
Pentagon details US strike on Iran nuclear site as Pete Hegseth attacks the press
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites had been "a resounding success', angrily pushing back against the 'fake news' media for questioning how effective the attacks were.
President Donald Trump and his administration are furious after a preliminary assessment suggested the attacks may not have fully destroyed Iran's nuclear facilities. The report was leaked to the press.
'President Trump directed the most complex and secretive military operation in history," Mr Hegseth told the press at the Pentagon. "And it was a resounding success, resulting in a ceasefire agreement and the end of the 12-day war."
Gen Dan Caine, US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the press conference that experts had spent 15 years developing the technology to attack Fordow and other Iranian nuclear bases.
He said the GBU-57, the 13.6-tonne munition dropped from B-2 stealth bombers on Saturday, was designed to burrow into the Fordow site and explode when deep underground.
Experts 'accomplished hundreds of test shots and dropped many full-scale weapons against extremely realistic targets for a single purpose – kill this target at the time and place of our nation's choosing', Gen Caine said.
The bombs do not leave a large crater as they explode far below the surface, he said, noting the weapons had flown down three ventilation shafts and all exploded as planned.
Mr Hegseth lambasted the Pentagon press corps for reporting on the initial assessment that suggested the US strikes on Fordow might not have fully "obliterated" Fordow.
'It's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump,' he said. 'It's almost personal when we see the way in which leaks are used to try to disparage the outcome or muddy the waters about the impact of what happened.'
He said that during the early stages of the bomb's development, the military had so many experts working on the programme doing modelling and simulation "that we were quietly and in a secret way, the biggest users of supercomputer hours within the United States of America".
The pilots of the bombers involved in the weekend strikes described the flash after the bomb drop as 'the brightest explosion they had ever seen', Gen Caine said.
A convoy of lorries photographed outside Fordow ahead of the strikes has led to speculation some of the enriched uranium was moved to another site before it could be destroyed.
Asked whether this was the case, Mr Hegseth acknowledged that the Pentagon was "looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where.
"I'm not aware of any intelligence that says things were not where they were supposed to be,' or that they were moved, Mr Hegseth said.
President Trump later said on Truth Social that the vehicles "at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts".
"Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!" he wrote.
Gen Caine also described how US troops at Al Udeid Airbase had defended against an Iranian missile attack on Monday.
He said about 44 American service members responsible for defending the entire base were present as rounds of Patriot missiles were launched.
Gen Caine said Qatar joined in the successful defence of what he called the largest single Patriot engagement in US military history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Pro-Palestinian activists in Japan want to avoid repeat of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Their cause was thrust into the spotlight after US President Trump compared strikes on Iran to Second World War bombings


Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Iran: Non-cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog is now law, says FM
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that a bill suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog was now "binding" after being passed by lawmakers and approved by a top vetting body. "The bill that was approved by (parliament) and has been approved by the Guardian Council today... is binding on us and there is no doubt about its implementation," he told state television. "From now on, our relationship and cooperation with the (International Atomic Energy) Agency will take a new form." On June 25, Iran's parliament approved a bill to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, state-affiliated news outlet Nournews reported. The move follows an air war with Israel in which Iran's longtime enemy said it wanted to prevent Tehran developing a nuclear weapon. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by state media as also saying Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme. The Iranian body tasked with vetting the legislation, the Guardian Council, approved the bill on Thursday, citing the recent US and Israeli strikes. Tehran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says an IAEA resolution this month declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks. Qalibaf was quoted as saying the IAEA had refused even to appear to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and "has put its international credibility up for sale." He said that "for this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the Agency until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and move at a faster pace with the country's peaceful nuclear programme." The full extent of the damage done to nuclear sites during the Israeli attacks and US bombing of underground Iranian nuclear facilities is not yet clear.


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran's conditions for US talks, and nuclear damage
Iran has made its conditions for a return to nuclear talks clear. Conflicting reports blur the scope of damage to Iran's nuclear assets. The World Bank is extending about $400 million to Lebanon and Syria. On today's episode of Trending Middle East: This episode features Lizzie Porter, Turkey Correspondent; Sarmad Khan, Assistant Business Editor; and Thomas Harding, Security and Policy Editor.