Call to axe Sheriffhall Roundabout support beaten
A push to axe the council's support for a controversial upgrade to a congested city roundabout has been snuffed out by the city's transport boss.
Plans to upgrade the busy Sheriffhall Roundabout, the only flat junction on the bypass, have been in the works since 2018, but work has not yet started on the project.
At a committee meeting yesterday, the city's Green group made a bid to cut the council's support for the flyover, saying money could be better spent elsewhere.
It was rebuffed by the city's transport leader, although he admitted building new infrastructure on the city bypass was not 'ultimately' the solution to increased traffic caused by population growth in the Lothians.
While the bypass is Transport Scotland's responsibility, cutting the council's support would have sent a strong message of dissatisfaction with the project to Holyrood.
Greens, both at the council and in the Scottish Parliament, have long opposed the flyover on the grounds that it could cause induced demand – the phenomenon by which adding more road infrastructure in an area can cause more people to start driving.
They say that money should instead be spent on improving public transport links and building infrastructure to allow for more walking and cycling.
Councillor Kayleigh Kinross-O'Neill, the Greens co-leader, said: 'Congestion is a human issue, no matter where and what it is, that unfortunately needs human-led behaviour change.
'We note the issues faced, and think we should be moving away from the conversation of the roads and staying on the path – no pun intended – of priortising walking, wheeling and cycling, and reducing car dependency.
'Totally appreciate that Sheriffhall is above all of us, and we're still awaiting the results of the public local inquiry. However we're all pretty tired of waiting, and we know there are better ways money could be spent across the region.'
Cllr Kinross-O'Neill said some possible options could be putting money towards the trams, more park and rides and expanded bus lanes in the capital.
She continued to say: 'We request that we withdraw the favour and support of the scheme, [or] any sort of waste of time road improvements that would cause congestion, not tackle it.'
The exchange came as part of a debate over a motion by Conservative councillor Neil Cuthbert calling for action on congestion on the city bypass, as well as modelling on what future traffic could look like on the road.
Edinburgh's Green group added their request to scrap support for the flyover as an amendment to the motion.
Transport and Environment Committee convener Stephen Jenkinson moved no action on Cllr Cuthbert's motion, which also eliminated the Green amendment.
He said: 'One of the main reasons that there are times where the bypass does get congested – and it does get congested, from time to time I am stuck on it – It's as much to do with population growth, not only in Edinburgh, but predominantly in East Lothian, which has increased the traffic on the bypass.
'So how do you tackle it? I don't think that building a flyover is ultimately the solution. What you have to do is actually do things to do what you can to remove the traffic, to get it back to norms.
'So public transport solutions, like tram, potentially bus rapid transport links to East Lothian and Midlothian, are the long term solutions in regards to giving the people using the bypass an alternative option.'
The debate over the flyover comes amid wider questions over the future of the project.
A need for it was identified 17 years ago, and in 2018 it was included in the Edinburgh and South East Scotland city region deal, which put £120 million towards the project.
But it has lumbered along slowly through the planning process, with more than 2,700 objections to its construction leading to an inquiry.
Though it was submitted in October of 2023, the Scottish Government is still reviewing the inquiry's report.
Earlier this month, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop told MSPs that she is waiting on advice from senior Scottish Government officials on the next steps for the project.
She added that she was unable to provide a timeline for when action would be taken.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Will the SNP give more than warm words to help Scottish journalism?
