Pocso Act not meant to criminalise adolescents' consensual relations: Allahabad HC
Allahabad HC (File photo)
Pocso Act
is "never meant to criminalise consensual romantic relationships between adolescents", Allahabad HC observed while granting bail to an 18-year-old boy arrested in March for allegedly raping a 16-year-old girlfriend. Counsel for the accused contended before HC that it is a case of consensual relationship and that there is no medical corroboration of the incident.
In its order dated April 29, HC said it would amount to perversity of justice if the statement of the victim was ignored and the accused was left to suffer in jail.
Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor: Several airports in India closed - check full list
Did Pak shoot down Indian jets? What MEA said
India foils Pakistan's attack on Jammu airport: What we know so far
Stressing that
consensual relationships
born out of love should be considered while granting bail, Justice Krishan Pahal said Pocso Act, enacted to protect children under the age of 18 years from sexual exploitation, has become a tool for their exploitation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian student in US duped by fake ICE agents in $5,000 scam
Live Events You Might Also Like: Harvard vs Trump: As fresh salvos are fired, international students live in anxiety and fear An Indian student in the United States was tricked into paying $5,000 in gift cards by individuals pretending to be US immigration officers. The scammers convinced her that she had violated immigration laws and faced arrest and deportation , according to a report by Newsweek. Shreya Bedi , a Master's student in Human-Computer Interaction at Indiana University Bloomington, arrived in the US in 2022 on an F-1 student visa . She received a call on May 29 from someone claiming to be an officer from the US. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The caller gave a name and badge number and asked her to verify the details on the official ICE website. The phone number matched what was listed for an ICE office in after, Bedi got a second call from someone posing as an officer from the Olympia Police Department. They told her there was a warrant for her arrest. She was warned that her phone was being monitored and she could not contact anyone else.'I felt completely trapped because they kept me on the phone for three hours straight, repeatedly warning me that hanging up or contacting anyone would violate my case and make things worse. I was too scared to risk it,' said Bedi to Newsweek.(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)The callers instructed her to purchase Apple and Target gift cards worth $5,000 and share the codes with them. They claimed a police officer would collect the bond papers the next day, but the follow-up never came.'They put me through hours of psychological torture, making me believe I was going to be deported and arrested,' she added. The scammers also had detailed knowledge about her, including her entry into the US, her academic records, and the Indian city she came is now trying to recover her losses through a GoFundMe campaign. She advised other international students to be cautious. 'You always have the right to hang up and call a lawyer, government agencies almost never call you directly; they send official mail,' she said. 'No legitimate government agency will ever ask for gift cards, bank details, or your Social Security number over the phone. If someone asks for any of these things, it's definitely a scam.''As international students, we don't fully understand how the system works here, which makes us easy targets. I feel embarrassed that I fell for this, but I want others to learn from my mistake,' Bedi told Newsweek.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Will the Rs. 500 note go out of circulation in March 2026? What government said on viral claim
The Centre debunked claims that the ₹500 currency note will be discontinued by next year, trying to calm the panic among the people caused by the claim. The panic over the future of currency notes began recently when a video on YouTube went viral over the past few days, claiming that the ₹500 notes will be phased out starting March 2026. The 12-minute-long video, uploaded on a channel named Capital TV and gaining more than five lakh views since June 2, triggered confusion and panic among people. The union government responded to the claims through the Press Information Bureau (PIB) fact-check unit, saying the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has not made any such announcement. The Indian government's official fact-checking agency also advised people not to fall victim to any kind of misinformation and always verify any claims made. " ₹500 notes have NOT been discontinued and remain legal tender. Always verify news from official sources before believing or sharing it," PIB's post on social media platform X reads. The ₹500 notes currently in circulation were introduced after the government announced demonetisation of the old ₹500 and ₹1000 notes in November 2016. The current note is 66mm x 150mm and comes in stone grey colour. The back of it has a picture of the Red Fort, complying with the theme of Indian heritage sites. The current ₹500 notes continue to have their amount written in 17 languages, like all the other notes in circulation. These languages include English, Hindi, Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Malayalam, Marathi, Nepali, Odia, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had demonetised the previous ₹500 notes, along with the ₹1000 notes, in a televised address on November 8, 2016. The government had billed it as a measure to fight corruption in the country and address the issue of counterfeit banknotes. The news notes came into circulation a couple of days later. The RBI had also introduced the new ₹2,000 currency note during the demonetisation exercise. However, those notes were withdrawn from circulation in May 2023. Despite being withdrawn, the ₹2000 notes remain legal tender.
