logo
China and US must keep talking to better understand each other: Chan Chun Sing

China and US must keep talking to better understand each other: Chan Chun Sing

Straits Times2 days ago

Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing speaking at the close of the Shangri-La Dialogue on June 1. ST PHOTO: JASON QUAH
Shangri-La Dialogue 2025 China and US must keep talking to better understand each other: Chan Chun Sing
SINGAPORE - Direct dialogue between the United States and China must continue, as both sides would benefit from understanding each other's perspectives more deeply despite their differences, said Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing.
Speaking at a media wrap-up on June 1 at the close of the Shangri-La Dialogue, Mr Chan said his private conversations with both delegations indicated that the superpowers do want to understand each other better, but that this would require frank dialogue.
'Even if they don't agree with what the other party says, it is important for them to hear what each other says and, perhaps more importantly, to understand why each party says what they say,' said Mr Chan.
His comments followed two days of discussions at the annual security forum in Singapore, which brought together regional and global defence leaders at the Shangri-La Hotel.
The press conference, attended by both local and foreign journalists, was dominated by questions about US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's speech at the forum's opening plenary, as well as China's lower-level representation at this year's gathering.
On May 31, the Pentagon chief had warned that the threat China posed to its neighbours in the Indo-Pacific was 'real', and he called on Asian countries to raise their defence spending.
Mr Chan said he had read Mr Hegseth's speech 'very carefully, more than once' and urged others to consider it in full rather than to focus only on certain parts.
While the speech did highlight concerns about China's behaviour, he noted that it also contained a 'quite significant' message of US intent.
Mr Hegseth had said the US did not seek war, nor to dominate or to strangle China. It also did not aim to encircle, provoke, or seek regime change, nor will it instigate or disrespect a proud and historic culture, he added.
'Yes, he did talk about the China threat,' said Mr Chan. 'But I think, and I may be wrong, it's the first time something like this has been stated so clearly.
'So I leave it to the audience to put the weights on the different parts of the speech.'
Mr Chan stressed the importance of not looking at China or the US as monolithic powers, and that both societies have their domestic and external challenges.
Understanding their internal dynamics will help countries understand why leaders of both powers do what they do, he added.
This is why the two powers have to talk to one another directly, and where the value of the Shangri-La Dialogue lies, said Mr Chan.
Replying to a question on how the US' and China's position on issues such as Taiwan and the South China Sea are so far apart that the two powers just talk over each other, Mr Chan said that is precisely why genuine dialogue is needed.
Besides the plenary discussions, the forum's value is in allowing for small-group discussions with counterparts from around the world.
Mr Chan said he himself had 13 such meetings on May 31, away from the main discussions.
'It's useful to just go into a room, have a cup of coffee, meet one another and exchange notes,' he said. 'And if Singapore can provide the coffee and the table and chairs, we will gladly do it.'
Conversely, it is not very useful in defence diplomacy to exchange notes through social media, especially if the intent is to achieve deeper understanding, he added.
On the absence of China's defence minister at the forum, Mr Chan reiterated that each country has their own considerations as to who they send, and there should not be an overemphasis on whether a certain personality attends or not.
For the first time since 2019, China's defence minister did not attend the dialogue. In his place, the delegation was led by Rear-Admiral (RADM) Hu Gangfeng, the vice-president of the People's Liberation Army National Defence University.
Mr Chan said he met with both the US and Chinese delegations, and that his message to both was the same: that military and economic security must reinforce each other, a perspective shared by many countries over the weekend.
Reflecting on his first Shangri-La Dialogue as Defence Minister, Mr Chan said some of his counterparts had asked how he had been able to conduct the forum just seven days into assuming the defence portfolio.
The event was clearly not put together in seven days, he said, but was the outcome of a year's worth of work by an entire team that included Mindef, the Singapore Armed Forces and other agencies.
'That is the beauty of the Singapore system - that it goes beyond the dependence on a single personality,' he said.
He added that a remark made during the ministerial roundtable discussions that resonated with him was the phrase 'freedom is not free'.
This was a powerful reminder that freedom requires commitment - both across political cycles, and in investments into people and capabilities, he said.
Besides budgetary resources, freedom also requires public support for defence, and rising to meet new troubles and challenges, he added.
'If we have the commitment to seek peace (and) to work on building those relationships and trust, then I'm more confident, that we can overcome the challenges by finding solutions.'
- Hariz Baharudin is a correspondent at The Straits Times covering politics.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel
China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel

