major financial backer. Tournaments have been held in Adelaide since 2023, and despite criticism of 'sportswashing' due to its links to Saudi Arabia, it has been hailed a success and awarded 'best golf event' at the World Golf Awards. With the plans to move from the Grange Golf Course to the city, Greg Norman Course Design has been given the contract to redesign the course, but no plans have yet been released. The government said it would be constructed on the existing golf course, as well as Park 27A, to the west of the course. It has not been revealed whether additional buildings will be part of the construction or how many trees will be removed to make way for it. The government said that for any tree that is cut down, at least three more will be planted. The government said the course would remain a public course after the redevelopment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store