This week's Behind the Headlines comes from content editor Xander Elliards. To receive the newsletter direct to your inbox every week for free, click here. IT is easier to learn about Scotland's green hydrogen industry from German television than from UK broadcasters, Culture Secretary Angus Robertson told a room of journalists and editors at Holyrood on Thursday. The remark was a stark reflection on the state of Scotland's media – one that grew sharper as Robertson continued. The SNP minister, himself a former BBC journalist, lamented the near-absence of foreign correspondents with regular slots in Scottish newspapers, saying he could count them 'on one finger' – a reference to The National's David Pratt. He acknowledged the broader crisis: Shrinking resources, job cuts, and a media landscape struggling under commercial pressures. A meeting was held in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday to discuss the fledgling Scottish Public Interest Journalism Institute (Image: Gordon Terris) 'Cuts, shrinkages to the industry – they've all had significant wider impacts on our institutions, culture, and society,' he said. 'Nevertheless, it's heartening to hear about the potential of the new institute and how it could be utilised to help support and preserve our independent publications and local titles and to ensure that we have an industry well into the future.' Robertson's reference was to the fledgling Scottish Public Interest Journalism Institute (SPIJI), which is set to officially launch next month (or thereabouts). SPIJI was recommended by the Scottish Government's own Public Interest Journalism Working Group – formed in 2021 to tackle the pandemic-era and structural threats facing Scottish newsrooms. Chaired by The National's founding editor Richard Walker, the institute aims to follow models such as the Dutch Journalism Fund: An arm's-length, state-backed body that invests in media as a democratic necessity. READ MORE: Seamus Logan: Using an election as plebiscite referendum is just not going to fly But progress has been slow, not least because the SNP have been reticent to give the group anything more than warm words. Back in 2022, when the idea was supported by the Scottish Government, Robertson said: 'We want to do all we can to support the sustainability and diversity of public interest journalism in Scotland and we will be working closely with industry stakeholders to see how an institute could help to ensure the sector remains resilient.' All they can, it seems, except put their money where their mouth is. At the meeting in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday, an array of Scottish writers, from freelancers and researchers to editors and reporters, spoke frankly about the state of the industry. One contributor described a vicious cycle: Falling print sales trigger cost-cutting and staff losses, quality declines, prices rise, readers abandon ship, and the spiral deepens. READ MORE: Assa Samake-Roman: We need to look at where our money vanishes to The cause is no mystery: Shareholders' pockets need to be lined, and public service journalism suffers. SPIJI offers an alternative. Its goal is to support local and independent journalism in ways commercial executives won't, and to defend Scotland's democracy by ensuring its citizens are informed. Because when the media falters, democratic accountability weakens. That's why the SNP's inaction on this matters. It is not enough to simply acknowledge the problem. If the Scottish Government truly believes a strong Scottish media is essential to a strong Scottish democracy, then it must do more than make speeches. It must fund that future. Our media needs more than warm words. It needs investment. Without it, who will tell Scotland's story?
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future as 50 more turbines
Three new planning applications — totalling 50 turbines up to 200 metres high — were lodged this week for sites at Glen Ullinish, Ben Sca, and Balmeanach. The developments add to the growing number of wind energy proposals across the island, with more than 130 turbines now either operational, approved, or awaiting consent. The timing of the new applications has drawn sharp criticism from community members already engaged in the inquiry over the Ben Aketil Wind Farm repowering. That project, led by developer Nadara, would double the height of existing turbines and extend the operational lifespan of the site. At the public hearing earlier this week, Highland Tory councillor Ruraidh Stewart said the pace and scale of development was putting serious pressure on local authorities and communities. 'I was really speaking on behalf of the community, saying that a lot of people had contacted me about this development as it came through the process. Public speaking isn't a natural thing for many — they don't want to get involved in inquiries, he said in an interview with The National after the session. 'What they're proposing for Ben Aketil is 200-metre wind turbines. That's hard to visualise with no context — but for comparison, that's about the height of the observation deck of The Shard. 'Putting something like that in the middle of Skye is just, by and large, inappropriate. I made the comparison in the inquiry: Skye is the second most visited tourist destination in all of Scotland, only behind Edinburgh. 'If someone proposed putting wind turbines on top of Arthur's Seat, they'd be laughed out of a planning meeting.' READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Highlanders are rallying against Scotland's energy land grab Landowners and campaigners have also raised doubts over the promised benefits of repowering. Charles MacDonald, who owns land near the Ben Aketil site, told the inquiry that developers were overstating local gains, revealing that no jobs had been promised. He shared that he had turned down three separate wind farm offers. Each company had made it clear that the construction phase wouldn't involve any local labour — workers would be brought in, complete the job, and leave. Just 1.2 maintenance positions are expected to be delivered from the repowerment at Ben Aketil. Campaigner Thor Klein (below), who attended this week's hearings, echoed that frustration. 'You've got consultants giving expert testimony who haven't even visited Skye. One of the cultural heritage experts admitted her whole report was done from a desk.' He said the inquiry revealed a 'lack of preparedness' by developers, and called on Scottish ministers to pause new approvals until a full review of the Scotland's energy strategy can be completed. 