logo
Landgraf talks ESAs at chamber reception

Landgraf talks ESAs at chamber reception

Yahoo15-02-2025

Feb. 14—About 150 people turned out Friday to the Odessa Chamber of Commerce's inaugural Pastries and Politics Reception to meet and greet elected representatives and officials from throughout the community.
State Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, was among the group. Landgraf said the legislative session is off to a good start, although it's going to be a tough time for consensus building across the state.
"We have a lot of contentious issues; a big development in the House yesterday, as the committee assignments were finally made. We have a house that's organized; a lot of consolidated committees, so things are going to look a lot different this session. I'm very honored that I've been named, again, to be chairman of the House Environmental Regulation Committee, which is really important for us in the Permian Basin. But with committee assignments made, bills are continuing to be filed. I'm ready to get to work," Landgraf said.
There is currently a bill filed by Rep. Briscoe Cain, HB 2736, which would require a two-thirds (66%) vote to authorize the issuance of bonds or to increase taxes. This issue is also part of Gov. Greg Abbott's Property Tax Relief emergency item.
Landgraf said he shares Abbott's goal of property tax relief and there are bills that would do that without changing majority rule in Texas.
"I think that we can achieve the same goal of having property tax relief for all Texans without having to change the way that we deal with property tax increases at the local level. I know it's a concern for a lot of our local taxing entities. On one hand, we do want property tax relief for all Texas property taxpayers. On the other hand, we want to make sure that institutions like Odessa College have the resources that they need to be able to fulfill their mission. They've done a great job of it over their multi-decade history. With the great leadership that we have in place, (President) Dr. (Gregory) Williams and his board and faculty and staff, I think that they can continue to do that, and that goes for a lot of other local government entities that we have here in the Permian Basin," Landgraf said.
Voter turnout in Ector County is usually low.
Landgraf said majority rule is a foundational principle.
"If you change that threshold too much, then it potentially comes a situation where you can have a very small group of voters" carrying the will of the majority, he said.
"There does seem to be something incompatible with that when it comes to our Constitutional Republic," Landgraf added.
On the subject of Education Savings Accounts, or vouchers, Landgraf said Abbott has made school choice an emergency item.
"The Texas Senate has already passed SB 2, which would provide Education Savings Accounts up to about $10,000 for about 100,000 students," he said.
"There is a lot of momentum behind this. As I mentioned, the Senate has already passed it. The House is probably going to come up with its own proposal that's going to look different, and then there will be some work between the House and the Senate. I do expect that there will be some sort of Education Savings Account legislation that passes. My goal for all of this is for ESAs is to be part of a larger legislative package where we can actually make educational opportunities for every student in Texas better, and that means that we also have to make sure that we are taking care of our K through 12 students in public schools all across the state, including Ector County ISD, including Monahans, including Kermit, Wink, Grandfalls, all of our school districts need to have plenty of support from the state. Our teachers need pay raises. They need to have a competitive advantage.
"I think that we can provide more school choice options, but we also need to make sure that students who are going to continue to rely on public schools have a good, good option within that when it passes," Landgraf said.
Part of SB 2 allows $2,000 for Education Savings Accounts for homeschool children whose families opt into that program. But it's not mandatory.
"It's purely optional, but if the family decides to do that and they want $2,000 to help cover the costs of homeschool education from books, supplies, learning programs, things like that, then they could be eligible for that Education Savings Account under the proposal. But there are also strings that come attached with that, like a testing requirement and some other oversight from the state," Landgraf said.
He added that he has gotten a lot of feedback from homeschool parents who want absolutely nothing to do with an ESA because they like having that autonomy.
They like being able to make all those decisions themselves.
"I've actually heard from a lot of homeschool parents saying we don't want these vouchers. We don't even want you to pass them. That's been an interesting dynamic to see, but I've gotten a lot of feedback from all sides on this issue," Landgraf said.
Out of the 100,000 or so students who could get Education Savings Accounts, 80% are targeted as low-income or learning disabled students. Students who have special needs that require special education. That makes up about 80% of the program now and then the other 20% would be open to everybody, all students in Texas.
"That's a bit of the balance, but it does seem to prioritize private schools. Of course, charter schools are public. They don't have tuition, and so they wouldn't be covered by these Education Savings Accounts just the same way that ISD students wouldn't be," Landgraf said.
