Inquest for newborn baby Alby Spreadborough who died at Emerald Hospital
A coronial inquest will investigate the death of a baby boy at a Queensland hospital, following more than two years of advocacy from his grieving parents.
Bec Spreadborough's precious son Alby died at Emerald Hospital in February 2023, after an obstructed labour, which occurs when the baby cannot move through the birth canal.
In a statement to the ABC, Ms Spreadborough said the decision to proceed to a coronial inquest was an "enormous relief" for her family.
She said the coroner's report was disappointing and did not adequately investigate the factors leading to his death.
"That trust was deeply let down."
Queensland Attorney-General and Minister for Integrity Deb Frecklington said she directed the state coroner to hold an inquest after a meeting with Ms Spreadborough and her husband, Tim.
"The loss of any child is heartbreaking, and I hope this decision helps them to get the answers they need," she said.
Ms Frecklington's decision marks the second time in recent weeks she has used her powers to order an inquest, after complaints about the central coroner's reports.
Ms Spreadborough said it took the central coroner more than two years to deliver the findings, which found Alby's death was not preventable.
The coroner ruled the cause of death was an obstructed labour with a Bandl's ring.
A Bandl's ring is a rare complication where a ring of muscle constricts between the upper and lower sections of the uterus.
She said she had raised with hospital staff her desire to have a caesarean section several times during her labour, but alleged she was pressured to continue to have a vaginal birth.
In Queensland, there have been two coronial inquests, both in 2017, for babies who died with obstructed labour as a factor in their deaths.
In both cases, the state coroner recommended better education for hospital staff to identify obstructed labour.
Ms Spreadborough said she was concerned about the experts the coroner relied on for the report, as there was no neonatologist who could have assessed Alby's condition and the hospital's resuscitation efforts.
That is despite a previous review from the Central Queensland Health Service, which recommended the Emerald maternity team undertake regular emergency skill drills for neonatal resuscitation, among other measures.
Earlier this year, Queensland Health announced it was developing new clinical guidelines for obstructed and prolonged labour, following Ms Spreadborough's advocacy.
It is due to be completed in the second half of this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
32 minutes ago
- News.com.au
TGA announces investigation into Choice claims on sunscreen
Australia's medicines watchdog has confirmed it will investigate a report claiming several sunscreens did not offer the sun protection they advertised. Consumer group CHOICE delivered the report last week, claiming it had tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens and found 16 of them fell short of the protection they advertised. SPF stands for 'sun protection factor' and is the measure of how well the sunscreen protects a user from the sun's UV rays. An SPF 50 sunscreen is meant to block about 98 per cent of the rays, meaning it will take 50 times longer to get burnt than with unprotected skin. The consumer group tested the products with experts in an accredited sunscreen lab, with four products returning SPF results in the 40s, four in the 30s, and seven in the 20s. The popular brands tested include Banana Boat, Cancer Council and Bondi Sands sunscreens. In one example, the Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ tested at 28, while the Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube tested at 43. The Therapeutic Goods Administration has responded to the report and said it would investigate CHOICE's findings and take 'regulatory action as required'. 'Sunscreens with a primary purpose of UV protection are considered to be therapeutic goods and are regulated by us to ensure their safety, quality and efficacy,' the watchdog stated. 'It is a requirement under therapeutic legislation that statements on sunscreen labels are truthful and not misleading. 'It is also a legislative requirement that a sponsor of a therapeutic sunscreen product holds evidence that supports the SPF claim they make at the time they include the medicine in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. 'We will be investigating the CHOICE findings and will take regulatory action as required. 'We cannot comment on individual matters including whether products may be subject to investigation or compliance and enforcement activity, or the status of any such investigation and activity.' One skincare company that says it takes the testing of its products seriously has been criticised by users following the release of the CHOICE results. CHOICE said Ultra Violette's Australian Sunscreen's lean screen 50+ mattifying zinc sunscreen was tested and returned a result of just SPF4. The company, which sells its products at Sephora, shared an Instagram post last month boasting about how much it cost to test their 'skin screens.' 'Do you know how SPF is actually tested? Making our SKINSCREENS can cost up to $150K in testing alone (sorry to our CFO!!!)' the post stated. 'We take the integrity of our products pretty damn seriously – no cutting corners here. 'We ensure you have the best protection (from both UVA and UVB), *and* the added skincare benefits to match, no matter where in the world you are. Consumers were quick to respond to the report, with one customer claiming she used the product for three years and now has concerns about its effectiveness. 