Top FDA Official Discloses She Never Received COVID-19 Vaccine
A top Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official said on May 15 that she never took a COVID-19 vaccine due to concerns about biodistribution.
Dr. Sara Brenner, the FDA's principal deputy commissioner, said during an event in Washington that she did not receive any of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Brenner said that she was pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic.
'It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were, and in my case, in particular, what the excretion would be in breast milk,' Brenner said. 'That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about.'
When asked whether the information that has emerged since then validates her choice, Brenner, who said she was not speaking on behalf of the FDA, said she thinks it does.
Researchers reported in a 2022 paper that messenger ribonucleic acid, which is in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots, was detected in human breast milk. Another paper, in 2023, detailed similar findings.
Pfizer and Moderna did not return requests for comment.
Dr. Marty Makary, the FDA's commissioner, has been critical of COVID-19 vaccine boosters. He has indicated that he received a primary series of one of the vaccines.
Click here to read more…
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Philippines warns of health emergency as HIV cases soar
AFP | Manila, Philippines Philippine medical authorities on Tuesday warned of a looming "public health emergency" as HIV infections have soared this year, with young males especially hard-hit. On average, 57 new cases a day were tallied in the country of 117 million people over the first three months of 2025, a 50 percent jump from a year earlier, health department data shows. "We now have the highest number of new cases here in the Western Pacific," Health Secretary Ted Herbosa said in a video message released Tuesday. "What is frightening is, our youth make up many of the new cases," he said. "It would be in our interest to (declare) a public health emergency, a national emergency for HIV to mobilise the entire society, the whole of government to help us in this campaign to reduce the number of new HIV cases," Herbosa added. The health department said 95 percent of newly reported cases were male, with 33 percent aged 15-24 and 47 percent aged 25-34. The government did not explain the causes behind the surge, which it said had set back government attempts to hit global targets set by a United Nations campaign to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. Under Philippine law, the president can declare a health emergency if an epidemic poses a threat to national security. The start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 was the last time that was done. Just 55 percent of those living with HIV in the Philippines have been diagnosed, the health department said, while only 66 percent of those diagnosed are on life-saving antiretroviral therapy. Sexual contact remains the predominant mode of transmission, with the bulk of cases since 2007 attributed to men having sex with men. HIV cases have been on the rise in the Philippines since 2021, with 252,800 people estimated to be living with HIV in the country by the end of this year.
Gulf Insider
3 days ago
- Gulf Insider
China Schools Isolate Students Amid COVID Surge
Doctors and residents across China continue to report more infections and deaths as the latest wave of COVID-19 continues, portraying a far more severe situation than the Chinese regime is letting on. Schools in various provinces are reportedly suspending classes and placing students in quarantine, leading to growing concerns among the public of a return of lockdowns, according to information provided to the Chinese language version of The Epoch Times and on social media.A 'home quarantine notice'—issued by a primary school in Guangzhou and circulated by Chinese netizens on China's TikTok equivalent, Douyin, before it was posted to social media platform X on May 26 before CCP censors could delete it—has attracted widespread attention. The notice said that a third grade student was ordered to undergo quarantine for seven days after being diagnosed with COVID-19. After the quarantine period, health certificates from a clinic and community health service agency were required for the student to return to school. Schools in Shaanxi and Jiangsu also suspended classes after some students exhibited fevers, which were suspected to be COVID-19 infections. The Chinese communist regime's official data show that the COVID-19 infection rate doubled in April, with 168,507 cases, including 340 severe cases and nine deaths. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) said that infection rates in China's southern provinces were higher than those in the north. Chinese state media Xinhua reported on May 28 that, according to health officials, the upward trend of COVID-19 infections has slowed, and in most provinces the epidemic has reached a peak or is on a downward trend. However, residents across the country told The Epoch Times that the situation is far worse and that official data continue to not match their lived experience. Because of the CCP's history of covering up information and publishing unreliable data, including the underreporting of COVID-19 infections and related deaths since early 2020, accounts from local medical doctors and residents can offer valuable information for understanding the situation on the ground in the totalitarian country. Kang Hong, a doctor at a clinic in Guangzhou city in China's south who used a pseudonym for safety concerns, told The Epoch Times on May 29 that most of those infected with COVID-19 in this wave have been adults, although it has also affected children. 'Their symptoms are far more severe than the common cold,' including the white-lung symptom often seen in COVID-19 patients, he said. Kang said that most patients came to the clinic for cold symptoms and fevers. They are not being tested for COVID-19 'because hospitals in China had not conducted large-scale nucleic acid testing for a long time because it was worried about causing social panic,' he said. Many patients are also unwilling to take a COVID-19 test, Kang said, 'because they know they are infected with the COVID-19 [based on their symptoms] and were unwilling to spend more than 100 yuan [about $13.90] for testing.' He said that a doctor in a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, where his daughter works, has died from COVID-19 in recent days. 'It's a senior doctor who only got tested when his symptoms became serious, and the result was COVID-19,' Kang said. Although COVID-19 infections have increased, the local health bureau has told doctors that they do not need to report confirmed cases, he said. Click here to read more Also read: Covid Vaccine for Children and Pregnant Women Removed From Recommended Immunization Schedule
