If Sarawak can, Sabah can: SAPP
Published on: Sunday, June 29, 2025
Published on: Sun, Jun 29, 2025 Text Size: Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) Deputy President Datuk Richard Yong We Kong Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) Deputy President Datuk Richard Yong We Kong called on Sabahans to take ownership of their future as the State Assembly is set to dissolve automatically by Nov. 11, paving the way for the state election. The SAPP Sec-Gen said the election presents an important opportunity for the people to strengthen state autonomy and ensure Sabah's direction remains in the hands of its own people. Speaking at the joint annual meeting of the SAPP Kepayan and Moyog Constituency Liaison Committees in Penampang, Yong, who is a Deputy Speaker, believes the future of Sabah must be decided by Sabahans themselves. 'This is a critical moment. We must defend our sovereignty and ensure the key to our future remains in our own hands,' he said. Citing neighbour Sarawak, Yong pointed to its achievements in financial independence. 'Sarawak has stood firm in asserting its rights. It recorded RM14.1 billion in revenue for 2024, more than double Sabah's RM6.4 billion. It has established its own sovereign wealth fund and is introducing free education. This shows what's possible when a state holds control over its finances.' In contrast, he laments Sabah still relies heavily on federal allocations and has yet to realise the 40 per cent net revenue return promised under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). Despite five changes in the federal leadership, he said, progress on MA63 has remained elusive. He also called on Sabahans to closely follow the Sabah Law Society's legal action which goes to trial on July 7, seeking to enforce the 40 per cent revenue entitlement. 'If successful, just from inland revenue alone, this could mean at least RM2 billion more for Sabah,' he said. 'What matters most is that Sabah's future is decided by Sabahans who are truly committed to defending our rights. We cannot hand the key to outsiders,' he stressed. SAPP Kepayan CLC Chairman Datuk Chong Pit Fah said the annual meeting carried special weight with the state election looming, describing it as a time for serious reflection on Sabah's future. He drew comparisons to Sarawak's firm stance on oil royalties, federal allocations and control over its own media. 'Everything Sarawak asked for has been delivered, step by step. Today, Sarawak is wealthier than Putrajaya. If we in Sabah want the same outcome, the only way forward is to vote for local parties,' Chong said. He said SAPP, which pulled out of Barisan Nasional in 2008, was the first to openly champion the Sabah autonomy movement and has consistently defended state rights. 'In recent times, some peninsula-based parties have started claiming they too support autonomy. But these are empty words designed to confuse the public and blur the facts,' he said. 'True autonomy means we no longer have to fly across the South China Sea just to ask what is rightfully ours.' He urged Sabahans to stop believing the notion that such aspirations are impossible. 'Sarawak has already proven otherwise. Blindly following others will only lead to confusion, and in the end, all we'll be left with are more taxes.' * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
2 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Sharifah Hasidah: No fixed date yet for next MA63 meeting, negotiations ongoing
Sharifah Hasidah speaks to reporters when met at the event. – Photo by Jude Toyat KUCHING (June 29): No fixed date has been set for the next Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) meeting, as negotiations on unresolved matters are still ongoing, said Datuk Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali. The Deputy Minister in the Sarawak Premier's Department (Law, State-Federal Relations and MA63) said the Sarawak government is still waiting for the main committee to convene the next meeting. 'There is no fixed date yet. Negotiations on MA63 are ongoing. We are waiting for the main committee to call for the next meeting,' she said. Sharifah Hasidah was responding to a question from reporters on the next MA63 meeting when met at the closing ceremony of the Maal Hijrah 1447H/2025M Festival at Masjid Jamek Negeri Sarawak today. When asked about the next agenda following the issue of redelineation, she reiterated that Sarawak remains firm in its demand for greater parliamentary representation. 'As for the 35 per cent representation in Parliament, this is something we continue to advocate and fight for. 'There will be continued negotiations and in-depth discussions on this demand. As of now, there is no final decision, but we will continue to pursue it,' she said. Sharifah Hasidah added that all unresolved claims under MA63 will continue to be discussed through existing formal platforms. 'All claims under MA63 that have not been resolved or finalised will continue to be discussed through the formal platforms that have been established. 'We will wait, that is all I can say for now,' she added.
Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
How Emergency affected Sabah and Sarawak: Both states yet to see MA63 autonomy fully restored despite revocation of the Emergency Ordinance in 2011
Published on: Sunday, June 29, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 29, 2025 By: Datuk Roger Chin Text Size: Few moments in Malaysian history have reshaped the constitutional fabric of the Federation as profoundly as the 1969 Emergency. For Sabah and Sarawak, the Emergency did not just suspend civil liberties — it laid the groundwork for a slow dismantling of the autonomy promised under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). The Proclamation of Emergency in 1969, triggered by the 13 May riots in Peninsular Malaysia, profoundly reshaped Malaysia's constitutional framework. Beyond its immediate suspension of civil liberties, it initiated a centralisation of power that altered the federal structure originally negotiated in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). Relying on Article 150 of the Federal Constitution, the Federal Government enacted a series of Emergency Ordinances that bypassed both democratic oversight and state consent. Many of these emergency-era laws continue to shape governance in Sabah and Sarawak today, despite the revocation of the Emergency in 2011. Importantly, Article 150(6)–(8) of the Federal Constitution shielded Emergency Ordinances from constitutional challenge while the Proclamation was in force. However, with the revocation of the Emergency in 2011, that protection no longer applies. These laws must now comply with the Federal Constitution or risk being struck down. Laws such as the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA 1974) and the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA 2012), which were derived from or rely on these Emergency ordinances, have outlived their legal justification. Emergency Ordinances - Federal Overreach Institutionalised Among the most impactful were six Emergency Ordinances that drastically reconfigured federal-state relations: Ordinance No. 1 (Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 1969) gave sweeping powers to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, including suspending elections and overriding any law. Ordinance No. 2 created the National Operations Council (NOC), centralising executive authority across all states. Ordinance No. 5 introduced detention without trial, severely weakening state judicial safeguards. Ordinance No. 6 authorised unilateral amendment or suspension of any federal or state law. Ordinance No. 7 redefined Malaysia's territorial sea as 12 nautical miles but limited state jurisdiction to only 3 nautical miles. Ordinance No. 10 extended federal laws such as the Continental Shelf Act 1966 and Petroleum Mining Act 1966 to Sabah and Sarawak, sidestepping constitutional safeguards. These ordinances disrupted the federal balance and centralised control over petroleum, law enforcement, and legislative powers. Territorial Boundaries Undermined - From Continental Shelf to 3 Nautical Miles Ordinance No. 7 and subsequently the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA 2012) codified the restriction of state jurisdiction to 3 nautical miles from the coast. This legal sleight of hand over maritime boundaries set the stage for the more consequential centralisation of Sabah and Sarawak's petroleum wealth. This contradicts the 1954 North Borneo and Sarawak Orders in Council, which defined their boundaries as extending to the edge of the continental shelf. The application of TSA 2012 to Sabah and Sarawak is constitutionally suspect, as Article 2(b) of the Federal Constitution requires the consent of both the state legislative assemblies and the Conference of Rulers for any alteration of state boundaries. No such consent was obtained. Beyond legal infringement, this restriction has real-world consequences for marine resource rights, indigenous fishing communities, and state planning authority over maritime development. These limitations impact the exercise of Native Customary Rights (NCR), particularly among coastal and island communities whose traditional fishing zones now fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction. Petroleum Development Act 1974 - A Centralised Grab Passed during Emergency rule, the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA 1974) vested ownership and regulatory control of petroleum in Petronas, under federal authority. Section 2(1) vests ownership in Petronas. Section 2(2) grants it exclusive regulatory