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Nikhil Gupta Sought Dismissal of Charges, Lawyers Say Filing Was ‘Inadvertent'
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now World Nikhil Gupta Sought Dismissal of Charges, Lawyers Say Filing Was 'Inadvertent' Devirupa Mitra 39 minutes ago Pre-trial proceedings for Gupta, who is accused of plotting to hire a hitman on behalf of a former Indian intelligence officer to assassinate US citizen and Khalistani separatist lawyer Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, are scheduled to begin this month. File image. A screengrab from a video released on June 18, 2024 by Czech police, of the extradition of Nikhil Gupta to the US. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: In an unexpected twist ahead of his trial later this year, jailed Indian businessman Nikhil Gupta submitted a signed letter to a federal New York judge seeking dismissal of his indictment, only for his lawyer to inform the court that the filing had been made 'inadvertently.' Gupta, who is accused of plotting to hire a hitman on behalf of a former Indian intelligence officer to assassinate US citizen and Khalistani separatist lawyer Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, is scheduled to go on trial in November, with pre-trial proceedings set to begin later this month. He has been in US federal custody since June 2024, following his arrest at Prague airport and subsequent extradition from the Czech Republic. The former Research and Analysis Wing officer Vikas Yadav is also charged in the indictment, but his whereabouts in India are still unknown. On May 29, the court formally received Gupta's seven-page letter, in which he asked the judge to throw out the charges against him and release him immediately on bail. The move raised eyebrows, as Gupta submitted the motion himself despite being represented by court-appointed attorneys. In his letter, emailed to the court, Gupta argued that the indictment was legally flawed because it did not cite a specific state or federal law that would have been broken had the alleged murder-for-hire plot been carried out. He also contended that his extradition from the Czech Republic was invalid because it was based on what he called a 'defective' indictment. The next day, Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York asked defence counsel whether they were aware of the pro se motion and whether Gupta truly intended to proceed with it. The judge noted that not only was Gupta already represented by two lawyers, who were appointed by the court, but that they had already decided on a pre-trial motion schedule. 'Defense Counsel is directed to confirm whether they are aware of Defendant's filing and whether it is Defendant's wish to proceed with the Pro Se Motion,' said Judge Marreo in his order dated May 30. Incidentally, Gupta is now on his third set of defence lawyers since arriving in the United States. His first lawyer withdrew in October last year, citing non-payment and 'irreconcilable differences' with client. The next set, appointed by the court at Gupta's request, remained on the case for about five months. His current lawyers, also court-appointed, have been representing him since April. In response to the judge's order, Matthew LaRoche and Nola B. Heller submitted a letter on May 30 itself, stating they had spoken with Gupta and that he had confirmed he was 'very satisfied with our representation' and did not wish to move forward with the self-filed motion. As for the filing, the lawyers said Gupta had 'inadvertently filed it.' However, the prosecution recommended, as per the letter, that the judge confirm Gupta's position in open court at the next pretrial conference. They said the judge should ask Gupta directly if he was satisfied with his lawyers and whether he still wished to withdraw the motion. The defence disagreed, saying Gupta's position had already been clearly conveyed. When contacted by The Wire, Matthew LaRoche declined to comment. Speaking to The Wire, former assistant US attorney and a partner at New York law firm Katten Muchin Rosenman, Jacques Semmelman, said that that the argument 'in Mr Gupta's letter to the court, that a defective indictment makes the extradition invalid and requires his release, is entirely incorrect' 'There is no remedy in the US legal system that provides what he's asking for. I am not agreeing that his indictment is defective as he claims, but even if it were defective, that would not invalidate the extradition. Once he is here, the US court does not inquire how he arrived,' he said. Semmelmans also noted that Nikhil Gupta has an 'extremely well-regarded defense attorney, Mr. LaRoche'. 'He's a top criminal defense attorney at a very prominent law firm, Milbank. Mr Gupta has top-notch representation,' he added. A week after the court acknowledged the letter, the federal judge on June 6 accepted the defence's request to withdraw Gupta's motion to dismiss all charges. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News As India and Canada's Foreign Ministers Speak Over Phone, Signs of a Further Thaw in Ties Lalu's Son Tej Pratap Is Expelled from RJD For the Second Time in Five Years Following Backlash, Delhi PWD Removes Photos of People Cleaning Drains Without Safety Gear Five Stark Instances Counter Environment Minister's 'Democracy Walking Alongside Development' Remark 'Numbers Matter, Else CDS Would Have Made Them Public': Sushant Singh Interview | What to Do When Your Mother-Tongue Fades Away Watch | 'Numbers Matter, Else CDS Would Have Made it Public': Sushant Singh Six Times Misogyny Overshadowed BJP's Symbolism Post-Operation Sindoor India's Inability to Produce Engines Makes Its Forces Vulnerable to Geopolitics and More View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