The way the SB 2 Education Savings Accounts are set up, it's purely voluntary for students to participate. It's also voluntary for a private school to participate.
"There's nothing that would compel a private school to accept a student the way that state law requires public schools to accept students who live in their designated neighborhoods. ... I do think that (it) could create some opportunities, not necessarily in West Texas. I don't know that it would have a tremendous impact, just because we don't have the volume of students here in the way that inner-city, Houston, does.
"I think it could create some opportunities for students who are in failing school districts in Houston who literally don't have any other options because there just isn't anything there for them without having some sort of financial assistance," he added.
Landgraf said he's talked to a lot of private schools in West Texas who don't want the ESA program because they're already at capacity and have waiting lists.
"And they would rather not have the strings that would be attached to any ESA," he added.
There is a lot of opposition to ESAs, but there is also a lot of support for having an ESA program that provides choice for students who don't have it.
"I think it's more of a principle thing for a lot of people. There's a lot of support on both sides. I will say that the anti-ESA crowd is definitely better organized and speaking a little bit louder. But there's also some misinformation on both sides about what this ESA does do. I want to be very clear that the ESA, even in SB 2 as proposed, would not dismantle public schools. It would only have an impact over 100,000 out of almost 6 million school children in Texas. We're talking about a very small percentage of students. What that means is, if we're only pulling about $1 billion, we're dedicating about $1 billion dollars to an ESA program when we're spending $96 billion on public education throughout the state; $1 billion is not going to defund $96 billion. I do want to be clear that this ESA program is not a silver bullet that's going to fix everything that's wrong with education in Texas. It's also not going to be something that can dismantle public education in Texas as we know it," Landgraf said.
He added that ESAs can be used by public school students for supplemental training, tutoring and for online education programs.
"There are also other opportunities that all students can take advantage of if they have special needs, what they need, after-school tutoring or online tutoring, things like that so there are other ways that even public school students can take ESA program," Landgraf said.
He noted that a lot of people think that there's no accountability that goes with this public money for private schools in SB 2.
"Yes, we do need to have accountability for that public money. The ESAs do not require students to take the STAAR exam, just a nationally norm referenced test, which can be a much more efficient standardized test. I think if that's good enough for ESAs it should be good enough for every student in Texas. I think there is also an opportunity to use this ESA conversation to really get some much needed reform to scrap the STAAR exam in Texas for all students," Landgraf said.
He also said there is nothing that would suggest SB 2 affects teacher retirement.
"I'm a huge proponent of retired teachers. I know that there's a narrative that's floating around out there that this would defund the pensions for retired teachers. That's something that I'm very sensitive about," Landgraf said.
In the last legislative session with the help of Texas voters, a lot of money was allocated to make sure that the Teacher Retirement System is actuarily sound for years to come.
Calculators on social media give figures on how much districts would lose if ESAs passed. Landgraf said he has seen them and said with 100,000 students spread across the state it's not going to take away from, especially rural school districts, where there aren't any private school options.
"The math doesn't actually work out. Again, I respect everybody for having very deeply held views on this issue, but again, from a policymaker's perspective, if we keep this about facts, then it's going to be a much better conversation. The fear tactics don't really resonate with me. I've got to look at the facts, and in a lot of cases, these generators showing how much money would be lost are not accurate," Landgraf said.
While the ESA program would start small, Landgraf said it would be up to future legislators to decide whether it will grow.
"It's always a possibility. It's also a possibility that if it's a dismal failure, it can be scrapped altogether. But if it's a success, then it can grow. I think we should allow it to grow or contract based on its own merits," Landgraf said.
Odessa Chamber of Commerce President/CEO Renee Earls said they have had receptions for elected officials throughout the years.
"We have the pleasure of meeting our elected officials on a regular basis. We can call them. We can talk to them. We meet with them on issues. But many of our members don't have that opportunity so really, this is for our members to get to meet them, visit with them, begin a relationship with them, and then later down the line, if they need something, they know who to call," Earls said.
The officials that are not elected are still a big part of the community.
Earls said they will be hosting a reception for newly minted ECISD Superintendent Keeley Boyer sometime in March.
"We wanted to see how successful it would be. (We) really had no idea what to expect, and so we threw it out there" and it's been successful, Earls said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers

Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'

Trump: Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he donates to Democrats
Trump: Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he donates to Democrats

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump: Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he donates to Democrats

President Trump on Saturday said tech billionaire Elon Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he moves to support Democratic political candidates in any upcoming elections, following a public rift between the two in recent days. In a phone interview with NBC News, Trump said Musk 'will have to pay the consequences' if he backs opponents to GOP lawmakers who support the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' he told the outlet. The president's remarks comes after he signaled his bromance with Musk is over as a tiff about the GOP megabill spiraled into an all-out brawl on social media. Musk went so far as to allege that Trump is named in the Jeffrey Epstein files, backed a call for impeachment and suggested he would have lost the presidential election without his support. Trump in response threatened to cancel federal government contracts for Musk's companies while calling the Tesla and SpaceX CEO 'crazy.' Prior to the implosion of the duo's relationship, the tech mogul indicated he would roll back his political spending in upcoming elections. 'In terms of political spending, I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk said last month. 'If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it,' he added. 'I do not currently see a reason.' The billionaire became one of the most powerful forces in U.S. politics after he threw his support behind Trump's reelection bid last summer, spending at least $250 million. He soon became a central figure in the White House as he advised the Department of Government Efficiency and the administration's efforts to reduce the size and scope of the federal government. Musk left the administration late last month as he voiced opposition to the House-crafted GOP spending bill over its potential impact on the national debt. When asked by NBC on Saturday if the president intends to reconcile with Musk, Trump replied in the negative. But he reiterated his confidence in his budget bill despite some GOP concerns in the upper chamber. 'The Republican Party has never been united like this before. It's never been. It's actually more so than it was three days ago,' Trump said, stating Musk's outburst benefited his push to get the bill passed before July 4. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' the president added. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.' Some of Musk's social media posts that intensified the feud on Thursday have since been deleted. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

'A huge moment': Martin Jarmond discusses UCLA's plans after House settlement
'A huge moment': Martin Jarmond discusses UCLA's plans after House settlement

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'A huge moment': Martin Jarmond discusses UCLA's plans after House settlement