Gulf Insider
3 days ago
- Gulf Insider
COVID Vaccine Removed for Kids, Pregnant Women
On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women were officially removed from the CDC's immunization schedule. 'Hi, everybody. I'm Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., your HHS secretary. And I'm here today with NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. I couldn't be more pleased to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule.' It was an unmistakable shift away from coercive one-size-fits-all medicine, and a clear signal that data, not politics, is now leading the conversation. On Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a historic course correction from the Biden-era vaccine policy. Standing alongside NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy announced that COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking points. When host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch. 'Can you clearly state what the policy is? Because this is confusing,' she asked. Makary responded without hesitation: 'Yeah, we believe the recommendation should be with a patient and their doctor.' That's when the real shift came into focus. 'So we're going to get away from these blanket recommendations in healthy young Americans.' 'On the COVID vaccine schedule, we don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth COVID booster shot.' 'We don't see the data there to support a young, healthy child getting a repeat infinite annual COVID vaccine.' He then laid out the sheer absurdity of where the old policy was heading. 'There's a theory that we should sort of blindly approve the new COVID boosters in young, healthy kids every year in perpetuity, and a young girl born today should get 80 COVID mRNA shots or other COVID shots in her average lifespan.' 'We're saying that's a theory, and we'd like to check in and get some randomized controlled data. It's been about four years since the original randomized trials. So we'd like an evidence based approach.' And then came the knockout line—delivered with facts no one could deny. 'That is a decision between a parent and their doctor—I don't know if you know these statistics, but 88% of American kids, their parents have said no to the COVID shot last season. So America, the vast majority of Americans are saying no.' Today, Dr. Marty Makary took the fight straight into the lion's den—appearing on CBS to dismantle the network's go-to vaccine talking host Margaret Brennan tried to paint the updated guidance as confusing, Makary didn't flinch.'Can you clearly state what the… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk. 'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they looked healthy,' she said. 'And COVID was serious for them.' But Makary was ready. Calm and precise, he dismantled the claim with surgical clarity. 'So first of all, we know the CDC data is contaminated with a lot of false positives from incidental positive COVID tests with routine testing of every kid that walks in the hospital.' 'We know that data historically under the Biden administration did not distinguish being sick from COVID or an incidental positive COVID test.' He shared what he's heard from the people who actually run the ICUs in America. 'When you go to an ICU in America and you ask how many people are in the ICU that are healthy, that are sick with COVID? The answer I get again, again is we haven't seen that in a year or years.' That's why, he warned, making universal recommendations based on flawed data isn't just wrong—it's dangerous. 'And so the worst thing you can do in public health is to put out an absolute universal recommendation in young, healthy kids.' 'And the vast majority of Americans are saying, no, we want to see some data. And you say, forget about the data, just get it anyway.' Brennan tried to shift gears—falling back on CDC data to argue that even healthy kids remained at risk.'So the CDC data said 41% of children aged 6 months to 17 years hospitalized with COVID between 2022 and 2024 did not have a known underlying condition. In other words, they… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 But it was the final exchange that landed like a sledgehammer. When Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker. 'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just rubberstamp EVERY single vaccine put in front of them.' He said the committee hadn't been focused on science, but on messaging and marketing. 'You look at the minutes of the last couple of years, they say, we want a simple message for everybody just so they can understand it. It was not a data based conversation. It was a conversation based on marketing and ease.' And without real evidence, he warned, these recommendations become little more than guesswork. 'If there's zero clinical data, you're opining. I mean—it's a theory.' 'And so we don't want to put out an absolute recommendation for kids, with no clinical data to support it.' The implication was unmistakable: public health decisions should be based on evidence and transparency—not rubber stamps and slogans. For the first time in years, someone on national television was calling out the system. But it was the final exchange that landed like a Brennan questioned why the HHS bypassed the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the new policy shift, Makary landed a haymaker.'That panel has been a kangaroo court where they just… — The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 1, 2025 Also read: Moderna Disables Comments On X Post Announcing New Covid Shot Amid Backlash