'Hey UV, I'm so worried about this report from CHOICE,' the customer replied on Instagram. Another customer said she had been 'badly burnt' using queen and supreme screens after reapplying the products and asked the company to stop selling them if they did not meet standards. Ultra Violette, which sell sunscreens between $27 and $77, has disputed CHOICE's findings. In a statement last week, the company said it was deeply committed to the health and safety of its customers and accused CHOICE of releasing misleading information to generate headlines. A spokesman said Ultra Violette only worked with reputable, TGA-licensed manufacturers who performed substantial quality release testing in accordance with the strictest SPF standards in the world. 'Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate,' a spokesman said in a statement. 'It is also essential to note here that the recognised authority governing sunscreens in Australia is the Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA), not CHOICE Magazine.' The company said it retested a batch of sunscreen when they found out about the Choice testing, and the results came back with an SPF reading of 61.7, which was above the 50+ threshold. 'CHOICE's recent retest only included 5 participants, where 2 results were considered non validated, resulting in a sample size of only 3,' the statement said. 'Over the past 4 years, we have conducted 3 different tests at independent labs vs. Choice's 1.3 tests.' A spokesman said if the CHOICE results represented the actual level of protection offered, they would have hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations. 'At Ultra Violette we take misleading claims made about our products very seriously,' the statement read. CHOICE chief executive officer Ashley de Silva said she stood by the test results. 'Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ product was first tested using a 10-person panel, in line with the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard,' she said. 'When the product returned a very low SPF of 4, we decided to test a new sample to confirm the result, using a five-person panel on a different batch at a different lab in Germany. 'The Ultra Violette product returned an SPF of 5 in this testing - an almost identical result. 'The additional testing is not a requirement of sunscreen testing standards, but an additional level of rigour and testing Choice decided to undertake to ensure the low SPF result for the Ultra Violette product was accurate.' Ms de Silva said the tests showed that products were not meeting consumer expectations. 'Consumers expect sunscreen to protect them in line with the SPF rating on the product, but as our testing has shown, the SPF label doesn't always match what's in the bottle,' he said. One sunscreen, Ultra Violette's lean screen SPF 50+ mattifying zinc skinscreen, returned a result of just SPF4. 'We were really shocked to see the results for Ultra Violette's lean screen SPF 50+ product, so much so that we actually decided to test a different batch at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results,' Mr de Silva said. 'Those tests found the product had an SPF of 5 – an almost identical result to our initial testing.' The consumer group was, however, quick to remind people that while a sunscreen may have ranked lower than claimed in its tests, that does not mean that products do not work. A sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or 20 can still give significant sun protection and is much better than using no sunscreen at all. The TGA said there could be 'variability' in SPF testing results across laboratories. 'Currently, the universally accepted methods of sunscreen SPF testing is using human subjects,' the watchdog said. 'It is a known issue that there is variability in SPF testing results across laboratories because testing on humans can be highly subjective and the response to a test can differ dramatically from one individual to another. 'While progress is being made internationally toward in-vitro sunscreen testing (not on human subjects), which will improve consistency of results, these methods are not yet in place. 'The TGA does not conduct human or animal testing. Where necessary, the TGA has outsourced SPF testing to accredited laboratories.'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Australian Red Cross Lifeblood loosens rules around LGBTQIA+ donating blood and plasma
Restrictions around sexually active gay and bisexual men donating blood and plasma are being loosened in a new world-leading move by Australian Red Cross Lifeblood. Under current rules, gay and bisexual men, and transgender women who have sex with men, cannot donate blood or plasma if they have had sex in the past three months. But from July 14, in the first set of rule changes, Lifeblood will remove most restrictions on donating plasma related to sexual activity. It has called this world-first the "plasma pathway", and says it will mean "most people, including gay and bisexual men, and anyone who takes PrEP, will be able to donate plasma without a wait period, providing they meet all other eligibility criteria". PrEP stands for pre-exposure prophylaxis and involves HIV-negative people taking antiretroviral medication to protect them and prevent infection. "Extensive research and modelling show that there will be no impact to the safety of the plasma supply with this change," Lifeblood said in a statement. Lifeblood chief medical officer Jo Pink said plasma was now the donation Australians needed the most, and the change would allow more than 600,000 extra people to give blood. "We're excited to be able to welcome more people from across the community into our donor centres from next month," Dr Pink told News Breakfast. "We now anticipate an extra 24,000 donors and 95,000 extra donations of plasma to be made each year." Dash Heath-Paynter, the CEO of Health Equity Matters, said the change "potentially unlocks thousands of donations of life-saving plasma". "Members of the LGBQTIA+ community members can now help those whose lives depend on plasma donations without a donation deferral period," Mr Heath-Paynter said. Alongside the changes to plasma donation rules, Lifeblood is working towards making changes to blood and platelet donation eligibility. Lifeblood said the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) had approved