powers. However, land and natural resources are matters under List II (State List) of the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution. The PDA was passed without the consent or adoption of the Sabah and Sarawak legislatures and without invoking Article 76(1)(c) or 76(2). With the revocation of the Emergency in 2011, the continued enforcement of the PDA in Sabah and Sarawak is open to constitutional challenge. Sarawak, for instance, has reasserted its rights under the Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 (OMO1958) and the imposition of State Sales Tax (SST) on petroleum products — a move upheld by the Court in Petronas v Comptroller of State Sales Tax, Sarawak [2020] 6 MLJ 1. The Frozen Special Grant Reviews - A Breach of Fiscal Federalism MA63 enshrined fiscal safeguards through Articles 112C(1) and 112D(4): Article 112C(1) entitles Sabah and Sarawak to a special grant. Article 112D(4) mandates that the grant be reviewed every five years. The first and only review occurred in 1969, but its recommendations were never implemented. For decades thereafter, no reviews took place. This dereliction, enabled by Emergency-era centralisation, amounts to a prolonged breach of constitutional duty. Even recent allocations were offered outside the constitutionally mandated framework. Emergency-Era Origins of the 1969 Grant Review The first and only formal review of the special grant due to Sabah under Article 112D of the Federal Constitution took place in 1969. However, it occurred during the nationwide Emergency, when Parliament had been suspended and federal authority was centralised under the National Operations Council (NOC). This context severely compromised the legitimacy and effectiveness of the review. Although the Federal Constitution envisages that such reviews must involve meaningful consultation and mutual agreement between the Federal and State Governments, the 1969 review was carried out in a top-down manner, without the participation or approval of the Sabah State Legislative Assembly. Moreover, while the review order was gazetted, its recommendations were never implemented. This amounted to a breach of Article 112D(4), which not only requires a review every five years but also assumes that each review is a substantive and binding constitutional process—not a discretionary or symbolic exercise. The Emergency framework at the time, reinforced by Article 150(6)–(8), insulated the federal executive from judicial scrutiny and eliminated ordinary mechanisms of accountability. As a result, Sabah was left with no constitutional remedy to enforce its entitlement. The absence of subsequent reviews—until recent efforts more than 50 years later—further entrenched a fiscal imbalance that denied Sabah the revenue it was due under the Malaysia Agreement 1963. In effect, Sabah's constitutional entitlement to special grants was frozen in both legal and fiscal terms. The Emergency enabled the Federal Government to bypass its duty under Article 112D, delaying not only a fair financial settlement but also the broader principle of equal partnership in the Federation. The legacy of this inaction persists to this day, and any new review must take into account the decades of underpayment and the urgent need for restitution. Federal Laws Imposed Without Consent During and after the Emergency, federal legislation was extended to Sabah and Sarawak without compliance with Article 76 of the Federal Constitution. Examples include: Education Act 1996 Local Government Act 1976 Under Article 76: Subsection (1)(b) requires a state request for Parliament to legislate on State List matters. Subsection (2) requires state consent to impose laws for uniformity. These constitutional safeguards were bypassed, eroding state autonomy and violating the spirit of MA63. Constitutional Supremacy and Post-Emergency Legality Article 4(1) of the Federal Constitution establishes that the Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation. Emergency Ordinances, while valid during the Emergency, lost immunity from judicial review once the Proclamation was revoked in 2011. Laws whose validity relied solely on Emergency powers must now comply with constitutional procedures or risk being ultra vires. The Constitution does not permit the permanent distortion of federal-state relations through temporary emergency measures. This includes the PDA 1974, TSA 2012, and all extended legislation not passed with Article 76 consent. Restoring Federal Balance - A Reform Agenda To undo the legacy of Emergency-era centralisation and revive