Centre officials respond to being on DHS sanctuary jurisdiction list
CENTRE COUNTY, Pa. (WTAJ) — The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) included Centre County and State College in a list of places violating federal law, but even after the list was taken down, it has officials wondering why they were on it in the first place.
The DHS issued a list last week detailing several locations in Pennsylvania that were 'deliberately obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws and endangering American citizens.' But, going to the list now brings up a page not found notification.
Centre County's commissioners have not forgotten they were on that list and wonder what got them on it to begin with.
Centre County officials respond to delay on Rockview, Quehanna closure decision
'We haven't heard from the federal government in terms of why we were put on the list,' Commissioner Amber Concepcion said. 'There were a wide variety of jurisdictions that also don't know why they were put on the list.'
According to the DHS, every place on the list will receive 'formal notification of its non-compliance,' but the commissioners say they have not gotten any such communication.
The DHS described the jurisdictions on the list as protecting 'dangerous criminal illegal aliens from facing consequences,' and putting law enforcement in danger. Commissioners do not believe this describes the county or State College.
'To the best of our knowledge, we're complying with all the relevant federal laws based on what counties do,' Commissioner Chair Mark Higgins said.
Commissioners say they have been in contact with elected officials, and while they have been 'helpful,' how the two locations ended up on the list is still a mystery to them. The DHS has not said when or if the list will be going back up.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
10 minutes ago
- UPI
DHS expedites 36 miles of border wall, waiving environmental laws
The Department of Homeland Security Thursday issued three new waivers for roughly 36 miles of a new border wall in Arizona and New Mexico. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem's approval also waives environmental laws to expedite the border wall work. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 5 (UPI) -- The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday issued three new waivers for roughly 36 miles of a new border wall in Arizona and New Mexico. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem approved the waivers, which allow environmental laws to be disregarded for border wall construction. DHS said in a statement, "The Secretary's waiver authority allows DHS to waive environmental laws -- including the National Environmental Policy Act -- to ensure the expeditious construction of physical barriers and roads, by minimizing the risk of administrative delays." DHS said the waivers to expedite the border wall project "are critical steps to secure the southern border and reinforce our commitment to border security." The project list for border wall construction under these waivers includes three in the El Paso sector, one in the Yuma sector and three in Tucson. Funding is provided through U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Fiscal year 2020 and 2021 appropriations. President Donald Trump pushed for a border wall during his first term, promising that he would build a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border and that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico did not pay for it. About 500 miles of border wall was built during Trump's first term.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream
By Nichola Groom (Reuters) -A last-minute tweak to the Republican budget bill passed by Congress last month would immediately end subsidies for solar leasing companies that help make rooftop systems affordable to homeowners, likely leading to a massive drop in the pace of installations, according to industry representatives. President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," now being taken up by the Republican-controlled Senate, would eliminate a 30% tax credit for solar leasing companies that charge homeowners a monthly fee for panels - one of numerous cuts directed at clean energy subsidies passed by former President Joe Biden. That provision, inserted shortly before the bill passed the House of Representatives on May 22, risks stifling a sector that buys American-made equipment, employs thousands of people and relieves strain on the grid, according to industry backers. "That's one of the harsher components of the one big, beautiful bill currently," said Gabe Rubio, a principal in the business incentives and tax credits practice at professional services firm BDO. Tax credits for homeowners who own their own rooftop systems would also be eliminated. The changes could result in as much as 40% less residential solar capacity being installed over the next five years, according to energy research firm Wood Mackenzie. Solar companies are lobbying the Senate to make changes to the bill before it becomes law. "America's home solar and storage industry is a powerful economic growth engine," Sunrun CEO Mary Powell said in a statement. "Senate Republicans now have an opportunity to advance the administration's energy independence agenda by amending this bill to keep American energy prices low and create well-paying U.S. manufacturing jobs." Trump campaigned on a promise to repeal the clean energy tax credits in Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, arguing they are expensive, unnecessary and harmful to business. Republican backers of the bill say the subsidy cuts would free up billions of dollars for other priorities. More than 5 million U.S. homes have solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. LAST MINUTE CHANGE An earlier version of the bill had protected the credit for leased solar systems, but fiscal hawks including Representative Chip Roy of Texas have said publicly that they pressed for deeper cuts to clean energy credits at the eleventh hour. Roy's office did not respond to a request for comment. Solar leasing was pioneered two decades ago by companies including Sunrun and SolarCity, which is now owned by Elon Musk's company Tesla, and quickly became the primary way home solar panels were financed. Under the model, solar installers partner with financiers that own the rooftop panels and offset their federal tax bills by claiming the credit. Homeowners either pay a monthly fixed fee to lease the equipment or pay for the electricity the system generates under a power purchase agreement (PPA). In what some analysts have said could be a loophole, the House bill directly references leased systems but does not mention PPAs. About 44% of residential systems sold today are under such arrangements, according to EnergySage, an online solar marketplace. Solar installers say undermining the subsidies could have a ripple effect on U.S. manufacturers that supply them. Freedom Forever, a top privately-held installer based in Temecula, California, said in two years it has gone from using no U.S.-made equipment to now sourcing 85% of it from American facilities. That is thanks to another IRA subsidy that provides bonus 10% tax credits for using American-made equipment. "The administration wants to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and that's what our industry has been doing for the last two to three years," Freedom Forever CEO Brett Bouchy said.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls Germany's larger defence budget 'a positive thing'
US President Donald Trump on Thursday called Germany's increased defence spending "a positive thing" but expressed some reservations about a better financed German military. "I know that you're spending more money on defence now and quite a bit more money. That's a positive thing," Trump told Merz during a press briefing in the Oval Office on the occasion of Merz's inaugural visit. But Trump declined to comment on specific percentages, stating that he had not discussed this much with Merz so far. Trump did however point to historical concerns the United States has had about German rearmament, following the US victory, together with other allies, over Nazi Germany in World War II. "I'm not sure that General [Douglas] MacArthur would have said it's positive. You know, he wouldn't like it, but I sort of think it's good." The highly decorated US general commanded the South Pacific arena during World War II and was not responsible for combat operations in Europe. Still Trump said overall he considers the development to be the right one – "at least to a certain point. "There'll be a point where I'll say, Please don't arm anymore," he added, jokingly. Trump confirmed that he also intended to discuss the presence of tens of thousands of US troops in Germany with his German guest. He said this was also good for Germany's economy, as it involved well-paid soldiers. Trump added that the relationship with Germany is "very important." According to the US military's European Command (EUCOM), around 78,000 American soldiers are currently stationed in Europe, including approximately 37,000 in Germany. The number fluctuates regularly, depending on rotations and exercises in the region. Since the start of Russia's war against Ukraine, the figure has varied significantly.