US is not committed to a Palestinian state, Muslim neighbours could give land, US ambassador says
A Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank is no longer a US policy goal, but Israel's 'Muslim neighbours' could give up their land to create one, US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Bloomberg news on Tuesday.
'Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it,' Huckabee, an appointee of US President Donald Trump and longtime advocate of settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank said when asked about a Palestinian state.
He added those steps probably won't occur 'in our lifetime,' he added.
Pressed on the topic, Huckabee repeated an explosive claim floated by some Israeli officials, that neighbouring Muslim countries could give their land to the Palestinians to create a state.
'Where is it gonna be? Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?' Huckabee asked. 'Does it need to be somewhere different?
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Huckabee did not rule out taking land from Saudi Arabia to create a Palestinian state, saying 'every option should be on the table,' when pressed.
'Muslim controlled countries have six hundred and forty-four times the amount of land Israel does. When people say Israel needs to give up something you kind of scratch your head and say let me see if I get this right…'why should these people [Israelis] give way when these people [muslim countries] have a lot of room that they could say 'we'll carve out something'.'
Huckabee's comments are likely to irk Egypt and Jordan. Their leaders fear that Israel wants to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza and the occupied West Bank onto their land.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated in May that carrying out a plan US President Donald Trump introduced earlier this year to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza and turn it into a 'Middle East Riviera' was now a condition for ending Israel's war on Gaza.
Displacing Palestinians
Huckabee's refusal to rule out carving out a Palestinians state in Saudi Arabia is likely to inflame tensions.
Netanyahu suggested in February that Palestinians should establish a state in Saudi Arabia, rather than in their homeland, in his latest dismissal of Palestinians' right to self-determination. His comments drew a sharp rebuke from Riyadh.
In his first term, Trump floated a Middle East peace plan dubbed the Deal of the century that called for a de facto rump Palestinian state without full sovereignty. But at the very least, that plan focused on fashioning a pseudo-state in the occupied West Bank.
Huckabee's comments are more hardline because he refuses to rule out displacing Palestinians in full.
Since the 1950's, successive American administration have stated that their ultimate goal to end the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a two-state solution. Many experts and diplomats have earmarked occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank and Gaza, which Israel seized from Egypt and Jordan in the 1967 war as the heartland of a future Palestinian state.
Huckabee is a prominent leader in the pro-Israel evangelical Christian movement, who has repeatedly denied the Palestinian national identity.
Huckabee advocated for the forcible displacement of Palestinians during the early days of Israel's war on Gaza.
'If the so-called Palestinians are so loved by the Muslim nations of the world, why wont any of those nations at least offer to give temporary refuge to their brothers and sisters in Gaza,' he said in October 2023.
He has been an outspoken advocate for Israel's annexation of the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. 'I think Israel has title deed to Judea and Samaria,' he told Politico in 2017, using the Hebrew language terms for the occupied West Bank.