true federalism, the following reforms are necessary: Restore Pre-1963 Maritime Boundaries Amend TSA 2012 or enact legislation reaffirming Sabah and Sarawak's continental shelf limits. Suspend or repeal its application to Sabah and Sarawak pending a new, equitable petroleum framework. Resume Article 112D Reviews Conduct overdue reviews, compensate for lost revenue, and institutionalise a permanent review mechanism. Identify, challenge, and repeal laws extended under Emergency powers that violate MA63 or lack state consent. Fulfilling the Promise of Malaysia Day A federation held together by historical agreements must not be allowed to drift apart through decades of constitutional erosion. The Emergency may be history, but its distortions are not. Sabah and Sarawak deserve not just rhetorical recognition, but a return to constitutional truth. The path to a stronger Malaysia begins with putting right what the Emergency put wrong. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
Daily Express
4 hours ago
- Daily Express
Hajiji's power solutions are in place
Published on: Sunday, June 29, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 29, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: ONE of Hajiji's first acts as CM was to reclaim the authority of Power Generation from KL. No such initiative was ever taken before he realised. Sabah would not be able to progress unless he could regain several rights for Sabah from the Federal Government. One of his top priorities was to reclaim the authority on power generation from KL. Daily power shortages, blackouts are not new. In fact, Sabah has been having power cuts and shortage since the 1980s, 40 long years ago! Sabahans, grinding their teeth, suffered blackouts almost daily. Small businesses were badly hit. Sandakan was the worst affected. Not one major investment for new power generation after 285MW gas IPP fully commissioned in 2014. IPP agreements were signed without Sabah's consent. Very serious under investment in power generation for two generations! Sabah's economy really suffered: Hardly investment came to Sabah for 40 years. Very serious economic setback. Like he regained the oil/gas rights, Hajiji retook power generation from KL with no fiery speeches, no blaming anyone, just get the job done. No blowing of trumpet when he got it back. ECoS was formed without fanfare. ECoS has been transforming Sabah's power generation since its inception! Thank God, ECoS has complete authority over Sabah's power generation now. Since ECoS has been formed, No more Delays in Approval for Power Generation. After Sabah's surrender of the authority to the Federal Government in 1982, approvals for new power generation could take up to 18 years or more in some cases. Cries of Sabah's power shortages were ignored and pushed to the back burner, given scant attention, no priority. Hajiji and his team must have burnt the 'mid-night oil' in negotiation with KL. Their hard work has paid off. The Energy Commission of Sabah (ECoS) was formed on January 10, 2023. It fully took over the regulatory authority for power generation [including renewable energy] on 3 January 2024. In anticipation of Sabah's future energy needs, the GRS government has added the Ocean Thermal Energy Enactment 2024 on April 25, 2024. This amendment empowers ECoS to regulate activities related to Ocean Thermal Power Conversion (OTEC). A most forward-looking move! Instant Solution for Sabah's Power Shortage is Impossible. 4 easily understood reasons: First. Lest anyone has the urging to play the blame game, Sabah's power shortages have started more than 40 years ago. Sabah's power needs have been neglected this long! No quick-fix solution is possible. Second. Power generation requires massive financial resources and construction time. It is not like cooking cheap instant noodle. Third. Power generation is expensive. The ECoS plan is possible and Sabah government can now actively partake in its development because Masidi has put the Sabah's financial management in order. Revenue has been at an all-time high since Hajiji's take over. Now at RM8b, almost double from 2020. Fourth. Hajiji's successful economic restructure has produced investors' confidence in power generation. ECoS has Produced a Miracle for Sabah. No more 18 years of waiting for approvals! ECoS, formed on 3 January, 2023, took over complete regulatory control only on 3 January 2024. CEO Nasser, all engineers, and staff are all Sabahans. They have done an incredible job. Within less than 2 years, everything is in place that will solve Sabah 