Straits Times

time7 hours ago

  • Straits Times

China's grip on rare earths gives President Xi leverage in US trade duel

Workers at the Magnequench Company make magnetic powders and products using rare earth metals in Tianjin, China. PHOTO: SIM CHI YIN/NYTIMES BEIJING – After the US and China agreed in Geneva to lower tariffs from astronomical heights, tensions are now surging over access to chips and rare earths. And Beijing increasingly appears to have an edge. President Donald Trump on May 30 accused China of violating the agreement struck in May, and sought a call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to sort things out. The main sticking point appears to be critical minerals, with US officials complaining Beijing hadn't sped up exports needed for cutting-edge electronics. The US has said the decision to reduce tariffs hinged on a Chinese agreement to lift export controls on some rare earths. 'It's going to require a discussion between the presidents of the two countries,' Deputy US Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said on June 2 in a brief interview with Bloomberg Television. A US administration official said on June 2 it was likely the leaders would speak this week. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Mr Faulkender added the US and China 'continue to have conversations' and Trump administration officials are urging their counterparts 'to fulfill the obligations that they made in Geneva to unlock those exports.' As China keeps constraints on metals critical to America's national security, Washington is ramping up its own tech restrictions. Over the past three weeks, the US has barred the shipping of critical jet engine parts to China, throttled Beijing's access to chip-design software and slapped fresh curbs on Huawei Technologies chips. That's sparked anger in world's second-largest economy. Chinese officials on June 2 vowed to respond and accused the US of undermining the Geneva consensus, dimming the chance of a leaders call. The dispute has the potential to endanger the fragile trade truce between Washington and Beijing. In theory, tariffs could snap back to more than 100 per cent after the 90-day negotiating period. It's uncertain if the spat over export curbs will derail relations. Mr Trump has incentive to avoid that, after the US economy shrank at the start of the year and markets panicked under the weight of huge tariffs. For years, Washington was believed to have the advantage over China in the fight for technological dominance thanks to its grip on semiconductor supply chains. Mr Xi has shown he's ready to fight back, in part by tightening controls over critical minerals in a bid to force the US into easing its restrictions. While the Trump administration has shown little sign of relenting on chip curbs, it has quickly discovered replacing China as a supplier of rare earths could take years and cause pain for key industries. The Asian nation produces almost 70 per cent of the world's metals crucial for making fighter jets, nuclear reactor control rods and other critical technology. China is gaining ground in the standoff, according to Mr Cory Combs, associate director at consultancy Trivium China who specialises in supply chains. Washington is still a decade away from securing rare earths independently from Beijing, while Chinese firms have developed capable alternatives to most US chips, he said. 'China's leverage is more durable than a lot of the US leverage at this stage,' he added. 'I'm not sure if this works out well for the US.' Supply-chain warfare As part of the agreement struck in Switzerland, China promised to remove or suspend 'non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States' after Mr Trump announced punitive duties in April. The Chinese government did not elaborate on what that entailed. Rare-earth exporters must apply for permits from the Ministry of Commerce. That process is opaque and difficult to verify, allowing officials to turn it on and off again with little visibility from the outside world. The paperwork involved has caused hold-ups, which are only now showing signs of easing. 'We are seeing some approvals come through – certainly slower than industry would like,' said Mr Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system.' For some US firms, the metals can't flow fast enough. Ford Motor temporarily shuttered a factory in Chicago last month because it ran short of rare earth components. At a long-running US defence aviation conference Mr Combs recently attended, rare earths were a top talking point. Attendees took the threat 'very seriously,' he said. Such concerns show why export controls have become a central pillar of China's supply-chain warfare: They can hurt US industries while causing little harm at home. Tariffs, in comparison, can be costly both for Chinese manufacturers and consumers. Giving Mr Xi even greater leverage, the impact of China's rare earths controls aren't limited to American importers. India's largest electric scooter maker, Bajaj Auto, warned last week that the country's vehicle production will take a hit as early as July if China doesn't resume shipments. 'Supplies and stocks are getting depleted as we speak,' said the firm's executive director Rakesh Sharma. Over 30 such applications have been made for shipping to Indian companies – and none have been approved so far, Mr Sharma added. Companies from another large Asian importer only started getting permits last week, according to an official from the country who asked not to be named. China's squeeze on all countries highlights another risk for Mr Trump: Strategic US sectors, such as batteries and semiconductors, depend on South Korea and Japan for components. If Beijing cuts off those US allies from rare earths, American firms could face even more pain. Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa called rare earths 'undoubtedly a critical theme for economic security,' after emerging on May 30 from his latest round of trade negotiations with US counterparts. Next battleground Critical minerals were flagged as the next battleground in US-China ties at the height of Mr Trump's first trade war, when Mr Xi visited one of his country's biggest permanent magnet producers – a trip widely seen as an implied threat. In July 2023, Beijing followed through by slapping export curbs on gallium and germanium – minerals used to make semiconductors – after the US sought to restrict China's access to artificial intelligence chips. Recognising the danger, the US Department of Defence has pledged to develop a complete mine-to-magnet rare earth supply chain for all domestic defense needs by 2027. A lack of commercially viable natural reserves, few engineers trained in the extraction process and limited numbers of companies able to compete at the industry's thin price margins are just some of the challenges the department faces. Catching up will also depend on how deeply Washington is willing to spend. Mr Trump is already tapping foreign capital. During the president's trip in May to the Middle East, MP Materials Corp – the sole US producer of rare earths – signed a deal with Saudi Arabia's top mining firm to develop a supply chain. The US could also intensify cooperation with Australia's Lynas Rare Earths Ltd – the largest producer of separated rare earths outside of China, although that operation still sends some of its oxides to the Asian nation for refining. While capacity is building in Brazil, South Africa, Japan and Vietnam, they can't offer an immediate fix for US firms. Beijing hasn't exhausted its leverage. Restrictions so far have targeted medium- and heavy-rare earths, which are concentrated in defense applications. Weaponising light rare earths – such as neodymium and praseodymium – could deal an even bigger blow to the US economy, as they're more widespread in consumer goods. For now, Mr Xi is unlikely to pursue the most extreme options as it could invite blowback from vulnerable industries, said Neil Thomas, a fellow for Chinese politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis. 'Beijing's controls on rare earths are a warning against further escalation,' he added. 'But if US-China tensions worsen again, then Beijing may start to inflict real pain on US defense supply chains.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Singapore Minister: Bridge ties with China now or risk dangerous misunderstandings
Singapore Minister: Bridge ties with China now or risk dangerous misunderstandings