'There are certain words I refuse to use. There is no such thing as a West Bank. It's Judea and Samaria. There's no such thing as a settlement. They're communities, they're neighborhoods, they're cities. There's no such thing as an occupation,' he said at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
18 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Posturing or potential strikes? Iran tensions ramp up ahead of nuclear talks
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that an Israeli strike on Iran "may very well happen', as he confirmed that the US was evacuating some US officials and their families from the region. The US is evacuating non-essential US embassy staff and their dependents from the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. Other reports said the US was evacuating some staff from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait, but the embassy in Bahrain denied a change in its posture on Thursday. Trump on Thursday said the risk of "massive conflict" led the US to draw down staff in the region. CBS News reported on Thursday that Israel is prepared to launch an attack on Iran's nuclear sites, and that US officials have been discussing how the US could assist Israel without taking a direct role. The report said options could include aerial refuelling or intelligence-sharing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The steady drumbeat of leaks raises questions about whether a strike could take place in the future, or if the Trump administration is trying to put pressure on Iran ahead of a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled to be held in Oman on Sunday. A US diplomat at one of the embassies restricting travel said the orders they have received were not out of the ordinary during flare-ups in local tensions. 'These steps don't necessarily mean military action is imminent. Still time for talks, it takes time to move people out. But these are steps that it would make sense to take as part of preparations, and to show seriousness. Provides important leverage in nuclear talks,' Danial Shapiro, a former US ambassador to Israel, said on X on Wednesday. 'Might help, could blow it' Trump himself toys publicly with the idea that the threat of an Israeli strike may help the US's negotiating position. "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump said, referring to Israel, before quickly adding, "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." In some ways, the reports that Israel is "poised" to strike Iran are redundant. By Trump's own admission, Israel has been lobbying him for months to bomb Iran. One senior US official recently told Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without direct American involvement. The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe, MEE reported. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etcetera,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack that support a bigger main target. Trump says Iran's proposal 'unacceptable' as Tehran touts intel on Israeli nukes Read More » Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Analysts say Netanyahu has refrained from attacking Iran in defiance of Trump because he wants to share political responsibility if the strikes go wrong and preserve an American backstop in the likely case of Iranian retaliation. On Thursday, Axios reported that Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told some Republican Senators that the administration fears Iran could retaliate against an Israeli strike with ballistic missiles, causing a 'mass casualty event". The article did not mention that Israel is widely understood to have its own arsenal of nuclear weapons. The Iranians have kept pace with Trump and upped their own rhetoric. During past flare-ups, Iranian officials have sent signals that they could shut down the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf, where 30 percent of the world's oil transits, and have leaked that they could bomb US bases in Gulf states if attacked. Iran has now clearly stated that threat. "All its [the United States] bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister added. Israel and Iran had two unprecedented exchanges of fire in October and April 2024. The US came to Israel's defence, shooting down missiles and drones in an attack Iran had carefully telegraphed beforehand. IAEA tensions Ahead of the talks on Sunday, tensions have also been rising with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Diplomats said the IAEA's board of governors adopted a resolution condemning Iran's "non-compliance" with its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution was carried by 19 votes in favour out of 35. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October. This mechanism would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then-US president Barack Obama. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, said the resolution was "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, he said Iran would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. The issue of whether Iran will be able to enrich uranium on its territory has become the main roadblock to nuclear talks with the US. Trump has insisted Iran will not be allowed to enrich any uranium.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel 'could very well' strike Iran, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Thursday said Israel may well strike Iran but stressed that he had cautioned against an attack while nuclear talks with Tehran continue. Mr Trump's comments come as the US has authorised the departure of non-essential personnel from Iraq and elsewhere as fears grow that Israel may attack Iran's nuclear sites. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. The prospect of military action in the Middle East comes as the US-Iran nuclear talks appear to be stalled over whether Tehran would be able to continue to enrich uranium in any capacity. Mr Trump this week said he was less confident a deal could be reached, and Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. But Mr Trump on Thursday said the US and Iran are 'fairly close to a pretty good agreement'. 'We've had very good discussions with Iran. It's got to be better than pretty good, though, but it's got to be – I prefer an agreement, as long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think that would blow it,' Mr Trump said. In another sign that a strike on Iran may not be imminent, US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff plans to travel to Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of talks with Iran. 