40-year-old power shortages. Nasser and his team have even got a roadmap that will give Sabah sufficient power beyond 2030. Most impressive is that ECoS has incorporated BESS [Battery Energy Storage System] biomass, solar and hydro to generate power in its master plan. 1 BESS is being installed in Lahad Datu. This is a new dimension for power generation for Sabah. Before, it was total reliant on diesel and gas. ECoS now also plays a pivotal role with state GLCs to strategize gas planning for power and industry needs. The attached chart is self-explanatory and reflective of the ECoS miracle, doubling present 1200 MW capacity. Hajiji's retake of power generation from KL is Pivotal for Sabah's Future. Several reasons: [1]. It is the first ever serious attempt to resolve Sabah's 40-year-old power problem, 40 years of economic doldrum. Soon, these 40 long miserable years will be over. Sabahans must have faith that the all Sabahan ECoS team under Nasser can and will solve this 40-year power problem. A new chapter of power supply is being unfolded now. Soon, when new power generations begin, Sabahans will begin to experience better lives. [2] ECoS plan has inspired investors' confidence. ECoS' master plan has played a indispensable role in Hajiji's strategy to attract massive investment into Sabah. Major foreign investors would not have shown interest or invest their billions in Sabah unless they have faith in ECoS' long term power plan. Sabah is a leading state in inflow of investment, implemented, being implemented and committed total RM58b. [3] ECoS' power master plan will have tremendous impact for all small businesses as constant supply of power will improve their business like never before. [4] For all Sabahans, we can live in better comfort. Babies can sleep in air-con comfort with no disruptions. For the rural folks, in situ solar power for individual kampongs is coming. Hajiji's Creation of ECoS for Sabah, How Important for Sabah's Future To sceptics, please consider these objectives of ECoS: [1] Energy Autonomy and Self-Regulation: ECoS is now the sole regulatory authority for onshore gas supply (since January 2023) and electricity supply and renewable energy (since January 2024) from federal bodies like Suruhanjaya Tenaga (ST) Malaysia and the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA). ECoS has direct oversight of licensing, approvals, and policy execution, streamlining processes and potentially boosting investor confidence in the state's energy sector in Sabah. [2] Driving Renewable Energy Development: ECoS will increase Sabah's renewable energy mix. The target is over 50% capacity by 2035 and 80% by 2050. This will be in line with Malaysia's National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR). [3] Securing, Sustainable, Affordable, and Accessible Energy: ECoS' vision is to deliver secure, sustainable, affordable, and accessible energy for Sabah. [4] Providing Consumer Protection and Safety: ECoS actively undertakes initiatives to protect consumer interests. [5] Economic Growth and Job Creation, ECoS will develop a vibrant sustainable energy sector and will generate employments for Sabahans. [6] Attracting local and foreign direct investments. [7] Developing skills for Sabahans, especially young Sabahans in the energy sector. [8] Promoting regional corporation, especially Sarawak. ECoS has achieved most of its above objectives within its short existence. All these objectives, though will take a bit of time, will elevate Sabah's economic performance to the forefront once again. ECoS is Epitome of 'Rumah Kita, Kita Jaga.' Hajiji's Success Template for GLCs and Agencies. In addition to Hajiji's GLC successful templates, ECoS is an excellent showcase for GLCs and Agencies. Sabah can be great again when other GLCs and agencies follow their examples. No more Sabah's power problems falling on deaf ears. Sabah has complete control of our destiny in power generation. ECoS is the living testimony that Sabahans can solve Sabah's fundamental problems. We do not need to beg or run to others. ECoS has proven that Sabahans can do it, can do it fast, can do it better. With Nasser's all Sabahan ECoS team, Sabah has moved fast to solve the 40-year-old power problems. They have a sense of urgency to solve the power needs of Sabah because they are Sabahans! ECoS can approve power generation within months, not years, certainly not decades. In Nasser's all-Sabahan ECoS team, we can confidently say to ourselves 'Rumah Kita, Kita Jaga Baik Baik' WITH PRIDE. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