Independent Singapore

time18 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

Singapore Minister: Bridge ties with China now or risk dangerous misunderstandings

SINGAPORE: The city-state's new Defense Minister Chan Chun Sing delivered a clear call for profound involvement and collaboration between China, the United States, and regional countries, cautioning that worldwide confidence and stability are contingent on sincere discussions and genuine negotiation, not hot air and inflated language. Speaking after the yearly Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defence conference initiated by the International Institute of Strategic Studies, Chan stressed that 'every opportunity possible' should be seized to foster meaningful conversations among global powers, Breaking Defense reported. 'Having spoken with both the US and the Chinese, I think both sides will benefit from a deeper understanding of each other's positions,' Chan said at a media session on Sunday. 'This way, we don't oversimplify complex issues or seek simplistic solutions.' But Chan highlighted that such discussions must go beyond superficial peacekeeping or mediation. 'It must be a true dialogue—one where both sides actively listen, not merely speak past each other,' he said. Pointing to U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's comments that Washington is not pursuing conflict or government change in China, Chan said such explanations were 'very useful' in dissipating distrust. 'There are certain perceptions on both sides,' he clarified. 'But both must clearly state their bottom lines to build mutual trust and confidence.' His remarks came hours after his speech during the summit meeting's concluding plenary assembly, where he responded to a question from a Chinese People's Liberation Army representative, who voiced out concerns over what he labelled as recurring assaults on China during the summit meeting. 'If China feels misunderstood or disrespected, then it is even more important for China to step forward and articulate its stance,' Chan said. 'The Shangri-La Dialogue is exactly the kind of platform where China can do that.' China's subdued presence at this year's summit drew attention, with the country sending a lower-level team led by Rear Admiral Hu Gangfeng, vice president of China's National Defense University. Particularly, Beijing capered its customary post-speech press meeting, choosing instead to issue a scathing statement condemning Secretary Hegseth for making offensive remarks and making China look like a menace. See also Heroes on the front lines of battle against Wuhan virus outbreak As a former army chief turned minister, Chan utilised his speech to highlight Singapore's long-standing position: that tiny states must be permitted to flourish under an international order that is founded on transnational law and shared esteem. 'Singapore will stand on the side of principles,' he professed. 'We support a global economic and security system where all states—large or small—have the right to compete, cooperate, and improve lives through trade, not war.' Chan also delivered a warning note against nations that take one-sided steps in the name of national security. While he accepted the predisposition to value one's safety, he foretold the risk in ignoring long-held standards. 'If there is no trust in nations abiding by shared rules, the pursuit of security could trigger a vicious cycle—where seeking protection by one state leads to heightened insecurity in others,' he stated. With pressures festering in the Indo-Pacific and major powers steering a fluctuating global environment, Chan's message was clear: discussions and negotiations, not disconnection or conflict, are the only route to long-term armistice. See also Thai king fires royal guards for 'adultery'