'Discussions are expected to be both direct and indirect, as in previous rounds,' a source said. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed to Iranian news outlet Tasnim that a delegation from Tehran would attend the talks. Tehran on Wednesday threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike the country's uranium enrichment sites. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. The US State Department has begun preparing to evacuate non-essential staff from the American embassy in Baghdad. At the same time, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the departure of military dependents from locations across the region. The US embassies in Kuwait and Bahrain have not changed their staffing levels, the State Department said. Meanwhile, the UK Maritime Trade Operations on Thursday said in an advisory note that the situation in the Middle East remains 'highly volatile'. The UKMTO has advised ships to use caution when passing through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump envoy Massad Boulos to visit Libya amid rising tensions, sources say
US envoy Massad Boulos is set to make his first official visit to Libya next week amid rising tensions in the capital city of Tripoli and neighbouring Sudan, a US official and an Arab source told Middle East Eye. Boulos, who is Trump's senior advisor to Africa, was supposed to travel to Libya earlier this year, the sources said, but Egyptian officials complained, saying they wanted him to visit Cairo first. Boulos met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the head of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service, Hassan Rashad, in May. Egypt is one of the main external powers in Libya. Ties between Egypt and the US have become strained over Washington's reassessment of military aid to Cairo and Trump's call earlier this year for a forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza, MEE previously reported. In Libya, Boulos is expected to visit Tripoli first, home to the United Nations-recognised government, and then travel to Benghazi in eastern Libya, which is controlled by a parallel government backed by General Khalifa Haftar and his sons. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Boulos's office did not respond to MEE's request for comment. The envoy's visit comes as Libya's powerful militias and politicians jostle for power. In May, Tripoli was convulsed by fighting between rival militias that killed at least eight people. The clashes started after the 444 Brigade loyal to Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibah killed the leader of a rival group. The 444 Brigade then launched attacks on a Salafist militia called the Rada Deterrence Force, which controls Tripoli's main airport. Dbeibah was appointed president in 2021 as a consensus candidate with a mandate to usher Libya into elections. The vote never took place. There have been regular protests against Dbeibah. Boulos has been in discussions with Dbeibah's top advisor about unlocking billions of dollars in sanctioned frozen wealth funds, MEE was the first to reveal. The two sides discussed putting some funds into investments with US companies in Libya. NBC later reported that in exchange for releasing the funds, the Trump administration pressed the government to accept up to 1 million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, which has been under Israeli assault since 7 October 2023, after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel. Saddam Haftar comes to the fore The instability in Tripoli has allowed Khalifa Haftar's family to lobby for support. Khalifa Haftar is 81 years old. His son Saddam is being cultivated as a likely successor, US and Arab officials tell MEE. Libya and Trump administration discussed sharing billions of dollars in frozen funds, sources say Read More » Saddam's stock is rising with the new Trump administration, especially in national security circles, the US official and Arab source told MEE. Saddam made a high-profile visit to Washington in April, where he met Boulos at the State Department. More importantly, he held a meeting with several senior US intelligence officials in Washington, the sources told MEE. That meeting has not been previously reported. Saddam has also been making overtures to countries traditionally closer to the government in Tripoli. He has visited Qatar and Turkey for support. This week, he visited Italy. Libya has been divided since the Nato-led removal of longtime ruler Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The civil war became a proxy conflict with Russia, the UAE, Egypt, and France backing Haftar and Turkey supporting the government in Tripoli. In 2019, Trump gave his tacit approval for the elder Haftar's bid to take over Tripoli. The attack failed when Turkey intervened. The battle lines in Libya have become more convoluted in recent years. Sudan spillover A case in point is the competing interests among external powers in Sudan. Although Egypt and the UAE both support Haftar's government, they are backing opposing sides in the Sudanese civil war. Egypt has thrown its support behind Sudan's army along with Iran and Turkey, while the UAE is backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Haftar has facilitated the shipment of arms to the RSF. 'You made a mistake trying to leave': Crossing enemy lines in the heart of Sudan Read More » Boulos has been trying to mediate a ceasefire between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Egyptian officials want Boulos to make progress on preventing a spillover of the Libyan and Sudanese conflicts, an Egyptian official told MEE. However, following their May meeting, the Egyptians assessed that his influence would be limited, the source said. Politico reported in May that Trump has curbed Boulos's influence. The US and Arab sources told MEE that expectations for Boulos's trip were low on all sides. The RSF said on Wednesday it seized a strategic zone on the border with Egypt and Libya. The announcements came a day after forces loyal to Haftar launched a cross-border attack alongside the RSF, the first allegation of direct Libyan involvement in the Sudanese war. The attack is likely to strain ties between Haftar and Egypt.
