No. 2 US diplomat questions need for Nato in deleted social media post
US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau was replying to a social media thread by Mr Matthew Whitaker, the US ambassador to Nato. PHOTO: AFP
No. 2 US diplomat questions need for Nato in deleted social media post
WASHINGTON - The number two US diplomat questioned the need for Nato in a post on X - which he later deleted - as the alliance prepares for an annual summit expected to be dominated by a US demand for higher defence spending and Russia's war on Ukraine.
Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau was replying to a social media thread by Mr Matthew Whitaker, the US ambassador to Nato. Mr Whitaker in his post said that what happened in the Indo-Pacific mattered for transatlantic security.
"He obviously didn't get the memo our [sic] of our Deputies Committee meeting on this very issue," Mr Landau wrote at 6:56pm on June 11, referring to Mr Whitaker. "Nato still a solution in search of a problem."
It was not clear if Mr Landau meant for his message to be public or if he intended to send Mr Whitaker's post to a third person.
"This was a casual, lighthearted remark intended for a brief, private exchange," a State Department spokesperson said in e-mailed comments.
"The Deputy Secretary's comment was in the context of his desire to improve Nato and ensure it remains focused on its mission," the spokesperson said.
Mr Landau's post was later deleted. The Deputies Committee is subordinate to the National Security Council and composed of deputy secretaries of State, Defence and other agencies, according to the White House website.
The administration of former President Joe Biden had pushed the European allies to pay more attention to the threats in the Indo-Pacific, particularly from China, but the Trump administration has encouraged those allies to focus on their own security.
Mr Landau's post contrasts with the views of most of Nato's European members, who see Russia and its war on Ukraine as an existential threat, and the US-led alliance as their main means of defence.
His post came as Nato leaders prepare for a two-day summit in the Hague beginning on June 24, where they will consider US President Donald Trump's demand that they boost defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to attend the meeting. Since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, he regularly has attended Nato summits, and alliance members have pledged billions in weapons and condemned Russia for an illegal war of conquest.
Mr Trump has shifted US policy, partially accepting Moscow's justifications for its full-scale invasion in February 2022 and disparaging Mr Zelensky.
European allies have expressed concern about Mr Trump's commitment to the 32-member alliance and its support for Ukraine's battle against Russia's occupation forces. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
German arms purchases to favour speed over supplier origin, top official says
FILE PHOTO: Head of Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support Kornelia Annette Lehnigk-Emden looks on, on the day of the presentation of a joint declaration of intent for the ARROW project at the Ministry of Defence in Berlin, Germany, September 28, 2023. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch/ File Photo German arms purchases to favour speed over supplier origin, top official says BERLIN - Germany's military procurement agency will prioritize rapid delivery in future defence contracts over the origin of the manufacturer, its top official told Reuters, as the country prepares to nearly double its military spending. "Which country we buy from depends on who can quickly offer the required material," Annette Lehnigk-Emden, director-general of the Bundeswehr's procurement agency BAAINBw, said in a written interview. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently backed U.S. President Donald Trump's demand to hike NATO's defence spending target to 5% of national GDP, a major shift made possible by a historic loosening of Berlin's constitutional debt brake. Germany spent 2.1% of its GDP, or approximately 90 billion euros ($104 billion), on defence last year, meeting NATO's current 2% spending target. At a summit in The Hague next week, NATO leaders are expected to commit to raising the spending goal to 5%. They will take a two-pronged approach that would see members spend 3.5% of their GDP on defence and dedicate 1.5% to broader security-related issues such as infrastructure and cyber security. German arms makers are hoping to benefit from the spending surge but companies in the United States, which have expansive military production capacity, also expect to boost profits. Lehnigk-Emden did not comment directly on whether the German defence industry has sufficient capacity to capitalize on the spending increase but urged companies to boost production. "The industry must expand its capacity. We will procure, that's for sure - and off the shelf... as time is of the essence," she said. It was urgent to equip forces by 2029, she added, the date when NATO warns Russia might be capable of a large-scale attack against allied territory. Lehnigk-Emden said air defence and ammunition were among the top priorities on the military's procurement list, aligning with NATO's targets for weapons and equipment. She dismissed concerns from some experts that under pressure to meet the 5% target, some spending may be unnecessary or misallocated, stating that it would be in line with the military's demands and approved by parliament. "This is why I don't see such a risk," she added. Lehnigk-Emden did not specify when Germany's defence spending might reach 3.5% of GDP. She highlighted plans for new legislation, due by the end of the year, to speed up procurement. The BAAINBw has faced past accusations of being too sluggish. The law will seek to minimize delays caused by legal challenges and will also grant the power to restrict some tenders to European bidders and subcontractors. Berlin is already making more use of a national security clause under EU law to prioritize domestic procurement, she said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