UCLA football coach DeShaun Foster, left, and athletic director Martin Jarmond now have clearer guidelines on how to allocate funds and scholarships to athletes after a judge approved a House settlement in an antitrust lawsuit. (Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press) Like a quarterback who completed offseason workouts, spring practices and fall training camp, Martin Jarmond had been preparing for this moment for nearly a year. On Saturday came the big unveiling. The UCLA athletic director discussed with The Times the plans for his department's operations in the new college sports world created by the House settlement agreement with the NCAA that will allow schools to pay athletes directly for the first time starting July 1. Advertisement The big takeaways: UCLA will distribute $20.5 million in revenue sharing — the maximum allowed under the settlement — while keeping its Olympic sports programs and athletic department staff intact. The school will also preserve scholarship limits at their current levels for at least one year in order to distribute more revenue sharing money to each player. 'This is a pivotal moment in collegiate athletics, and we have to continue to invest in our athletics program to compete at the highest level,' Jarmond said. 'That's why student-athletes come to UCLA, to get the best education and compete at the highest level, and we must invest in our student-athletes to provide that championship-level experience.' While Jarmond would not divulge the specifics of his revenue-sharing arrangement, it's expected that UCLA will follow other Power Four conference schools in using U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken's back-payment formula as a model for current athletes. Under this formula, which will distribute $2.8 billion to athletes who competed from 2016 to 2024 to compensate them for lost name, image and likeness opportunities, roughly 75% of the money will be shared with football players, 15% with men's basketball players, 5% with women's basketball players and 5% with all remaining athletes. Read more: Landmark NCAA settlement decision clears way for schools to directly pay athletes Advertisement 'We've worked really hard to look at the House settlement, along with other factors,' Jarmond said, 'to determine how we were going to split up the revenue share.' Jarmond told The Times last year that he anticipated a bigger share of revenue going to football and men's basketball players because they were 'responsible for more of the revenue based on the House settlement and the back pay for NIL and all those things.' Payments will rise each year as part of the 10-year settlement agreement. Even though roster limits could eventually rise to 105 for football and 15 for men's basketball as part of the settlement, keeping scholarship limits at their current levels — 85 for football, 13 for men's basketball — will allow UCLA to provide each player on scholarship a bigger share of revenue. As part of the settlement agreement, any money used for scholarships (which have an estimated value of $65,000 per athlete at UCLA) comes out of the revenue sharing pot. Jarmond said his department would reevaluate this arrangement in a year to ensure it was best serving the school's athletes. UCLA is also committed to preserving its Olympic sports that have provided the lion's share of NCAA championships in an athletic department widely regarded as one of the best in the nation. Jarmond said there would be no staffing cuts, but some personnel might be reassigned to better serve the athletic department. Advertisement 'We are looking at reallocating staff,' Jarmond said, 'to positions that better meet our needs in a changing landscape.' The ability to pay players directly could help UCLA in ways that go beyond compensating its athletes. Revenue sharing arrangements could help narrow the resource gap between the Bruins and other Big Ten Conference schools that had more deep-pocketed NIL collectives engaging in pay-for-play practices. Now, all new NIL deals exceeding $600 must be approved by NIL Go, a clearinghouse created by the College Sports Commission to analyze deals to ensure they serve a valid business purpose and provide fair market value. It's expected that all existing college NIL collectives — including UCLA's Men of Westwood (which serves men's basketball), Bruins for Life (football) and Champion of Westwood (women's basketball, Olympic sports) — will essentially become marketing agencies that try to find endorsement deals for athletes. Advertisement Read more: Chancellor Julio Frenk suggests he'll be actively involved with UCLA athletics Jarmond said UCLA was seeking a third-party partner to help secure so-called true NIL opportunities. Being based in Los Angeles should provide Bruins athletes with a clear advantage in securing marketing deals, Jarmond said. Other challenges remain. Having traveled to Washington, D.C., to lobby for federal NIL legislation, Jarmond said he believed it was necessary to eliminate the imbalance that exists with more than 30 states having their own NIL laws. While distributing $20.5 million in revenue will be another financial blow to an athletic department that has run $219.5 million in the red over the last six fiscal years — though the entire debt has been covered by the university, bringing the balance to zero — Jarmond said he has long championed athletes being paid and believes the move is long overdue. As part of the settlement involving back pay to athletes, UCLA's share of NCAA revenue will be reduced by more than $1 million annually for the next 10 years. Advertisement UCLA's finances could soon improve under a College Football Playoff revenue sharing agreement that is expected to provide Big Ten schools an additional $8 million to $12 million annually beginning in 2026. That's on top of media rights deals tilted heavily in favor of Big Ten and Southeastern Conference schools, giving the Bruins another infusion of much-needed cash. The athletic department has a new ally in Chancellor Julio Frenk, who signaled his intention to be closely involved with the school's sports programs during a recent interview with The Times. 'Chancellor Frenk has been extremely supportive of athletics and the impact that it has on our community,' Jarmond said. 'He has been supportive of our efforts every step of the way. He hit the ground running during a pivotal time not just for athletics but the university, and he has demonstrated support at a high level and I'm grateful for his leadership at such a pivotal time for athletics.' While acknowledging that UCLA athletics needed to be more creative with revenue generation as part of what he called 'a huge moment' that would forever change the trajectory of college sports, Jarmond said the school's commitment to sports was unwavering. Advertisement 'We have to be bold and innovative in this new world,' Jarmond said. 'UCLA has always been on the forefront and been a leader and that's not going to change. We will embrace this new era and we will continue to support our student-athletes at a championship level.' Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store