a submission to remove gender-based sexual activity rules. It will mean that all donors will be given the same questions about sexual activity, regardless of gender or sexuality, once the changes come into effect. Men will no longer be asked if they have had sex with another man before they donate blood. On top of that, people in a sexual relationship of six months or more with a single partner will be able to donate blood and most people with new or multiple partners will also be able to donate if they have not had anal sex in the past three months. Lifeblood has not given a date for when the changes will come into effect, but Dr Pink is hopeful of it being from early next year. "There are many steps that Lifeblood needs to take before we can implement the new gender-neutral assessments, including working with state and territory governments to change the donor questionnaire," Dr Pink said. These changes to blood- and plasma-donating rules will "make it easier for more people in the LGBTQIA+ community to donate" Dr Pink added.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Tasmanian state election 2025 promise tracker: What the Liberals, Labor, Greens and Nationals are promising
When the party promises become available, we will add them to our tracker. ( ABC News: Luke Bowden ) Tasmanians will head to the polls on Saturday July 19, barely a year after the previous state election. The ABC has asked the Liberals, Labor, the Greens and the Nationals to provide their promises to voters this election. Here's what they have announced so far. Allow pharmacies to open for longer at night and on weekends. Expand the range of conditions and medications that pharmacists can diagnose and prescribe, such as ear infections, reflux, skin conditions, such as shingles and eczema, rhinitis, and wound care. Allow pharmacies to open for longer at night and on weekends. Expand the range of conditions and medications that pharmacists can diagnose and prescribe, such as ear infections, reflux, skin conditions, such as shingles and eczema, rhinitis, and wound care. Invest in specialist women's health clinic, The Bubble, to expand health services in the state's north. Invest in specialist women's health clinic, The Bubble, to expand health services in the state's north. Upgrade hydrotherapy pools at the North West Support School (NWSS) campuses in Devonport and Burnie, which will be accessible to the public. Upgrade hydrotherapy pools at the North West Support School (NWSS) campuses in Devonport and Burnie, which will be accessible to the public. Provide four new free-of-charge breast screening clinics for those aged 50 to 74 located in Kingborough, Devonport, Triabunna and Glenorchy. Provide four new free-of-charge breast screening clinics for those aged 50 to 74 located in Kingborough, Devonport, Triabunna and Glenorchy. Introduce Paramedic Practitioner roles and change the law to allow them to prescribe certain medications. Introduce Paramedic Practitioner roles and change the law to allow them to prescribe certain medications. Provide scholarships for Registered Nurses to gain Master of Nurse Practitioners qualifications. Extend existing stamp duty concessions to newly built houses. Extend existing stamp duty concessions to newly built houses. Release a monthly planning dashboard that compares council performance on planning and development approvals. Release a monthly planning dashboard that compares council performance on planning and development approvals. Review the process for appealing requests for information and "make sure councils are held to account". Review the process for appealing requests for information and "make sure councils are held to account". Clarify and simplify what is required to submit a development application. Supports the development of the Macquarie Point stadium through special enabling legislation in parliament, rather than the Project of State Significance process. Supports the development of the Macquarie Point stadium. The party has supported the passage of special enabling legislation until now but during the campaign has said it will consult on what is the "right approval process". Opposes the development of the Macquarie Point stadium. Opposes the development of the Macquarie Point stadium. Ensure there are no cuts to the public service workforce. Set on-time, on-budget delivery of infrastructure projects as a key performance indicator of all department secretaries and government business CEOs. Set on-time, on-budget delivery of infrastructure projects as a key performance indicator of all department secretaries and government business CEOs. Ban bonuses for government business executives who fail to deliver on projects. Ban bonuses for government business executives who fail to deliver on projects. Establish an on-time, on-budget infrastructure oversight team. Both new Spirit of Tasmania ships to be brought back to Tasmania by Christmas. No promises have been made yet for these categories No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Jobs No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Aboriginal Affairs No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Privatisation No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Cost of living No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Law and Order No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Climate and environment No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Business No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Community No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Energy No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Tourism No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Arts No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Sports No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Primary industries No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Miscellaneous No promises have been made for this category. Liberals Labor Greens Nationals Posted 19m ago 19 minutes ago Tue 17 Jun 2025 at 9:24pm