Taking sides, without context, 'breeds irrelevance': Chan Chun Sing on global order and security, Singapore News
Taking sides, without context, 'breeds irrelevance': Chan Chun Sing on global order and security, Singapore News

AsiaOne

time20 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

Taking sides, without context, 'breeds irrelevance': Chan Chun Sing on global order and security, Singapore News

In a fragmenting global security and economic order, taking sides blindly can make a country irrelevant, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) on Sunday (June 1). Minister Chan was speaking at the sixth and final plenary of the 22nd SLD on the topic of enhancing security co-operation for a stable Asia-Pacific alongside Papua New Guinea Defence Minister Billy Joseph and Sweden Defence Minister Pål Jonson. "For Singapore, we believe that taking sides, regardless of issues and context, breeds irrelevance," Chan stated, adding that if we must choose sides, he hopes that it will be the side of principles. These principles are ones that "uphold a global order, where we do not descend into the law of the jungle, where the mighty do what they wish and the weak suffer what they must", he explained. "Singapore will choose the side of principles that promote a more integrated global economic and security order underpinned by international law and sovereign equality." 'For the common good' In this global order, states, regardless of size, will have a fair chance to compete and improve the lives of people through trade, he also explained. Chan further emphasised Singapore's stance that all states have agency and responsibilities to uphold the global order. This, he explained, is why Singapore works with "like-minded partners", making connections "for the common good". "Any functioning global rules-based economic and security order must be able to address the emerging challenges of the day and the challenges of tomorrow," he stressed. "Openness and inclusivity are important, because all stakeholders must feel that they have a voice in shaping the rules." He also pledged that Singapore would work alongside Asean to raise awareness and develop principles to "facilitate defence co-operation on critical underwater infrastructure security in our region". [[nid:717748]] Addressing those present, Chan stated: "To all the powers of the world: the greater one's power, the greater is one's responsibility. "All great powers can choose to demonstrate the power of its example, or you can choose to demonstrate the example of its power. We all have a choice to make." Don't go it alone, Chan Chun Sing warns In his speech, Chan also highlighted the need to co-operate with others instead of "going alone". He explained that prioritising individual security isn't wrong, but must be done alongside a commitment to international laws and norms. If there is no trust between countries to act in accordance with these laws and norms, individual security could come at the expense of the insecurity of others, Chan said. "'My security first should not become 'my security only'," he warned. "Otherwise, we all fall victim to the Prisoners' Dilemma, where the pursuit of self-interest leads to less ideal outcomes, both individually and collectively." A Prisoners' Dilemma refers to a logical paradox where individuals pursue their own self-interests, inadvertently causing a less optimal outcome for everyone across the board. Chan then shared the importance of domestic confidence, citing US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said that credible deterrence starts at home. "International co-operation and effective diplomacy must also start with domestic confidence," he said. "Externalising one's domestic issues cannot be the solution to one's domestic challenges." Conversely, it is domestic cohesion, policy coherence and leadership continuity that builds credibility, Chan stated. "Domestic security and external security must be mutually reinforcing… Political and military leaders must arrest the instinct or temptation to go at it alone when they feel insecure. Only then can we avoid conflict and keep the peace," added Chan. [[nid:716881]] khooyihang@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store