IAEA chief says no further damage at Iranian enrichment facilities
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi looks on, on the day of an exceptional meeting of the agency's Board of Governors to discuss Israel's strike on Iran that have hit nuclear targets including the Natanz nuclear complex, at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Elisabeth Mandl VIENNA - U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi provided an update on Monday on the situation at Iran's nuclear facilities after Israel launched military strikes and said there was no sign of further damage at the Natanz or Fordow enrichment sites. Grossi and the International Atomic Energy Agency he heads had previously reported that the smallest of Iran's three enrichment plants, an above-ground pilot plant at the sprawling Natanz nuclear complex, had been destroyed. While there was no sign of a physical attack on the bigger underground enrichment plant at Natanz, its power supply was destroyed, which may have damaged the uranium-enriching centrifuges there. No damage was seen at the Fordow plant dug into a mountain. "There has been no additional damage at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant site since the Friday attack, which destroyed the above-ground part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant," Grossi said in a statement to an exceptional meeting of his agency's 35-nation Board of Governors. Having said over the weekend that Israeli strikes damaged four buildings at the Isfahan nuclear facilities including the uranium conversion facility that processes "yellowcake" uranium into uranium hexafluoride, the feedstock for centrifuges, so it can be enriched, he elaborated on the damage there. "At the Esfahan nuclear site, four buildings were damaged in Friday's attack: the central chemical laboratory, a uranium conversion plant, the Tehran reactor fuel manufacturing plant, and the UF4 (uranium tetrafluoride) to EU metal processing facility, which was under construction," he said. "The (International Atomic Energy) Agency is and will remain present in Iran. Safeguards inspections in Iran will continue as soon as safety conditions allow, as is required under Iran's NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) safeguards obligations," he added. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran says Parliament is preparing Bill to leave nuclear non-proliferation treaty
Iran's state media said that no decision on quitting the treaty had yet been made by Parliament. PHOTO: REUTERS DUBAI – Iranian parliamentarians are preparing a Bill that could push Tehran towards exiting the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), the Foreign Ministry said on June 16, while reiterating Tehran's official stance against developing nuclear weapons. 'In the light of recent developments, we will take an appropriate decision. Government has to enforce Parliament Bills, but such a proposal is just being prepared, and we will coordinate in the later stages with Parliament,' the ministry's spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said, when asked at a press conference about Tehran potentially leaving the NPT. The NPT, which Iran ratified in 1970, guarantees countries the right to pursue civilian nuclear power in return for requiring them to forgo atomic weapons and cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Israel began bombing Iran last week, saying Tehran was on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Iran has always said its nuclear programme is peaceful, although the IAEA declared last week that Tehran was in violation of its NPT obligations. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated on June 16 that nuclear weapons were against a religious edict by the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Iranian state media said no decision on quitting the NPT had yet been made by Parliament, while a parliamentarian said the proposal was at the initial stages of the legal process. Mr Baghaei said developments such as Israel's attack 'naturally affect the strategic decisions of the state', noting that Israel's attack had followed the IAEA resolution, which he suggested was to blame. 'Those voting for the resolution prepared the ground for the attack,' Mr Baghaei said. Israel, which never joined the NPT, is widely assumed by regional governments to possess nuclear weapons, although it does not confirm or deny this. 'The Zionist regime is the only possessor of weapons of mass destruction in the region,' Mr Baghaei said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