'Even the applicant had to admit there's no comprehensive plan connecting these various wind farm projects,' Klein said. 'That lack of oversight is frankly shocking. We're facing a massive infrastructure transformation, but there's no roadmap. This leaves local councils like Highland Council completely overwhelmed, because corporations push multiple developments simultaneously, hoping something sticks. 'It's not a sustainable governance model, and I hope the reporter takes note of that.' He also said there was 'little to no community benefit'. Nadara, the developer behind Ben Aketil, has claimed that its existing wind farm has delivered £700,000 in community benefits. But critics argue that amounts to just £1685 per megawatt—far below the Scottish Government's non-binding benchmark of £5000 per MW set in 2014. READ MORE: 53 community councils unite to demand Highland energy projects pause Stewart, who is also a crofter, noted the community was disillusioned with the process, but said he was glad to see so many locals attending the sessions throughout the week. 'By and large, the majority of the community opposes it. But there's a real disillusionment with the process. 'From what I've heard, the council, who objected, and the Skye Wind Information Group, who instructed their own experts, made very compelling points for refusal. 'But there's still doubt whether those views will be meaningfully considered. 'Look at the Ackron Wind Farm decision in East Sutherland. The government reporter recommended refusal, but Scottish ministers approved it anyway. 'There's a disconnect — a lack of trust that even after participating in the process, communities will be heard.' Originally the council objected due to peatland impact, in line with another statutory body. The developers then reconfigured the turbine layout to avoid some peat areas, and those objections were withdrawn. Stewart believes that on paper, the peat restoration plans sound reasonable. But the best protection for peat 'is not damaging it in the first place,' he said. 'Especially when so much of this power might never reach the market. Digging up thousands of tonnes of peatland in the name of green energy doesn't sit right with me. 'Peatland is vital for ecosystems, carbon storage, and climate resilience. 'The first Ben Aketil wind farm was supposed to operate for 33 years — now, 18 years in, they're digging it up and starting again. 'It happens time and again as turbines get bigger — they just dig up more.' Residents have also raised fears over infrastructure, emergency planning, and fire risk. Turbine components would arrive via the pier at Kyle of Lochalsh and travel by truck to remote sites on Skye. But Klein said there were no detailed transport plans provided yet — only verbal assurances. 'We're talking about massive vehicles on single-track roads,' he said. 'And no one has explained how they'll deal with emergencies—especially fires at battery storage sites, which local fire services are not equipped to handle.' Looking Ahead With more projects entering the planning system each week, residents fear a tipping point is approaching. 'Right now, there are three more applications on the table—this week alone,' said Klein. 'That's another 50 turbines. It's too much, too fast, with too little oversight.' As the volume of projects increases, pressure is growing on Scottish ministers to intervene. Both campaigners and councillors are calling for a coordinated national strategy that balances renewable energy goals with the protection of local communities and landscapes. 'I'm not against wind turbines or anything like that,' Klein said. 'it's really crucial to ask for a pause — to evaluate, think it through, and then make decisions. 'Because you're overwhelming local democratically elected bodies. It's a big danger."
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Rod Stewart speaks in support of Reform UK and Nigel Farage
The former Faces frontman came out in support of the hard-right party leader in an interview with The Times ahead of his set in the 'legends slot' at Glastonbury on Sunday. The London-born Stewart, who is known for playing up his Scottish heritage, was asked where he saw the UK's political future heading. He said: 'It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me. But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. READ MORE: Nigel Farage branded 'clown' as he suggests scrapping Barnett formula 'For instance, I've read about [Prime Minister Keir] Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. 'We're fed up with the Tories. 'We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well.' He added: 'What options have we got? I know some of his family, I know his brother, and I quite like him.' Asked what Farage stood for other than 'Brexit, tightened immigration policies and unrealistic economic promises', the singer said: 'Yeah, yeah. But Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. 'Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.' The remarks signal a stark departure from Stewart's previous attacks on Farage. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage pictured during a visit to ScotlandIn 2024, after the Reform UK leader suggested that the West and Nato were to blame for Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Stewart said: 'I'm outraged and dumbfounded that Farage blames the West for the war – is he suggesting that Nato is the aggressor here? 'Nato's purpose is to guarantee the freedom and security of its members through political and military means, not to start a war on paranoid [Vladimir] Putin's Russia. 'Shame on you Nigel." In a previous interview ahead of his Glastonbury set, Stewart revealed that his former Faces bandmate Ronnie Wood will join him on stage and said he will have three different guests coming on, plus an orchestra. 'I'm really looking forward to it,' he added. 'And it is a different gig. It's like when you're playing a cup final: you're trying to treat it like another game. But, of course, it's not. It's special. 'It'll be glamorous, it'll be sexy. 'And we've got a little orchestra coming on to play with us. And we may have some bagpipes.' Stewart's best known solo songs include Da Ya Think I'm Sexy?, Every Beat Of My Heart, and Maggie May.
